Molecular cytogenetic analysis of monoecious hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) cultivars reveals its karyotype variations and sex chromosomes constitution
- 768 Downloads
Hemp (Cannabis sativa L., 2n = 20) is a dioecious plant. Sex expression is controlled by an X-to-autosome balance system consisting of the heteromorphic sex chromosomes XY for males and XX for females. Genetically monoecious hemp offers several agronomic advantages compared to the dioecious cultivars that are widely used in hemp cultivation. The male or female origin of monoecious maternal plants is unknown. Additionally, the sex chromosome composition of monoecious hemp forms remains unknown. In this study, we examine the sex chromosome makeup in monoecious hemp using a cytogenetic approach. Eight monoecious and two dioecious cultivars were used. The DNA of 210 monoecious plants was used for PCR analysis with the male-associated markers MADC2 and SCAR323. All monoecious plants showed female amplification patterns. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with the subtelomeric CS-1 probe to chromosomes plates and karyotyping revealed a lack of Y chromosome and presence of XX sex chromosomes in monoecious cultivars with the chromosome number 2n = 20. There was a high level of intra- and intercultivar karyotype variation detected. The results of this study can be used for further analysis of the genetic basis of sex expression in plants.
KeywordsHemp Cannabis sativa Monoecious hemp Sex chromosome Karyotype
We thank Dr I.V. Romanova for providing seeds of monoecious cultivars ‘Gentus’, ‘Diana’, ‘Ingreda’, ‘Margo’, ‘Tzivilsky Skorospeliy’ and ‘Rigs’. The reported study was partially supported by RFBR, research project #13-04-02116 and 15-04-06244.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Amaducci S, Errani M, Venturi G (1998) Comparison among monoecious and dioecious hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) genotypes: preliminary results. L’informatore agrario 26:39–42Google Scholar
- Badaeva ED, Badaev NS, Gill BS, Filatenko AA (1994) Intraspecific karyotype divergence in Triticum araraticum (Poaceae). Plant Syst Evol 192:117–145Google Scholar
- Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1990) Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12:13–15Google Scholar
- Faeti V, Mandolino G, Ranalli P (1996) Genetic diversity of Cannabis sativa germplasm based on RAPD markers. Plant Breed 115:367–370Google Scholar
- Heslop‐Harrison J (1956) Auxin and sexuality in Cannabis sativa. Physiol Plant 9:588–597Google Scholar
- Hoffmann W (1952) Die vererbung der geschlechtsformen des hanfes (Canabis sativa L.) II. Theor Appl Genet 22:147–158Google Scholar
- Moliterni VMC, Cattivelli L, Ranalli P, Mandolino G (2004) The sexual differentiation of Cannabis sativa L.: a morphological and molecular study. Euphytica 140:95–106Google Scholar
- Nishiyama I, Yamada I, Mazaki M (1947) Studies on artificial polyploidy plants. XI. Changes of the sex ratio in the progeny of the autotetraploid hemp. Seiken Ziho 3:144–151Google Scholar
- Schabelny MM (2010) Development of monoecious cultivars of south hemp. PhD thesis, Krasnodar Lukyanenko Research Institute of Agriculture, Russia (In Russian)Google Scholar
- Schaffner JH (1921) Influence of environment on sexual expression in hemp. Botanical Gazette 197–219Google Scholar
- Schultes RE, Klein WM, Plowman T, Lockwood TE (1974) Cannabis, an example of taxonomic neglect. Bot Mus Leafl Harv Univ 23:337–367Google Scholar
- Truta E, Olteanu N, Surdu S, Zamfirache MM, Oprica L (2007) Some aspects of sex determinism in hemp. Analele Stiintificeale Universitatii “Alexandru Ioan Cuza”, Sectiunea Genetica si Biologie Moleculara VIII:31–39Google Scholar