Amino Acids

, Volume 43, Issue 1, pp 447–455

Predicting protein sumoylation sites from sequence features

Original Article

Abstract

Protein sumoylation is a post-translational modification that plays an important role in a wide range of cellular processes. Small ubiquitin-related modifier (SUMO) can be covalently and reversibly conjugated to the sumoylation sites of target proteins, many of which are implicated in various human genetic disorders. The accurate prediction of protein sumoylation sites may help biomedical researchers to design their experiments and understand the molecular mechanism of protein sumoylation. In this study, a new machine learning approach has been developed for predicting sumoylation sites from protein sequence information. Random forests (RFs) and support vector machines (SVMs) were trained with the data collected from the literature. Domain-specific knowledge in terms of relevant biological features was used for input vector encoding. It was shown that RF classifier performance was affected by the sequence context of sumoylation sites, and 20 residues with the core motif ΨKXE in the middle appeared to provide enough context information for sumoylation site prediction. The RF classifiers were also found to outperform SVM models for predicting protein sumoylation sites from sequence features. The results suggest that the machine learning approach gives rise to more accurate prediction of protein sumoylation sites than the other existing methods. The accurate classifiers have been used to develop a new web server, called seeSUMO (http://bioinfo.ggc.org/seesumo/), for sequence-based prediction of protein sumoylation sites.

Keywords

Protein sumoylation site prediction Random forests Support vector machines Biological features SeeSUMO 

Supplementary material

726_2011_1100_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (38 kb)
Supplementary Tables (PDF 38 kb)

References

  1. Ahmad S, Sarai A (2005) PSSM-based prediction of DNA binding sites in proteins. BMC Bioinforma 6:33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmad S, Gromiha MM, Sarai A (2004) Analysis and prediction of DNA-binding proteins and their binding residues based on composition, sequence and structural information. Bioinformatics 20(4):477–486PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bradley A (1997) The use of the area under the ROC curve in the evaluation of machine learning algorithms. Pattern Recognit 30:1145–1159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gasteiger E, Hoogland C, Gattiker A, Duvaud S, Wilkins MR, Appel RD, Bairoch A (2005) The proteomics protocols handbook. Humana Press, TotowaGoogle Scholar
  5. Geiss-Friedlander R, Melchior F (2007) Concepts in sumoylation: a decade on. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 8(12):947–956PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gorodkin J, Heyer LJ, Brunak S, Stormo GD (1997) Displaying the information contents of structural RNA alignments: the structure logos. Comput Appl Biosci 13(6):583–586PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Hietakangas V, Anckar J, Blomster HA, Fujimoto M, Palvimo JJ, Nakai A, Sistonen L (2006) PDSM, a motif for phosphorylation-dependent SUMO modification. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(1):45–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kawashima S, Kanehisa M (2000) AAindex: amino acid index database. Nucleic Acids Res 28(1):374PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, Valentin F, Wallace IM, Wilm A, Lopez R (2007) Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23(21):2947–2948PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Martin S, Wilkinson KA, Nishimune A, Henley JM (2007) Emerging extranuclear roles of protein SUMOylation in neuronal function and dysfunction. Nat Rev Neurosci 8(12):948–959PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Matic I, Schimmel J, Hendriks IA, van Santen MA, van de Rijke F, van Dam H, Gnad F, Mann M, Vertegaal AC (2010) Site-specific identification of SUMO-2 targets in cells reveals an inverted SUMOylation motif and a hydrophobic cluster SUMOylation motif. Mol Cell 39(4):641–652PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Noble WS (2006) What is a support vector machine? Nat Biotechnol 24(12):1565–1567PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pu X, Guo J, Leung H, Lin Y (2007) Prediction of membrane protein types from sequences and position-specific scoring matrices. J Theor Biol 247(2):259–265PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ren J, Gao X, Jin C, Zhu M, Wang X, Shaw A, Wen L, Yao X, Xue Y (2009) Systematic study of protein sumoylation: development of a site-specific predictor of SUMOsp 2.0. Proteomics 9(12):3409–3412PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sarge KD, Park-Sarge OK (2009) Sumoylation and human disease pathogenesis. Trends Biochem Sci 34(4):200–205PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Schneider TD, Stephens RM (1990) Sequence logos: a new way to display consensus sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 18(20):6097–6100PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Stankovic-Valentin N, Deltour S, Seeler J, Pinte S, Vergoten G, Guerardel C, Dejean A, Leprince D (2007) An acetylation/deacetylation-SUMOylation switch through a phylogenetically conserved psiKXEP motif in the tumor suppressor HIC1 regulates transcriptional repression activity. Mol Cell Biol 27(7):2661–2675PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Steffan JS, Agrawal N, Pallos J, Rockabrand E, Trotman LC, Slepko N, Illes K, Lukacsovich T, Zhu YZ, Cattaneo E (2004) SUMO modification of Huntingtin and Huntington’s disease pathology. Science 304(5667):100–104PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Swets JA (1988) Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 240(4857):1285–1293PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Teng S, Srivastava AK, Wang L (2010) Sequence feature-based prediction of protein stability changes upon amino acid substitutions. BMC Genomics 11(Suppl 2):S5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wang L, Brown SJ (2006a) BindN: a web-based tool for efficient prediction of DNA and RNA binding sites in amino acid sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 34(Web Server issue):W243–W248Google Scholar
  22. Wang L, Brown SJ (2006b) Prediction of RNA-binding residues in protein sequences using support vector machines. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 1:5830–5833PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Wang L, Huang C, Yang MQ, Yang JY (2010) BindN+ for accurate prediction of DNA and RNA-binding residues from protein sequence features. BMC Syst Biol 4(Suppl 1):S3PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Xu J, He Y, Qiang B, Yuan J, Peng X, Pan XM (2008) A novel method for high accuracy sumoylation site prediction from protein sequences. BMC Bioinforma 9:8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Xue Y, Zhou F, Fu C, Xu Y, Yao X (2006) SUMOsp: a web server for sumoylation site prediction. Nucleic Acids Res 34(Web Server issue):W254–W257PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Yang SH, Galanis A, Witty J, Sharrocks AD (2006) An extended consensus motif enhances the specificity of substrate modification by SUMO. EMBO J 25(21):5083–5093PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zhao J (2007) Sumoylation regulates diverse biological processes. Cell Mol Life Sci 64(23):3017–3033PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Genetics and BiochemistryClemson UniversityClemsonUSA
  2. 2.J.C. Self Research Institute of Human GeneticsGreenwood Genetic CenterGreenwoodUSA

Personalised recommendations