Mineralogy and Petrology

, Volume 95, Issue 1–2, pp 105–112 | Cite as

Amphibole—a key indicator mineral for petrogenesis of the Purulia carbonatite, West Bengal, India

  • Aniket Chakrabarty
  • Amit Kumar Sen
  • Tamal K. Ghosh
Original Paper

Abstract

The Purulia carbonatite of West Bengal, India is a dyke occurring within the 100 km long South Purulia Shear Zone (SPSZ), which marks the boundary between the Singhbhum Group of Rocks and the Chhotanagpur Granite Gneissic Complex (CGGC). It is composed essentially of calcite with apatite, amphibole, phlogopite, biotite, magnetite and ilmenite as common accessories. Based on optical properties and mineral chemistry two varieties of the amphibole are recognized: magnesiokatophorite and richterite. The latter is characterized by a relatively high content of Si and Na, while the former is enriched in Al and Ca. Such a composition of the amphibole is characteristic for the intermediate to the late stage carbonatite development. These two co-existing amphiboles reflect a sudden variation in total pressure within the magma chamber during the intrusion of the carbonatite dyke. It is inferred that the magnesiokatophorite started crystallizing first along with calcite and apatite. Subsequently, the ascent of carbonatitic magma to a more shallow depth (hypabyssal) resulted in the formation of the richterite. The difference in amphibole composition reflects a variation in the total pressure within the magma chamber that took place during the formation of the Purulia carbonatite. However, an alternative explanation, such as wallrock contamination, or liquid immiscibility, followed by carbonate magma segregation or magma mixing, may also be possible. There is, however, no evidence corroborating such an interpretation.

References

  1. Basu SK (1988) Investigation of apatite and other associated minerals in the southern Shear Zone, Purulia District, West Bengal. Extended Abstracts, Rec Geol Surv India 122: Part 2, 42Google Scholar
  2. Basu SK (1993) Alkaline–carbonatite complex in precambrian of South Purulia Shear Zone, Eastern India: its characteristics and mineral potentialities. Indian Miner 47:179–194Google Scholar
  3. Bell K (1989) Carbonatites genesis and evolution. Unwin Hyman, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhattacharya C, Chakraborty A, Banerjee PK (1991) Petrology–geochemistry of apatite–magnetite amphibolites and their role in phosphate mineralisation along the southern shear zone, Puruliya Dt., West Bengal. Indian J Earth Sci 18:94–109Google Scholar
  5. Bulakh AG (1965) Amphibole group. In: Kukharenko AA (ed) Kaledonskii kompleks ul’traosnovnykh, shchelochnykh porod i karbonatitov Kol’skogo Poluostrova i severnoi Karelia. Nedra, Moscow, pp 453–463 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  6. Chakhmouradian AR, Zaitsev AN (2002) Calcite–Amphibole–Clinopyroxene rock from the Afrikanda Complex, Kola Peninsula, Russia: mineralogy and a possible link to carbonatites. III. Silicate minerals. Can Mineral 40:1347–1374Google Scholar
  7. Dasgupta S, Bhattacharya DK (1992) Apatite mineralisation along Singhbhum and Purulia–Bankura shear zones: their nature and physico-chemical characteristics. Indian Miner 46:123–132Google Scholar
  8. Fabriés J (1978) Les types paragénétiques des amphiboles sodiques dans les roches magmatiques. Bull Minéral 101:155–165Google Scholar
  9. Giret A, Bonin B, Leger JM (1980) Amphibole compositional trends in oversaturated and understurated alaklaine plutonic ring-complexes. Can Mineral 18:481–495Google Scholar
  10. Hammarstrom JM, Zen E (1986) Aluminium in hornblende: an empirical igneous geobarometer. Am Mineral 71:1297–1313Google Scholar
  11. Hogarth DD (1989) Pyrochlore, apatite and amphibole: distinctive minerals in carbonatite. In: Bell K (eds) Carbonatites: genesis and evolution. Unwin Hyman, London, pp 105–148Google Scholar
  12. Holland T, Blundy J (1994) Non-ideal interactions in calcic amphiboles and their bearing on amphibole–plagioclase thermometry. Contrib Mineral Petrol 116:433–447Google Scholar
  13. Hollister LS, Grissom GC, Peters EK, Stowell HH, Sisson VB (1987) Confirmation of the emperical correlation of Al in hornblende with pressure of sloidification of calc-alkaline plutons. Am Mineral 72:231–239Google Scholar
  14. Kapustin YL (1973) Mineralogiya Kory Vyvetrivaniya Karbonatitov. Nedra, Moscow (in Russian)Google Scholar
  15. Kapustin YL (1980) Mineralogy of carbonatites. Amerind, New Delhi, India (translated by DK Biswas)Google Scholar
  16. Leake BE (1978) Nomenclature of amphiboles. Mineral Mag 42:533–563Google Scholar
  17. Leake BE, Woolley AR, Arps CES, Birch WD, Gilbert MC, Grice JD, Hawthorne FC, Kato A, Kisch HJ, Krivovichev VG, Linthout K, Larid J, Mandarino JA, Maresch WV, Nickel EH, Rock NMS, Schumacher JC, Smith DC, Stephenson NCN, Ungaretti L, Whittaker EJW, Youzhi G (1997) Nomenclature of amphiboles: report of the Subcommittee on Amphiboles of the International Mineralogical Association, Commission on New Minerals and Mineral Names. Can Mineral 35:219–246Google Scholar
  18. Leake BE, Woolley AR, Birch WD, Burke EAJ, Ferraris G, Grice JD, Hawthorne FC, Kisch HJ, Krivovichev VG, Schumacher JC, Stephenson NCN, Whittaker EJW (2004) Nomenclature of amphiboles: additions and revisions to the International Mineralogical Associations amphibole nomenclature. Min Mag 68(1):209–215Google Scholar
  19. Meeker GP, Bern AM, Brownfield IK, Lowers HA, Sutley SJ, Hoefen TM, Vance JS (2003) The composition and morphology of amphiboles from the Rainey Creek Complex, Near Libby, Montana. Am Mineral 88:1955–1969Google Scholar
  20. Mitchell RH (1990) A review of the compositional variation of amphiboles in alkaline plutonic complexes. Lithos 26:135–156Google Scholar
  21. Samoylov VS (1977) Karbonatity (fatsii i usloviya obrazovaniya). Nauka, Moscow (in Russian)Google Scholar
  22. Samoylov VS, Gormasheva GS (1975) Alkali amphiboles of carbonatites and genetically related rocks. Zapiski Vsesoyuznogo Mineralogicheskogo Obshchetva 104:145–159 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  23. Samoylov VS, Gormasheva GS, Chernysheva EA (1974) Low-aluminum alkalic amphiboles of carbonatites. Yearbook Institute of Geochemistry, Irskutsk, pp 189–193Google Scholar
  24. Schmidt MW (1992) Amphibole composition in tonalite as a function of pressure: an experimental calibration of the Al-in-hornblende barometer. Contrib Mineral Petrol 110:304–310Google Scholar
  25. Sokolov SV (1985) Carbonates in ultramafic alkali-rock, and carbonatite intrusions. Geochem Int 22:150–166Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aniket Chakrabarty
    • 1
  • Amit Kumar Sen
    • 1
  • Tamal K. Ghosh
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Earth SciencesIIT RoorkeeRoorkeeIndia
  2. 2.Institute Instrumentation CentreIIT RoorkeeRoorkeeIndia
  3. 3.R&D DivisionTata Steel LtdJamshedpurIndia

Personalised recommendations