Journal of Economics

, 98:203 | Cite as

Privatization and entries of foreign enterprises in a differentiated industry

  • Toshihiro Matsumura
  • Noriaki Matsushima
  • Ikuo Ishibashi
Article

Abstract

We investigate whether or not privatization is beneficial from the viewpoint of social welfare in a monopolistic competition model. We discuss the relationship between the welfare effects of privatization and the degree of foreign direct investment in the private sector, which is an important problem in developing countries and in transition economies such as China and Central and Eastern European countries. We find that, in the long run, privatization of a public firm is more likely to improve welfare when the country depends on foreign capital in the private sector, whereas the opposite tendency exists in the short run.

Keywords

Mixed oligopoly Privatization Product differentiation Foreign firms Free entry 

JEL Classification

L13 H42 

References

  1. Anderson SP, de Palma A, Thisse J-F (1997) Privatization and efficiency in a differentiated industry. Eur Econ Rev 41: 1635–1654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bárcena-Ruiz JC, Garzón MB (2003) Mixed duopoly, merger and multiproduct firms. J Econ 80: 27–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bárcena-Ruiz JC, Garzón MB (2005a) Economic integration and privatization under diseconomies of scale. Eur J Political Econ 21: 247–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bárcena-Ruiz JC, Garzón MB (2005b) International trade and strategic privatization. Rev Dev Econ 9(4): 502–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bárcena-Ruiz JC, Garzón MB (2006) Mixed oligopoly and environmental policy. Span Econ Rev 8(2): 139–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bös D, Peters W (1995) Double inefficiency in optimally organized firms. J Public Econ 56: 355–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brandão A, Castro S (2007) State-owned enterprises as indirect instruments of entry regulation. J Econ 92(3): 263–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carstensen K, Toubal F (2004) Foreign direct investment in Central and Eastern European countries: a dynamic panel analysis. J Comp Econ 32: 3–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chang WW (2005) Optimal trade and privatization policies in an international duopoly with cost asymmetry. J Int Trade Econ Dev 14(1): 19–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chao C-C, Yu ESH (2006) Partial privatization, foreign competition, and optimum tariff. Rev Int Econ 14(1): 87–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Corneo G, Rob R (2003) Working in public and private firms. J Public Econ 87: 1335–1352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Corneo G, Jeanne O (1994) Oligopole mixte dans un marche commun. Annales d’Economie et de Statistique 33: 73–90Google Scholar
  13. Cremer H, Marchand M, Thisse J-F (1991) Mixed oligopoly with differentiated products. Int J Ind Organ 9: 43–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dadpay A, Heywood JS (2006) Mixed oligopoly in a single international market. Aust Econ Pap 45(4): 269–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fjell K, Pal D (1996) A mixed oligopoly in the presence of foreign private firms. Can J Econ 29: 737–743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fjell K, Heywood JS (2002) Public Stackelberg leadership in a mixed oligopoly with foreign firms. Aust Econ Pap 41(3): 267–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fujiwara K (2006) Trade patterns in an international mixed oligopoly. Econ Bull 6(9): 1–7Google Scholar
  18. Fujiwara K (2007) Partial privatization in a differentiated mixed oligopoly. J Econ 92(1): 51–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gil-Moltó MJ, Poyago-Theotoky J (2008) Flexible versus dedicated technology adoption in the presence of a public firm. South Econ J 74(4): 997–1016Google Scholar
  20. Heywood JS, Ye G (2008a) Mixed oligopoly, sequential entry, and spatial price discrimination. Econ Inq (in press). doi:10.1111/j.1465-7295.2008.00134.x
  21. Heywood JS, Ye G (2008b) Delegation in a mixed oligopoly: the case of multiple private firms. Manag Decision Econ (in press). doi:10.1002/mde.1436
  22. Ishibashi I, Matsumura T (2006) R&D competition between public and private sectors. Eur Econ Rev 50: 1347–1366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ishibashi K, Kaneko T (2008) Partial privatization in mixed duopoly with price and quality competition. J Econ 95(3): 213–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kato K (2006) Can allowing to trade permits enhance welfare in mixed oligopoly. J Econ 88(3): 263–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kato K, Tomaru Y (2007) Mixed oligopoly, privatization, subsidization and the order of firms’ moves: several types of objectives. Econ Lett 96(2): 287–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lee S-H (2006) Welfare-improving privatization policy in the telecommunications industry. Contemp Econ Policy 24(2): 237–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lee S-H, Hwang H-S (2003) Partial ownership for the public firm and competition. Jpn Econ Rev 54(3): 324–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lu Y (2006) Endogenous timing in a mixed oligopoly with foreign competitors: the linear demand case. J Econ 88(1): 49–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lu Y, Poddar S (2006) The choice of capacity in mixed duopoly under demand uncertainty. Manch School 74(3): 266–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lu Y, Poddar S (2007) Firm ownership, product differentiation and welfare. Manch School 75(2): 210–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Matsumura T (1998) Partial privatization in mixed duopoly. J Public Econ 70: 473–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Matsumura T (2000) Entry regulation and social welfare with an integer problem. J Econ 71: 47–58Google Scholar
  33. Matsumura T (2003a) Endogenous role in mixed markets: a two production period model. South Econ J 70: 403–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Matsumura T (2003b) Stackelberg mixed duopoly with a foreign competitor. Bull Econ Res 55: 275–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Matsumura T, Kanda O (2005) Mixed oligopoly at free entry markets. J Econ 84(1): 27–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Matsumura T, Matsushima N (2004) Endogenous cost differentials between public and private enterprises: a mixed duopoly approach. Economica 71: 671–688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Matsushima N, Matsumura T (2003) Mixed oligopoly and spatial agglomeration. Can J Econ 36: 62–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Matsushima N, Matsumura T (2006) Mixed oligopoly, foreign firms, and location choice. Reg Sci Urban Econ 36: 753–772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Merrill W, Schneider N (1966) Government firms in oligopoly industries: a short-run analysis. Q J Econ 80: 400–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mujumdar S, Pal D (1998) Effects of indirect taxation in a mixed oligopoly. Econ Lett 58: 199–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nett L (1993) Mixed oligopoly with homogeneous goods. Ann Public Coop Econ 64: 367–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nett L (1994) Why private firms are more innovative than public firms. Eur J Political Econ 10: 639–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nishimori A, Ogawa H (2002) Public monopoly, mixed oligopoly and productive efficiency. Aust Econ Pap 41: 185–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Norbäck P-J, Persson L (2005) Privatization policy in an international oligopoly. Economica 72: 635–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ohori S (2006) Optimal environmental tax and level of privatization in an international duopoly. J Regul Econ 29: 225–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pal D (1998) Endogenous timing in a mixed oligopoly. Econ Lett 61: 181–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pal D, White MD (1998) Mixed oligopoly, privatization, and strategic trade policy. South Econ J 65: 264–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Poyago-Theotoky J (1998) R&D competition in a mixed duopoly under uncertainty and easy imitation. J Comp Econ 26: 415–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sun Q, Zhang A, Li J (2005) A study of optimal state shares in mixed oligopoly: implications for SOE reform and foreign competition. China Econ Rev 16: 1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tomaru Y (2006) Mixed oligopoly, partial privatization and subsidization. Econ Bull 12(5): 1–6Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Toshihiro Matsumura
    • 1
  • Noriaki Matsushima
    • 2
  • Ikuo Ishibashi
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute of Social ScienceUniversity of TokyoBunkyo-ku, TokyoJapan
  2. 2.Institute of Social and Economic ResearchOsaka UniversityIbaraki, OsakaJapan
  3. 3.Osaka School of International Public PolicyOsaka UniversityToyonaka, OsakaJapan

Personalised recommendations