Acta Mechanica

, Volume 225, Issue 1, pp 277–297 | Cite as

Influence of humidity on creep response of sandwich beam with a viscoelastic soft core

  • Maziar RamezaniEmail author
  • Thomas Neitzert


Polymer foam cored sandwich beams are widely used in load-bearing components due to their high strength to weight ratio. To improve the reliability in using sandwich beams, it is essential to understand their long-term creep response in terms of variation of stresses and deformations with time under external mechanical and environmental stimuli. This paper presents an analytical model for investigating the creep response of sandwich beams made with a viscoelastic soft core, including the effect of the variable ambient humidity under the sustained load and its influence on the creep behavior. The model is based on a high-order viscoelastic structural modeling. The soft core is modeled as a viscoelastic material using differential-type constitutive relations that are based on the linear Boltzman’s principle of superposition and accounting for the deformability of the core in shear and through its thickness. Several numerical examples are presented in order to show the capability of the model and to investigate the effect of moisture on the creep behavior of sandwich beams. Finite element simulations of the creep response of sandwich beams are also performed using ABAQUS software to validate the proposed theoretical model. The results show the concentrations of shear and transverse normal stresses near the edges and their variation in time and with the change of humidity.


Axial Force Creep Behavior Soft Core Sandwich Panel Face Sheet 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Adam C.: Moderately large vibrations of imperfect elastic-plastic composite beams with thick layers. Int. J. Acoust. Vib. 7(1), 11–20 (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Adam C., Ziegler F.: Forced flexural vibrations of elastic-plastic composite beams with thick layers. Compos. Part B Eng. 28(3), 201–213 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alwis K.G.N.C., Burgoyne C.J.: Time-temperature superposition to determine the stress-rupture of aramid fibres. Appl. Compos. Mater. 13(4), 249–264 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bazant Z.P., Wu S.T.: Rate-Type creep law of aging concrete based on maxwell chain. Mater. Struct. 7(1), 45–60 (1974)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bîrsan M., Sadowski T., Marsavina L., Linul E., Pietras D.: Mechanical behavior of sandwich composite beams made of foams and functionally graded materials. Int. J. Solids Struct. 50(3–4), 519–530 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen C., Fleck N.A., Ashby M.F.: Creep response of sandwich beams with a metallic foam core. Adv. Eng. Mater. 4(10), 777–780 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Davies J.M.: Lightweight Sandwich Construction. Blackwell Science, Oxford (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Findley W.N., Lai J.S., Onran K.: Creep and Relaxation of Nonlinear Viscoelastic Materials (with an Introduction to Linear Viscoelasticity). North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam (1976)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Frostig Y.: Hygothermal (environmental) effects in high-order bending of sandwich beams with a flexible core and a discontinuous skin. Compos. Struct. 37(2), 205–221 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Frostig Y., Baruch M., Vilanay O., Sheinman I.: High-order theory for sandwich beam behavior with transversely flexible core. J. Eng. Mech. 118(5), 1026–1043 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hamed, E.: Creep response of sandwich beams with a viscoelastic core and composite laminates. In: 14th European Conference on Composite Materials, Paper ID: 645-ECCM14, 7–10 June 2010. Budapest, Hungary (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hamed, E., Ramezani, M.: Effect of boundary conditions on the creep response of sandwich beams with a viscoelastic soft core. In: Australasian Conference on the Mechanics of Structures and Materials (ACMSM22), 11–14 December 2012, Sydney, Australia (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Huang J.S., Gibson L.J.: Creep of sandwich beams with polymer foam cores. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2(2), 171–182 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Irschik H., Ziegler F.: Dynamics of linear elastic structures with selfstress: a unified treatment for linear and nonlinear problems. ZAMM—J. Appl. Math. Mech. 68(6), 199–205 (1988)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kesler O., Crews L.K., Gibson L.J.: Creep of sandwich beams with metallic foam cores. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 341(1–2), 264–272 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kim J.-S., Wang K.W.: On the asymptotic boundary conditions of an anisotropic beam via virtual work principle. Int. J. Solids Struct. 48(16–17), 2422–2431 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Massabò R., Cavicchi A.: Interaction effects of multiple damage mechanisms in composite sandwich beams subject to time dependent loading. Int. J. Solids Struct. 49(5), 720–738 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nyashin Y., Lokhov V., Ziegler F.: Decomposition method in linear elastic problems with eigenstrain. ZAMM—J. Appl. Math. Mech. 85(8), 557–570 (2005)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ramezani, M., Hamed, E.: On the influence of temperature on the creep response of sandwich beams with a viscoelastic soft core. In: 6th International Composites Conference (ACUN-6), 14–16 November 2012, Melbourne, Australia (2012)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shenoi R.A., Allen H.G., Clark S.D.: Cyclic creep and creep fatigue interaction in sandwich beam. J. Strain Anal. Eng. Des. 32(1), 1–18 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre of Advanced Manufacturing Technologies (CAMTEC), School of EngineeringAuckland University of TechnologyAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations