Development of Digital MRI Consoles Using General-Purpose Digital Instruments and Microcontroller Boards
Abstract
We developed two digital magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) consoles using general-purpose digital instruments and microcontroller boards. The first console consisted of a digital oscilloscope (8-bit resolution, 250-MHz sampling frequency), an arbitrary waveform generator (14-bit resolution, 100-MHz sampling frequency), and three 32-bit microcontroller boards. The second console consisted of a digital oscilloscope (16-bit resolution, 1-GHz sampling frequency) with a built-in waveform generator (14-bit resolution, 200-MHz sampling frequency) and three 32-bit microcontroller boards. MRI experiments were performed using a 1.0-T and 90-mm gap yokeless permanent magnet to evaluate the MRI consoles. Three-dimensional spin-echo and gradient-echo images were successfully acquired using the first and second MRI consoles using an undersampling technique and RF phase correction. We concluded that the digital MRI consoles could be built using general-purpose digital instruments and microcontroller boards at a reduced cost and within a short development time.
Keywords
Digital Oscilloscope Phase Correction Magnetic Resonance Imaging System Magnetic Resonance Imaging Signal Waveform GeneratorNotes
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge Dr. Tomoyuki Haishi for the use of the 1.0-T permanent magnet MRI system and helpful discussions.
References
- 1.P. Lauterbur, Nature 242, 190 (1973)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.R. Proska, in Proceedings of the 7th Annual meeting of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, San Francisco (1988), p. 266Google Scholar
- 3.G.N. Holland, D.M. Blakeley, J.R. Stauber, D. Flugan, K.S. Denison, in Proceedings of the 8th Annual meeting of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Amsterdam (1989), p. 182Google Scholar
- 4.R.S. Stormont, P.J.P. Noonan, N.J. Pelc, N.R. Hattes, M.D. Anas, R.H. Howarth, R. Glusick, in Proceedings of the 8th Annual meeting of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Amsterdam (1989), p. 962Google Scholar
- 5.J. Bollenbeck, M. Vester, R. Oppelt, H. Kroeckel, W. Schnell, Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 13, 860 (2005)Google Scholar
- 6.M. Kasal, J. Halámek, V. Husek, M. Villa, U. Ruffina, Proc. Cofrancesco Rev. Sci. Instrum. 65, 1897 (1994)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.K. Raoof, A. Asfour, J.M. Fournier, IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference, Anchorage, AK, USA (2002), p. 21Google Scholar
- 8.J. Bodurka, P.J. Ledden, P. van Gelderen, R. Chu, J.A. de Zwart, D. Morris, J.H. Duyn, Magn. Res. Med. 51, 165–171 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.P. Perez, A. Santos, Med. Eng. Phys. 26, 523 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.S. Jie, X. Qin, L. Yang, L. Gengying, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 76, 105101 (2005)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.S. Hashimoto, K. Kose, T. Haishi, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 83, 053702 (2012)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.P.P. Stang, S.M. Conolly, J.M. Santos, J.M. Pauly, G.C. Scott, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 31, 370 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.W. Tang, H. Sun, W. Wang, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 83, 104701 (2012)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.X. Liang, S. Binghe, M. Yueping, Z. Ruyan, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 84, 054702 (2013)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.T. Shirai, T. Haishi, S. Utsuzawa, Y. Matsuda, K. Kose, Magn. Reson. Med. Sci. 4, 137 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.A. Kumar, D. Welti, R.R. Ernst, J. Magn. Reson. 18, 69 (1975)ADSGoogle Scholar