Advertisement

Acta Mechanica

, Volume 230, Issue 3, pp 965–977 | Cite as

Sound transmission through triple plates separated by air cavities in the low-frequency range

  • Akintoye Olumide OyeladeEmail author
  • Obanishola Mufutau Sadiq
  • Omotayo A.  Fakinlede
Original Paper
  • 52 Downloads

Abstract

A theoretical study of sound transmission in rigid duct through clamped triple plates separated by two impervious air cavities is formulated. The vibrating motion of the plates and the sound pressure field are expanded in terms of an infinite series of the modal functions. The accuracy of the theoretical predictions is first checked against experimental and numerical results, with good agreement achieved. The model predictions are then used to explore the influence of key parameters on the sound isolation capability of the triple-plate configuration, including the thickness of the plates and that of the air cavities. Furthermore, the sound transmission loss (STL) of the triple-plate model is compared with that of a double plate. Results showed that replacing the double plates with three plates while keeping the air cavity gaps between the plates the same degrades the STL in the low-frequency range. However, using the triple plates is more suitable to enhance the sound insulation performance when enough space is available.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors appreciate the Micromechanics Research Group in the Department ofMechanics of the Beijing Institute of Technology under the leadership of Professor Gengkai Hu, for their support in conducting this research study.

References

  1. 1.
    Xin, F.X., Lu, T.J.: Analytical and experimental investigation on transmission loss of clamped double panels: implication of boundary effects. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 125(3), 1506–1517 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kim, H., Kim, S., Lee, S., Seo, Y., Ma, P.: Sound transmission loss of double plates with an air cavity between them in a rigid duct. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 139(5), 2324–2333 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chazot, J., Guyader, J.: Prediction of transmission loss of double panels with a patch-mobility method. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 121(1), 267–278 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    London, A.: Transmission of reverberant sound through double walls. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 22(2), 270–279 (1950)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Beranek, L.L., Work, G.A.: Sound transmission through multiple structures containing flexible blankets. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 21(4), 419–428 (1949)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Olivier, D., Noureddine, A.: Experimental estimation of the transmission loss contributions of a sound package placed in a double wall structure. Appl. Acoust. 72(6), 372–379 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kropp, W., Rebillard, E.: On the air-borne sound insulation of double wall constructions. Acta Acust. United Acust. 85(5), 707–720 (1999)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    António, J., Tadeu, A., Godinho, L.: Analytical evaluation of the acoustic insulation provided by double infinite walls. J. Sound Vib. 263(1), 113–129 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Xin, F., Lu, T., Chen, C.: External mean flow influence on noise transmission through double-leaf aeroelastic plates. AIAA J. 47(8), 1939–1951 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lee, J.H., Kim, J.: Analysis of sound transmission through periodically stiffened panels by space-harmonic expansion method. J. Sound Vib. 251(2), 349–366 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Xin, F.X., Lu, T.J.: Sound radiation of orthogonally rib-stiffened sandwich structures with cavity absorption. Compos. Sci. Technol. 70(15), 2198–2206 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Xin, F.X., Lu, T.J.: Analytical modelling of fluid loaded orthogonally rib-stiffened sandwich structures. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 58(9), 1374–1396 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Xin, F.X., Lu, T.J.: Effects of core topology on sound insulation performance of lightweight all-metallic sandwich panels. Mater. Manuf. Process. 26(11), 1213–1221 (2010)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liu, Y., Daudin, C.: Analytical modelling of sound transmission through finite clamped double-wall sandwich panels lined with poroelastic materials. Compos. Struct. 172, 359–373 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhou, J., Bhaskar, A., Zhang, X.: Sound transmission through a double-panel construction lined with poroelastic material in the presence of mean flow. J. Sound Vib. 332(16), 3724–3734 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    D’Alessandro, V., Petrone, G., Franco, F., De Rosa, S.: A review of the vibroacoustics of sandwich panels: models and experiments. J. Sandw. Struct. Mater. 15(5), 541–582 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Varoglu, E., Karacabeyli, E., Stiemer, S., Ni, C., Buitelaar, M., Lungu, D.: Midply wood shear wall system: performance in dynamic testing. J. Struct. Eng. 133(7), 1035–1042 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Varoglu, E., Karacabeyli, E., Stiemer, S., Ni, C.: Midply wood shear wall system: concept and performance in static and cyclic testing. J. Struct. Eng. 132(9), 1417–1425 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Xin, F.X., Lu, T.J.: Analytical modeling of sound transmission through clamped triple-panel partition separated by enclosed air cavities. Eur. J. Mech. A/Solids 30(6), 770–782 (2011)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dimino, I., Vitiello, P., Aliabadi, F.: Sound transmission through triple panel partitions. Recent Pat. Mech. Eng. 6(3), 200–215 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Liu, Y.: Sound transmission through triple-panel structures lined with poroelastic materials. J. Sound Vib. 339, 376–395 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dimino, I., Vitiello, P., Aliabadi, F.: Active reduction of sound transmission through triple panel partitions: performance evaluation. In: 41st International Congress and Exposition on Noise Control Engineering, vol. 2 (2012)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Vinokur, R.: Transmission loss of triple partitions at low frequencies. Appl. Acoust. 29(1), 15–24 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Brekket, A.: Calculation methods for the transmission loss of single, double and triple partitions. Appl. Acousrrcs 14, 225–240 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Oyelade, A.O., Yi, C., Zhang, R., Hu, G.: Analytical and experimental investigation on sound transmission of double thin plates with magnetic negative stiffness. Int. J. Appl. Mech. 10(5), 1–17 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Young, D.: Vibration of rectangular plates by the Ritz method. J. Appl. Mech. 17(4), 448–453 (1950)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Leissa, A.W.: Vibration of Plates, vol. 362. Ohio State University Columbus, Columbus (1969)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Huebscher, R.G.: Friction equivalents for round, square and rectangular ducts. ASHVE Trans. (Renamed ASHRAE Trans.) 125(3), 101–144 (1948)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Carneal, J.P., Fuller, C.R.: An analytical and experimental investigation of active structural acoustic control of noise transmission through double panel systems. J. Sound Vib. 272(3–5), 749–771 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Akintoye Olumide Oyelade
    • 1
    Email author
  • Obanishola Mufutau Sadiq
    • 1
  • Omotayo A.  Fakinlede
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringUniversity of LagosLagosNigeria
  2. 2.Department of Systems Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringUniversity of LagosLagosNigeria

Personalised recommendations