Brassinosteroids protect Lycopersicon esculentum from cadmium toxicity applied as shotgun approach
- 381 Downloads
Surface-sterilized seeds of two tomato cultivars (cv. K-25 and Sarvodya) were soaked in 100 μM CdCl2 for 8 h (shotgun approach). The resulting 59-day-old seedlings were sprayed with 10−8 M of 28-homobrassinolide (HBL) or 24-epibrassinolide (EBL) to their foliage. Both cultivars showed significantly different response to Cd stress. Cadmium severely restricted the growth, photosynthetic efficiency, and activity of nitrate reductase (E.C. 18.104.22.168) and carbonic anhydrase (E.C. 22.214.171.124) in Sarvodya as compared to K-25. However, the activities of antioxidative enzymes were significantly higher in K-25. This result may be considered an indication of better tolerance of the K-25 cultivars to Cd stress. Moreover, the spray of both the brassinosteroids (HBL/EBL) were found very effective in neutralizing the adverse effects generated by metals that reflect in better photosynthetic performance by the cultivars. An interesting aspect of this study is that HBL or EBL spray caused a further increase in proline content and antioxidative enzyme activities, which were already enhanced by Cd stress. This effect of brassinosteroids (HBL/EBL) was more pronounced in K-25 than in Sarvodya, representing the tolerance and adoptable behavior of K-25.
KeywordsBrassinosteroids Enzymatic antioxidants Photosynthesis Tomato
The authors are thankful to the anonymous reviewers for their valuable suggestions. This work was funded by University Grants Commission [Project No. 32-403/2006 (SR)], New Delhi, India.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Costa G, Morel JL (1994) Water relations, gas exchange and amino acid content in Cd-treated lettuce. Plant Physiol Biochem 32:561–570Google Scholar
- Hayat S, Ahmad A (2003) Brassinosteroids: bioactivity and crop productivity. Kluwer Academic, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
- Hopkins WJ (1995) Introduction to plant physiology. Kluwer Academic, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
- Kamuro Y, Takatsuto S (1991) Practical application of brassinosteroids in agricultural fields. In: Sakurai A, Yokota T, Clouse SD (eds) Brassinosteroids: steroidal plant hormones. Springer, Tokyo, pp 223–241Google Scholar
- Khripach VA, Zhabinskii VN, Groot AE (1999) Brassinosteroids: a new class of plant hormones. Academic, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
- Khripach VA, Zhabinskii VN, Khripach NB (2003) New practical aspects of brassinosteroids and results of their 10 year agricultural use in Russia and Balarus. In: Hayat S, Ahmad A (eds) Brassinosteroids: bioactivity and crop productivity. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 189–230Google Scholar
- Nunez M, Mazzateva P, Mazarra LM, Siqueira WJ, Zullo MAT (2003) Influence of brassinosteroid analogue on antioxidant enzymes in rice grown in culture medium with NaCl. Biol Plant 37:67–70Google Scholar
- Obata H, Inone N, Umebayshi M (1996) Effect of cadmium on plasma membrane ATPase from plant root differing in tolerance to cadmium. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 42:361–366Google Scholar
- Raghuramulu N, Nair MK, Kalyanasundarum S (1983) A manual of laboratory techniques. National Institute of Nutrition, Silver Prints, HyderabadGoogle Scholar
- Ranganna S (1976) Manual of analysis of fruit and vegetables products. McGraw Hill, New Delhi, p 77Google Scholar
- Reddy MP, Vora AB (1986) Changes in pigment composition, hill reaction activity and saccharide metabolism in bajra (Pennisetum typhoides S&H) leaves under NaCl salinity. Photosynthetica 20:50–55Google Scholar
- Sadasivam S, Manickam A (1997) Carotenes. In: Sadasivam S, Manickam A (eds) Biochemical methods. New Age International, New Delhi, pp 187–188Google Scholar
- Singh PK, Tewari RK (2003) Cadmium toxicity induced changes in plant water relations and oxidative metabolism of Brassica juncea L. Plants J Environ Biol 24:107–112Google Scholar