Archives of Virology

, Volume 164, Issue 5, pp 1453–1457 | Cite as

A rapid, sensitive and inexpensive method for detection of grapevine red blotch virus without tissue extraction using loop-mediated isothermal amplification

  • J. Lucina Romero Romero
  • Gavriela Dena Carver
  • Patricio Arce Johnson
  • Keith L. Perry
  • Jeremy R. ThompsonEmail author
Brief Report


Grapevine red blotch virus (GRBV) is an emerging virus of significant viticultural importance throughout North America. Here, we report the development of a simple protocol for point-of-use detection of GRBV. Extraction of nucleic acids is not required; instead, the whole intact plant can simply be pricked with a sterile pipette tip, which is then incubated in sterile distilled water to provide the sample template in a loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) reaction. This method is 10,000 times more sensitive than conventional PCR, costs under a dollar per sample, and can be completed from sampling to readout in just over half an hour.



Many thanks to the Cornell Latin American Studies Program Fellowship for funding JLR2 while at Cornell. We are also grateful to John Keeton and colleagues at the USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Unit for providing us with dormant field cane material from the USDA grapevine germplasm repository, and to Heather McLane, Aisha Younas and Alex Cha for their technical and greenhouse support. Thanks also to Marc Fuchs for critically reading the manuscript. This work was supported by USDA-NIFA Hatch project number 1013513, and the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Cornell University.


This study was funded by a Cornell Latin American Studies Program Fellowship, USDA-NIFA Hatch project number 1013513 and the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Cornell University.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Supplementary material

705_2019_4207_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (1.8 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 1792 kb)


  1. 1.
    Blanco-Ulate B, Hopfer H, Figueroa-Balderas R, Ye Z, Rivero RM, Albacete A, Pérez-Alfocea F, Koyama R, Anderson MM, Smith RJ, Ebeler SE, Cantu D (2017) Red blotch disease alters grape berry development and metabolism by interfering with the transcriptional and hormonal regulation of ripening. J Exp Bot 68:1225–1238CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cieniewicz EJ, Pethybridge SJ, Gorny A, Madden LV, McLane H, Perry KL, Fuchs M (2017) Spatiotemporal spread of grapevine red blotch-associated virus in a California vineyard. Virus Res 241:156–162CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gambino G, Perrone I, Gribaudo I (2008) A Rapid and effective method for RNA extraction from different tissues of grapevine and other woody plants. Phytochem Anal 19:520–525CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gasperin-Bulbarela J, Licea-Navarro AF, Pino-Villar C, Hernandez-Martinez R, Carrillo-Tripp J (2018) First report of grapevine red blotch virus in Mexico. Plant Dis. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Krenz B, Thompson JR, McLane HL, Fuchs M, Perry KL (2014) Grapevine red blotch-associated virus Is Widespread in the United States. Phytopathology 104:1232–1240CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Li R, Fuchs MF, Perry KL, Mekuria T, Zhang S (2017) Development of a fast Amplifyrp Acceler8 diagnostic assay for grapevine red blotch virus. J Plant Pathol 99:657–662Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Notomi T, Okayama H, Masubuchi H, Yonekawa T, Watanabe K, Amino N, Hase T (2000) Loop-mediated isothermal amplification of DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 28:e63CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Poojari S, Lowery DT, Rott M, Schmidt AM, Úrbez-Torres JR (2017) Incidence, distribution and genetic diversity of Grapevine red blotch virus in British Columbia. Can J Plant Pathol 39:201–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Reynard J-S, Brodard J, Dubuis N, Zufferey V, Schumpp O, Schaerer S, Gugerli P (2018) Grapevine red blotch virus: absence in Swiss vineyards and analysis of potential detrimental effect on viticultural performance. Plant Dis 102:651–655CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Setiono FJ, Chatterjee D, Fuchs M, Perry KL, Thompson JR (2018) The distribution and detection of grapevine red blotch virus in its host depend on time of sampling and tissue type. Plant Dis 102:2187–2193CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sudarshana MR, Perry KL, Fuchs MF (2015) Grapevine red blotch-associated virus, an emerging threat to the grapevine industry. Phytopathology 105:1026–1032CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vargas-Asencio J, Wojciechowska K, Raskerville M, Gomez AL, Perry KL, Thompson JR (2017) The complete nucleotide sequence and genomic characterization of grapevine asteroid mosaic associated virus. Virus Res 227:82–87CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yepes LM, Cieniewicz E, Krenz B, McLane H, Thompson JR, Perry KL, Fuchs M (2018) Causative role of grapevine red blotch virus in red blotch disease. Phytopathology 108:902–909CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de Biotecnología AgrícolaInstituto Politécnico Nacional, CIIDIR, Unidad SinaloaGuasaveMexico
  2. 2.Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology Section, School of Integrative Plant ScienceCornell UniversityIthacaUSA
  3. 3.Dept. de Genética Molecular y MicrobiologíaPontificia Universidad Católica de ChileSantiagoChile

Personalised recommendations