Advertisement

Acta Mechanica

, Volume 225, Issue 2, pp 413–430 | Cite as

Hybrid reliability analysis of structures with multi-source uncertainties

  • Lei Wang
  • Xiaojun WangEmail author
  • Yong Xia
Article

Abstract

A new hybrid reliability analysis technique based on the convex modeling theory is developed for structures with multi-source uncertainties, which may contain randomness, fuzziness, and non-probabilistic boundedness. By solving the convex modeling reliability problem and further analyzing the correlation within uncertainties, the structural hybrid reliability is obtained. Considering various cases of uncertainties of the structure, four hybrid models including the convex with random, convex with fuzzy random, convex with interval, and convex with other three are built, respectively. The present hybrid models are compared with the conventional probabilistic and the non-probabilistic models by two typical numerical examples. The results demonstrate the accuracy and effectiveness of the proposed hybrid reliability analysis method.

Keywords

Failure Surface Limit State Function Structural Reliability Fuzzy Random Variable Interval Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Elishakoff I.: Probabilistic Theory of Structures. Dover, New York (1999)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ditlevsen O., Madsen H.O.: Structural Reliability Methods. Wiley, Chichester (1996)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Melchers R.E.: Structural Reliability: Analysis and Prediction. Wiley, Chichester (1999)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Madsen H.O., Krenk S., Lind N.C.: Methods of Structural Safety. Dover, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lemaire M.: Structural Reliability. ISTE-Wiley, New York (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hurtado, J.E., Alvarez, D.A.: The encounter of interval and probabilistic approaches to structural reliability at the design point. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 225–228, 74–94 (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jiang C., Han X., Lu G.Y.: A hybrid reliability model for structures with truncated probability distributions. Acta Mech. 223, 2021–2038 (2012)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kang Z., Luo Y.J.: Reliability-based structural optimization with probability and convex set hybrid models. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 42, 89–102 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ge R., Chen J.Q., Wei J.H.: Reliability-based design of composites under the mixed uncertainties and the optimization algorithm. Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica 2, 19–27 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Elishakoff I.: Three versions of the finite element method based on concepts of either stochasticity, fuzziness or anti-optimization. Appl. Mech. Rev. 51, 209–218 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ben-Haim Y., Elishakoff I.: Convex Models of Uncertainty in Applied Mechanics. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1990)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Qiu, Z.P., Wang, X.J.: Set-Theoretical Convex Methods for Problems in Structural Mechanics with Uncertainties. Beijing: Science Press (2008); (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Elishakoff I., Ohsaki M.: Optimization and Anti-optimization of Structures Under Uncertainty. Imperial College Press, London (2010)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wang X.J., Wang L., Elishakoff I., Qiu Z.P.: Probability and convexity concepts are not antagonistic. Acta Mech. 219, 45–64 (2011)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ben-Haim Y., Elishakoff I.: Robust reliability of structures. Adv. Appl. Mech. 33, 1–41 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Elishakoff I.: Discussion on the paper: “a non-probabilistic concept of reliability”. Struct. Saf. 17, 195–199 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Guo S.X., Lu Z.Z., Feng Y.S.: A non-probabilistic model of structural reliability based on interval analysis. Chin. J. Comput. Mech. 18, 56–60 (2001)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Guo S.X., Lu Z.Z.: Procedure for analyzing the fuzzy reliability of mechanical structures when parameters of probabilistic models are fuzzy. J. Mech. Strength 25, 527–529 (2003)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Guo S.X., Lu Z.Z.: Comparison between the non-probabilistic and probabilistic reliability methods for uncertain structure design. Chin. J. Appl. Mech. 20, 107–110 (2003)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Qiu Z.P., Mueller P.C., Frommer A.: The new non-probabilistic criterion of failure for dynamical systems based on convex models. Math. Comput. Model. 40, 201–215 (2004)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wang X.J., Qiu Z.P., Elishakoff I.: Non-probabilistic set-theoretic model for structural safety measure. Acta Mech. 198, 51–64 (2008)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jiang C., Han X., Lu G.Y., Liu J., Zhang Z., Bai Y.C.: Correlation analysis of non-probabilistic convex model and corresponding structural reliability technique. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 200, 2528–2546 (2011)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jiang C., Bi R.G., Lu G.Y., Han X.: Structural reliability analysis using non-probabilistic convex model. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 254, 83–98 (2013)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kang Z., Luo Y.J.: On structural optimization for non-probabilistic reliability based on convex models. Chin. J. Theor. Appl. Mech. 38, 807–815 (2006)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jiang C., Han X., Liu G.R.: Optimization of structures with uncertain constraints based on convex model and satisfaction degree of interval. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 196, 4791–4800 (2007)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Luo Y.J., Kang Z., Luo Z., Alex L.: Continuum topology optimization with non-probabilistic reliability constraints based on multi-ellipsoid convex model. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 39, 297–310 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Balu A.S., Rao B.N.: Inverse structural reliability analysis under mixed uncertainties using high dimensional model representation and fast Fourier transform. Eng. Struct. 37, 224–234 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Penmetsa R.C., Grandhi R.V.: Efficient estimation of structural reliability for problems with uncertain intervals. Comput. Struct. 80, 1103–1112 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hall J.W., Lawry J.: Generation combination and extension of random set approximations to coherent lower and upper probabilities. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 85, 89–101 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Karanki D.R., Kushwaha H.S., Verma A.K., Ajit S.: Uncertainty analysis based on probability bounds (p-box) approach in probabilistic safety assessment. Risk Anal. 29, 662–675 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gao W., Wu D., Song C.M., Tin-Loi F., Li X.J.: Hybrid probabilistic interval analysis of bar structures with uncertainty using a mixed perturbation Monte-Carlo method. Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 47, 643–652 (2011)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Jiang C., Lu G.Y., Han X., Liu L.X.: A new reliability analysis method for uncertain structures with random and interval variables. Int. J. Mech. Mater. Des. 8, 169–182 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Du X.P., Sudjianto A., Huang B.Q.: Reliability-based design under the mixture of random and interval variables. J. Mech. Des. 127, 1068–1076 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Guo S.X., Lu Z.Z.: Hybrid probabilistic and non-probabilistic model of structural reliability. J. Mech. Strength 24, 52–54 (2002)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Qiu Z.P., Wang J.: The interval estimation of reliability for probabilistic and non-probabilistic hybrid structural system. Eng. Failure Anal. 17, 1142–1154 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lu H., Zhou J., Golek R., Zhou M.: Hybrid reliability assessment for packaging prototyping. Microelectron. Reliab. 45, 597–609 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Chowdhury R., Rao B.N.: Hybrid high dimensional model representation for reliability analysis. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 198, 753–765 (2009)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Luo Y.J., Kang Z.: Structural reliability assessment based on probability and convex set mixed model. Comput. Struct. 87, 1408–1415 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ni Z., Qiu Z.P.: Hybrid probabilistic fuzzy and non-probabilistic model of structural reliability. Comput. Ind. Eng. 58, 463–467 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Rosenblatt M.: Remarks on a multivariate transformation. Ann. Math. Stat. 23, 470–472 (1952)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Rackwitz R., Flessler B.: Structural reliability under combined random load sequences. Comput. Struct. 9, 489–494 (1978)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Hasofer A.M., Lind N.C.: Exact and invariant second-moment code format. J. Eng. Mech. Div. 100, 111–121 (1974)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Zadeh L.A.: Fuzzy algorithm. Inf. Control 12, 94–120 (1968)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Goggin P.R.: The elastic constants of carbon-fibre composites. J. Mater. Sci. 8, 233–244 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Chen, L.M., Yang, B.N.: Mechanical analysis for composite materials. Beijing: China Science and Technology Press (2006); (in Chinese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Solid MechanicsBeihang UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringThe Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityHung HomHong Kong, China

Personalised recommendations