Mobile phone termination charges with asymmetric regulation
- First Online:
- Cite this article as:
- Baake, P. & Mitusch, K. J Econ (2009) 96: 241. doi:10.1007/s00712-008-0054-7
- 87 Downloads
We model competition between two unregulated mobile phone companies with price-elastic demand and less than full market coverage. We also assume that there is a regulated full-coverage fixed network. In order to induce stronger competition, mobile companies could have an incentive to raise their reciprocal mobile-to-mobile access charges above the marginal costs of termination. Stronger competition leads to an increase of the mobiles’ market shares, with the advantage that (genuine) network effects are strengthened. Therefore, ‘collusion’ may well be in line with social welfare.