Maternally focused worry
- 224 Downloads
Emerging evidence suggests that many women in the postnatal period experience clinically significant levels of anxiety but do not meet full diagnostic criteria for an existing anxiety disorder. In this study, 167 women with infants aged 2 weeks to 12 months were interviewed for current and lifetime history of depression and anxiety disorders using the SCID-I and completed a range of self-report measures measuring psychological risk factors and current depressive and anxiety symptomatology. Qualitative comments provided by women diagnosed with ADNOS (maternally focused worry) were analyzed and themes identified, and independent t-tests and chi-square tests were conducted to compare differences between these women and women with GAD. Results showed (1) there to be almost as many women who met criteria for ADNOS (maternally focused worry) as met criteria for GAD, and (2) that women with maternally focused worry were indistinguishable from women with GAD in terms of anxiety and depressive symptom severity, functional impairment and a range of risk factors. These results highlight the status of maternally focused worry as an under-recognized phenomenon and one in need of further clinical and research attention.
KeywordsAnxiety disorders Parenting Postpartum period Worry Generalized anxiety disorder
This work was supported by Karitane and a National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC) Public Health Scholarship.
- American Psychiatric Association (1994) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th edn. American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Beck AT, Steer RA (1993) Beck anxiety inventory manual, 3rd edn. The Psychological Corporation, Harcourt Brace & Company, San AntonioGoogle Scholar
- Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK (1996) Beck depression inventory manual—2nd edn (BDI-II). The Psychological Corporation, Harcourt Brace & Company, San AntonioGoogle Scholar
- Cox J (1994) Origins and development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. In: Cox J, Holden J (eds) Perinatal Psychiatry: Use and Misuse of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. London, Gaskell, pp 115–124Google Scholar
- Curtrona CE, Russell DW (1987) The provisions of social relationships and adaptation to stress. Advances in Personal Relationships 1:37–67Google Scholar
- First MB, Gibbon M, Spitzer RL, Williams JW (2002) Users guide to the structured clinical interview for DSM-IV-TR axis I disorders—research version—(SCID-I for DSM-IV-TR, November 2002 Revision). Biometrics Research Department, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Gorman LL, O’Hara MW, Figueiredo B, Hayes S, Jacquemain F, Kammerer MH, Klier CM, Rosi S, Seneviratne G, Sutter-Dallay A-L, The TCS-PND Group (2004) Adaptation of the structured clinical interview for DSM-IV disorders for assessing depression in women during pregnancy and post-partum across countries and cultures. Br J Psychiatry 184:s17–s23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Weissman AN (1979) The dysfunctional attitude scale: a validation study. Dissertation, University of PennsylvaniaGoogle Scholar
- Zanarini MC, Skodol AE, Bender D, Dolan R, Sanislow C, Schaefer E, Morey LC, Grilo CM, Shea MT, McGlashan TH, Gunderson JG (2000) The collaborative longitudinal personality disorders study: reliability of axis I and II diagnoses. J Personal Disord 14:291–299Google Scholar