Amino Acids

, Volume 46, Issue 5, pp 1403–1407 | Cite as

Site-specific pegylation of an antimicrobial peptide increases resistance to Pseudomonas aeruginosa elastase

  • Chiara Falciani
  • Luisa Lozzi
  • Silvia Scali
  • Jlenia Brunetti
  • Luisa Bracci
  • Alessandro Pini
Short Communication

Abstract

M33 is a branched peptide currently under preclinical characterization for the development of a new antibacterial drug against gram-negative bacteria. Here, we report its pegylation at the C-terminus of the three-lysine-branching core and the resulting increase in stability to Pseudomonas aeruginosa elastase. This protease is a virulence factor that acts by destroying peptides of the native immune system. Peptide resistance to this protease is an important feature for M33-Peg activity against Pseudomonas.

Keywords

Antimicrobial peptides Branched peptides Pegylation Peg Elastase Peptide stability 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Italian Foundation for Cystic Fibrosis (Project FFC#12/2013). The authors thank Gian Maria Rossolini and Simona Pollini for MICs calculation.

Conflict of interest

The patents covering the intellectual property of peptide M33 are owned by or licensed to SetLance. Chiara Falciani, Alessandro Pini and Luisa Bracci are partners of SetLance.

References

  1. Bailon P, Won CY (2009) PEG-modified biopharmaceuticals. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 6:1–16PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bracci L, Falciani C, Lelli B, Lozzi L, Runci Y, Pini A, De Montis MG, Tagliamonte A, Neri P (2003) Synthetic peptides in the form of dendrimers become resistant to protease activity. J Biol Chem 278:46590–46595PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ciofu O, Hansen CR, Høiby N (2013) Respiratory bacterial infections in cystic fibrosis. Curr Opin Pulm Med 19:251–258PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. de Kreij A, Venema G, van den Burg B (2000) Substrate specificity in the highly heterogeneous M4 peptidase family is determined by a small subset of amino acids. J Biol Chem 275:31115–31120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Falciani C, Lozzi L, Pini A, Corti F, Fabbrini M, Bernini A, Lelli B, Niccolai N, Bracci L (2007a) Molecular basis of branched peptide resistance to enzyme proteolysis. Chem Biol Drug Des 69:216–221PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Falciani C, Fabbrini M, Pini A, Lozzi L, Lelli B, Pileri S, Brunetti J, Bindi S, Scali S, Bracci L (2007b) Synthesis and biological activity of stable branched neurotensin peptides for tumor targeting. Mol Cancer Ther 6:2441–2448PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Falciani C, Lelli B, Brunetti J, Pileri S, Cappelli A, Pini A, Pagliuca C, Ravenni N, Bencini L, Menichetti S, Moretti R, De Prizio M, Scatizzi M, Bracci L (2010) Modular branched neurotensin peptides for tumor target tracing and receptor-mediated therapy: a proof-of-concept. Curr Cancer Drug Targets 10:695–704PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Falciani C, Accardo A, Brunetti J, Tesauro D, Lelli B, Pini A, Bracci L, Morelli G (2011) Target-selective drug delivery through liposomes labeled with oligobranched neurotensin peptides. Chem Med Chem 6:678–685PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Falciani C, Lozzi L, Pollini S, Luca V, Carnicelli V, Brunetti J, Lelli B, Bindi S, Scali S, Di Giulio A, Rossolini GM, Mangoni ML, Bracci L, Pini A (2012) Isomerization of an antimicrobial peptide broadens antimicrobial spectrum to gram-positive bacterial pathogens. PLoS One 7:e46259PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Falciani C, Brunetti J, Lelli B, Ravenni N, Lozzi L, Depau L, Scali S, Bernini A, Pini A, Bracci L (2013) Cancer selectivity of tetrabranched neurotensin peptides is generated by simultaneous binding to sulfated glycosaminoglycans and protein receptors. J Med Chem 56:5009–5018PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hornef MW, Normark S, Henriques-Normark B, Rhen M (2005) Bacterial evasion of innate defense at epithelial linings. Chem Immunol Aller 86:72–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lee SH, Lee S, Youn YS, Na DH, Chae SY, Byun Y, Lee KC (2005) Synthesis, characterization, and pharmacokinetic studies of PEGylated glucagon-like peptide-1. Bioconjug Chem 16:377–382PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lozzi L, Lelli B, Runci Y, Scali S, Bernini A, Falciani C, Pini A, Niccolai N, Neri P, Bracci L (2003) Rational design and molecular diversity for the construction of anti-alpha-bungarotoxin antidotes with high affinity and in vivo efficiency. Chem Biol 10:411–417PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pasut G, Veronese FM (2009) PEG conjugates in clinical development or use as anticancer agents: an overview. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 61:1177–1188PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Pasut G, Veronese FM (2012) State of the art in PEGylation: the great versatility achieved after 40 years of research. J Control Rel 161:461–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pendleton JN, Gorman SP, Gilmore BF (2013) Clinical relevance of the ESKAPE pathogens. Exp Rev Anti Infect Ther 11:297–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pini A, Giuliani A, Falciani C, Runci Y, Ricci C, Lelli B, Malossi M, Neri P, Rossolini GM, Bracci L (2005) Antimicrobial activity of novel dendrimeric peptides obtained by phage display selection and rational modification. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 49:2665–2672PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pini A, Runci Y, Falciani C, Lelli B, Brunetti J, Pileri S, Fabbrini M, Lozzi L, Ricci C, Bernini A, Tonello F, Dal Molin F, Neri P, Niccolai N, Bracci L (2006) Stable peptide inhibitors prevent binding of lethal and oedema factors to protective antigen and neutralize anthrax toxin in vivo. Biochem J 395:157–163PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pini A, Giuliani A, Falciani C, Fabbrini M, Pileri S, Lelli B, Bracci L (2007) Characterization of the branched antimicrobial peptide M6 by analyzing its mechanism of action and in vivo toxicity. J Pept Sci 13:393–399PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pini A, Falciani C, Bracci L (2008) Branched peptides as therapeutics. Curr Protein Pept Sci 9:468–477PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pini A, Falciani C, Mantengoli E, Bindi S, Brunetti J, Iozzi S, Rossolini GM, Bracci L (2010) A novel tetrabranched antimicrobial peptide that neutralizes bacterial lipopolysaccharide and prevents septic shock in vivo. FASEB J 24:1015–1022PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pini A, Lozzi L, Bernini A, Brunetti J, Falciani C, Scali S, Bindi S, Di Maggio T, Rossolini GM, Niccolai N, Bracci L (2012) Efficacy and toxicity of the antimicrobial peptide M33 produced with different counter-ions. Amino Acids 43:467–473PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schmidtchen A, Frick IM, Andersson E, Tapper H, Björck L (2002) Proteinases of common pathogenic bacteria degrade and inactivate the antibacterial peptide LL-37. Mol Microbiol 46:157–168PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tam JP (1988) Synthetic peptide vaccine design: synthesis and properties of a high-density multiple antigenic peptide system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:5409–5413PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chiara Falciani
    • 1
    • 2
  • Luisa Lozzi
    • 1
  • Silvia Scali
    • 1
  • Jlenia Brunetti
    • 1
  • Luisa Bracci
    • 1
    • 3
  • Alessandro Pini
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Biotecnologie MedicheUniversità di SienaSienaItaly
  2. 2.SetLance srl, Toscana Life SciencesSienaItaly
  3. 3.Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria SeneseSienaItaly

Personalised recommendations