Creatine but not betaine supplementation increases muscle phosphorylcreatine content and strength performance
- 1.3k Downloads
We aimed to investigate the role of betaine supplementation on muscle phosphorylcreatine (PCr) content and strength performance in untrained subjects. Additionally, we compared the ergogenic and physiological responses to betaine versus creatine supplementation. Finally, we also tested the possible additive effects of creatine and betaine supplementation. This was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Subjects were assigned to receive betaine (BET; 2 g/day), creatine (CR; 20 g/day), betaine plus creatine (BET + CR; 2 + 20 g/day, respectively) or placebo (PL). At baseline and after 10 days of supplementation, we assessed muscle strength and power, muscle PCr content, and body composition. The CR and BET + CR groups presented greater increase in muscle PCr content than PL (p = 0.004 and p = 0.006, respectively). PCr content was comparable between BET versus PL (p = 0.78) and CR versus BET + CR (p = 0.99). CR and BET + CR presented greater muscle power output than PL in the squat exercise following supplementation (p = 0.003 and p = 0.041, respectively). Similarly, bench press average power was significantly greater for the CR-supplemented groups. CR and BET + CR groups also showed significant pre- to post-test increase in 1-RM squat and bench press (CR: p = 0.027 and p < 0.0001; BET + CR: p = 0.03 and p < 0.0001 for upper- and lower-body assessments, respectively) No significant differences for 1-RM strength and power were observed between BET versus PL and CR versus BET + CR. Body composition did not differ between the groups. In conclusion, we reported that betaine supplementation does not augment muscle PCr content. Furthermore, we showed that betaine supplementation combined or not with creatine supplementation does not affect strength and power performance in untrained subjects.
KeywordsBetaine supplementation Creatine supplementation Maximal muscle strength Muscle power output Phosphorylcreatine content
We would like to thank Ethika® for providing the nutritional supplements. Hamilton Roschel and Serena del Favero were supported by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo–FAPESP (2010/51428-2 for HR). The authors declare that they do not have conflict of interests.
- Choe HS, H.L. Li, Park JH, Kang CW, Ryu KS (2010) Effect of betaine on growth hormone pulsatile secretion and serum metabolites in finishing pigs. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl) 23(3):379–384Google Scholar
- Greenhaff PL, Casey A, Short AH, Harris R, Soderlund K, Hultman E (1993) Influence of oral creatine supplementation of muscle torque during repeated bouts of maximal voluntary exercise in man. Clin Sci (Lond) 84(5):565–571Google Scholar
- Gualano B, de Salles Painneli V, Roschel H, Artioli GG, Junior MN, Lucia de Sa Pinto A, Rossi da Silva ME, Cunha MR, Otaduy MC, da Costa Leite C, Ferreira JC, Pereira RM, Brum PC, Bonfa E, Lancha AHJ (2011) Creatine in Type 2 diabetes: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Med Sci Sports Exerc 43:770–778Google Scholar
- Harris RC, Soderlund K, Hultman E (1992) Elevation of creatine in resting and exercised muscle of normal subjects by creatine supplementation. Clin Sci (Lond) 83(3):367–374Google Scholar
- Maresh CM, Farrell MJ, Kraemer WJ, Yamamoto LM, Lee EC, Armstrong LE, Hatfield DL, Sokmen B, Diaz JC, Speiring BA, Anderson JA, Volek JS (2008) The effects of betaine supplementation on strength and power performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 39:S101Google Scholar
- Nicastro H, Gualano B, de Moraes WM, de Salles PV, da Luz CR, dos Santos CA, de Salvi GF, Medeiros A, Brum PC, Lancha AHJ (2011) Effects of creatine supplementation on muscle wasting and glucose homeostasis in rats treated with dexamethasone. Amino Acids (in press)Google Scholar
- Sewell DA, Harris RC (2002) Effect of creatine supplementation in the thoroughbred horse. Equine Vet J 18:239–242Google Scholar
- Siri WE (1993) Body composition from fluid spaces and density: analysis of methods 1961. Nutrition 9(5):480–491 (discussion 480, 492)Google Scholar