Protoplasma

, Volume 253, Issue 2, pp 357–365 | Cite as

On the excitation of action potentials by protons and its potential implications for cholinergic transmission

Original Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

One of the most conserved mechanisms for transmission of a nerve pulse across a synapse relies on acetylcholine (ACh). Ever since the Nobel Prize-winning works of Dale and Loewi, it has been assumed that ACh—subsequent to its action on a postsynaptic cell—is split into inactive by-products by acetylcholinesterase (AChE). Herein, the widespread assumption of inactivity of ACh’s hydrolysis products is falsified. Excitable cells (Chara braunii internodes), which had previously been unresponsive to ACh, became ACh-sensitive in the presence of AChE. The latter was evidenced by a striking difference in cell membrane depolarization upon exposure to 10 mM intact ACh (∆V = −2 ± 5 mV) and its hydrolysate (∆V = 81 ± 19 mV), respectively, for 60 s. This pronounced depolarization, which also triggered action potentials, was clearly attributed to one of the hydrolysis products: acetic acid (∆V = 87 ± 9 mV at pH 4.0; choline ineffective in the range 1–10 mM). In agreement with our findings, numerous studies in the literature have reported that acids excite gels, lipid membranes, plant cells, erythrocytes, as well as neurons. Whether excitation of the postsynaptic cell in a cholinergic synapse is due to protons or due to intact ACh is a most fundamental question that has not been addressed so far.

Keywords

Characeae Acetylcholine Acetylcholinesterase Acetic acid pH 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank K. Kaufmann for advocating the importance of interfaces and enzymatic “proton pistols” in biology. Moreover, we thank him for stimulating lectures and discussions. I. Silman, B. Fichtl, S. Shrivastava, H. Kong, and W. Hanke have provided helpful criticism of the manuscript. CF is grateful for funding by the Max Kade Foundation (http://maxkadefoundation.org/) and the Austrian Academy of Sciences (www.oeaw.ac.at/). MFS would like to acknowledge financial support by BU-ENG-ME and by the German Science Foundation (DFG; research unit SHENC (visiting professorship)). Chara cells for starting our cultures were kind gifts of W. Hanke, I. Foissner, M. Bisson, and R. Wayne. We also thank D. Campbell for crafting plexiglass chambers.

References

  1. Akaike N, Ueno S (1994) Proton-induced current in neuronal cells. Prog Neurobiol 43:73–83CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bal W, Kurowska E, Maret W (2012) The final frontier of pH and the undiscovered country beyond. PLoS One 7, e45832. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045832 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Bartol TM, Land BR, Salpeter EE, Salpeter MM (1991) Monte Carlo simulation of miniature endplate current generation in the vertebrate neuromuscular junction. Biophys J 59:1290–1307. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(91)82344-X CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Beilby M (1989) Electrophysiology of giant algal cells. Methods Enzymol 174:403–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burckhardt B, Kroll B, Frömter E (1992) Proton transport mechanism in the cell membrane of Xenopus laevis oocytes. Pflugers Arch 420:78–82CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Changeux J-P, Edelstein S (2005) Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Odile Jacob Publishing Corporation, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Cowan S (1936) The initiation of all-or-none responses in muscle by acetylcholine. J Physiol 88:3P–5PGoogle Scholar
  8. Dale H (1936) Some recent extensions of the chemical transmission of the effects of nerve impulses. Nobel lectureGoogle Scholar
  9. Del Castillo J, Rodriguez A, Romero C (1967) Pharmacological studies on an artificial transmitter-receptor system. Ann N Y Acad Sci 144:803–818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dettbarn W (1962) Acetylcholinesterase activity in Nitella. Nature 194:1175–1176CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Ehrenpreis S (1967) Possible nature of the cholinergic receptor. Ann N Y Acad Sci 144:720–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Einstein A (1913) Zum gegenwärtigen Stande des Problems der spezifischen Wärme. Abhandlungen Bunsengesellschaft 3:330–364Google Scholar
  13. Frederickson RC, Jordan LM, Phillis JW (1971) The action of noradrenaline on cortical neurons: effects of pH. Brain Res 35:556–560CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Goldman R, Silman H, Caplan S et al (1965) Papain membrane on a collodion matrix: preparation and enzymic behavior. Science 150:758–760CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Gong X, Bisson M (2002) Acetylcholine-activated Cl- channel in the Chara tonoplast. J Membr Biol 188:107–113. doi: 10.1007/s00232-001-0177-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Griesbauer J, Bössinger S, Wixforth A, Schneider M (2012) Simultaneously propagating voltage and pressure pulses in lipid monolayers of pork brain and synthetic lipids. Phys Rev E 86:061909. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.86.061909 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gruol D, Barker J, Huang L et al (1980) Hydrogen ions have multiple effects on the excitability of cultured mammalian neurons. Brain Res 183:247–252CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Gundersen C, Miledi R (1983) Acetylcholinesterase activity of Xenopus laevis oocytes. Neuroscience 10:1487–1495CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Heimburg T (2010) Lipid ion channels. Biophys Chem 150:2–22. doi: 10.1016/j.bpc.2010.02.018 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hoekman T, Dettbarn W (1971) Acetylcholine—a possible mechanism for the depolarization response in giant axons of the lobster circumesophageal connective. Biochem Pharmacol 20:1713–1717CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Holland WC, Graham JH (1955) Factors affecting the rates of hemolysis of mammalian erythrocytes on isotonic solutions of choline and certain choline esters. Am J Physiol 183:538–544PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hope A, Walker N. (1975) The physiology of giant algal cells. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  23. Katz B (1962) The Croonian Lecture: the transmission of impulses from nerve to muscle, and the subcellular unit of synaptic action. Proc R Soc London Ser B 155:455–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kaufmann K (1977a) On the kinetics of acetylcholine at the synapse. Naturwissenschaften 64:371–376CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Kaufmann K (1977b) Fast kinetics of acetylcholine at synaptic membranes. Int J Quantum Chem Suppl XII:169–178Google Scholar
  26. Kaufmann K (1980) Acetylcholinesterase und die physikalischen Grundlagen der Nervenerregung. Universität Göttingen, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  27. Kaufmann K (1985) Lipid mechanisms and acetylcholinesterase function. In: Changeux J-P, Hucho F, Mälicke A, Neumann E (eds) Mol. basis nerve act. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin-New York, pp 765–778Google Scholar
  28. Kaufmann K, Silman I (1980) The induction of ion channels through excitable membranes by acetylcholinesterase. Naturwissenschaften 67:608–610CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Kaufmann K, Silman I (1983) The induction by protons of ion channels through lipid bilayer membranes. Biophys Chem 18:89–99CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Kaufmann K, Hanke W, Corcia A (1989) Ion channel fluctuations in pure lipid bilayer membranes: control by voltage. In: Book. https://sites.google.com/site/schneiderslab/research-group/literature
  31. Kimelberg H, Papahadjopoulos D (1974) Effects of phospholipid acyl chain fluidity, phase transitions, and cholesterol on (Na+ + K+)-stimulated adenosine triphosphatase. J Biol Chem 249:1071–1080PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Kisnierienė V, Sakalauskas V, Pleskačiauskas A et al (2009) The combined effect of Cd2+ and ACh on action potentials of Nitellopsis obtusa cells. Cent Eur J Biol 4:343–350. doi: 10.2478/s11535-009-0028-y Google Scholar
  33. Krishtal O, Pidoplichko V (1980) A receptor for protons in the nerve cell membrane. Neuroscience 5:2325–2327CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Kuffler S, Yoshikami D (1975) The number of transmitter molecules in a quantum: an estimate from iontophoretic application of acetylcholine at the neuromuscular synapse. J Physiol 251:465–482CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Kuhn W, Hargitay B, Katchalsky A, Eisenberg H (1950) Reversible dilation and contraction by changing the state of ionization of high-polymer acid networks. Nature 165:514–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kusano K, Miledi R, Stinnakre J (1977) Acetylcholine receptors in the oocyte membrane. Nature 270:739–741CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Kusano K, Miledi R, Stinnakre J (1982) Cholinergic and catecholaminergic receptors in the Xenopus oocyte membrane. J Physiol 328:143–170CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Loewi O (1936) The chemical transmission of nerve action. Nobel lectureGoogle Scholar
  39. Lühring H, Witzemann V (1995) Internodal cells of the giant green alga Chara as an expression system for ion channels. FEBS Lett 361:65–69CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Matthews-Bellinger J, Salpeter M (1978) Distribution of acetylcholine receptors at frog neuromuscular junctions with a discussion of some physiological implications. J Physiol 279:197–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Mehrishi JN, Bauer J (2002) Electrophoresis of cells and the biological relevance of surface charge. Electrophoresis 23:1984–1994CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Nachmansohn D (1959) Chemical and molecular basis of nerve activity. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  43. Nachmansohn D, Neumann E (1974) Properties and function of proteins in excitable membranes: an integral model of nerve excitability. Ann N Y Acad Sci 227:275–284CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Podleski T, Changeux J (1967) Electrical phenomena associated with the activity of the membrane-bound acetylcholinesterase. Science 157:1579–1581CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Potter L (1970) Synthesis, storage and release of [14C]acetylcholine in isolated rat diaphragm muscles. J Physiol 206:145–166CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Rosenberry TL (1979) Quantitative simulation of endplate currents at neuromuscular junctions based on the reaction of acetylcholine with acetylcholine receptor and acetylcholinesterase. Biophys J 26:263–289. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(79)85249-2 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Salpeter MM, Eldefrawi ME (1973) Sizes of end plate compartments, densities of acetylcholine receptor and other quantitative aspects of neuromuscular transmission. J Histochem Cytochem 21:769–778. doi: 10.1177/21.9.769 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Silman I, Futerman A (1987) Modes of attachment of acetylcholinesterase to the surface membrane. Eur J Biochem 170:11–22CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Silman H, Karlin A (1967) Effect of local pH changes caused by substrate hydrolysis on the activity of membrane-bound acetylcholinesterase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 58:1664–1668CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Sinning A, Hübner C (2013) Minireview: pH and synaptic transmission. FEBS Lett 587:1923–1928. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2013.04.045 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Soreq H, Parvari R, Silman I (1982) Biosynthesis and secretion of catalytically active acetylcholinesterase in Xenopus oocytes microinjected with mRNA from rat brain and from Torpedo electric organ. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 79:830–834CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Träuble H (1977) Membrane electrostatics. In: Abrahamsson S, Pascher I (eds) Struct. Biol. Membr. Springer, pp 509–550Google Scholar
  53. Walters D, Kuhn W, Kuhn H (1961) Action potential with an artificial pH-muscle. Nature 189:381–383CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Wathey J, Nass M, Lester H (1979) Numerical reconstruction of the quantal event at nicotinic synapses. Biophys J 27:145–164. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(79)85208-X CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Wunderlich B, Leirer C, Idzko A-L et al (2009) Phase-state dependent current fluctuations in pure lipid membranes. Biophys J 96:4592–4597CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Wurzel M (1959) A suggested mechanism for the action of choline esters on animal organs, inferred from a study of the effect of choline-, beta-methylcholine-, and thiocholine-esters. Experientia 15:430–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wurzel M (1967) The physiological role of cholinesterase at cholinergic receptor sites. Ann N Y Acad Sci 144:694–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Biological Physics Group, Department of Mechanical EngineeringBoston UniversityBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations