Acta Mechanica

, Volume 228, Issue 1, pp 307–322 | Cite as

Vibrating particles system algorithm for truss optimization with multiple natural frequency constraints

Original Paper

Abstract

In this paper, the recently developed physically inspired non-gradient algorithm is employed for structural optimization with frequency constraints. The algorithm being called vibrating particles system (VPS) mimics the free vibration of single degree of freedom systems with viscous damping. Truss optimization with frequency constraints has attracted substantial attention recently in order to enhance the dynamic performance of structures. These kinds of problems are believed to represent nonlinear and non-convex search spaces with several local optima and therefore are suitable for examining the capabilities of the new algorithms. A set of five truss design problems are considered for evaluating the VPS in this article. The numerical results demonstrate the efficiency and robustness of the new method and its competitive performance to other algorithms for structural optimization problems.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Kaveh, A., Zolghadr, A.: Topology optimization of trusses considering static and dynamic constraints using the CSS. Appl. Soft Comput. 13, 2727–34 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tong, W.H., Jiang, J.S., Liu, G.R.: Solution existence of the optimization problem of truss structures with frequency constraints. Int. J. Solids Struct. 37, 4043–4060 (2000)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bellagamba, L., Yang, T.Y.: Minimum mass truss structures with constraints on fundamental natural frequency. AIAA J. 19, 1452–1458 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lin, J.H., Chen, W.Y., Yu, Y.S.: Structural optimization on geometrical configuration and element sizing with static and dynamic constraints. Comput. Struct. 15, 507–515 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Konzelman, C.J.: Dual methods and approximation concepts for structural optimization. M.Sc. Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Toronto, Canada (1986)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Grandhi, R.V., Venkayya, V.B.: Structural optimization with frequency constraints. AIAA J. 26, 858–66 (1988)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang, D., Zha, W., Jiang, J.: Truss optimization on shape and sizing with frequency constraints. AIAA J. 42, 622–630 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sedaghati, R.: Benchmark case studies in structural design optimization using the force method. Int. J. Solids Struct. 42, 5848–5871 (2005)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lingyun, W., Mei, Z., Guangming, W., Guang, M.: Truss optimization on shape and sizing with frequency constraints based on genetic algorithm. Comput. Mech. 35, 361–368 (2005)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gomes, H.M.: Truss optimization with dynamic constraints using a particle swarm algorithm. Expert Syst. Appl. 38, 957–968 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kaveh, A., Zolghadr, A.: Truss optimization with natural frequency constraints using a hybridized CSS-BBBC algorithm with trap recognition capability. Comput. Struct. 102–103, 14–27 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Miguel, L.F.F., Fadel Miguel, L.F.: Shape and size optimization of truss structures considering dynamic constraints through modern meta-heuristic algorithms. Expert Syst. Appl. 39, 9458–9467 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zuo, W., Bai, J., Li, B.: A hybrid OC-GA approach for fast and global truss optimization with frequency constraints. Appl. Soft Comput. 14, 528–535 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kaveh, A., Javadi, S.M.: Shape and size optimization of trusses with multiple frequency constraints using harmony search and ray optimizer for enhancing the particle swarm optimization algorithm. Acta Mech. 225, 1595–1605 (2014)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kaveh, A., Ilchi Ghazaan, M.: Hybridized optimization algorithms for design of trusses with multiple natural frequency constraints. Adv. Eng. Softw. 79, 137–147 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hosseinzadeh, Y., Taghizadieh, N., Jalili, S.: Hybridizing electromagnetism-like mechanism algorithm with migration strategy for layout and size optimization of truss structures with frequency constraints. Neural Comput. Appl. 27, 953–971 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kaveh, A., Ilchi Ghazaan, M.: A new meta-heuristic algorithm: vibrating particles system. Scientia Iranica, Accepted for publicationGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Beer, F.P., Johnston Jr., E.R., Mazurek, D.F., Cornwell, P.J., Self, B.P.: Vector Mechanics for Engineers. McGraw-Hill Companies, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kaveh, A., Talatahari, S.: A novel heuristic optimization method: charged system search. Acta Mech. 213, 267–286 (2010)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kaveh, A., Ilchi Ghazaan, M.: Optimal design of dome truss structures with dynamic frequency constraints. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 53, 605–621 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre of Excellence for Fundamental Studies in Structural EngineeringIran University of Science and TechnologyNarmak, TehranIran
  2. 2.Department of Civil EngineeringIran University of Science and TechnologyNarmak, TehranIran

Personalised recommendations