Quantum molecular descriptors and adsorption properties of SCN− on (6,0), (7,0), (8,0), and Ga-doped (6,0) zigzag single-walled boron nitride nanotubes: a computational study
- 179 Downloads
- 2 Citations
Abstract
The behavior of the thiocyanate anion (SCN−) adsorbed on the external surface of H-capped (6,0), (7,0), (8,0), and Ga-doped (6,0) zigzag single-walled boron nitride nanotubes was studied by using density functional calculations. Geometry optimizations were carried out at the B3LYP/6-31G* level of theory using the Gaussian 03 suite of programs. We present the nature of the SCN− interaction in selected sites of the nanotubes. Our results show that the pristine boron nitride nanotubes cannot significantly detect SCN−. The calculated binding energy of the Ga-doped (6,0) single-walled boron nitride nanotube indicated that SCN− can be absorbed significantly on the Ga site and these nanotubes can therefore be used for SCN− storage. Binding energy corresponding to adsorption of SCN− on the Ga site in the Ga-doped (6,0) single-walled boron nitride nanotube was calculated to be −263.3 kJ mol−1. The calculated binding energies for SCN− in N-down orientation are higher than those in S-down orientation for all of the configurations. Also, we showed that the nanotube diameter has no significant role in determining the binding energy of SCN− and only the orientation and location of the SCN− and also doping of nanotubes by other atoms play an important role in determining the binding energy. The decrease in global hardness, energy gap, and ionization potential due to SCN− adsorption leads to a the lowering of stability and increase in reactivity of the (6,0) zigzag SCN−– and Ga-doped (6,0) zigzag SCN−–boron nitride nanotube complexes.
Graphical abstract
Keywords
Quantum molecular descriptors Boron nitride nanotubes Adsorption Binding energy DFTReferences
- 1.Ijima S (1991) Nature 354:56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Derycke V, Martel R, Appenzeller J, Avouris P (2002) Appl Phys Lett 80:2773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Liu C, Fan YY, Liu M, Cong HT, Cheng HM, Dresselhaus MS (1999) Science 286:1127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Zurek B, Autschbach J (2004) J Am Chem Soc 126:13079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Nojeh A, Lakatos GW, Peng S, Cho K, Pease RFW (2003) Nano Lett 3:1187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Baei MT, Soltani AR, Moradi AV, Tazikeh Lemeski E (2011) Comput Theoret Chem 970:30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Baei MT (2011) Monatsh Chem. doi: 10.1007/s00706-011-0674-4
- 8.Moradian R, Azadi S, Vasheghani Farahani S (2008) Phys Lett A 372:6935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Qian Z, Hou S, Zhang J, Li R, Shen Z, Zhao X, Xue Z (2005) Physica E 30:81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Baei MT, Sayyed Alang SZ, Moradi AV, Torabi P (2011) J Mol Model. doi: 10.1007/s00894-011-1130-4
- 11.Baei MT, Moradi AV, Torabi P, Moghimi M (2011) Monatsh Chem 142:1097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Wu Q, Hu Z, Liu C, Wang X, Chen Y (2005) J Phys Chem B109:19719Google Scholar
- 13.Roy S, Springborg M (2009) J Phys Chem C 113:81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Zhang SL (2001) Phys Lett A 285:207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Wang P, Orimo S, Matsusima T, Fujii H, Majer G (2002) Appl Phys Lett 80:318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Ma R, Bando Y, Zhu H, Sato T, Xu C, Wu D (2002) J Am Chem Soc 124:7672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Fitzgerald M, Bowie JH (2004) J Phys Chem A 108:3668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Bierbaum VM, Grabowski JJ, DePuy CH (1984) J Phys Chem 88:1389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Smith D, Spanel P (1995) Mass Spectrom Rev 14:255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Baei MT, Soltani AR, Torabi P, Moradi AV (2011) Monatsh Chem 142:979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Chattaraj PK, Sarkar U, Roy DR (2006) Chem Rev 106:2065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Hazarika KK, Baruah NC, Deka RC (2009) Struct Chem 20:1079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Parr RG, Szentpaly L, Liu S (1999) J Am Chem Soc 121:1922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Baei MT, Sayyed-Alangi SZ, Soltani A, Bahari M, Masoodi A (2011) Monatsh Chem 142:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Tournus F, Charlier JC (2005) Phys Rev B 71:165421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, Scuseria GE, Robb MA, Cheeseman JR, Zakrzewski VG, Montgomery JA Jr, Stratmann RE, Burant JC, Dapprich S, Millam JM, Daniels AD, Kudin KN, Strain MC, Farkas O, Tomasi J, Barone V, Cossi M, Cammi R, Mennucci B, Pomelli C, Adamo C, Clifford S, Ochterski J, Petersson GA, Ayala PY, Cui Q, Morokuma K, Malick DK, Rabuck AD, Raghavachari K, Foresman JB, Cioslowski J, Ortiz JV, Baboul AG, Stefanov BB, Liu G, Liashenko A, Piskorz P, Komaromi I, Gomperts R, Martin RL, Fox DJ, Keith T, Al-Laham MA, Peng CY, Nanayakkara A, Gonzalez C, Challacombe M, Gill PMW, Johnson B, Chen W, Wong MW, Andres JL, Gonzalez C, Head-Gordon M, Replogle ES, Pople JA (2003) Gaussian 03, rev. B03. Gaussian, PittsburghGoogle Scholar
