Mineralogy and Petrology

, Volume 112, Supplement 2, pp 447–462 | Cite as

Kelvin and Faraday kimberlite emplacement geometries and implications for subterranean magmatic processes

  • Wayne BarnettEmail author
  • Michael Stubley
  • Casey Hetman
  • Ron Uken
  • Chris Hrkac
  • Tom McCandless
Original Paper


The Kennady North Project kimberlites (Northwest Territories of Canada) comprises multiple shallow dipping dykes and several volcaniclastic bodies that have an unusual shallow plunging geometry and complex “pipe” shapes that are termed chonoliths. The detailed exploration of the entire system provides exceptional evidence for subterranean volcanic conduit growth processes. The possible processes leading to the development of the kimberlite bodies are discussed, with emphasis on the importance of the subsurface intrusive system geometry and the local stress tensor. Emplacement into a locally compressive stress regime (i.e. σ1 and σ2 inclined at a low angle to surface) could change the kimberlite emplacement geometries to that observed at Kennady North. Models are proposed for the development of the chonoliths, to emphasize aspects of the growth of kimberlite systems that are not well understood. The conclusions challenge or evolve current emplacement models and should influence kimberlite exploration and resource definition assumptions.


Diamond Volcanic Dyke Exploration Chonolith 



The authors would like to acknowledge the organizational committee of the 11 IKC for an exceptional conference and the opportunity to submit this manuscript. The gracious support and many detailed and thoughtful recommendations from Bruce Kjarsgaard, was greatly appreciated. The reviewers, Herb Helmstaedt and Eric de Kemp, are also thanked for their reviews that helped improve the message. Janine Kavanagh is thanked for pointing us towards the term “chonolith”.

Supplementary material

710_2018_621_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (144 kb)
Fig. S1 (PDF 144 kb)


  1. Agashev AM, Pokhilenko NP, Takazawa E, McDonald JA, Vavilov MA, Watanabe T, Sobolev NV (2008) Primary melting sequence of a deep (> 250 km) lithospheric mantle as recorded in the geochemistry of kimberlite–carbonatite assemblages, Snap Lake dyke system, Canada. Chem Geol 255(3):317–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson OL (1979) The role of fracture dynamics in kimberlite pipe formation. In: Meyer HOA, Boyd FR (eds) Kimberlites, diatremes, and diamonds: their geology, petrology and geochemistry. Proceedings of the 2nd International Kimberlite Conference, American Geophysical Union, pp 344–353Google Scholar
  3. Aurora Geosciences (2016) Project exploration update and maiden mineral resource estimate, Kennady North Project, Northwest Territories, Canada. Technical Report 43–101, prepared on behalf of Kennady Diamonds IncGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnes SJ, Cruden AR, Arndt N, Saumur BM (2016) The mineral system approach applied to magmatic Ni–Cu–PGE sulphide deposits. Ore Geol Rev 76:296–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barnett W, Kurszlaukis S, Tait M, Dirks P (2011) Kimberlite wall-rock fragmentation processes: Venetia K08 pipe development. B Volcanol 73(8):941–958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barnett W, Jelsma H, Watkeys M, Freeman L, Bloem A (2013) How structure and stress influence kimberlite emplacement. In: Pearson DG, Grütter HS, Harris JW, Kjarsgaard BA, O’Brien H, Rao NC, Sparks S (eds) Proceedings of 10th International Kimberlite Conference. Springer, New Delhi, pp 51–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bezzola M, Hetman C, Garlick G, Creaser R, Hrkac C, Vivian G, Diering M, Nowicki T (2017) Geology and resource development of the Kelvin kimberlite pipe, NWT, Canada. Proceedings of the 11th International Kimberlite Conference, abstract 11IKC-4643Google Scholar
  8. Clement CR (1982) A comparative geological study of some major kimberlite pipes in the Northern Cape and Orange Free State. Dissertation, 2 volumes, University of Cape Town, IXX+432 + 406 ppGoogle Scholar
  9. Clemente CS, Amorós EB, Crespo MG (2007) Dike intrusion under shear stress: effects on magnetic and vesicle fabrics in dikes from rift zones of Tenerife (Canary Islands). J Struct Geol 29(12):1931–1942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cowan EJ, Beatson RK, Fright WR, McLennan TJ, Mitchell TJ (2002) Rapid geological modelling. Extended abstracts for applied structural geology for mineral exploration and mining. International Symposium, Kalgoorlie, Western Australia, pp. 23–25Google Scholar
  11. Daly RA (1914) Igneous rocks and their origin. McGraw-Hill Book Company Inc., 563 ppGoogle Scholar
  12. Delaney PT, Pollard DD, Ziony JI, McKee EH (1986) Field relationships between dikes and joints: emplacement process and palaeostress analysis. J Geophys Res 91:4920–4938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Doyle BJ, Kivi K, Scott Smith BH (1999) The Tli Kwi Cho (D027 and D018) diamondiferous kimberlite complex, Northwest Territories, Canada. In: Gurney JJ, Richardson SR (eds) Proceedings of the 7th International Kimberlite Conference, Cape Town, pp 194–204Google Scholar
  14. Field M, Scott-Smith BH (1999) Contrasting geology and near-surface emplacement of kimberlite pipes in southern Africa and Canada. In: Gurney JJ, Richardson SR (eds) Proceedings of the 7th International Kimberlite Conference. Cape Town, pp 214–237Google Scholar
  15. Field M, Stiefenhofer J, Robey J, Kurszlaukis S (2008) Kimberlite-hosted diamond deposits of southern Africa: a review. Ore Geol Rev 34(1–2):33–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fisher RV (1960) Classification of volcanic breccias. Geol Soc Am Bull 71(7):973–982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gainer D, Hetman C, Diering M (2017) The geology of the Faraday 3 kimberlite, Kennady Lake, NWT Canada. Extended abstracts of the 11th International Kimberlite Conference, Gaborone, abstract 11IKC-4586Google Scholar
  18. Gernon T, Field M, Sparks R (2012) Geology of the Snap Lake kimberlite intrusion, NW Territories, Canada: field observations and their interpretation. J Geol Soc Lond 169:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Glazner AF, Bartley JM (2006) Is stoping a volumetrically significant pluton emplacement process? Geol Soc Am Bull 118(9–10):1185–1195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gudmundsson A (2002) Emplacement and arrest of sheets and dykes in central volcanoes. J Volcanol Geoth Res 116:279–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harder M, Nowicki TE, Hetman CM, Freeman L, Abedu B (2013) Geology and evaluation of the K2 kimberlite, Koidu Mine, Sierra Leone, West Africa. In: Pearson DG, Grütter HS, Harris JW, Kjarsgaard BA, O’Brien H, Rao NC, Sparks S (eds) Proceedings of 10th International Kimberlite Conference. Springer, New Delhi, pp 191–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Heaman LM, Kjarsgaard BA, Creaser RA (2003) The timing of kimberlite magmatism and implications for diamond exploration: a global perspective. Lithos 71:153–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Helgeson HC, Kirkham DH, Flowers GC (1974) Theoretical prediction of the thermodynamic behavior of aqueous electrolytes at high pressures and temperatures I: summary of the thermodynamic / electrostatic properties of the solvent. Am J Sci 274:1089–1198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Helmstaedt HH, Pehrsson SJ (2012) Geology and tectonic evolution of the Slave Province – a post- Lithoprobe perspective. In: Percival JA, Cook FA, Clowes RM (eds) Tectonic styles in Canada: the lithoprobe perspective. Geological Association of Canada, Special Paper 49, pp 379–466Google Scholar
  25. Hetman CM, Smith BS, Paul JL, Winter F (2004) Geology of the Gahcho Kue kimberlite pipes, NWT, Canada: root to diatreme magmatic transition zones. Lithos 76(1):51–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Johnson JW, Norton D (1991) Critical phenomena in hydrothermal systems: state, thermodynamic, electrostatic, and transport properties of H2O in the critical region. Am J Sci 291:541–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kattenhorn SA, Watkeys MK (1995) Blunt-ended dyke segments. J Struct Geol 17(11):1535–1542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kavanagh JL, Sparks RSJ (2011) Insights of dyke emplacement mechanics from detailed 3D dyke thickness datasets. J Geol Soc Lond 168(4):965–978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lister JR, Kerr RC (1991) Fluid-mechanical models of crack propagation and their application to magma transport in dykes. J Geophys Res 96(B6):10049–10077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lorenz V (1975) Formation of phreatomagmatic maar–diatreme volcanoes and its relevance to kimberlite diatremes. Phys Chem Earth 9:17–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lorenz V, Kurszlaukis S (2007) Root zone processes in the phreatomagmatic pipe emplacement model and consequences for the evolution of maar–diatreme volcanoes. J Volcanol Geoth Res 159(1–3):4–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mandl G (2005) Rock joints: the mechanical genesis. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, p 221Google Scholar
  33. Molyneux SJ, Hutton DHW (2000) Evidence for significant granite space creation by the ballooning mechanism: the example of the Ardara pluton, Ireland. Geol Soc Am Bull 112(10):1543–1558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mort K, Woodcock NH (2008) Quantifying fault breccia geometry: Dent fault, NW England. J Struct Geol 30(6):701–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nakamura K (1977) Volcanoes as possible indicators of tectonic stress orientation – principal and proposal. J Volcanol Geoth Res 2:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nelson L, Hetman C, Diering M (2017a) The geology of the Faraday 1 kimberlite, NWT, Canada. Extended abstracts of the 11th International Kimberlite Conference, Gaborone, abstract 11IKC-4613Google Scholar
  37. Nelson L, Hetman C, Diering M (2017b) The geology of the Faraday 2 kimberlite, NWT, Canada. Extended abstracts of the 11th International Kimberlite Conference, Gaborone, abstract 11IKC-4678Google Scholar
  38. Nicholson R, Pollard DD (1985) Dilation and linkage of echelon cracks. J Struct Geol 7(5):583–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Norton D, Dutrow B (2001) Complex behavior of magma-hydrothermal processes: role of supercritical fluid. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 65:4009–4018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Paterson SR, Fowler TK (1993) Re-examining pluton emplacement processes. J Struct Geol 15(2):191–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Patterson M, Francis D, McCandless T (2009) Kimberlites: magmas or mixtures? Lithos 112S:191–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pollard DD (1973) Derivation and evaluation of a mechanical model for sheet intrusions. Tectonophysics 19:233–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pollard DD (1987) Elementary fracture mechanics applied to the structural interpretation of dykes. In: Hall HC, Fahrig WF (eds) Mafic dyke swarms. Geological Association of Canada, Special Paper 34, pp 5–24Google Scholar
  44. Rubin AM (1995) Propagation of magma-filled cracks. Annu Rev Earth Pl Sc 23:287–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Russell JK, Porritt LA, Lavallee Y, Dingwell DB (2012) Kimberlite ascent by assimilation-fuelled buoyancy. Nature 481:252–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Scott Smith B, Nowicki TE, Russell JK, Webb KJ, Mitchell RH, Hetman CM, Harder M, Skinner EMW, Robey JA (2013) Kimberlite terminology and classification. In: Pearson DG, Grütter HS, Harris JW, Kjarsgaard BA, O’Brien H, Rao NC, Sparks S (eds) Proceedings of 10th International Kimberlite Conference. Springer, New Delhi, pp 1–17Google Scholar
  47. Skinner EMW, Marsh JS (2004) Distinct kimberlite pipe classes with contrasting eruption processes. Lithos 76:183–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sparks RS, Baker L, Brown RJ, Field M, Schumacher J, Stripp G, Walters A (2006) Dynamical constraints on kimberlite volcanism. J Volcanol Geoth Res 155(1–2):18–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Stamm N, Schmidt MW (2017) Asthenospheric kimberlites: volatile contents and bulk compositions at 7 GPa. Earth Planet Sc Lett 474:309–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Stephenson PR, Vann J (2001) Common sense and good communication in mineral resource and ore reserve estimation. In: Edwards AC (ed) Mineral resource and ore reserve estimation - the AusIMM guide to good practice. Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Melbourne, pp 13–20Google Scholar
  51. Stubley MP (2005) Slave craton: interpretive bedrock compilation. Northwest Territories Geological Survey, NWT-NU Open File 2005–01Google Scholar
  52. Stubley MP (2015) Bedrock hosts to the kelvin-faraday, MZ, and Doyle kimberlite bodies southeastern Slave Craton (NTS 075N). Internal report prepared for Kennady Diamonds and Aurora Geosciences Ltd., 45 ppGoogle Scholar
  53. Tappert R, Tappert MC (2017) Novel kimberlite exploration tools: delineating country rock hydration associated with kimberlites using VIS-SWIR hyperspectral point data collected from drill core. Abstracts of the 2017 Yellowknife Geoscience Forum, pp 78–79Google Scholar
  54. White JL, Sparks RSJ, Bailey K, Barnett WP, Field M, Windsor L (2012) Kimberlite sills and dykes associated with the Wesselton kimberlite pipe, Kimberley, South Africa. S Afr J Geol 115(1):1–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wilson L, Head JW III (2007) An integrated model of kimberlite ascent and eruption. Nature 447:53–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc.VancouverCanada
  2. 2.Stubley Geoscience Ltd.CochraneCanada
  3. 3.Aurora GeosciencesYellowknifeCanada
  4. 4.Kennady DiamondsTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations