Validation of Edinburgh postnatal depression scale for adolescent mothers
- 450 Downloads
The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale has widespread use internationally with adult women, but few psychometric properties have been described for samples of adolescent mothers. The purpose of this paper is to validate the psychometric properties of the EPDS in a sample of adolescent mothers (n = 149) in a southern, urban area of the United States. Internal consistency reliability was .88. Principal components analysis supported a two factor structure accounting for 60% of variance. Results of item response theory analysis suggest that the EPDS and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies of Depression Scale have similar psychometric properties. This data can be used to provide evidence of construct validity of the EPDS. The study provides a foundation for further psychometric testing of the instrument.
KeywordsDepression Adolescents Instrument validation
- Allen Guttmacher Institute. US Teenage Pregnancy Statistics. Available at: www.agi-usa.org/teen-preg/special report.html. Retrieved April 29, 2008.
- American Psychiatric Association. (1994). The diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed. American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
- Beck AT (1973) The diagnosis and management of depression. University of Pennsylvania Press, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
- Carmines EG, Zeller RA (1979) Reliability and validity assessment. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
- Cox JL, Holden JM (2003) Perinatal mental health: A guide to the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale. The Royal College of Psychiatrists, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Gaynes, B.N., Gavin, N., Meltzer-Brody, S., Lohr, K.N., Swinson, T.G., Brody, S. & Miller, W.C. (2005). Perinal depression: Prevalence, screening accuracy, and screening outcomes. Evidence Report. Assessment number 119. (Prepared by the RTI-University of North Carolina Evidence Based Practice Center, under contract no. 290-02-0016.) Rockville, Md: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.Google Scholar
- Hambleton RK, Swaminathan H (1985) Item Response Theory: Principles and Applications. Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing, BostonGoogle Scholar
- Koniak-Griffin D, Walker DS, de Traversay J (1996) Predictors of depression symptoms in pregnant adolescents. J Perinatol 16:1–6Google Scholar
- Linacre, M. (2009). WINSTSEPS: Multiple-choice, rating scale, and partial credit Rasch analysis (www.winsteps.com).
- Munro BH (2005) Statistical methods for health care research, 4th edn. Lippincott, Williams, & Wilkins, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
- Nunnally JC, Bernstein LH (1994) Psychometric theory, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Ostini R, Nering M (2006) Polytomous item response theory models. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CaGoogle Scholar
- Prescott CA, McArdle JJ, Hishinuma ES, Johnson RC, Miyamoto RH, Andrade NN, Edman JL, Makini GK Jr, Nahulu LB, Yuen NYC, Carlton BS (2004) Prediction of major depression and dysthymia from CES-D scores among ethnic minority adolescents. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 37:495–503Google Scholar
- Radloff LS, Locke BZ (1986) The community mental health assessment survey and the CES-D scale. In: Weissmann MM, Myers JK, Ross CE (eds) Community surveys of psychiatric disorders. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ, pp 177–189Google Scholar
- United States Department of Health and Human Services. (2000). Healthy People 2010. 2nd ed. With understanding and improving health and objectives for improving health. 2 vols. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar