Advertisement

Protoplasma

, Volume 255, Issue 4, pp 1195–1204 | Cite as

Phospholipase Dδ assists to cortical microtubule recovery after salt stress

  • Jindřiška Angelini
  • Stanislav Vosolsobě
  • Petr Skůpa
  • Angela Yeuan Yen Ho
  • Erica Bellinvia
  • Olga Valentová
  • Jan Marc
Original Article

Abstract

The dynamic microtubule cytoskeleton plays fundamental roles in the growth and development of plants including regulation of their responses to environmental stress. Plants exposed to hyper-osmotic stress commonly acclimate, acquiring tolerance to variable stress levels. The underlying cellular mechanisms are largely unknown. Here, we show, for the first time, by in vivo imaging approach that linear patterns of phospholipase Dδ match the localization of microtubules in various biological systems, validating previously predicted connection between phospholipase Dδ and microtubules. Both the microtubule and linear phospholipase Dδ structures were disintegrated in a few minutes after treatment with oryzalin or salt. Moreover, by using immunofluorescence confocal microscopy of the cells in the root elongation zone of Arabidopsis, we have shown that the cortical microtubules rapidly depolymerized within 30 min of treatment with 150 or 200 mM NaCl. Within 5 h of treatment, the density of microtubule arrays was partially restored. A T-DNA insertional mutant lacking phospholipase Dδ showed poor recovery of microtubule arrays following salt exposition. The restoration of microtubules was significantly retarded as well as the rate of root growth, but roots of overexpressor GFP-PLDδ prepared in our lab, have grown slightly better compared to wild-type plants. Our results indicate that phospholipase Dδ is involved in salt stress tolerance, possibly by direct anchoring and stabilization of de novo emerging microtubules to the plasma membrane, providing novel insight into common molecular mechanism during various stress events.

Keywords

Phospholipase Dδ Microtubule dynamics Salt stress Arabidopsis roots BY-2 

Introduction

Salinity stress is a major environmental issue worldwide, affecting most irrigated agricultural land. Excess cytoplasmic Na+ is toxic to cells because it interferes with K+ uptake and nutrition. To alleviate the effects of salt stress, plants use a variety signaling mechanisms that lead to ionic and osmotic homeostasis, regulation of cell division and expansion, and detoxification signaling for minimizing and repairing the damage (Golldack et al. 2014).

Besides biochemical processes, plants can also exhibit morphological changes to their roots. Growth rates of primary root are reduced in response to mild salt stress. Changes in cell growth rate are preceded by an alteration of microtubule dynamics, among other factors (Wang et al. 2007; West et al. 2004). Interestingly, Arabidopsis seedlings withstand salt stress better when microtubules (MTs) were depolymerized and actin filaments more polymerized during the early stages of salt stress, whereas the converse cytoskeletal situation resulted in a higher rate of seedling death (Wang et al. 2007; Wang et al. 2010).

Phospholipid signaling is one of the molecular mechanisms involved in salt stress tolerance. The important player of this signaling besides phospholipase A2 and phospholipase C is phospholipase D (PLD) which hydrolyzes membrane phospholipids to produce a free head-group and phosphatidic acid (PA), an important second messenger in plants. From the 12 subgroups of Arabidopsis PLDs, PLD α1, α3, and δ are involved in salt stress signaling (Hong et al. 2016). From those, PLDδ can directly interact with cytoskeletal components. In a tubulin pull-down assay, a membrane-associated protein was purified from tobacco as a potential microtubule-plasma membrane linking protein (Marc et al. 1996) and an antibody raised against this protein reacted with PLDδ in an Arabidopsis cDNA library screen (Gardiner et al. 2001). Arabidopsis PLDδ used directly in a pull-down assay bound to β-tubulin, actin 7, flotillin homolog, and other proteins (Ho et al. 2009).

It was shown that PA can directly interact with MAP65-1 (microtubule-associated protein 65-1) and thus enhance polymerization and bundling of microtubules under salt stress conditions (Zhang et al. 2012). Microtubule stability is probably also regulated by degradation of certain MAPs. For example, SPR1 protein, known to stabilize microtubules, is rapidly degraded under salt stress, and this in turn allows fast reorganization of cortical microtubules (Wang et al. 2011). Interestingly, many environmental factors including salt, wounding, cold, fungal infection, heat stress, and osmotic stress that affect PLD activity also affect microtubule organization (Hong et al. 2016, Zhang et al. 2017). The enhanced fitness of stressed Arabidopsis plants depends on both increased expression (activation) or inhibition of PLDs and it differs in this regard according to the type of stress situation. Interestingly, also subsequent microtubule response differs substantially depending on the stress conditions (Hong et al. 2016, Zhang et al. 2017).

We hypothesized that the ability of plants to tolerate salt stress relies on the alignment of cortical microtubule arrays and their association with the plasma membrane by links with microtubule-associated proteins (MAPs) such as PLDδ (Dixit and Cyr 2004).

In the present study, we show for the first time that PLDδ decorates microtubule structures in vivo. Further, we explored the effects of NaCl stress during the very early stages of microtubule organization. The results show that high salt concentrations induce transient microtubule depolymerization, followed by restoration of cortical microtubules and maintenance of root growth under high salt stress. Exposure of the null Atpldδ mutant to salt stress showed that the lack of PLDδ hindered the restoration of the cortical microtubule array as well as root growth, suggesting that PLDδ, rather than its product PA, is involved in salt stress tolerance.

Materials and methods

Plant material and treatment

Live imaging experiments employed 3-day-old suspension cultures of tobacco BY-2 cells (Nicotiana tabaccum L cv. Bright-Yellow 2) (Nagata et al. 1992). One tenth of the final volume of BY-2 cells (inoculum) was weekly subcultured into the fresh, sterile liquid medium (4,3 g/L Murashige and Skoog salts, 30 g/L sucrose, 100 mg/L inositol, 1 mg/L thiamin, 0,2 mg/L 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, and 200 mg/L KH2PO4), pH = 5.8. Cells were cultivated in darkness at 26 °C on an orbital incubator (120 rpm). Co-localization experiments were performed on 9-day-old Arabidopsis thaliana (ecotype Columbia-0) plantlets transiently expressing microtubular marker RFP-MBD on the background of plants stably expressing GFP-AtPLDδ. In the experiments showing PLDδ patterns, localization, root growth after salt stress, and latrunculin treatment 5- to 12-day-old seedlings of Arabidopsis thaliana (ecotype Columbia-0) stably transformed with 35S::GFP-PLDδ construct and Arabidopsis thaliana (ecotype Columbia-0) expressing GFP-fABD2 (Voight et al. 2005) were used.

Five-day-old seedlings of wild-type (WT) Arabidopsis thaliana (ecotype Columbia-0) and the T-DNA insertional mutant Atpldδ (SALK_023247) were used in experiments investigating microtubule recovery after salt stress and root growth. Homozygous lines of T-DNA mutant Atpldδ were checked by PCR genotyping, specific primers were used according to Pinosa, who also verified lack of functional transcript in this line (Pinosa et al. 2013).

Seeds of all used lines of Arabidopsis thaliana were sterilized with 50% ethanol for 1–5 min, followed by 2.5% sodium hypochlorite with 0.1% Triton X-100 for 10 min, and washed four times in sterile Milli-Q water. Seeds were then sown under sterile conditions in Petri dishes containing nutrient medium [4.4 g/L basal salts (Murashige and Skoog 1962) supplemented with 1% (w/v) sucrose, pH to 5.7] solidified with 1.2% (w/v) agar. Seeds were imbibed at 4 °C for 48 h to ensure synchronous germination. Seedlings were grown on vertically oriented plates in a controlled growth chamber at constant light (80–100 μmol m−2 s−1) and air temperature (25 ± 1 °C).

Specified concentrations of NaCl were added to the nutrient medium before autoclaving. Arabidopsis seedlings in the experiment studying root growth were grown for 5 days on normal agar medium and then transferred to the medium containing salt using watchmaker’s forceps under sterile conditions. All chemicals were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, USA. Stock solution of oryzalin [4-(dipropylamino)-3,5-dinitrobenzenesulfonamide] (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) was diluted in growth medium to 20 μM concentration, cytoskeletal drug latrunculin B (Sigma-Aldrich, USA), and membrane specific dye FM 4-64 (ThermoFisher, Scientific) were solved in DMSO to prepare 1000× concentrated stock solution which was then diluted by growth medium to final concentrations and applied immediately on slides with the BY-2 cells or Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings.

Preparation of plant material expressing GFP-PLDδ and RFP-MBD

Tobacco BY-2 cells were transiently transformed according to the protocol recommended and supplied with Particle Delivery System, Helios 1000/He (Bio-Rad, USA). Gold particles 1.6 μm diameter (Bio-Rad laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) were coated with Gateway vector p2GWF7 (35S::AtPLDδ-GFP construct), p2FGW7 (35S::GFP-AtPLDδ construct), or binary vector pK7WGF2 containing cDNA of (35S::GFP-AtPLDδ construct) (Andreeva et al. 2009). After 20–24-h transformation, the expression of all constructs was observed.

Stable transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana, Col-0, wild type with binary vector pK7WGF2 (Ho et al. 2009) containing 35S::GFP-PLDδ construct were performed according to Clough and Bent (1998) using Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain C58C1.

For co-localization experiments, Arabidopsis plants stably expressing AtGFP-PLDδ were transiently transformed with A. tumefaciens strain C58C1 containing RFP tagged microtubular marker - RFP-MBD (microtubule-binding domain) inserted into the binary vector pGreen0029 (Hellens et al. 2000). Transformation procedure was performed according to Li et al. (2009) with the following modifications. Optical densities of A. tumefaciens according to OD600 reading were 0.1, 0.06, and 0.04. The expression of RFP-MBD was monitored in 24-h intervals up to 96 h. cDNA of HsMBD (Marc et al. 1998) was taken from p2RGW7 Gateway vector and later transferred into pGreen0029 binary vector with RFP reporter gene, downstream from the 35S promotor. All used Gateway vectors were provided by Prof. J. Marc, Sydney (personal communication).

Microtubule immunolabeling

Arabidopsis roots were processed for immunofluorescence microscopy using a modified method of Sugimoto et al. (2000). Whole seedlings were fixed for 40 min with 1.5% (v/v) paraformaldehyde and 0.5% glutaraldehyde in PMET buffer [50 mM PIPES, 2 mM MgSO4, 5 mM EGTA, 0.05% (v/v) triton X-100, pH 7.0] and rinsed in PMET buffer three times for 10 min. The roots of the seedlings were then digested for 15 min with 0.01% pectolyase and 0.1% pectinase in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) [10 mM Na2HPO4, 2 mM KH2PO4, 137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 0.02% (w/v) NaN3, pH 7.2]. Seedlings were subsequently rinsed three times for 5 min with PME buffer [50 mM PIPES, 2 mM MgSO4, 5 mM EGTA, pH 7.0] containing 10% glycerol, extracted with − 20 °C methanol for 10 min, and rehydrated in PBS for 10 min. Seedlings were then incubated overnight at 37 °C with a mouse monoclonal antibody (class IgM) against α-tubulin at 1:1000 dilution, then washed three times for 5 min in PBS, and incubated with a sheep-anti-mouse IgG antibody conjugated with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) at 1:30 dilution. After rinsing three times in PBS, the seedlings were mounted on multi-well slides (ICN Biomedicals, Cleveland OH, USA) in PBS with 20% glycerol (Agar Scientific, Stansted, Essex, UK). Cover-slips were sealed with clear nail polish.

Confocal laser scanning microscopy

Images for immunolocalization experiments and live imaging of BY-2 cells were acquired by confocal laser scanning microscope Zeiss LSM 5 DUO (Jena, Germany). Excitation at 488 nm with an argon ion laser was used for FITC fluorochrome. Optical sections of the epidermal layer in the root elongation zone were collected with a 63x Zeiss LCI Plan-Neofluar/Imm Korr/DIC (NA 1.30). Image projections for immunolocalization experiments were processed in Zeiss LSM Image Browser from at least 15 optical sections, 0.4 μm thick in the Z-axis for each Z-stack.

All of the final images were processed with Adobe Photoshop 7.0 (Adobe Systems, Mountain View, CA, USA) and Inkscape (Free Software Foundation, Inc., Boston, USA). In the microtubule density experiment the images of 6–8 roots were examined for each treatment.

Live images of Arabidopsis seedlings were obtained by confocal laser scanning microscope Zeiss 880 (Jena, Germany). Optical sections of cotyledon pavement cells were acquired with 63x Plan-Apochromat, Oil DIC M27 (NA 1.40) objective. Laser excitation 488 and 561 nm, band pass emission filter 499–540 and 579–633 nm respectively, were used for GFP and RFP visualization. Images were processed with ZEN Lite software (Zeiss, Jena, Germany) and Inkscape (Free Software Foundation, Inc., Boston, USA).

Image analysis

To determine the density of cortical microtubules per unit cell length, the number of microtubules crossing 20-μm longitudinal transects were counted in each of five cells in each of six replicate roots, for each time interval and two root regions (between 300 and 420 and 540–660 μm from the root apex). Number of microtubules per length unit was determined by manual counting in particular area of all photos in each Z-stack. Data obtained were analyzed for statistical significance using ANOVA.

Root growth

Root growth was quantified by marking the position of the root tip on the back of vertical Petri dishes each day during the experiment. The marked Petri dishes were then scanned, and the distances from the hypocotyl to the root tip were measured with ImageJ 1.30x software (Wayne Rasband, National Institutes of Health, USA; http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij). Fifteen roots were measured in each treatment for each time interval in two independent experiments. Time dependence of square root transformed root length were fitted by linear mixed-effects using “lmer” function from package “lme4” in R (RCoreTeam 2013), factors “plant identity” and “replication” were used as source of random variability, and factors “genotype variant” and “treatment type” as fixed effects. Significances of tested effects and their interactions were determined using “anova” function from package “lmerTest.”

Results

Fluorescently labeled PLDδ decorates microtubules

Biolistic transformation of BY-2 cells allowed us to achieve quick and reliable examination of the putative close physical connection of PLDδ with microtubules. While AtPLDδ-GFP (C-terminal fusion) construct demonstrated only homogenous GFP signal in the cells (Fig. 1a), fusion protein with GFP tag on N terminus, GFP-AtPLDδ in p2FGW7 vector, displayed two prevailing localization patterns in close proximity to the plasma membrane. Generally, a structured layer of small pellet-like dots below plasma membrane was observed, but also clear lines which resembled microtubules (Fig. 1b) were visible in some cells. Similar results were acquired using binary vector pK7WGF2 with GFP-AtPLDδ construct. (Fig. 1c).
Fig. 1

Different patterns of GFP-tagged PLDδ in suspension culture cells. Laser scanning microscope (CLSM 5 DUO – Zeiss) images of 3-day-old BY-2 tobacco cells. All visualized cells transiently express different vectors and constructs with GFP-tagged PLDδ. Transformation was realized using the biolistic approach. a Maximum intensity projection of 30 optical sections of homogenous PLDδ-GFP protein layer immediately beneath plasma membrane. Cells were transformed with 35S::PLDδ-GFP construct in expression vector. b Image represents linear protein pattern in single optical section underneath plasma membrane. For transformation was used 35S::GFP-PLDδ construct in expression vector. c Maximum intensity projection of 19 optical sections taken in tight proximity under plasma membrane. Transient transformation was performed with 35S::GFP-PLDδ construct in binary vector. df The micrographs with maximum intensity projection of three optical sections depict part of single cell transiently transformed with 35S::GFP-PLDδ construct in expression vector before (d), 11–14 min (e), and 15–18 min (f) after treatment with 20 μM oryzalin. Scale bars = 10 μm.

The localization of GFP-PLDδ was also observed in response to the application of microtubule-disrupting agent, oryzalin. Ten minutes after treatment with 20 μM oryzalin, linear PLDδ structures were partially disintegrated, and after 15 min, completely disappeared (Fig. 1e, f).

Similar results were obtained for Arabidopsis thaliana plants with stable expression of GFP-PLDδ protein. GFP-PLDδ in all examined tissues (cotyledon, leaf, hypocotyl, and root; Fig. 2) was presented as a layer of numerous distinct dots near and below the plasma membrane (Fig. S1) which were reassembling on transient basis. Compared to other tissues, the PLDδ dotted pattern in root tissues was ordinarily looser, consisting of somewhat larger and more isolated pellets. Nevertheless, the assembly of dots in all tissues was frequently shifting in fluctuant line-like patterns and less frequently reassembled in more distinct and more permanent linear microtubule-like structures (Fig. 2). Microtubule-like lines were also observed and co-localized with the transiently expressed microtubule marker RFP-MBD (microtubule-binding domain) (Fig. 3a–c).
Fig. 2

GFP-PLDδ patterns beneath plasma membrane in different organs of Arabidopsis thaliana. Frontal view of single optical sections of layer close underneath plasma membrane in epidermal cells of various organs of Arabidopsis thaliana stably transformed with 35S::GFP-PLDδ construct. Images of 5- to 12-day-old plants were obtained by confocal laser scanning microscope Zeiss 880 except linear leaf pattern taken with laser scanning microscope (CLSM 5 DUO – Zeiss). Length of the side of each squared picture represents 10 μm

Fig. 3

Linear GFP-PLDδ pattern co-localized with microtubular marker disappears after salt treatment. Cortical layer of 9-day-old Arabidopsis cotyledon pavement cells. Each row of images depicts different cell belonging to the same cotyledon. Projections were obtained by confocal laser scanning microscope Zeiss 880. ac Maximum intensity projection of 11 optical sections. Stable expression of 35S::GFP-PLDδ construct visualized typical dotted and linear pattern (a). b Microtubules visualized 72 h after transient transformation with Agrobacterium tumefaciens carrying binary vector with microtubular marker - RFP-MBD. c Merged a and b images. df Maximum intensity projection of six optical sections of molecular pattern 7 min after treatment with 200 mM NaCl. d Stable expression of 35S::GFP-PLDδ. e Microtubular marker - RFP-MBD. f Merged d and e images. gi Maximum intensity projection of five optical sections of molecular pattern 9 min after treatment with 200 mM NaCl. g Stable expression of 35S::GFP-PLDδ. h Microtubular marker - RFP-MBD. i Merged g and h images. Scale bars = 10 μm

Disruption of microtubules after salt stress is well documented (Zhang et al. 2012), so it was reasonable to investigate whether GFP-PLDδ linear structures would react in a similar way. Therefore, we treated plantlets expressing co-localized PLDδ and MT with 200 mM NaCl. Both linear GFP-PLDδ- and RFP-tagged microtubules were partially disintegrated after 7 min (Fig. 3d–f) and almost completely undetectable at 9 min (Fig. 3g–i). Disorganization of GFP-PLDδ structures after microtubule depolymerization is here in an agreement with oryzalin effect as described above and indicates a tight association of PLDδ with microtubules. We had therefore applied actin polymerization inhibitor latrunculin B to 12-day-old GFP-PLDδ expressing Arabidopsis seedlings, to verify specificity of this effect. Treatment with 200 nM latrunculin B had no observable effect on the stability of PLDδ linear patterns monitored over 30 min in hypocotyl cells (Fig. S2a-c).

Arabidopsis phospholipase Dδ mutant is impaired in the ability to restore microtubule density under salt stress

To study microtubule dynamics after salt stress, we exposed fresh wild-type and Atpldδ seedlings to 150 or 200 mM NaCl for up to 5 h, and visualized microtubules in the root epidermal layer by immunolabeling. Confocal microscopy indicated that the recovery of microtubules in the mutant was significantly retarded during the 5-h experiment of treatment with 150 mM NaCl, as shown by quantitative analysis of microtubule density (Fig. 4a, b). Thus, while there were no significant differences in microtubule density between the intact WT and the mutant at time 0 and after the dramatic depolymerization within 30 min exposure, the retardation became significant after 2 and 3 h of exposure.
Fig. 4

Microtubule density in root epidermal cells in wild-type Arabidopsis thaliana (Col-0) and AtPLDδ seedlings exposed to salt stress. Five-day-old seedlings were transferred to agar nutrient media containing 150 or 200 mM NaCl. Samples of seedlings were taken at 0 min, 30 min, 2 h, 3 h, and 5 h after transfer and processed for immunofluorescence localization of microtubules in the root. The columns show the average microtubule density per unit cell length in epidermal cells between 300–420 and 540–660 μm from the root apex after treatment with 150 mM (a) and 200 mM (b) NaCl. Values are averages ± SE (n = 60) from two independent experiments; *significant at P = 0.05, **significant at P = 0.01, and ***significant at P = 0.001

Whereas the recovery over the 2–5-h interval in 150 mM NaCl-treated WT reached 0.61 microtubules μm−1 on average, the recovery in the mutant was hindered and reached only 0.46 microtubules μm−1 over the same period (Fig. 4a). Exposure to 200 mM NaCl led to a slower recovery compared to 150 mM NaCl, although the recovery in the mutant was again significantly hindered (Fig. 4b). Thus, whereas the recovery in the WT over the 2–5-h interval reached on average 0.42 microtubules μm−1, the retarded recovery in the mutant reached only 0.22 microtubules μm−1 over the same period.

Taken together, we have observed an important and a previously undescribed role for PLDδ in MT restoration upon salt stress, which could have an important impact on downstream physiological responses in the cell.

Inhibition of root elongation is salt concentration-dependent and is more pronounced in Arabidopsis pldδ insertional mutant

To examine the possible role of PLDδ in NaCl stress-induced microtubule reorganization, we compared root growth of wild-type Arabidopsis thaliana, Col-0 with an Arabidopsis thaliana, Col-0 T-DNA insertion mutant line AtPLDδ as well as with Arabidopsis plants stably transformed with 35S::GFP-PLDδ. To evaluate the phenotype during normal growth and development, we first grew seedlings on normal media for 5 days, after 5 days, seedlings were transferred on the new plates with 150 mM (Fig. 5b), 200 mM NaCl (Fig. 5c) or without salt (Fig. 5a). We have monitored changes in root growth on daily basis for the next 6 days. The resulting square root transformed data were then fitted by linear mixed-effects model to evaluate statistical significance of trends across interacting variables. In result, growth of pldδ mutant was about 0.36 ± 0.07 or 0.49 ± 0.10 mm/day slower when growing on 150 or 200 mM NaCl respectively, with high significance (p = 9.409e-07 ***; Fig. 5 and Fig. S3.). While the difference in growth rate of root elongation in the 150 mM treatment was especially pronounced for pldδ, mutant, which was growing slower, also the faster growth of the overexpressing line GFP-PLDδ with lower statistical significance (p = 0.0283 *; Fig. 5b). In conclusion, we have observed changes in root growth rate caused by changes in microtubule dynamic which are more severe when PLDδ is lacking.
Fig. 5

Differences in root growth rate of Arabidopsis thaliana (Col-0) wild type, Atpldδ, and GFP-PLDδ exposed to salt stress. Five-day-old seedlings of wild type (WT), Atpldδ mutant (pldδ), and plants overexpressing 35S::GFP-PLDδ construct (GFP-PLDδ) were transferred to agar nutrient media containing 150 (b) or 200 mM (c) NaCl. Seedlings transferred to normal medium were used as control (a). The root length was measured every day till day 11; every column in the plot represents root length increment for 2 days from day 4. Values shown are averages ± SE (n = 15) from two independent experiments. Significances of tested effects and their interactions (plant genotype effect vs. growth rate difference) is determined by ANOVA test and indicated by letters: interaction of pldδ genotype vs. WT on 150 mM, indicated “a” significant at ***P = 0.001; interaction of pldδ vs. WT in both salt concentrations, indicated “b” significant at ***P = 0.001; and interaction of overexpressor GFP-PLDδ vs. WT on 150 mM, indicated “c” significant at *P = 0.05

Discussion

Indications of a link between PLDδ and parts of microtubular cytoskeleton have been previously described (Andreeva et al. 2009; Ho et al. 2009), but evidence of a direct physical link between PLDδ and microtubules is lacking.

Using live imaging and confocal microscopy, we have observed co-localization between microtubules and PLDδ linear structures. Linear pattern of GFP-PLDδ alone or emerging from dotted GFP-PLDδ background was observed in several independent plant models and different cell types. In Arabidopsis seedlings, we have observed the PLDδ linear structures in leaf epidermal cells, cotyledons, hypocotyl, and root cells (Fig. 2). To assess whether our results are applicable to different, independent plant models, we examined tobacco BY-2 cells transiently expressing GFP-AtPLDδ. We observed similar structures to those in Arabidopsis. Importantly, we confirmed that those GFP-PLDδ linear structures co-localized with RFP-tagged microtubular marker - RFP-MBD in cotyledon pavement cells co-expressing both proteins.

Linear, microtubule-like localization of PLDδ was observed using N-terminally tagged constructs (GFP-PLDδ). A similar construct tagged in the C-terminal displayed cytosolic localization, similar to untagged GFP, suggesting that tagging of PLDδ at the C-terminal interferes with its insertion into the plasma membrane, a localization that is supported by various studies, including biochemical fractionation (Andreeva et al. 2009; Wang and Wang 2001). The observed localization of PLDδ was also influenced by developmental factors. The linear pattern of PLDδ was observed more often in young plants. Cells undergoing elongation, namely root and hypocotyl cells, also showed linear pattern more frequently. However, we have to point out transient character of PLDδ line patterns. PLDδ pattern is comprised of many dynamic dots which assemble into lines on transient basis. Pattern of stable lines is relatively less common phenomenon.

Proper microtubule spatial organization, specifically transversal arrangement, facilitate cell elongation, or anisotropic growth (Granger and Cyr 2001). This suggests that perhaps PLDδ may assist in microtubular reorganization during the early developmental stages of cells.

Interestingly, linear GFP-PLDδ patterns were disrupted within a few minutes upon application of oryzalin, a microtubule-disrupting drug (Fig. 1d–f), yet is unchanged upon application of latrunculin B, an actin disrupting drug, which provides an evidence of a close spatial relationship between PLDδ and microtubules. If PLDδ operates putatively like a scaffold, stabilizing microtubules to the plasma membrane (Gardiner et al. 2001), then PLDδ domains remain aligned alongside microtubules. When microtubules suddenly disappear, such as during depolymerization, PLDδ proteins aligned to microtubules would also be released, and thereby move randomly, causing a disruption of the observed linear structures of PLDδ. A similar situation would be expected for both PLDδ linear structures and microtubules in response to salt treatment.

Confocal images demonstrated tight co-localization of GFP-PLDδ line structures with microtubules as well as degradation of linear PLDδ structures after treatment, with high concentrations of salt. Involvement of either PLDδ or microtubules during salt stress response has been demonstrated separately by numerous studies (Zhang et al. 2012). We have observed the simultaneous degradation of both linear PLDδ structures and microtubules in response to treatment with high concentration of salt. Hence, we conclude there is a close physical and possibly direct interaction of microtubules and PLDδ, as hypothesized by Marc and Gardiner (Gardiner et al. 2001; Marc et al. 1996). The coordinated timing and relocalization of PLDδ and MT we observed in response to treatment with either oryzalin or salt is consistent with such a relationship.

Next, we considered and tested functional relevance for the proposed link between PLDδ and microtubules under the assumption of the aforementioned premise. Attachment of microtubules to the plasma membrane is important for microtubule stabilization and spatial organization. The AtPLDδ mutant is apparently impaired in the ability to restore microtubule density under salt stress. This behavior is consistent with the finding that PLDδ is markedly upregulated in response to dehydration and salt stress (Katagiri et al. 2001), and is therefore consistent with the proposed plasma membrane—PLDδ—microtubule interconnection (Gardiner et al. 2001) as well as with the known mechanism of microtubule stabilization by structural MAPs (Cai 2010; Dixit and Cyr 2004; Wang et al. 2011). MAP65-1 increases microtubule polymerization and bundling during salt stress after phosphatidic acid binding. These processes are initiated by enhanced activity of PLDα1 and δ and lead to the promotion of salt tolerance in Arabidopsis plants, but PLDα1 itself has no direct connection to microtubules (Zhang et al. 2012). In addition, a double mutant of Arabidopsis pldα1 and pldδ is more sensitive to salt concerning reduced root growth, compared to single mutants (Bargmann et al. 2009).

Along with decreased recovery of microtubules under salt stress, we also consistently observed a statistically significant deceleration of root growth in Atpldδ mutants in comparison to wild type (Figs. 5 and S3). This effect has been previously described (Bargmann et al. 2009), and in our study, we additionally showed the time and concentration dependency of this effect and also slightly better root growth of plants overexpressing GFP-PLDδ after treatment with 150 mM NaCl. Retarded growth rate in the mutant within 6 days following 200 mM NaCl treatment implies a significant role for PLDδ during salt stress tolerance. Although there is some redundancy between PLD isoforms concerning PA production (Johansson et al. 2014), such a long-term inability of mutant plants to overcome salt stress in the same extent as wild-type plants supports the idea of some unique feature of PLDδ, which is not completely complemented by other PLD isoforms, despite their increased activity following salt treatment (Bargmann et al. 2009). It suggests that the mechanism that involves PLDδ is independent of PA production or any following downstream responses upon salt stress (such as MAP65-1-related mechanism). Instead, this predicted mechanism may be related to PLDδ physical or scaffolding function in linking microtubules to the plasma membrane (Dhonukshe et al. 2003).

Assuming that PLDδ is implicated in the stabilization of microtubules under stress situations, it is of note that co-occurrence of both PLDδ and accumulation of microtubules under the same conditions has been reported in other processes, and the same underlying mechanism may be operating in these cases. For example, Blumeria graminis infection of Arabidopsis epidermal cells was reported to be accompanied by a higher accumulation of specifically the δ isoform of PLD, whereas microscopic analysis revealed increased accumulation of PLDδ beneath the B. graminis penetration site (Pinosa et al. 2013). The targeted accumulation of microtubules under the same conditions is also well documented (Huesmann et al. 2012). It may imply the importance of close localization of PLDδ for targeted de novo microtubule reorganization as a general molecular mechanism in response to different stress signals.

From all PLD isoforms, only PLDδ is predicted to bind to microtubules so far (Gardiner et al. 2001). We therefore propose stabilization of microtubules through direct connection of PLDδ to microtubules as being possible accessory mechanism for microtubule stabilization and improved salt tolerance and possibly more generally, also in other stress processes, where microtubular spatial organization is affected.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Jan Petrášek for microscopy and further guidance and to Jiří Kubásek for the help with data processing.

Funding information

This work was supported by the Czech Science Foundation Grant No. 14-09685S and by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic, projects NPU I, LO1417, and LM2015062. Microscope Zeiss 880 and LSM5DUO: IEB Imaging Facility is supported by OPPK—Operational Program Prague Competitiveness CZ.2.16/3.1.00/21519.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

709_2018_1204_Fig6_ESM.gif (4 mb)
Fig. S1

Subcellular localization of GFP-PLDδ pattern. a-d – dotted GFP-PLDδ pattern (a, c, d) in root cells of seven-day-old Arabidopsis thaliana stably transformed with 35S::GFP-PLDδ construct, stained with FM 4-64 dye (b, c, d). All pictures represents the same optical section of x,y plane (a, b, c) and y, z plane (d) imaging of GFP-PLDδ layer (a, c, d) and FM 4-64 stained plasma membrane (b, c, d). (c, d) merged a and b images. e-h - dotted and linear GFP-PLDδ pattern (e, g, h) in cotyledon pavement cells of nine-day-old Arabidopsis thaliana stably transformed with 35S::GFP-PLDδ construct. Microtubules (f, g, h) visualized 72 h after transient transformation with vector carrying 35S::RFP-MBD construct. Pictures display maximal intensity projection of twelve optical sections. Plane x,y (e, f, g) and y, z (h). (g, h) merged e and f images. i-j - linear GFP-PLDδ pattern (i, j) in hypocotyl cells of twelve-day-old Arabidopsis thaliana stably transformed with 35S::GFP-PLDδ construct. Pictures display maximal intensity projection of five optical sections. Plane x,y (i) and x, z (j). All pictures were taken with confocal laser scanning microscope Zeiss 880. Scale bars = 10 μm. (GIF 4092 kb)

709_2018_1204_MOESM1_ESM.tiff (4.7 mb)
High resolution image (TIFF 4822 kb)
709_2018_1204_Fig7_ESM.gif (4.6 mb)
Fig. S2

GFP-PLDδ linear pattern after treatment with 200 nM latrunculin B. a-c – linear GFP-PLDδ pattern in hypocotyl of twelve-day-old Arabidopsis thaliana stably transformed with 35S::GFP-PLDδ construct. Seedlings without treatment (a) or 18 min (b) and 34 min (c) after treatment with 200 nM latrunculin B. d-f - visualised actin filaments in leaf cells of ten-day-old Arabidopsis stably transformed with 35S::GFP-fABD2. Seedlings without treatment (d) or 15 min (e) and 21 min (f) after treatment with 200 nM latrunculin B. Single optical sections observed with confocal laser scanning microscope Zeiss 880. Scale bars = 10 μm. (GIF 4092 kb) (GIF 4736 kb)

709_2018_1204_MOESM2_ESM.tiff (4.1 mb)
High resolution image (TIFF 4208 kb)
709_2018_1204_Fig8_ESM.gif (119 kb)
Fig. S3

Differences in root length of Arabidopsis thaliana (Col-0) wild-type, Atpldδ and GFP-PLDδ exposed to salt stress – line chart. Five-day-old seedlings of wild type (WT), Atpldδ mutant (pldδ) and plants overexpressing 35S::GFP-PLDδ construct (GFP-PLDδ) were transferred to agar nutrient media containing 150 (b) or 200 mM (c) NaCl. Seedlings transferred to normal medium were used as control (ctrl - a). The root length was measured every day till day eleven. Values shown are averages ± SE (n = 15) from two independent experiments, with high significance. Scale bars = 10 μm. (GIF 119 kb)

709_2018_1204_MOESM3_ESM.tiff (196 kb)
High resolution image (TIFF 196 kb)

References

  1. Andreeva Z, Ho AYY, Barthet MM, Potocky M, Bezvoda R, Zarsky V, Marc J (2009) Phospholipase D family interactions with the cytoskeleton: isoform delta promotes plasma membrane anchoring of cortical microtubules. Funct Plant Biol 36(7):600–612.  https://doi.org/10.1071/FP09024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bargmann BO, Laxalt AM, ter Riet B, van Schooten B, Merquiol E, Testerink C, Haring MA, Bartels D, Munnik T (2009) Multiple PLDs required for high salinity and water deficit tolerance in plants. Plant Cell Physiol 50(1):78–89.  https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcn173 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Cai G (2010) Assembly and disassembly of plant microtubules: tubulin modifications and binding to MAPs. J Exp Bot 61(3):623–626.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erp395 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Clough SJ, Bent AF (1998) Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 16(6):735–743.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00343.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Dhonukshe P, Laxalt AM, Goedhart J, Gadella TW, Munnik T (2003) Phospholipase d activation correlates with microtubule reorganization in living plant cells. Plant Cell 15(11):2666–2679.  https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.014977 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Dixit R, Cyr RJ (2004) The cortical microtubule array: from dynamics to organization. Plant Cell 16(10):2546–2552.  https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.104.161030 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Gardiner JC, Harper JD, Weerakoon ND, Collings DA, Ritchie S, Gilroy S, Cyr RJ, Marc J (2001) A 90-kD phospholipase D from tobacco binds to microtubules and the plasma membrane. Plant Cell 13(9):2143–2158.  https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.13.9.2143 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Golldack D, Li C, Mohan H, Probst N (2014) Tolerance to drought and salt stress in plants: unraveling the signaling networks. Front Plant Sci 5:151CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Granger CL, Cyr RJ (2001) Spatiotemporal relationships between growth and microtubule orientation as revealed in living root cells of Arabidopsis thaliana transformed with green-fluorescent-protein gene construct GFP-MBD. Protoplasma 216(3-4):201–214.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02673872 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hellens RP, Edwards EA, Leyland NR, Bean S, Mullineaux PM (2000) pGreen: a versatile and flexible binary Ti vector for Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation. Plant Mol Biol 42(6):819–832.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006496308160 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Ho AYY, Day DA, Brown MH, Marc J (2009) Arabidopsis phospholipase D as an initiator of cytoskeleton-mediated signalling to fundamental cellular processes. Funct Plant Biol 36(2):190–198.  https://doi.org/10.1071/FP08222 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hong Y, Zhao J, Guo L, Kim SC, Deng X, Wang G, Zhang G, Li M, Wang X (2016) Plant phospholipases D and C and their diverse functions in stress responses. Prog Lipid Res 62:55–74.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plipres.2016.01.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Huesmann C, Reiner T, Hoefle C, Preuss J, Jurca ME, Domoki M, Feher A, Huckelhoven R (2012) Barley ROP binding kinase1 is involved in microtubule organization and in basal penetration resistance to the barley powdery mildew fungus. Plant Physiol 159:311–320CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Johansson ON, Fahlberg P, Karimi E, Nilsson AK, Ellerstrom M, Andersson MX (2014) Redundancy among phospholipase D isoforms in resistance triggered by recognition of the Pseudomonas syringae effector AvrRpm1 in Arabidopsis thaliana. Front Plant Sci 5(639).  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00639
  15. Katagiri T, Takahashi S, Shinozaki K (2001) Involvement of a novel Arabidopsis phospholipase D, AtPLD-delta, in dehydration-inducible accumulation of phosphatidic acid in stress signalling. Plant J 26:595–605CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Li JF, Park E, von Arnim AG, and Nebenführ A (2009) The FAST technique: a simplified Agrobacteriumbased transformation method for transient gene expression analysis in seedlings of Arabidopsis and other plant species. Plant Methods 5:6–21Google Scholar
  17. Marc J, Sharkey DE, Durso NA, Zhang M, Cyr RJ (1996) Isolation of a 90-kD microtubule-associated protein from tobacco membranes. Plant Cell 8(11):2127–2138.  https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.8.11.2127 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Marc J, Granger CL, Brincat J, Fisher DD, Kao T (1998) A GFP–MAP4 reporter gene for visualizing cortical microtubule rearrangements in living epidermal cells. Plant Cell 10:1927–1939PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15(3):473–497.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nagata T, Nemoto Y, Hasezawa S (1992) Tobacco BY-2 cell line as the “HeLa” cell in the cell biology of higher plants. Int Rev Cytol 132:1–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pinosa F, Buhot N, Kwaaitaal M, Fahlberg P, Thordal-Christensen H, Ellerstrom M, Andersson MX (2013) Arabidopsis phospholipase D delta is involved in basal defense and nonhost resistance to powdery mildew fungi. Plant Physiol 163:896–906CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. RCoreTeam (2013) A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  23. Sugimoto K, Williamson RE, Wasteneys GO (2000) New techniques enable comparative analysis of microtubule orientation, wall texture, and growth rate in intact roots of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 124(4):1493–1506.  https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.124.4.1493 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Voight B, Timmers ACJ, Šamaj J, Müller J, Baluška F, Menzel D (2005) GFP-FABD2 fusion construct allows in vivo visualization of the dynamic actin cytoskeleton. Eur J Cell Biol 84:494–507Google Scholar
  25. Wang C, Wang X (2001) A novel phospholipase D of Arabidopsis that is activated by oleic acid and associated with the plasma membrane. Plant Physiol 127(3):1102–1112.  https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.010444 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Wang C, Li J, Yuan M (2007) Salt tolerance requires cortical microtubule reorganization in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol 48:1534–1547CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Wang C, Zhang L, Yuan M, Ge Y, Liu Y, Fan J, Ruan Y, Cui Z, Tong S, Zhang S (2010) The microfilament cytoskeleton plays a vital role in salt and osmotic stress tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Biol 12:70–78CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Wang S, Kurepa J, Hashimoto T, Smalle JA (2011) Salt stress-induced disassembly of Arabidopsis cortical microtubule arrays involves 26S proteasome-dependent degradation of SPIRAL1. Plant Cell 23:3412–3427CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. West G, Inze D, Beemster GT (2004) Cell cycle modulation in the response of the primary root of Arabidopsis to salt stress. Plant Physiol 135:1050–1058CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhang Q, Lin F, Mao T, Nie J, Yan M, Yuan M, Zhang W (2012) Phosphatidic acid regulates microtubule organization by interacting with MAP65-1 in response to salt stress in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 24(11):4555–4576.  https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.112.104182 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhang Q, Song P, Qu Y, Wang P, Jia Q, Guo L, Zhang C, Mao T, Yuan M, Wang X, Zhang W (2017) Phospholipase Dδ negatively regulates plant thermotolerance by destabilizing cortical microtubules in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Environ 40:2220–2235 Article acceptedCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biochemistry and MicrobiologyUniversity of Chemistry and Technology PraguePrague 6Czech Republic
  2. 2.Department of Experimental Plant Biology, Faculty of ScienceCharles UniversityPrague 2Czech Republic
  3. 3.Institute of Experimental BotanyAcademy of Sciences of the Czech RepublicPrague 6Czech Republic
  4. 4.Department of Biosciences, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural SciencesUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
  5. 5.School of Biological SciencesUniversity of SydneyCamperdownAustralia

Personalised recommendations