Advertisement

Mineralogy and Petrology

, Volume 112, Issue 4, pp 577–589 | Cite as

Theoretical growth of framboidal and sunflower pyrite using the R-package frambgrowth

Original Paper
  • 127 Downloads

Abstract

Framboids and sunflowers are the most ubiquitous shapes of sedimentary pyrite. Framboids are spherical aggregates of nanocrystals, while sunflowers are formed by overgrowth of framboids and represent intermediate stages in the transformation of framboids into euhedrae. The characterization of the size populations of these shapes provides critical information about the paleoredox conditions at time of formation and the subsequent changes in these conditions. This paper describes in detail an algorithm designed to model the growth and generate significant populations of both framboids and sunflowers, using functions of the statistical software R. The source code is provided as supplementary material to this paper. The algorithm uses several growth mechanisms based on dependence on or independence of the number of nanocrystals for framboids and the external diameter for sunflowers. Variability in the generated size populations depends on several parameters of the algorithm, such as the diameter of the nanocrystals, the initial diameter of the framboids and the maximum value of the random numbers. The resulting populations of framboids and sunflowers can be compared with data obtained from analysis of real samples in order to understand and model the genetic paleo-processes.

Keywords

Pyrite framboids Pyrite sunflower R-package Redox conditions Computer simulation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study is part of the work of the Research Group number 910197 of the Community of Madrid and the Complutense University of Madrid “Procesos Metalogenéticos en Sistemas Magmáticos e Hidrotermales.” Victor Cárdenes is grateful to his Marie Curie IEF grant 623082 TOMOSLATE, from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development.

References

  1. Bond DPG, Wignall PB (2010) Pyrite framboid study of marine Permian-Triassic boundary sections: a complex anoxic event and its relationship to contemporaneous mass extinction. Geol Soc Am Bull 122:1265–1279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Butler IB, Rickard D (2000) Framboidal pyrite formation via the oxidation of iron (II) monosulfide by hydrogen sulphide. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 64:2665–2672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cárdenes V, Cnudde V, Merinero R, Dewanckele J, de Boever W, Cnudde JP (2015) Determination of the REDOX paleoconditions: a high resolution X-ray tomography study of micro pyrite occurrence. In: Long B, Francus P (eds) 2nd International conference on Tomography of Materials and Structures. INRS, Quebec, AbstractsGoogle Scholar
  4. Cárdenes V, Merinero R, De Boever W, Rubio-Ordóñez Á, Dewanckele J, Cnudde J-P, Boone M, Van Hoorebeke L, Cnudde V (2016) Characterization of micropyrite populations in low-grade metamorphic slate: a study using high-resolution X-ray tomography. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 441:924–935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cavalazzi B, Barbieri R, Cady SL, George AD, Gennaro S, Westall F, Lui A, Canteri R, Rossi AP, Ori GG, Taj-Eddine K (2012) Iron-framboids in the hydrocarbon-related middle Devonian Hollard Mound of the anti-atlas mountain range in Morocco: evidence of potential microbial biosignatures. Sediment Geol 263:183–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cavalazzi B, Agangi A, Barbieri R, Franchi F, Gasparotto G (2014) The formation of low-temperature sedimentary pyrite and its relationship with biologically-induced processes. Geol Ore Deposits 56:395–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ding H, Yao S, Chen J (2014) Authigenic pyrite formation and re-oxidation as an indicator of an unsteady-state redox sedimentary environment: evidence from the intertidal mangrove sediments of Hainan Island, China. Cont Shelf Res 78:85–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eberl DD, Drits VA, Srodon J (1998) Deducing growth mechanisms for minerals from the shapes of crystal size distributions. Am J Sci 298:499–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eberl DD, Kile DE, Drits VA (2002) On geological interpretations of crystal size distributions: constant vs. proportionate growth. Am Mineral 87:1235–1241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Folk RL (2005) Nannobacteria and the formation of framboidal pyrite: textural evidence. J Earth Syst Sci 114:369–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Grimes ST, Davies KL, Butler IB, Brock F, Edwards D, Rickard D, Briggs DEG, Parkes RJ (2002) Fossil plants from the Eocene London clay: the use of pyrite textures to determine the mechanism of pyritization. J Geol Soc 159:493–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kucha H, Schroll E, Raith JG, Halas S (2010) Microbial sphalerite formation in carbonate-hosted Zn-Pb ores, Bleiberg, Austria: micro- to nanotextural and sulfur isotope evidence. Econ Geol 105:1005–1023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Large DJ, Sawlowicz Z, Spratt J (1999) A cobaltite-framboidal pyrite association from the Kupferschiefer: possible implications for trace element behaviour during the earliest stages of diagenesis. Mineral Mag 63:353–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Large DJ, Fortey NJ, Milodowski AE, Christy AG, Dodd J (2001) Petrographic observations of iron, copper, and zinc sulfides in freshwater canal sediment. J Sediment Res 71:61–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. MacLean LCW, Tyliszczak T, Gilbert PUPA, Zhou D, Pray TJ, Onstott TC, Southam G (2008) A high-resolution chemical and structural study of framboidal pyrite formed within a low-temperature bacterial biofilm. Geobiology 6:471–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Merinero R, Lunar R, Martinez-Frias J, Somoza L, Diaz-del-Rio V (2008) Iron oxyhydroxide and sulphide mineralization in hydrocarbon seep-related carbonate submarine chimneys, Gulf of Cadiz (SW Iberian Peninsula). Mar Pet Geol 25:706–713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Merinero R, Lunar R, Somoza L, Diaz-Del-Rio V, Martinez-Frias J (2009) Nucleation, growth and oxidation of framboidal pyrite associated with hydrocarbon-derived submarine chimneys: lessons learned from the Gulf of Cadiz. Eur J Mineral 21:947–961CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Merinero R, Lunar R, Gonzalez FJ, Somoza L, Martinez-Frias J (2014) A mathematical algorithm to simulate the growth and transformation of framboidal pyrite: characterization of the biogenic influence in their size distributions. In: Pardo-Iguzquiza E, Heredia GAC, Moreno-Merino J, Duran JJ, Vargas-Guzman JA (eds) Mathematics of planet earth. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 793–796Google Scholar
  19. Merinero R, Cárdenes V, Lunar R, Boone MN. Cnudde V (2017) Representative size distributions of framboidal, euhedral and sunflower pyrite from high-resolution X-ray tomography and scanning electron microscopy analyses. Am Mineral 102:620–631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Popa R, Kinkle BK, Badescu A (2004) Pyrite framboids as biomarkers for iron-sulfur systems. Geomicrobiol J 21:193–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. R Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  22. Rickard D, Luther GW (1997) Kinetics of pyrite formation by the H2S oxidation of iron (II) monosulfide in aqueous solutions between 25 and 125 °C: the mechanism. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 61:135–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. RStudio Team (2015) RStudio: integrated development for R. RStudio Inc., Boston http://www.rstudio.com/
  24. Sawlowicz Z (1993) Pyrite framboids and their development: a new conceptual mechanism. Int J Earth Sci 82:148–156Google Scholar
  25. Suits NS, Wilkin RT (1998) Pyrite formation in the water column and sediments of a meromictic lake. Geology 26:1099–1102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wei H, Chen D, Wang J, Yu H, Tucker ME (2012) Organic accumulation in the lower Chihsia formation (Middle Permian) of South China: constraints from pyrite morphology and multiple geochemical proxies. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 353:73–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wignall PB, Newton R, Brookfield ME (2005) Pyrite framboid evidence for oxygen-poor deposition during the Permian–Triassic crisis in Kashmir. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 216:183–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wilkin RT, Barnes HL (1997) Formation processes of framboidal pyrite. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 61:323–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wilkin RT, Barnes HL, Brantley SL (1996) The size distribution of framboidal pyrite in modern sediments: an indicator of redox conditions. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 60:3897–3912CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Crystallography and Mineralogy DepartmentComplutense University of MadridMadridSpain
  2. 2.Pore-scale Processes in Geomaterials Research Team (PProGRess)Ghent UniversityGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations