Advertisement

Amino Acids

pp 1–15 | Cite as

A comprehensive toxicity evaluation of novel amino acid-modified magnetic ferrofluids for magnetic resonance imaging

  • Ruchita Shelat
  • Lokesh Kumar Bhatt
  • Aparna Khanna
  • Sudeshna ChandraEmail author
Original Article
  • 96 Downloads

Abstract

Stem cells have been widely exploited as remedial agents in regenerative medicine due to its tremendous potential in treatment of various debilitating diseases. In spite of this fact, there is need of a reliable, clinically applicable cell tracker for deciphering the homing and distribution of stem cells post-transplantation. Researchers have proposed the use of superparamagnetic magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles for in vivo and in vitro tracking and imaging of stem cells. However, there is not much understanding of the chemical coatings on the nanoparticles, which is very important for the sustainability of stem cells in biological system. For any biomedical applications, the surface properties and the core structure of nanoparticles play a significant role. This study reports surface modification of magnetic Fe3O4 nanofluid with biocompatible amino acids viz., arginine and histidine to maintain colloidal stability at neutral pH, impart least disruption when encountered with the biological system and allow labeling with mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). The size of amino acids-modified magnetic nanoferrofluid (AA@MNFs) was restricted to 15–25 nm for enhanced uptake in stem cells. In vitro cytotoxicity profile of stem cells labeled AA@MNFs was estimated using various assays like MTT, LDH and AO/EtBr followed by detailed pre-clinical toxicity assessment of AA@MNFs which illustrated least toxicity effects in major tissues of the animals. In vitro MRI scans of the stem cells labeled AA@MNFs confirmed the suitability of the reported ferrofluids for the use as MR contrast agents.

Keywords

Ferrofluid Mesenchymal stem cells Amino acid In vitro cytotoxicity Acute toxicity Magnetic resonance imaging 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Department of MEMS, IIT Bombay for VSM analysis, Dr. K. C. Barick, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC) for XRD facility and Dr. Kolja Them, University Medical Center, Hamburg for TEM analysis. The authors would also like to acknowledge Department of Biosciences and Bioengineering (BSBE), IIT Bombay for confocal microscopy facility. We would also like to acknowledge Dr. Bhawan Paunipagar, Head Radiologist, Wockhardt Hospitals, Mumbai and Mr. Thomas Kurian, Philps International, Mumbai for their help with MRI studies.

Financial disclosure

The authors would like to thank Department of Biotechnology (DBT), Govt of India, for financial support under the Grant No: BT/PR21753/MED/31/355/2016. Ms. Ruchita Shelat is a recipient of Women’s Scientist Scheme-A (WOS-A), Department of Science and Technology (DST), under the Grant No: SR/WOS-A/LS-453.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

All applicable national (CPCSEA) and institutional guidelines (IAEC) for the care and use of animals were followed. All procedures performed in studies involving animals were in accordance with the ethical standards of the NMIMS institution.

Supplementary material

726_2019_2726_MOESM1_ESM.docx (7.4 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 7628 kb)

References

  1. Agudelo CA, Tachibana Y, Noboru T, Iida H, Yamaoka T (2011) Long-term in vivo magnetic resonance imaging tracking of endothelial progenitor cells transplanted in rat ischemic limbs and their angiogenic potential. Tissue Eng Part A 17:2079–2089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aicher A, Brenner W, Zuhayra M, Badorff C, Massoudi S, Assmus B, Eckey T, Henze E, Zeiher AM, Dimmeler S (2003) Assessment of the tissue distribution of transplanted human endothelial progenitor cells by radioactive labeling. Circulation 107:2134–2139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arbab AS, Wilson LB, Ashari P, Jordan EK, Lewis BK, Frank JA (2005) A model of lysosomal metabolism of dextran coated superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) nanoparticles: implications for cellular magnetic resonance imaging. NMR Biomed 18:383–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Azadniv M, Dugger K, Bowers WJ, Weaver C, Crispe IN (2007) Imaging CD8+ T cell dynamics in vivo using a transgenic luciferase reporter. Int Immunol 19:1165–1173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bagherpour AR, Kashanian F, Ebrahimi SS, Habibi-Rezaei M (2018) l-arginine modified magnetic nanoparticles: green synthesis and characterization. Nanotechnology 29:075706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barick KC, Aslam M, Prasad PV, Dravid VP, Bahadur D (2009) Nanoscale assembly of amine-functionalized colloidal iron oxide. J Magn Magn Mater 321:1529–1532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berry CC, Wells S, Charles S, Aitchison G, Curtis AS (2004) Cell response to dextran-derivatised iron oxide nanoparticles post internalisation. Biomaterials 25:5405–5413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bos C, Delmas Y, Desmouliere A, Solanilla A, Hauger O, Grosset C, Dubus I, Ivanovic Z, Rosenbaum J, Charbord P, Combe C (2004) In vivo MR imaging of intravascularly injected magnetically labeled mesenchymal stem cells in rat kidney and liver. Radiology 233:781–789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Corot C, Warlin D (2013) Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for MRI: contrast media pharmaceutical company R&D perspective. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 5:411–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ebrahiminezhad A, Ghasemi Y, Rasoul-Amini S, Barar J, Davaran S (2012) Impact of amino-acid coating on the synthesis and characteristics of iron-oxide nanoparticles (IONs). Bull Korean Chem Soc 33:3957–3962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eggenhofer E, Luk F, Dahlke MH, Hoogduijn MJ (2014) The life and fate of mesenchymal stem cells. Front Immunol 5:148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. El-Dakdouki MH, El-Boubbou K, Zhu DC, Huang X (2011) A simple method for the synthesis of hyaluronic acid coated magnetic nanoparticles for highly efficient cell labelling and in vivo imaging. RSC Adv 1:1449–1452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fu Y, Kedziorek D, Kraitchman DL (2010) Recent developments and future challenges on imaging for stem cell research. J Cardiovasc Transl Res 3:24–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gad SC, Chengelis CP (1988) Acute toxicology testing perspectives and horizons. The Telford Press, Caldwell, NJCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Green MD, Snoeck HW (2011) Novel approaches for immune reconstitution and adaptive immune modeling with human pluripotent stem cells. BMC Med 9:51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gupta AK, Curtis AS (2004) Surface modified superparamagnetic nanoparticles for drug delivery: interaction studies with human fibroblasts in culture. J Mater Sci Mater Med 15:493–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gupta AK, Gupta M (2005) Synthesis and surface engineering of iron oxide nanoparticles for biomedical applications. Biomaterials 26:3995–4021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hofmann M, Wollert KC, Meyer GP, Menke A, Arseniev L, Hertenstein B, Ganser A, Knapp WH, Drexler H (2005) Monitoring of bone marrow cell homing into the infarcted human myocardium. Circulation 111:2198–2202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hoonjan M, Sachdeva G, Chandra S, Kharkar PS, Sahu N, Bhatt P (2018) Investigation of HSA as a biocompatible coating material for arsenic trioxide nanoparticles. Nanoscale 10:8031–8041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Horie M, Kato H, Fujita K, Endoh S, Iwahashi H (2011) In vitro evaluation of cellular response induced by manufactured nanoparticles. Chem Res Toxicol 25:605–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hoskins C, Cuschieri A, Wang L (2012) The cytotoxicity of polycationic iron oxide nanoparticles: common endpoint assays and alternative approaches for improved understanding of cellular response mechanism. J Nanobiotechnol 10:15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Huang X, Teng X, Chen D, Tang F, He J (2010) The effect of the shape of mesoporous silica nanoparticles on cellular uptake and cell function. Biomaterials 31:438–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Isaksson K, Åkerberg D, Posaric-Bauden M, Andersson R, Tingstedt B (2014) In vivo toxicity and biodistribution of intraperitoneal and intravenous poly-l-lysine and poly-l-lysine/poly-L-glutamate in rats. J Mater Sci Mater Med 25:1293–1299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Issa B, Obaidat IM, Albiss BA, Haik Y (2013) Magnetic nanoparticles: surface effects and properties related to biomedicine applications. Int J Mol Sci 14:21266–21305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kandpal ND, Sah N, Loshali R, Joshi R, Prasad J (2014) Co-precipitation method of synthesis and characterization of iron oxide nanoparticles. J Sci Ind Res 73:87–90Google Scholar
  26. Kavitha A, Parambath A (2018) Polyacrylamide and related polymers. In: Engineering of biomaterials for drug delivery systems: beyond polyethylene glycol, 1st Edn, Elsevier Science, pp 229–253.Google Scholar
  27. Korchinski DJ, Taha M, Yang R, Nathoo N, Dunn JF (2015) Iron oxide as an Mri contrast agent for cell tracking: supplementary issue. Magn Reson Insights 8:S23557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kou L, Sun J, Zhai Y, He Z (2013) The endocytosis and intracellular fate of nanomedicines: implication for rational design. Asian J Pharm Sci 8:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Laurent S, Forge D, Port M, Roch A, Robic C, Vander Elst L, Muller RN (2008) Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: synthesis, stabilization, vectorization, physicochemical characterizations, and biological applications. Chem Rev 108:2064–2110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Laurila JP, Laatikainen L, Castellone MD, Trivedi P, Heikkila J, Hinkkanen A, Hematti P, Laukkanen MO (2009) Human embryonic stem cell-derived mesenchymal stromal cell transplantation in a rat hind limb injury model. Cytotherapy 11:726–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mahmoudi M, Simchi A, Imani M, Shokrgozar MA, Milani AS, Häfeli UO, Stroeve P (2010) A new approach for the in vitro identification of the cytotoxicity of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. Coll Surf B 75:300–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McCarthy JR, Weissleder R (2008) Multifunctional magnetic nanoparticles for targeted imaging and therapy. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 60:1241–1251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mennan C, Wright K, Bhattacharjee A, Balain B, Richardson J, Roberts S (2013) Isolation and characterisation of mesenchymal stem cells from different regions of the human umbilical cord. Biomed Res Int 2013:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Modo M, Cash D, Mellodew K, Williams SC, Fraser SE, Meade TJ, Price J, Hodges H (2002) Tracking transplanted stem cell migration using bifunctional, contrast agent-enhanced, magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroimage 17:803–811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Modo M, Mellodew K, Cash D, Fraser SE, Meade TJ, Price J, Williams SC (2004) Mapping transplanted stem cell migration after a stroke: a serial, in vivo magnetic resonance imaging study. Neuroimage 21:311–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Murali VS, Wang R, Mikoryak CA, Pantano P, Draper R (2015) Rapid detection of polyethylene glycol sonolysis upon functionalization of carbon nanomaterials. Exp Biol Med 240:1147–1151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nahrendorf M, Zhang H, Hembrador S, Panizzi P, Sosnovik DE, Aikawa E, Libby P, Swirski FK, Weissleder R (2008) Nanoparticle PET-CT imaging of macrophages in inflammatory atherosclerosis. Circulation 117:379–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nguyen PK, Riegler J, Wu JC (2014) Stem cell imaging: from bench to bedside. Cell Stem Cell 4:431–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. OECD (2001) The OECD guidelines for testing of chemicals, 420 acute oral toxicity-fixed dose procedure. Organization of Economic Cooperation Development, ParisGoogle Scholar
  40. Ramos-Cabrer P, Hoehn M (2012) MRI stem cell tracking for therapy in experimental cerebral ischemia. Transl Stroke Res 3:22–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ranga A, Agarwal Y, Garg KJ (2017) Gadolinium based contrast agents in current practice: risks of accumulation and toxicity in patients with normal renal function. Indian J Radiol Imaging 27:141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rogosnitzky M, Branch S (2016) Gadolinium-based contrast agent toxicity: a review of known and proposed mechanisms. Biometals 29:365–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ruggiero A, Thorek DL, Guenoun J, Krestin GP, Bernsen MR (2012) Cell tracking in cardiac repair: what to image and how to image. Eur Radiol 22:189–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sanganeria P, Chandra S, Bahadur D, Khanna A (2015a) Effect of HSA coated iron oxide labeling on human umbilical cord derived mesenchymal stem cells. Nanotechnology 26:125103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sanganeria P, Sachar S, Chandra S, Bahadur D, Ray P, Khanna A (2015b) Cellular internalization and detailed toxicity analysis of protein-immobilized iron oxide nanoparticles. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 103:25–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schulze E, Ferrucci JJ, Poss K, Lapointe L, Bogdanova A, Weissleder R (1995) Cellular uptake and trafficking of a prototypical magnetic iron oxide label in vitro. Invest Radiol 30:604–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sharkey J, Lewis PJS, Barrow M, Alwahsh SM, Noble J, Livingstone E, Lennen RJ, Jansen MA, Carrion JG, Liptrott N, Forbes S (2017) Functionalized superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles provide highly efficient iron-labeling in macrophages for magnetic resonance-based detection in vivo. Cytotherapy 19:555–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shelat R, Chandra S, Khanna A (2018) Detailed toxicity evaluation of β-cyclodextrin coated iron oxide nanoparticles for biomedical applications. Int J Biol Macromol 110:357–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shetty P, Cooper K, Viswanathan C (2010) Comparison of proliferative and multilineage differentiation potentials of cord matrix, cord blood, and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Asian J Transfus Sci 4:14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Shukla S, Jadaun A, Arora V, Sinha RK, Biyani N, Jain VK (2015) In vitro toxicity assessment of chitosan oligosaccharide coated iron oxide nanoparticles. Toxicol Rep 2:27–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sibov TT, Pavon LF, Miyaki LA, Mamani JB, Nucci LP, Alvarim LT, Silveira PH, Marti LC, Gamarra LF (2014) Umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells labeled with multimodal iron oxide nanoparticles with fluorescent and magnetic properties: application for in vivo cell tracking. Int J Nanomed 9:337Google Scholar
  52. Silva SA, Sousa AL, Haddad AF, Azevedo JC, Soares VE, Peixoto CM, Soares AJ, Issa AF, Felipe LRV, Branco RV, Addad JA (2009) Autologous bone-marrow mononuclear cell transplantation after acute myocardial infarction: comparison of two delivery techniques. Cell Trans 18:343–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sosnovik DE, Weissleder R (2007) Emerging concepts in molecular MRI. Curr Opin Biotechnol 18:4–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sosnovik DE, Nahrendorf M, Weissleder R (2007) Molecular magnetic resonance imaging in cardiovascular medicine. Circulation 115:2076–2086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Souba WW, Pacitti AJ (1992) How amino acids get into cells: mechanisms, models, menus, and mediators. J Parenter Enter Nutr 16:569–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Stephen ZR, Kievit FM, Zhang M (2011) Magnetite nanoparticles for medical MR imaging. Mater Today 14:330–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sun J, Zhou S, Hou P, Yang Y, Weng J, Li X, Li M (2007) Synthesis and characterization of biocompatible Fe3O4 nanoparticles. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 80:333–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sun JH, Zhang YL, Qian SP, Yu XB, Xie HY, Zhou L, Zheng SS (2012) Assessment of biological characteristics of mesenchymal stem cells labeled with superparamagnetic iron oxide particles in vitro. Mol Med Rep 5:317–320Google Scholar
  59. Thanh NT (2012) Magnetic nanoparticles: from fabrication to clinical applications. CRC Press, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Thomas R, Park IK, Jeong YY (2013) Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for multimodal imaging and therapy of cancer. Int J Mol Sci 14:15910–15930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tie SL, Lin YQ, Lee HC, Bae YS, Lee CH (2006) Amino acid-coated nano-sized magnetite particles prepared by two-step transformation. Coll Surf A 273:75–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Titlow WB, Lee CH, Ryou C (2013) Characterization of toxicological properties of l-lysine polymers in CD-1 mice. J Microbiol Biotechnol 23:1015–1022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ünal B, Durmus Z, Baykal A, Sözeri H, Toprak MS, Alpsoy L (2010) l-Histidine coated iron oxide nanoparticles: synthesis, structural and conductivity characterization. J Alloy Compd 505:172–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wang YXJ (2015) Current status of superparamagnetic iron oxide contrast agents for liver magnetic resonance imaging. World J Gastroenterol 21:13400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wu G, Bazer FW, Davis TA, Kim SW, Li P, Rhoads JM, Satterfield MC, Smith SB, Spencer TE, Yin Y (2009) Arginine metabolism and nutrition in growth, health and disease. Amino Acids 37:153–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wu W, Xiao X, Zhang S, Ren F, Jiang C (2011) Facile method to synthesize magnetic iron oxides/TiO2 hybrid nanoparticles and their photodegradation application of methylene blue. Nanoscale Res Lett 6:533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Xie J, Wang J, Niu G, Huang J, Chen K, Li X, Chen X (2010) Human serum albumin coated iron oxide nanoparticles for efficient cell labeling. Chem Commun 46:433–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Xu C, Mu L, Roes I, Miranda-Nieves D, Nahrendorf M, Ankrum JA, Zhao W, Karp JM (2011) Nanoparticle-based monitoring of cell therapy. Nanotechnology 22:494001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Xu C, Miranda-Nieves D, Ankrum JA, Matthiesen ME, Phillips JA, Roes I, Wojtkiewicz GR, Juneja V, Kultima JR, Zhao W, Vemula PK (2012) Tracking mesenchymal stem cells with iron oxide nanoparticle loaded poly (lactide-co-glycolide) microparticles. Nano Lett 12:4131–4139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Yu M, Huang S, Yu KJ, Clyne AM (2012) Dextran and polymer polyethylene glycol (PEG) coating reduce both 5 and 30 nm iron oxide nanoparticle cytotoxicity in 2D and 3D cell culture. Int J Mol Sci 13:5554–5570CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biological Sciences, Sunandan Divatia School of ScienceNMIMS UniversityMumbaiIndia
  2. 2.Department of PharmacologySVKM’s Dr. Bhanuben Nanavati College of PharmacyMumbaiIndia
  3. 3.Department of Chemistry, Sunandan Divatia School of ScienceNMIMS UniversityMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations