Advertisement

Acta Mechanica

, Volume 219, Issue 1–2, pp 45–64 | Cite as

Probability and convexity concepts are not antagonistic

  • Xiaojun Wang
  • Lei Wang
  • Isaac Elishakoff
  • Zhiping Qiu
Article

Abstract

This study is devoted to two objectives to illustrate that the probability and convexity concepts are not antagonistic and to introduce a new non-probabilistic convex model for structural reliability analysis. It is shown that the new measure of safety is easier to evaluate than the corresponding measure utilizing the interval analysis. Moreover, interrelation between the classical probabilistic method and convex modeling method is demonstrated. The purpose of this study is not to replace the probabilistic approach by the convex modeling method, but to illustrate that the probability and convexity concepts are compatible. Some numerical examples are presented to illustrate the feasibility of the proposed methodology.

Keywords

Uncertain Parameter Interval Analysis Safe Region Uncertain Variable Limit State Function 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Wang G.Y.: On the development of uncertain structural mechanics (in Chinese). Adv. Appl. Mech. 32(2), 205–211 (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Oberkampf W.L., Helton J.C., Joslyn C.A., Wojtkiewicz S.F., Ferson S.: Challenge problems: uncertainty in system response given uncertain parameters. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 85, 11–19 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Elishakoff I.: Three versions of the finite element method based on concepts of either stochasticity, fuzziness or anti-optimization. Appl. Mech. Rev. 51(3), 209–218 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ben-Haim Y., Elishakoff I.: Convex Models of Uncertainty in Applied Mechanics. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1990)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Qiu Z.P., Wang X.J.: Set-Theoretical Convex Methods for Problems in Structural Mechanics with Uncertainties (in Chinese). Science Press, Beijing (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Elishakoff I., Ohsaki M.: Optimization and Anti-Optimization of Structures Under Uncertainty. Imperial College Press, London (2010)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ben-Haim Y.: Robust reliability of structures. Adv. Appl. Mech. 33, 1–41 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Guo S.X., Lu Z.Z., Feng S.Y.: A non-probabilistic model of structural reliability based on interval analysis (in Chinese). Chin. J. Comput. Mech. 18(1), 56–60 (2001)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Elishakoff I.: Discussion on the paper: a non-probabilistic concept of reliability. Struct. Saf. 17(3), 195–199 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Guo X.S., Lu Z.Z.: Procedure for analyzing the fuzzy reliability of mechanical structures when parameters of probabilistic models are fuzzy (in Chinese). J. Mech. Strength 25(5), 527–529 (2003)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Qiu P.Z., Mueller C.P., Frommer A.: The new non-probabilistic criterion of failure for dynamical systems based on convex models. Math. Comput. Model. 40(1–2), 201–215 (2004)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Qiu P.Z., Chen Q.S., Wang J.X.: Criterion of the non-probabilistic robust reliability for structures (in Chinese). Chin. J. Comput. Mech. 21(1), 1–6 (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang X.J.: Robust reliability of structural vibration. J. Beijing Univ. Aeronaut. Astronaut. 29(11), 1006–1010 (2003) (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wang X.J., Qiu P.Z., Elishakoff I.: Non-probabilistic set-model for structural safety measure. Acta Mech. 198, 51–64 (2008)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Elishakoff, I.: Are probabilistic and antioptimization methods interrelated? In: Elishakoff, I. (ed.) Whys and Hows in Uncertainty Modeling: Probability Fuzziness and Anti-Optimization, Springer, Wien (1999)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ziegler F.: Private communication (2010)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Entropy (information theory) From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entropy_%28information_theory%29

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xiaojun Wang
    • 1
  • Lei Wang
    • 1
  • Isaac Elishakoff
    • 2
  • Zhiping Qiu
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Solid MechanicsBeijing University of Aeronautics and AstronauticsBeijingChina
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringFlorida Atlantic UniversityBoca RatonUSA

Personalised recommendations