Comparative NMR Relaxivity Study of Polyoxometalate-Based Clusters [Mn4(H2O)2(P2W1SO56)2]16− and [{Dy(H2O)6}2Mn4(H2O)2(P2W15O56)2]10− from 20 MHz to 1.2 GHz

Abstract

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance relaxivities are a measure for the sensitivity of a contrast agent (CA), i.e. the potential of a paramagnetic moiety to enhance longitudinal and transverse relaxation of molecules in its near neighbourhood. The underlying mechanism is called Paramagnetic Relaxation Enhancement (PRE). The relaxivity, characterizing PRE, depends not only on the external applied magnetic field but also depends on numerous factors, such as number of coordinated water molecules, water exchange rate, rotational diffusion, first and second coordination hydration sphere, electronic and magnetic properties of paramagnetic centers and the molecular shape/size of the CA. Relaxation rates are usually normalized to the concentration of the contrast agent to provide the relaxivities. To investigate the influence of these factors on PRE of newly synthesized potential CA, two paramagnetic metals containing polyoxometalates (POMs) [Mn4(H2O)2(P2W15O56)2]16− (Mn4-P2W15) and [{Dy(H2O)6}2Mn4(H2O)2(P2W15O56)2]10− (Dy2Mn4-P2W15) were selected as models to be studied at 1H Larmor frequencies from 20 MHz to 1.2 GHz. Structurally, the POM Dy2Mn4-P2W15 is similar to the tetra-nuclear manganese(II)-substituted sandwich-type POM Mn4-P2W15, with the two coordinated DyIII cations acting as linkers connecting Mn4-P2W15 units, thus forming a 1D ladder-like chain structure based on sandwich-type rungs strung together by the dysprosium cations. This study shows that POM (Dy2Mn4-P2W15) is a promising CA at high magnetic fields and proves that the use of heterometallic clusters is an effective strategy to increase PRE due to the synergistic effects from different metal ions.

Introduction

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) contrast agents are characterized by their Paramagnetic Relaxation Enhancement (PRE). PRE is the degree to which the paramagnetic molecules/contrast agents can enhance the longitudinal and transverse relaxation rates (R1 = 1/T1 and R2 = 1/T2, respectively) of molecules in their nearest surroundings. This phenomenon occurs due to fluctuating hyperfine interactions between the unpaired electrons of a paramagnetic ion and the surrounding molecules, usually water. A major challenge of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is its relatively low sensitivity, therefore, a considerable amount of effort is directed towards creating new contrast agents for improved sensitivity and image contrast. As the sensitivity of NMR/MRI increases with magnetic field due to increased polarization, a trend in NMR/MRI research is to use higher fields. Until recently, most clinical MRI scanners operate at 3 T; however, higher magnetic fields up to 9.4 T have been used under appropriate ethical agreement for neuroscientific and clinical research since the late 1990s. However, there are still technological, physical and safety limitations at high magnetic fields [1,2,3,4]. The drive toward higher field strengths is also important for the purpose of fundamental research, for material science and for industrial applications (imaging of non-living objects for quality assurance and inspection). MRI is finding increasing applications in various areas, such as water treatment, petrogeology, medical implants, food, agriculture, polymers and polymer composites, and pharmaceuticals. Perhaps the most eminent advantage in applying magnetic resonance methods in chemical engineering research is that both chemistry and transport can be tracked in three dimensions in optically opaque systems [5, 6]. GdIII containing compounds are well known for their T1 relaxation enhancing capability due to its isotropic electronic ground state (8S7/2) and long electronic relaxation time (τS). However, the r1 relaxivity often decreases with magnetic field for most of the well-known and established contrast agents [7]. This behavior represents a challenge for current contrast agent design. Therefore, it is important to develop new high-field contrast agents for emerging high‐field MRI applications in medicine as well as in chemical engineering systems. In fact, recent research has shown that paramagnetic lanthanide ions, such as dysprosium(III), due to its asymmetric/anisotropic electronic ground state (6H15/2), short electronic relaxation time (∼10−13 s) and a very high magnetic moment (μ = 10.2 μB) has the tendency to exhibit especially a high transverse relaxivities at high magnetic fields, this makes DyIII based compounds promising candidate for dominantly T2 contrast enhancement at ultra-high fields [8,9,10]. In some compounds also the DyIII longitudinal relaxivities increase with field, which is the preferred contrast enhancement.

Relaxivity depends not only on the field and on the intrinsic electronic properties of the paramagnetic centers but also on the temperature, molecular mobility, the number of exchangeable water molecules and their distance to paramagnetic centers as well as their rate of exchange with bulk solvent [11]. Concerning adjustment of dose or concentration, new classes of contrast agents with improved relaxivity can be designed by incorporating high numbers of paramagnetic centers within the same molecule or cluster that in turn means that lower doses can be given to produce marked alterations in contrast [7, 12]. Up till now, the NMR relaxivities of ultra-high ground spin state cyclic coordination clusters based on 3d and 4f ions [FeIII10LnIII10(Me-tea)10(Me-teaH)10(NO3)10] (Ln = Dy, Gd; Me-tea = triethanolamine) were studied over a wide range of 1H Larmor frequencies from 10 MHz up to 1.4 GHz [13, 14] and the PRE properties of polyoxometalate (POM) clusters containing both 3d and 4f paramagnetic ions {Ln30Co8Ge12W108O408} {Ln30Co8}(Ln = Gd, Dy) were studied as well up to 1.4 GHz [15]. These investigations revealed that the relaxivities of these clusters containing a large number of paramagnetic centers are in sum much higher than the commercially available, often Gd-based medical contrast agents with only one paramagnetic center. Polyoxometalate (POM) clusters represent a class of inorganic compounds, which show an unmatched variety of molecular and electronic structures with unique properties that make them attractive for applications in magnetism, magnetic coolers, imaging, catalysis, energy and medicine [15,16,17,18,19,20]. Although a wide range of biological activities of POMs have been reported, their broad-spectrum interactions with biomolecules and toxicity hinder their clinical usage [19]. Concerning non-medical applications, POMs possess high potential to be used as industrial contrast agents due to the low cost synthesis, stability, solubility and robust nature. POMs and their lacunary derivatives can be functionalized by grafting of the organic substituents and metal cations onto the surface, which offers the possibility to fine-tune the properties of the resulting hybrid system. Under controlled basic conditions, lacunary POM ligands can be produced by removing one or more metal-oxo polyhedra from the parent POM structures. Lacunary POMs offer unique features as ligands, including their size, diamagnetic nature, arrangement of coordination sites, flexibility of coordination modes and ability to rearrange, making it possible to incorporate any number of 3d-paramagnetic metal centers [21, 22], lanthanide ions [23, 24], 3d-4f-metal ions [15, 17, 25] and organic groups [26].

In this work, two POM compounds Na16[Mn4(H2O)2(P2W15O56)2]·53H2O (shortened to Mn4-P2W15) [27] and Na10[{Dy(H2O)6}2Mn4(H2O)2(P2W15O56)2]·59H2O (shortened to Dy2Mn4-P2W15) [28] were selected as models to be examined for their PRE at 1H Larmor frequencies from 20 MHz to 1.2 GHz.

Structure of the POMs

Mn4-P2W15 is constructed by two trilacunary POM ligands [P2W15O56]12− sandwiching a tetra-nuclear Mn cluster {Mn4O16(H2O)2} (4 paramagnetic MnII ions with electron spin S = 5/2) through the W–O–Mn and P–O–Mn bridging modes. There are two terminal / exchangeable water molecules that are directly attached to the paramagnetic cluster {Mn4O16(H2O)2} (Fig. 1). The Dy2Mn4-P2W15 compound consists of a Mn4-P2W15 unit and two DyIII metal ions (2 paramagnetic DyIII ions with S = 5/2) attached to the POM skeleton (Fig. 2). Each DyIII center connects two Mn4-P2W15 subunits via two W═O···Dy bonds forming a one-dimensional (1D) ladder-like chain, built up of the sandwich anions Mn4-P2W15 and the DyIII ions (Fig. 3). The paramagnetic centers {Dy(H2O)6} and {Mn4(H2O)2} in Dy2Mn4-P2W15 have 6 and 2 directly coordinated exchangeable water molecules, respectively (Fig. 2). The terminal water ligands connected to the metal cations are labile enough to be potentially exchangeable by solvent water molecules or any organic substrates present in the solution [26]. The DyIII metal ions remain attached to the POM skeleton in aqueous solution as shown by photoluminescence studies. More details about these solution studies are reported in [28], where, however, the existence of a 1D structure in solution could not be identified. The sodium cations can allow further growth of the crystal structure into a 2D framework. Such structures, constructed from alkali metal cation linkers, usually collapse in solution due to the weak interactions as established from mass spectroscopy studies on extended POM frameworks [Ln(H2O)nGeW11O39]5− (Ln = Dy, Er; n = 4, 3) [29].

Fig. 1
figure1

Ball-and-stick and wire representation for crystal structure of Mn4-P2W15: a Diamagnetic POM ligand {P2W15O56}. b Compound Mn4-P2W15. The paramagnetic {Mn4} core is highlighted in colour. c Compound Mn4-P2W15 where POM ligands are shown in wire-and-stick representation. For clarity, cation and crystal water molecules are omitted. Colour code: Oxygen = red balls, aqua ligand on Mn ions = turquoise balls (colour figure online)

Fig. 2
figure2

Ball-and-stick and wire representation for crystal structure of Dy2Mn4-P2W15: a Diamagnetic POM ligand {P2W15O56}. b Compound Dy2Mn4-P2W15. The paramagnetic {Mn4} core and Dy metal ions attached to the POM skeleton are highlighted in colours. c Compound Dy2Mn4-P2W15 where POM ligands are shown in wire-and-stick representation. For clarity, cation and crystal water molecules are omitted. Colour code: Oxygen = red balls, aqua ligand on Dy and Mn ions = turquoise balls (colour figure online)

Fig. 3
figure3

Ball-and-stick representation for crystal structure of Dy2Mn4-P2W15 as the 1D ladder-like chain with other units shown in wire-and-stick representation for clarity. Colour code: Oxygen = red balls, aqua ligand on Dy metal ions = turquoise balls (colour figure online)

Magnetic Properties

Magnetic properties of the POMs Mn4-P2W15 and Dy2Mn4-P2W15 have also been reported [28]. The room temperature χMT product (χM = molar magnetic susceptibility) for Mn4-P2W15 is close to the expected value for four isolated MnII ions, 16.8 cm3 K mol−1 (cf. 17.5 cm3 K mol−1 for four MnII, electron spin s = 5/2, gyromagnetic ratio g = 2.00). Furthermore, molar magnetization (Mβ) at 2 and 5 K as function of applied magnetic field in the range 0–7 T indicates a strong anti-ferromagnetic interaction. The temperature-dependent product χMT of Dy2Mn4-P2W15 displays a room temperature χMT value of 45.3 cm3 K mol−1 close to the expected value for four isolated MnII ions and two non-interacting DyIII, 45.8 cm3 K mol−1 for four MnII, s = 5/2, g = 2.00 and two DyIII, S = 5/2; gJ = 4/3). The collective effects of the anti-ferromagnetic exchange operating in the Mn4-P2W15 unit along with the anisotropic magnetic properties of DyIII ions have been observed in Dy2Mn4-P2W15. Mβ(H) for compound Dy2Mn4-P2W15 displays very anisotropic behaviour and no saturation of the magnetization is observed. More details about synthesis, structure, characterization, and magnetic studies are reported in [28]. These two POMs with different structural compositions which remain intact in solution provide suitable systems to carry out comparative PRE studies to check the influence of DyIII ions and size effects under various applied magnetic fields, i.e. 1H Larmor frequencies.

Results and Discussion

Water is the prominent solvent in biological and medical CA applications and it is also common in chemical and process engineering. One way to design CAs for MRI with suitable parameters at high magnetic fields and knowing the behaviour of the presented POMs in aqueous solutions are essential. Both compounds Mn4-P2W15 and Dy2Mn4-P2W15 are soluble and stable in aqueous media. The equimolar clear solution of POM Dy2Mn4-P2W15 resulted through sonication, whereas the clear solution of the POM Mn4-P2W15 was obtained on stirring. It has always been great challenge to understand the complicated solution behaviour of large POM clusters. Contrary to what might be expected, large highly charged particles are known to form large agglomerations in diluted aqueous systems. Many types of giant POMs (macroanions) are hydrophilic and very soluble in water or other polar solvents because of the external water ligand layer and the negative charges of the POMs, which are balanced by small counterions, such as Na+, Li+, K+ and NH4+. Such hydrophilic macroanions tend to self-assemble further into hollow, spherical, single-layer “blackberry”-type structures mostly in very dilute solution (< 1 × 10–5 mol L1). Generally, in polyoxometalate chemistry, the aggregation process is termed as blackberry formation, which is different from the aggregation of hydrophobic colloids forming through van der Waals forces, which leads to phase separation. This unique solution behaviour of POMs can be investigated by a combination of application of laser light scattering (LLS), dynamic light scattering (DLS), small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS), and small angle neutron scattering (SANS). In the present study, the blackberry formation is unlikely because blackberry structures are not easy to form due to the high-energy barrier between discrete single macroanions and supramolecular structures. There are different parameters (variation of solvent mixture/concentration/pH/time) that need to be optimized for the formation of blackberries [30]. During the PRE measurements, also at the highest Larmor frequency, no agglomeration was observed in the small cylindrical volumes of 1 mm in diameter, 1–2 mm in height (> 400 MHz).

PRE: Paramagnetic Relaxation Enhancement

Having shown the basic suitability of the POMs to serve as CA in aqueous solutions, the dispersion of the longitudinal and the transverse relaxivities were investigated while the 1H Larmor frequencies ν0 corresponding to magnetic fields ranged from 20 MHz up to 1.2 GHz in the present study. The experimental details of the NMR measurements have been described previously in detail in [13,14,15]. Essentially, NMR systems based on permanent magnets (≤ 80 MHz), on superconducting magnets (≤ 400 MHz) and on high-power (24 MW) electromagnets (≥ 800 MHz) were used to measure the relaxivities of the POMs. Inversion recovery and CPMG multi-echo sequences were applied to measure relaxation rates R1 and R2 as function of concentration in 0.2 mM steps over the range 0–1 mM at each magnetic field. The rates depend linearly on concentration as expected for a homogeneous solution where aggregation especially at the larger concentrations does not play an important role. Therefore, the data were condensed to the plot of both relaxivity dispersions being discussed below. The coefficients of determination were in the range [0.95;0.9998] for the linear regressions for obtaining the relaxivities from the concentration dependent relaxation rates.

Inner Sphere (IS) and Outer Sphere (OS) Contribution

The paramagnetic relaxation in the present study can be explained by intermolecular dynamics of the water molecule with respect to the contrast agents. The basis is the hyperfine interaction between 1H spins and the electronic spins of the paramagnetic ions. Diverse influencing factors are known which need to be quantified when aiming for a theoretical explanation of the observed PRE. For a detailed description, we refer to the book by Bertini et al., where the theoretical framework of PRE is given [31]. The Solomon–Bloembergen–Morgan theory, as well as the Curie spin approach, isotropic and dipolar contributions, is described there. In this article, we restrict ourselves to the following rough picture: The PRE phenomena are split into the inner sphere (IS) and outer sphere (OS) contributions for simplicity. The inner sphere (metal-bound) contribution comes from the nuclear spins (usually 1H)/water molecules directly attached to the paramagnetic centers in the complex. The outer sphere contributions roughly correspond to the relative translational and rotational Brownian motions of free water molecules (bulk water molecules in the nearby environment) with respect to paramagnetic centers [32].

Longitudinal Relaxivity r1

Both POMs show PRE as expected due to the presence of paramagnetic centers in the clusters (Fig. 4). In the case of Dy2Mn4-P2W15, the longitudinal relaxivities r1 are larger compared to Mn4-P2W15 which can be attributed to the electron spin effect of the two DyIII and four MnII ion compared to the electron spin effect of four MnII ions in Mn4-P2W15. Assuming that the electron spins of the individual ions add up in the cluster, the total electron spin would be 15 in Dy2Mn4-P2W15 and 10 in Mn4-P2W15 leading to an expected increase of PRE by a factor in the order of 1.5 using this simplistic approach of assuming that the cluster effectively acts as one single moiety in PRE, i.e. that the effective, total spin accounts for the observed PRE. We experimentally observe a factor in the order of 4 between Dy2Mn4-P2W15 and Mn4-P2W15. This is a strong indication that the simple picture is not appropriate. As seen in the chemical structure, the Dy ions are surrounded by water molecules, and it is very likely that chemical exchange occurs. In a theoretical description of PRE of these POMs, inner sphere contributions are, therefore, likely to be considered for PRE introduced by the Dy ions, whereas the Mn ions seem to contribute to PRE dominantly by outer sphere contributions. Additionally, the rotational correlation times will be different for Dy2Mn4-P2W15 and Mn4-P2W15.

For application as a CA, a high r1 is especially desirable as the reduction of longitudinal relaxation leads to a positive contrast enhancement in MRI. In addition, a high PRE allows reduction concentration in the making MRI less invasive in total. However often, r1 decreases with magnetic field. This is not the case for the ultra-high magnetic clusters {Dy30Co8} and {Fe10Dy10} already described in our papers [13,14,15]. There we found that these Gd clusters show a slight decrease of r1 while the Dy analogues show an increase with Larmor frequency. Here, r1 is found to be field independent or to slightly increase within the experimental error for Dy2Mn4-P2W15 (Fig. 4). As discussed in previous publications, cooperative effects as well as the electronic correlation times must be considered and in the present case, chemical exchange and inner sphere contributions need to be considered.

Fig. 4
figure4

Longitudinal relaxivities r1 of the total clusters as a function of 1H Larmor frequency. Both POMs show PRE reflecting the contributions of MnIII and DyIII

Transverse Relaxivity r2

Not only the longitudinal but also the transverse relaxivities are of importance in the application of a magnetic cluster as CA. Most of the MRI pulse sequences are based on either gradient or spin echoes leading to a non-negligible influence of transverse relaxation. The values of r2 are usually much larger than r1, while increasing with magnetic field. Again, r2 is larger for Dy2Mn4-P2W15 making the significance of the Dy ions evident (Fig. 5). Similar findings were made for {Dy30Co8}[15]. As usual, the relaxivity increases, in the present case approximately linearly, with field, leading to an enhanced negative image contrast at larger fields. Influencing factors again are—apart from the electronic correlation times—the rotational and diffusional correlation times as well as the chemical exchange probability which is enhanced for Dy2Mn4-P2W15 compared to Mn4-P2W15. Please also note that the exposure of water molecules in the surrounding of the Dy ions is much more pronounced than that of the Mn ions leading to the drastic enhancements in the case of Dy2Mn4-P2W15 compared to Mn4-P2W15. In fact, the transverse relaxivities of both compounds are much larger than the longitudinal relaxivities. This means that the POMs studied here are dominantly r2 or “negative” relaxation agents. However, they should not be considered as superparamagnetic particles as the chemical structure and the physical mechanism differ considerably. This is evident in the case of exchangeable water molecules discussed above (Figs. 1 and 2).

Fig. 5
figure5

As in Fig. 4 for longitudinal relaxivity, the values of transverse relaxivity are clearly lower for Mn4-P2W15. Please note additionally the approximately linear increase of r2 with Larmor frequency for Dy2Mn4-P2W15

Materials and Methods

The compounds Na16[Mn4(H2O)2(P2W15O56)2]0.53H2O [27] and Na10[{Dy(H2O)6}2Mn4(H2O)2(P2W15O56)2]·59H2O [28] were synthesized according to the literature methods and were characterized by IR spectroscopy. All reactions were carried out under aerobic conditions. All other reagents were purchased commercially and were used without further purification.

Conclusion

Herein we have presented the PRE properties of two POM clusters Mn4-P2W15 and Dy2Mn4-P2W15, which were experimentally explored by 1H NMR longitudinal and transverse relaxivity studies. The improved relaxation ability of the POM with four MnII and 2 DyIII ions in comparison to the POM with only four MnII ions proves that relaxation behaviour can be altered by chemical and /or electronic change. This work shows that presence of the heterometallic metal centers within the same molecules is a useful strategy in developing new relaxation agents for the high magnetic field applications. The incorporation of DyIII ions into POM architectures represents promising strategy for the development of high-field MRI contrast agents.

References

  1. 1.

    M. Harris, S. Biju, T.N. Parac-Vogt, Chem. Eur. J. 25, 13838 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    C.Y. Chou, M. Abdesselem, C. Bouzigues, M. Chu, A. Guiga, T.H. Huang, F. Ferrage, T. Gacoin, A. Alexandrou, D. Sakellariou, Sci. Rep. 7, 1 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    E. Moser, E. Laistler, F. Schmitt, G. Kontaxis, Front. Phys. 5, 1 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    M.E. Ladd, P. Bachert, M. Meyerspeer, E. Moser, A.M. Nagel, D.G. Norris, S. Schmitter, O. Speck, S. Straub, M. Zaiss, Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 109, 1 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    G. Giovannetti, A. Guerrini, P.A. Salvadori, Magn. Reson. Imaging 34, 730 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    L.D. Hall, T.A. Carpenter, Magn. Reson. Imaging 10, 713 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    P. Caravan, Chem. Soc. Rev. 35, 512 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    X.Y. Zheng, J. Pellico, A.A. Khrapitchev, N.R. Sibson, J.J. Davis, Nanoscale 10, 21041 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    E. Debroye, S. Laurent, L. Vanderelst, R.N. Muller, T.N. Parac-Vogt, Chem. Eur. J. 19, 16019 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    M. Bottrill, L. Kwok, N.J. Long, Chem. Soc. Rev. 35, 557 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    J. Wahsner, E.M. Gale, A. Rodríguez-Rodríguez, P. Caravan, Chem. Rev. 119, 957 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    M.W. Marashdeh, B. Ababneh, O.M. Lemine, A. Alsadig, K. Omri, L. El Mir, A. Sulieman, E. Mattar, Results Phys. 15, 102651 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    G. Guthausen, J.R. Machado, B. Luy, A. Baniodeh, A.K. Powell, S. Krämer, F. Ranzinger, M.P. Herrling, S. Lackner, H. Horn, Dalton Trans. 44, 5032 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    J.R. Machado, A. Baniodeh, A.K. Powell, B. Luy, S. Krämer, G. Guthausen, ChemPhysChem 15, 3608 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    M. Ibrahim, S. Krämer, N. Schork, G. Guthausen, Dalton Trans. 48, 15597 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    D.-L. Long, R. Tsunashima, L. Cronin, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49, 1736 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    M. Ibrahim, V. Mereacre, N. Leblanc, W. Wernsdorfer, C.E. Anson, A.K. Powell, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 15574 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    M. Ibrahim, Y. Lan, B.S. Bassil, Y. Xiang, A. Suchopar, A.K. Powell, U. Kortz, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50, 4708 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    A. Bijelic, M. Aureliano, A. Rompel, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58, 2980 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    M.J. Martínez-Pérez, O. Montero, M. Evangelisti, F. Luis, J. Sesé, S. Cardona-Serra, E. Coronado, Adv. Mater. 24, 4301 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    S.T. Zheng, G.Y. Yang, Chem. Soc. Rev. 41, 7623 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    O. Oms, A. Dolbecq, P. Mialane, Chem. Soc. Rev. 41, 7497 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    C. Boskovic, Acc. Chem. Res. 50, 2205 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    X. Ma, W. Yang, L. Chen, J. Zhao, CrystEngComm 17, 8175 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    S. Reinoso, Dalton Trans. 40, 6610 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    P. Mialane, A. Dolbecq, F. Sécheresse, Chem. Commun. (2006). https://doi.org/10.1039/B603594A

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    C.J. Gómez-García, J.J. Borrás-Almenar, E. Coronado, L. Ouahab, Inorg. Chem. 33, 4016 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    M. Ibrahim, E. Moreno-pineda, T. Bergfeldt, C.E. Anson, A.K. Powell, Materials (Basel) 11, 155 (2018)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    M. Ibrahim, I.M. Mbomekallé, P. De Oliveira, A. Baksi, A.B. Carter, Y. Peng, T. Bergfeldt, S. Malik, C.E. Anson, ACS Omega 4, 21873 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    P. Yin, D. Li, T. Liu, Chem. Soc. Rev. 41, 7368 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    I. Bertini, C. Luchinat, G. Parigi, Solution NMR of Paramagnetic Molecules: Applications to Metallobiomolecules and Models, vol. 2 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    D. Ni, W. Bu, E.B. Ehlerding, W. Cai, J. Shi, Chem. Soc. Rev. 46, 7438 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

M.I. and A.K.P. acknowledge support by the Helmholtz society through program Science and Technology of Nanosystems (STN). M. I. thanks the German Science Foundation (DFG-IB 123/1-1). The financial support of DFG is highly acknowledged for Pro2NMR @ KIT and the NMR instrumentation. COST Actions MultiComp (CA15107) and MOLSPIN (CA15128) are also acknowledged. Part of this work was performed at the LNCMI, a member of the European Magnetic Field Laboratory. Audrey Zoulim developed part of the data analysis software used for the experiments at LNCMI.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Gisela Guthausen or Annie K. Powell.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ibrahim, M., Rudszuck, T., Kerdi, B. et al. Comparative NMR Relaxivity Study of Polyoxometalate-Based Clusters [Mn4(H2O)2(P2W1SO56)2]16− and [{Dy(H2O)6}2Mn4(H2O)2(P2W15O56)2]10− from 20 MHz to 1.2 GHz. Appl Magn Reson 51, 1295–1305 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00723-020-01267-1

Download citation