Appraisal of immediate and late effects of mobile phone radiations at 2100 MHz on mitotic activity and DNA integrity in root meristems of Allium cepa
The present study evaluated the potential of 2100 MHz radiofrequency radiations to act as cytotoxic and genotoxic agent. Fresh onion (Allium cepa L.) roots were exposed to electromagnetic field radiations (EMF-r) for different durations (1 h and 4 h) and evaluated for mitotic index (MI), phase index, chromosomal aberrations, and DNA damage. DNA damage was investigated with the help of the comet assay by assessing various parameters like % head DNA (HDNA), % tail DNA (TDNA), tail moment (TM), and olive tail moment (OTM). Effects of EMF-r exposure were also compared with that of methyl methanesulfonate (MMS; 90 μM), which acted as a positive control. The post-exposure effects of EMF-r after providing the test plants with an acclimatization period of 24 h were also evaluated. Compared to the control, a significant increase in the MI and aberration percentage was recorded upon 4 h of exposure. However, no specific trend of phase index in response to exposure was detected. EMF-r exposure incited DNA damage with a significant decrease in HDNA accompanied by an increase in TDNA upon exposure of 4 h. However, TM and OTM did not change significantly upon exposure as compared to that of control. Analysis of the post-exposure effects of EMF-r did not show any significant change/recovery. Our data, thus, suggest the potential cytotoxic and genotoxic nature of 2100 MHz EMF-r. Our study bears great significance in view of the swiftly emergent EMF-r in the surrounding environment and their potential for inciting aberrations at the chromosomal level, thus posing a genetic hazard.
KeywordsElectromagnetic field radiations Onion Chromosomal aberrations Genotoxicity Recovery
The authors are thankful to the Science and Engineering Research Board, Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi (India) for financial support.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Andreuccetti D, Fossi R, Petrucci C (1997) An Internet resource for the calculation of the dielectric properties of body tissues in the frequency range 10 Hz–100 GHz, IFACCNR, Florence, Italy. 2017. Based on data published by C. Gabriel et al. in 1996. Available online at http://niremf.ifac.cnr.it/tissprop/. Accessed 10 Aug 2018
- Beaubois E, Girard S, Lallechere S, Davies E, Paladian F, Bonnet P, Ledoigt G, Vian A (2007) Intercellular communication in plants: evidence for two rapidly transmitted systemic signals generated in response to electromagnetic field stimulation in tomato. Plant Cell Environ 30:834–844. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01669.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bernardini C, Zannoni A, Turba ME, Bacci ML, Forni M, Mesirca P, Remondini D, Castellani G, Bersani F (2007) Effects of 50 Hz sinusoidal magnetic fields on Hsp27, Hsp70, Hsp90 expression in porcine aortic endothelial cells (PAEC). Bioelectromagnetics 28:231–237. https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.20299 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Çenesiz M, Atakişi O, Akar A, Önbilgin G, Ormanc N (2011) Effects of 900 and 1800 MHz electromagnetic field application on electrocardiogram, nitric oxide, total antioxidant capacity, total oxidant capacity, total protein, albumin and globulin levels in Guinea pigs. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg 17:357–362. https://doi.org/10.9775/kvfd.2010.3410 Google Scholar
- Cretescu I, Rodica C, Velicevici G, Ropciuc S, Buzamat G (2013) Response of barley seedlings to microwaves at 945 MHz. Sci Pap Anim Sci Biotechnol 46:185–191Google Scholar
- Franzellitti S, Valbonesi P, Ciancaglini N, Biondi C, Contin A, Bersani F, Fabbri E (2010) Transient DNA damage induced by high-frequency electromagnetic fields (GSM 1.8 GHz) in the human trophoblast HTR-8/SVneo cell line evaluated with the alkaline comet assay. Mutat Res 683:35–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2009.10.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Klonowski W (2018) Non-thermal effects of electromagnetic fields in biology and medicine. In: Eskola H, Väisänen O, Viik J, Hyttinen J (eds) EMBEC & NBC 2017. EMBEC 2017, NBC 2017. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 65. Springer, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
- Kumar G, Kesarwani S, Sharma V (2003) Clastogenic effect of individual and combined treatment of gamma rays and EMS in Lens culinaris. J Cytol Genet 4:149–154Google Scholar
- Lai H, Singh NP (1997) Melatonin and N-tert-butyl-α-phenylnitrone block 60-Hz magnetic field-induced DNA single and double strand breaks in rat brain cells. J Pineal Res 22:152–162. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-079X.1997.tb00317.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Prokhorova IM, Kovaleva MI, Fomicheva AN, Babanazarova OV (2008) Spatial and temporal dynamics of mutagenic activity of water in lake Nero. Inland Water Biol 12:1–25Google Scholar
- Roux D, Vian A, Girard S, Bonnet P, Paladian F, Davies E, Ledoigt G (2008) High frequency (900 MHz) low amplitude (5 V m−1) electromagnetic field: a genuine environmental stimulus that affects transcription, translation, calcium and energy charge in tomato. Planta 227:883–891. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-007-0664-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sykes PJ, McCallum BD, Bangay MJ, Hooker AM, Morley AA (2001) Effect of exposure to 900 MHz radiofrequency radiation on intrachromosomal recombination in pKZ1 mice. Radiat Res 156:495–502. https://doi.org/10.1667/0033-7587(2001)156[0495.EOETMR]2.0CO:2Google Scholar
- Tice RR, Agurell E, Anderson D, Burlinson B, Hartmann A, Kobayashi H, Miyamae Y, Rojas E, Ryu JC, Sasaki YF (2000) Single cell gel/comet assay: guidelines for in vitro and in vivo genetic toxicology testing. Environ Mol Mutagen 35:206–221. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2280(2000)35:3%3C206::AID-EM8%3E3.0.CO;2-J CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Verschaeve L, Slaets D, Van Gorp U, Maes A, Vanderkom J (1994) In vitro and in vivo genetic effects of microwaves from mobile phone frequencies in human and rat peripheral blood lymphocytes. In: Simunic D (ed) Proceedings of cost 244 meetings on mobile communication and extremely low frequency field: instrumentation and measurements in bioelectromagnetics research, Information Venture Inc., Plzen, pp 74–83Google Scholar
- Vian A, Davies E, Gendraud M, Bonnet P (2016) Plant responses to high frequency electromagnetic fields. Biomed Res Int Article ID 1830262, 13 pages. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/1830262