Advertisement

Nonlinear evolutionary problem for a laminated inhomogeneous spherical shell

  • Sergey LychevEmail author
  • Konstantin Koifman
Original Paper
  • 30 Downloads

Abstract

In the present paper, the finite deformations of a laminated inhomogeneous spherical shell are studied. A laminated shell can be considered as a limit case for multilayered shells when the thickness of each layer tends to zero while their quantity tends to infinity. Such a limit might be useful in modeling of multilayered structures with large amount of layers, for example, produced by layer-by-layer additive manufacturing. It is easy to explain the nature of inhomogeneity for multilayered structures (discrete inhomogeneity). It is just the result of the fact that in the stress-free state the shapes of layers do not fit to each other. Thus, they cannot be assembled without gaps or overlaps. Proper assembly becomes possible only after individual deformations of layers that cause self-equilibrated stresses in their assembly. The explanation of inhomogeneity for laminated structures (continuous inhomogeneity) is slightly more complicated. It can be given upon the idea of a continuous family of reference shapes that are free from stresses only locally. In the present paper, this approach is discussed in detail. To define measures for stresses and strains on laminated structures, one has to determine corresponding fields in some specific way. Such definitions that are obtained by formalism, adopted in the theory of smooth manifolds with non-Euclidean connection, are also given. To compare a discrete inhomogeneity with its continuous counterpart, the stress–strain states for the sequence of multilayered structures have been examined. The common factor of these structures is that they have equal final volume. Meanwhile, the number of layers increases with their order in the sequence. The measure for inhomogeneity related with non-Euclidean connection is found from a nonlinear evolutionary problem. To support improved understanding of the interplay between multilayered and laminated structures, the stresses and strains exerted in them are studied in comparison. Considerations of the reverse situation, in which some multilayered structure with discrete inhomogeneity is defined upon a given laminated structure, are also carried out. The convergence with decreasing maximal thickness for layers to the original laminated structure is illustrated numerically. In this, one can see similarity with the partitioning procedure in the theory of integrals.

List of symbols

\(\mathcal {P}\)

Physical space

\(\mathcal {E}\)

Three-dimensional Euclidean affine space

\(\mathcal {V}\)

Translation vector space, associated with \(\mathcal {E}\)

\(\mathfrak {B}\)

Body

\(\vee \)

Joining operation

\(\varvec{g}\)

Riemannian metric on \(\mathcal {P}\)

\(\varvec{G}\)

Riemannian metric on \(\mathfrak {B}\)

\(\mathfrak {M}\), \(\mathfrak {N}\)

Smooth manifolds

\(\mathrm{Diff}(\mathfrak {M})\)

The set of all diffeomorphisms on smooth manifold \(\mathfrak {M}\)

\(C^{\infty }(\mathfrak {M};\,\mathfrak {N})\)

The set of all smooth mappings between smooth manifolds \(\mathfrak {M}\) and \(\mathfrak {N}\)

\(\mathrm{Em}(\mathfrak {M};\,\mathfrak {N})\)

The set of all smooth embeddings between smooth manifolds \(\mathfrak {M}\) and \(\mathfrak {N}\)

\(T\mathfrak {M}\)

Tangent bundle of smooth manifold \(\mathfrak {M}\)

\(T^{*}\mathfrak {M}\)

Cotangent bundle of smooth manifold \(\mathfrak {M}\)

\(\mathrm{Sec}(\mathfrak {E})\)

Vector space of smooth sections of a vector bundle \(\mathfrak {E}\rightarrow \mathfrak {M}\)

\(\varkappa \)

Configuration

\(\gamma \)

Deformation

\(\varvec{I}\)

Identity tensor

\(\varvec{F}\)

Deformation gradient

\(\varvec{K}_{\mathfrak {X}}\)

Local configuration at point \(\mathfrak {X}\)

\(\varvec{T}\)

Cauchy stress tensor

\(\varvec{P}\)

First Piola–Kirchhoff stress tensor

\(a_{n,\,k}\)

Parameter of the deformation of kth layer in nth assembly

\(\alpha \)

Evolution parameter

\(b_{\alpha }\)

Local distortion that corresponds to the value \(\alpha \) of the evolution parameter

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The work was performed with partial financial support from the RFBR No. 18-08-01346, RFBR No. 18-29-03228 and FASO (Project No. AAAA-A17-117021310373-3).

Supplementary material

707_2019_2399_MOESM1_ESM.rar (11.8 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (rar 12128 KB)

References

  1. 1.
    Abraham, R., Marsden, J.E., Ratiu, T.: Manifolds, Tensor Analysis, and Applications, vol. 75. Springer, New York (2012)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Adachi, M.: Embeddings and Immersions. American Mathematical Society, Providence (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bilby, B., Bullough, R., Smith, E.: Continuous distributions of dislocations: a new application of the methods of non-Riemannian geometry. In: Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, vol. 231, pp. 263–273. The Royal Society (1955)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Campbell, T., Williams, C., Ivanova, O., Garrett, B.: Could 3D Printing Change the World? Technologies, Potential, and Implications of Additive Manufacturing. Atlantic Council, Washington (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dautray, R., Lions, J.L.: Mathematical Analysis and Numerical Methods for Science and Technology. Volume 5 Evolution Problems I. Springer, New York (2000).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-58090-1
  6. 6.
    de Wit, R.: Fundamental aspects of dislocation theory, vol. I, chapter Linear Theory of Static Disclinations, pp. 651–673. National Bureau of Standards (U.S.) (19 70)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Decher, G., Schlenoff, J.B. (eds.): Multilayer Thin Films. Wiley VCH Verlag GmbH, London (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Edelen, D.G.: A four-dimensional formulation of defect dynamics and some of its consequences. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 18(9), 1095–1116 (1980).  https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7225(80)90112-3 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Eliseev, V.: Mechanics of Elastic Bodies. Saint Petersburg State Polytechnic Publishing House, Saint Petersburg (2003). (in Russian) Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Epstein, M.: The Geometrical Language of Continuum Mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Epstein, M., Elzanowski, M.: Material Inhomogeneities and Their Evolution: A Geometric Approach. Springer, New York (2007)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gibson, I., Rosen, D.W., Stucker, B., et al.: Additive Manufacturing Technologies. Springer, New York (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Goloveshkina, E.V., Zubov, L.M.: Universal spherically symmetric solution of nonlinear dislocation theory for incompressible isotropic elastic medium. Arch. Appl. Mech. (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00419-018-1403-9 Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gurtin, M.E., Murdoch, A.I.: A continuum theory of elastic material surfaces. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 57(4), 291–323 (1975)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hodge, N., Ferencz, R., Vignes, R.: Experimental comparison of residual stresses for a thermomechanical model for the simulation of selective laser melting. Addit. Manuf. 12, 159–168 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2016.05.011. (Special Issue on Modeling & Simulation for Additive Manufacturing) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Husemoller, D.: Fibre Bundles. Springer, New York (1994).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2261-1 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kanso, E., Arroyo, M., Tong, Y., Yavari, A., Marsden, J.G., Desbrun, M.: On the geometric character of stress in continuum mechanics. Z. Agew. Math. Phys. 58(5), 843–856 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kellogg, O.D.: Foundations of Potential Theory. Springer, New York (1967).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-86748-4 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kondo, K.: Geometry of elastic deformation and incompatibility. In: Memoirs of the Unifying Study of the Basic Problems in Engineering Science by Means of Geometry, vol. 1, pp. 5–17. Gakujutsu Bunken Fukyo-Kai, Tokyo (1955)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kondo, K.: Non-Riemannian geometry of imperfect crystals from a macroscopic viewpoint. Mem. Unifying Study Basic Probl. Eng. Sci. Means Geom. 1, 6–17 (1955)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kondo, K.: Non-Riemannian and Finslerian approaches to the theory of yielding. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 1(1), 71–88 (1963)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kondo, K.: On the analytical and physical foundations of the theory of dislocations and yielding by the differential geometry of continua. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 2(3), 219–251 (1964)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kröner, E.: Allgemeine Kontinuumstheorie der Versetzungen und Eigenspannungen. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 4, 18–334 (1959)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lazar, M.: On the fundamentals of the three-dimensional translation gauge theory of dislocations. Math. Mech. Solids (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1177/1081286510370889 Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lee, J.M.: Introduction to Smooth Manifolds. Springer, New York (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lychev, S.: Geometric Aspects of the Theory of Incompatible Deformations in Growing Solids, pp. 327–347. Springer, New York (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56050-2_19
  27. 27.
    Lychev, S., Koifman, K.: Geometric aspects of the theory of incompatible deformations. Part I. Uniform configurations. Nanomech. Sci. Technol. Int. J. 7(3), 177–233 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lychev, S., Koifman, K.: Geometry of Incompatible Deformations: Differential Geometry in Continuum Mechanics, vol. 50. De Gruyter, New York (2018)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lychev, S., Kostin, G., Koifman, K., Lycheva, T.: Modeling and optimization of layer-by-layer structures. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1009, 012014 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1009/1/012014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lychev, S., Manzhirov, A., Bychkov, P.: Discrete and continuous growth of deformable cylinder. In: Transactions on Engineering Technologies: World Congress on Engineering (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9804-4_17
  31. 31.
    Manzhirov, A., Parshin, D.: Accretion of a viscoelastic ball in a centrally symmetric force field. Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk. MTT 1, 66–83 (2006)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Marsden, J.E., Hughes, T.J.: Mathematical Foundations of Elasticity. Courier Corporation, North Chelmsford (1994)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Maugin, G.A.: Material Inhomogeneities in Elasticity, vol. 3. CRC Press, Boca Raton (1993)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mooney, M.: A theory of large elastic deformation. J. Appl. Phys. 11(9), 582–592 (1940).  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1712836 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Mukherjee, T., Zhang, W., DebRoy, T.: An improved prediction of residual stresses and distortion in additive manufacturing. Comput. Mater. Sci. 126, 360–372 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2016.10.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Noll, W.: The foundations of classical mechanics in the light of recent advances in continuum mechanics. In: Henkin, L., Suppes, P., Tarski, A. (eds.) The Axiomatic Method, with Special Reference to Geometry and Physics, Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, vol. 27, pp. 266–281. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1959).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0049-237X(09)70033-3 Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Noll, W.: Materially uniform simple bodies with inhomogeneities. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 27(1), 1–32 (1967)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ortiz-Bernardin, A., Sfyris, D.: A finite element formulation for stressed bodies with continuous distribution of edge dislocations. Acta Mech. 226(5), 1621–1640 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-014-1273-3 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Petersen, P.: Riemannian Geometry, vol. 171. Springer, Nwe York (2006)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Rakotomanana, L.: A Geometric Approach to Thermomechanics of Dissipating Continua. Progress in Mathematical Physics. Birkhäuser, Basel (2004).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-8176-8132-6 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Rivlin, R.: Large elastic deformations of isotropic materials. IV. Further developments of the general theory. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond, Ser. A Math. Phys. Sci. 241(835), 379–397 (1948).  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1948.0024 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Rudolph, G., Schmidt, M.: Differential Geometry and Mathematical Physics. Part I. Manifolds, Lie Groups and Hamiltonian Systems. Springer, Dordrecht (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5345-7
  43. 43.
    Segev, R., Rodnay, G.: Cauchy’s theorem on manifolds. J. Elast. 56(2), 129–144 (1999).  https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1007651917362 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Southwell, R.: An Introduction to the Theory of Elasticity for Engineers and Physicists. Oxford Engineering Science Series. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1941)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Truesdell, C., Noll, W.: The Non-linear Field Theories of Mechanics/Die Nicht-Linearen Feldtheorien der Mechanik, vol. 2. Springer, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Truesdell, C., Toupin, R.: The Classical Field Theories. Springer, New York (1960)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Truesdell, C.A.: A First Course in Rational Continuum Mechanics. Volume 1-General Concepts, vol. 1. Academic Press, Inc, Cambridge (1977)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Trzesowski, A.: On the geometric origin of Orowan-type kinematic relations and the Schmid yield criterion. Acta Mech. 141(3), 173–192 (2000).  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01268676 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Vastola, G., Zhang, G., Pei, Q., Zhang, Y.W.: Controlling of residual stress in additive manufacturing of ti6al4v by finite element modeling. Addit. Manuf. 12, 231–239 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2016.05.010. (Special Issue on Modeling & Simulation for Additive Manufacturing)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Vetyukov, Y., Gruber, P., Krommer, M., Gerstmayr, J., Gafur, I., Winter, G.: Mixed Eulerian-Lagrangian description in materials processing: deformation of a metal sheet in a rolling mill. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 109, 1371–1390 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.5314 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Wang, C.C.: On the geometric structures of simple bodies, a mathematical foundation for the theory of continuous distributions of dislocations. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 27(1), 33–94 (1967)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Wang, X.: Recursion formulas for Appell functions. Integral Transforms Spec. Funct. 23, 421–433 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1080/10652469.2011.596483 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Yavari, A., Goriely, A.: Riemann-Cartan geometry of nonlinear disclination mechanics. Math. Mech. Solids 18(1), 91–102 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1177/1081286511436137 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Yavari, A., Goriely, A.: Riemann–Cartan geometry of nonlinear dislocation mechanics. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 205(1), 59–118 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00205-012-0500-0 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Yu, B., Pan, D.Z.: Design for Manufacturability with Advanced Lithography. Springer, New York (2015)Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Zelenina, A.A., Zubov, L.M.: Spherically Symmetric Deformations of Micropolar Elastic Medium with Distributed Dislocations and Disclinations, pp. 357–369. Springer, Cham (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73694-5_19
  57. 57.
    Zubov, L.M.: Spherically symmetric solutions in the nonlinear theory of dislocations. Dokl. Phys. 59, 419–422 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1134/S1028335814090079 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Problems in Mechanics RASMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Bauman Moscow State Technical UniversityMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations