Advertisement

Mineralogy and Petrology

, Volume 94, Issue 1–2, pp 45–60 | Cite as

Late Miocene to Pleistocene potassic volcanism in the Republic of Macedonia

  • Yotzo Yanev
  • Blazo Boev
  • Carlo Doglioni
  • Fabrizio Innocenti
  • Piero Manetti
  • Zoltan Pecskay
  • Sonia TonariniEmail author
  • Massimo D’Orazio
Original Paper

Abstract

The potassic (K) to ultrapotassic (UK) volcanic rocks cropping out in the Vardar Zone of Macedonia and southern Serbia span in age from Late Miocene (6.57 Ма) to Pleistocene (1.47 Ма). The main identified outcrops are in the Kumanovo, Sveti Nikole, Shtip and Demir Kapia areas; the southernmost occurrences of these volcanic rocks are located in the large Kozuf Massif (Voras Massif in Greece) at the Macedonia–Greek border. Three distinct groups may be distinguished. The first group has a shoshonitic affinity and occurs in the Kozuf Massif (LMg-K group); it includes shoshonites to rare rhyolites, with latites and trachytes being the most widespread products. The second group consists of potassic rocks (HMg-K group, K2O/Na2O between 1.0 and 1.8) occurring in both southern Serbia (Cer and Slavujevci) and Macedonia (Djuristhe, near Sveti Nikole). The third group, present only in Macedonia, consists of ultrapotassic rocks (UK group, K2O/Na2O >1.8, Mg# >71) classified as UK shoshonites, UK latites and UK phonotephrites; overall, they show a “Roman Province type” affinity (Group III of Foley, Venturelli, Green, Toscani, Earth Sci Rev 24:81–134, 1987). Geochemically, the studied rocks exhibit strong enrichment in LILE, Th and Pb, as well as relative depletion in Ta–Nb and Hf; such signatures are typical of magmas generated in convergent geotectonic settings. In the HMg-K and UK rocks, Sr and Nd isotopic ratios vary from 0.70768 to 0.71040, and 0.51243 to 0.512149, respectively. The rocks of the LMg-K group show relatively limited Sr and Nd isotope variations (0.7087–0.7093 and 0.51233–0.51229), which correlate with a decrease in MgO and increase in SiO2 contents. The geochemical features of the LMg-K volcanic rocks indicate that their evolution was mainly driven by fractional crystallization coupled with contamination by feldspar-rich crustal materials. In contrast, the HMg-K and UK rocks have not been significantly modified by crustal contamination, and their geochemical features are considered to reflect lithospheric mantle heterogeneity acquired during the subduction of the Western Vardar Ocean and the Apulian plate. The metasomatizing agent was apparently more enriched in Zr, Th, Ta and Ce than in fluid-mobile elements, such as Pb and Cs, suggesting that it was characterized by a high melt/fluid ratio. The potassic and ultrapotassic magmatic activity developed in response to the Pliocene–Pleistocene extension in the Vardar Zone, in turn related to the opposite propagation of extension in the Aegean and Pannonian basins (respectively SW and NE).

Keywords

Subduction Mantle Source Late Miocene Lithospheric Mantle Crustal Contamination 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was financially supported by PRIN (Cofin-MIUR) and by CNR grants. We thank Dejan Prelević and Hilary Downes for their constructive reviews; the editorial handling of Johann Raith was greatly appreciated.

References

  1. Agostini S, Doglioni C, Innocenti F, Manetti P, Tonarini S, Savasçin MY (2007) The transition from subduction-related to intraplate Neogene magmatism in the Western Anatolia and Aegean area. In: Beccaluva L, Bianchini G, Wilson M (eds) Cenozoic volcanism in the Mediterranean area. Geol Soc Am Spec Paper 418:1–15Google Scholar
  2. Altherr R, Meyer H-P, Holl A, Volker F, Alibert C, McCulloch MT, Majer V (2004) Geochemical and Sr–Nd–Pb isotopic characteristics of Latе Cenozoic leucite lamproites from the East European Alpine belt (Macedonia and Yugoslavia). Contrib Mineral Petrol 147:58–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Battaglia M, Murray MH, Serpelloni E, Bürgmann R (2004) The Adriatic region: An independent microplate within the Africa–Eurasia collision zone. Geophys Res Lett 31:L09605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beattie P (1993) Olivine-melt and orthopyroxene-melt equilibria. Contrib Mineral Petrol 115:103–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bennet RA, Hreinsdóttir S, Buble G, Basić T, Bacić Z, Marjanovic M, Casale G, Gendaszek A, Cowan D (2008) Eocene to present subduction of southern Adria mantle lithosphere beneath the Dinarides. Geology 36:3–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boccaletti M, Manetti P, Peccerillo A (1974) Hypothesis on the plate tectonic evolution of the Carpatho-Balkan arcs. Earth Planet Sci Lett 23:193–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boev B, Lepitkova S (1991) Petrologic features of the volcanic rocks from the vicinity of Alshar. Geol Maced 5:15–30Google Scholar
  8. Boev B, Yanev Y (2001) Tertiary magmatism within the Republic of Macedonia: a review. Acta Vulcanol 13:57–72Google Scholar
  9. Carminati E, Doglioni C, Carrara G, Dabovski C, Dumurdjanov N, Gaetani M, Georgiev G, Mauffret A, Sartori R, Seranne M, Scrocca D, Scionti V, Torelli L, Zagorchev I, Argnani A (2004) Transmed: section III. In: Cavazza W, Roure F, Spakman W, Stampfli G, Ziegler P (eds) The Transmed atlas. 32nd IGC Florence, CD-Rom. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  10. Conticelli S, D’Antonio M, Pinarelli L, Civetta L (2002) Source contamination and mantle heterogeneity in the genesis of Italian potassic and ultrapotassic rocks: Sr–Nd–Pb isotope data from Roman Province and Southern Tuscany. Mineral Petrol 74:189–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cvetković V, Prelević D, Downes H, Jovanović M, Vaselli O, Pécskay Z (2004) Origin and geodynamic significance of Tertiary postcollisional basaltic magmatism in Serbia (central Balkan Peninsula). Lithos 73:161–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cvetković V, Downes H, Prelević D, Lazarov M, Resimic-Sarić K (2007) Geodynamic significance of ultramafic xenoliths from eastern Serbia: relics of sub-arc oceanic mantle? J Geodynam 43:504–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Doglioni C, Busatta C, Bolis G, Marianini L, Zanella M (1996) On the structural evolution of the eastern Balkans (Bulgaria). Mar Pet Geol 13:225–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dumurdzanov N, Serafimovski T, Burchfiel BC (2004) Evolution of the Neogene–Pleistocene basins of Macedonia. Geol Soc Am, Digital Map Chart Series 1:1–20Google Scholar
  15. Dumurdzanov N, Serafimovski T, Burchfiel BC (2005) Cenozoic tectonics of Macedonia and its relation to the South Balkan extensional regime. Geosphere 1:1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Foley SF, Venturelli G, Green DH, Toscani L (1987) The ultrapotassic rocks: characteristics, classification, and constraints for petrogenetic models. Earth Sci Rev 24:81–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harkovska A, Yanev Y, Marchev P (1989) General features of the Paleogene orogenic magmatism in Bulgaria. Geol Balc 19(1):37–72Google Scholar
  18. Irvine TN, Baragar WRA (1971) A guide to the chemical classification of the common volcanic rocks. Can J Earth Sci 8:523–548Google Scholar
  19. Kissel C, Speranza F, Milićević V (1995) Paleomagnetism of external southern and central Dinarides and northern Albanides: implications for the Cenozoic activity of the Scutari-Peć transverse zone. J Geophys Res 100:14999–15007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kolios N, Innocenti F, Manetti P, Peccerillo A, Giuliani O (1980) The Pliocene volcanism of the Voras Mts (Central Macedonia, Greece). Bull Volcanol 43:553–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kovács I, Csontos L, Szabó C, Bali E, Falus G, Benedek K, Zajacz Z (2007) Paleogene–early Miocene to Quaternary volcanism in the Carpathian Pannonian region: role of subduction, extension and mantle plume. Geol Soc Am Special Pap 418:93–112Google Scholar
  22. Le Maitre RW (1989) A classification of igneous rocks and glossary of terms. Blackwell Scientific Publication, Oxford, p 193Google Scholar
  23. Le Maitre RW (2002) Igneous rocks—a classification and glossary of terms. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  24. McDonough WF, Sun SS (1995) The composition of the Earth. Chem Geol 120:223–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Niu Y, O’Hara MJ (2003) Origin of ocean island basalts: a new perspective from petrology, geochemistry, and mineral physics considerations. J Geophys Res 108:2209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pamić J, Gusic I, Jelaska V (1998) Geodynamic evolution of the central Dinarides. Tectonophysics 297:251–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Peccerillo A (2005) Plio-Quaternary volcanism in Italy: petrology, geochemistry, geodynamics. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  28. Peccerillo A, Martinotti G (2006) The Western Mediterranean lamproitic magmatism: origin and geodynamic significance. Terra Nova 18:109–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Piromallo C, Morelli A (2003) P wave tomography of the mantle under Alpine-Mediterranean area. J Geophys Res 108:20065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Prelević D, Foley SF (2007) Accretion of arc-oceanic lithospheric mantle in the Mediterranean: evidence from extremely high-Mg olivines and Cr-rich spinel inclusions from lamproites. Earth Planet Sci Lett 256:120–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Prelević D, Foley SF, Cvetković V, Jovanović M, Melzer S (2001) Tertiary ultrapotassic-potassic rocks from Serbia, Yugoslavia. Acta Vulcanol 13:101–115Google Scholar
  32. Prelević D, Foley SF, Romer RL, Cvetković V, Downes H (2005) Tertiary ultrapotassic volcanism in Serbia: constraints on petrogenesis and mantle source characteristics. J Petrol 46:1443–1487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Prelević D, Foley SF, Cvetković V (2007) A review of petrogenesis of Mediterranean Tertiary lamproites: a perspective from the Serbian ultrapotassic province. Geol Soc Am Special Pap 418:113–129Google Scholar
  34. Putirka K, Mikaelian H, Ryerson FJ, Shaw H (2003) New clinopyroxene-liquid thermobarometers for mafic, evolved and volatile-bearing lava compositions, with applications to lavas from Tibet and the Snake River Plain, ID. Am Mineral 88:1542–1554Google Scholar
  35. Putirka K, Perfit M, Ryerson FJ, Jackson MG (2007) Ambient and excess mantle temperatures, olivine thermometry and active vs. passive upwelling. Chem Geol 241:177–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Steiger KH, Jäger E (1977) Subcommission on geochronology: convention on the use of decay constants in geo-and cosmochronology. Earth Planet Sci Lett 36:359–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Taylor SR, McLennan SM (1995) The geochemical evolution of the continental crust. Rev Geophys 33:241–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Terzić M, Svešnikova EV (1991) Age of leucite-bearing rocks in Yugoslavia. Comptes Rendus des Séances de la Societé de Géologie Serbe de Géologie pour les années 1987, 1988, 1989:283–287Google Scholar
  39. Venturelli G, Capedri S, Di Battistini G, Crawford AJ, Kogarko LN, Celestini S (1984a) The ultrapotassic rocks from southeastern Spain. Lithos 17:37–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Venturelli G, Thorpe RS, Dal Piaz GV, Del Moro A, Potts JP (1984b) Petrogenesis of calc-alkaline, shoshonitic and associated ultrapotassic Oligocene volcanic rocks from the northwestern Alps. Contrib Mineral Petrol 86:209–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yanev Y (2003) Mantle source of the Paleogene collision-related magmas of the Eastern Rhodopes (Bulgaria) and Western Thrace (Greece): characteristics of the mafic magmatic rocks. N Jahrb Mineral Abh 178:131–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yanev Y, Boev B, Doglioni C, Innocenti F, Manetti P, Lepitkova S (2003) Neogene ultrapotassic-potassic volcanic association in the Vardar zone (Macedonia). CR Acad Bulg Sci 56(4):53–58Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yotzo Yanev
    • 1
  • Blazo Boev
    • 2
  • Carlo Doglioni
    • 3
  • Fabrizio Innocenti
    • 4
    • 5
  • Piero Manetti
    • 5
  • Zoltan Pecskay
    • 6
  • Sonia Tonarini
    • 5
    Email author
  • Massimo D’Orazio
    • 4
  1. 1.Geological InstituteBulgarian Academy of SciencesSofiaBulgaria
  2. 2.University St Ciril and Metodii, Faculty of Mining and GeologyShtipRepublic of Macedonia
  3. 3.Università La Sapienza, Dipartimento di Scienze della TerraRomeItaly
  4. 4.Università di Pisa, Dipartimento di Scienze della TerraPisaItaly
  5. 5.Istituto di Geoscienze e Georisorse, CNRPisaItaly
  6. 6.ATOMKI, Hungarian Academy of SciencesDebrecenHungary

Personalised recommendations