Definitions matter: if maternal–fetal relationships are not attachment, what are they?
Since Cranley's conceptualization in 1981, which produced a useful measure to investigate the construct, maternal–fetal relationships have most often been referred to as maternal–fetal, antenatal or prenatal “attachment”. However, critical analysis of the literature suggests that this relationship is not an attachment relationship at all, as Bowlby and Ainsworth first defined it, but a multi-faceted construct guided instead by the caregiving system, the reciprocal partner to the attachment system, which evolved to provide care and protection.
KeywordsMaternal–fetal attachment Prenatal attachment Caregiving Fetal representations Relationships Pregnancy
The author would like to thank Ben Marshall and Abigail Millings for their assistance and the two anonymous reviewers for their very helpful comments on an earlier draft of the paper.
- Bowlby J (1982) Attachment: attachment and loss. Pimlico, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Cassidy J (2008) The nature of the child's ties. In: Cassidy J, Shaver PR (eds) Handbook of attachment: theory, research and clinical applications, 2nd edn. Guilford Press, New York, pp 3–22Google Scholar
- George C, Solomon J (2008) Handbook of attachment: theory, research and clinical applications. In: Cassidy J, Shaver PR (eds) Handbook of attachment: theory, research and clinical applications, 2nd edn. Guilford Press, New York, pp 833–856Google Scholar
- Müller ME (1992) A critical review of prenatal attachment research. Sch Enq Nurs Pract 6:5–22Google Scholar
- Shieh C, Kravitz M, Wang HH (2001) What do we know about maternal–fetal attachment? Kaohsiung J Med Sci 17:448–454. Cited in Yarcheski et alGoogle Scholar