Assessing prenatal depression in the rural developing world: a comparison of two screening measures
- 533 Downloads
Significant levels of prenatal depression are reported from the Indian subcontinent (25–45%). A wide variety of measures have been used to screen for prenatal depression in western research. However, little evidence exists on the use of such measures in the context of the developing world. The objective of this study was to assess the validity of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and the Kessler 10 Scale of Psychological Distress (K10) as screening measures for prenatal depression in rural South India. One hundred ninety-four women in their third trimester of pregnancy were assessed at a rural prenatal clinic in Karnataka, South India, using the EPDS, the K10 (scored 0–40) and a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview to establish a DSM-IV diagnosis of depression. Depressed women scored significantly higher on the EPDS and K-10 than controls. A receiver-operating characteristic analyses showed both scales to be good screening instruments for prenatal depression in rural South India at a cut-off of ≥13 on the EPDS (sensitivity = 100%, specificity = 84.90%, and area under the curve = 0.95) and ≥6 on the K10 (sensitivity = 100%, specificity = 81.30%, and area under the curve = 0.95). The EPDS and K10 have thus been shown to have equally good sensitivity and specificity in rural settings in the developing world at a cut-off score of ≥13 and ≥6, respectively. This study demonstrates the validity of the EPDS and K10 in screening pregnant women for depression during their prenatal check-ups.
KeywordsPrenatal depression EPDS K10 Screening Developing world India
The authors are grateful to the Child: Care Health and Development Trust for a grant supporting this study and the Ashok Ranganathan Bursary, Exeter College, University of Oxford for supporting the travel expenses incurred, both of which were awarded to Michelle C. Fernandes. We also gratefully acknowledge the contribution of the staff of Snehalaya Hospital, Solur and the participating mothers of the Solur Mother and Baby Project whose co-operation enables this research to continue.
Conflicts of interest
- Gaynes BN, Gavin N et al (2005) Perinatal depression: prevalence, screening accuracy, and screening outcomes. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 119. u. C. N. Prepared by the RTI-University of North Carolina Evidence-based Practice Center, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, U.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesGoogle Scholar
- Harkness J, Pennell BE et al (2008) Translation procedures and translation assessment in the world mental health survey translating, validating and adapting mental health measures in non-western setting 19 initiative. The world health organization mental health survey. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Standley K, Soule B et al (1978) Dimensions of prenatal anxiety and their influence on pregnancy outcome. Am J Obstet 135:22–26Google Scholar
- United Nations Report (2009), World Fertility Data 2008, United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population DivisionGoogle Scholar