Numerical simulations of emulsions in shear flows
- 49 Downloads
We present a modification of a recently developed volume of fluid method for multiphase problems (Ii et al. in J Comput Phys 231(5):2328–2358, 2012), so that it can be used in conjunction with a fractional-step method and fast Poisson solver, and validate it with standard benchmark problems. We then consider emulsions of two-fluid systems and study their rheology in a plane Couette flow in the limit of vanishing inertia. We examine the dependency of the effective viscosity \(\mu \) on the volume fraction \(\varPhi \) (from 10 to \(30\%\)) and the Capillary number Ca (from 0.1 to 0.4) for the case of density and viscosity ratio 1. We show that the effective viscosity decreases with the deformation and the applied shear (shear-thinning) while exhibiting a non-monotonic behavior with respect to the volume fraction. We report the appearance of a maximum in the effective viscosity curve and compare the results with those of suspensions of rigid and deformable particles and capsules. We show that the flow in the solvent is mostly a shear flow, while it is mostly rotational in the suspended phase; moreover, this behavior tends to reverse as the volume fraction increases. Finally, we evaluate the contributions to the total shear stress of the viscous stresses in the two fluids and of the interfacial force between them.
The work is supported by the Microflusa project. This effort receives funding from the European Union Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under Grant Agreement no. 664823. L.B. and M.E.R. also acknowledge financial support by the European Research Council Grant no. ERC-2013-CoG-616186, TRITOS. The computer time was provided by Swedish National Infrastructure for Computing (SNIC).
- 6.Caserta, S., Guido, S.: Vorticity banding in biphasic polymer blends. Langmuir 28(47), 16254–16262 (2012)Google Scholar
- 7.Caserta, S., Simeone, M., Guido, S.: A parameter investigation of shear-induced coalescence in semidilute PIB–PDMS polymer blends: effects of shear rate, shear stress volume fraction, and viscosity. Rheol. Acta 45(4), 505–512 (2006)Google Scholar
- 8.Caserta, S., Simeone, M., Guido, S.: Shear banding in biphasic liquid–liquid systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100(13), 137801 (2008)Google Scholar
- 9.Cristini, V., Guido, S., Alfani, A., Blawzdziewicz, J., Loewenberg, M.: Drop breakup and fragment size distribution in shear flow. J. Rheol. 47(5), 1283–1298 (2003)Google Scholar
- 10.Cummins, S.J., Francois, M.M., Kothe, D.B.: Estimating curvature from volume fractions. Comput. Fluids 83(6–7), 425–434 (2005)Google Scholar
- 16.Ferrini, F., Ercolani, D., De Cindio, B., Nicodemo, L., Nicolais, L., Ranaudo, S.: Shear viscosity of settling suspensions. Rheol. Acta 18(2), 289–296 (1979)Google Scholar
- 25.Loewenberg, M.: Numerical simulation of concentrated emulsion flows. J. Fluids Eng. 120(4), 824–832 (1998)Google Scholar
- 27.Mason, T.G.: New fundamental concepts in emulsion rheology. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 4(3), 231–238 (1999)Google Scholar
- 30.Noh, W.F., Woodward, P.: SLIC (simple line interface calculation). In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Numerical Methods in Fluid Dynamics, pp. 330–340. Springer (1976)Google Scholar
- 31.Picano, F., Breugem, W.P., Mitra, D., Brandt, L.: Shear thickening in non-Brownian suspensions: an excluded volume effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111(9), 098302 (2013)Google Scholar
- 38.Quintard, M., Whitaker, S.: Transport in ordered and disordered porous media II: generalized volume averaging. Transp. Porous Media 14(2), 179–206 (1994)Google Scholar
- 41.Rosti, M.E., Brandt, L.: Suspensions of deformable particles in a Couette flow. J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnnfm.2018.01.008 (2018) (accepted)
- 42.Rosti, M.E., Brandt, L., Mitra, D.: Rheology of suspensions of viscoelastic spheres: deformability as an effective volume fraction. Phys. Rev. Fluids 3(1), 012301(R) (2018)Google Scholar
- 44.Sacanna, S., Pine, D.J.: Shape-anisotropic colloids: building blocks for complex assemblies. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 16(2), 96–105 (2011)Google Scholar
- 51.Takeishi, N., Imai, Y., Ishida, S., Omori, T., Kamm, R.D., Ishikawa, T.: Cell adhesion during bullet motion in capillaries. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 311(2), H395–H403 (2016)Google Scholar
- 55.Tryggvason, G., Sussman, M., Hussaini, M.Y.: Immersed boundary methods for fluid interfaces. Comput. Methods Multiphase Flow 37, 239–261 (2007)Google Scholar
- 58.Xia, Y., Gates, B., Yin, Y., Lu, Y.: Monodispersed colloidal spheres: old materials with new applications. Adv. Mater. 12(10), 693–713 (2000)Google Scholar
- 62.Youngs, D.L.: An interface tracking method for a 3D Eulerian hydrodynamics code. Technical Report 44/92, Atomic Weapons Research Establishment (1984)Google Scholar
- 64.Zarraga, I.E., Hill, D.A., Leighton Jr., D.T.: The characterization of the total stress of concentrated suspensions of noncolloidal spheres in Newtonian fluids. J. Rheol. 44(2), 185–220 (2000)Google Scholar
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.