Advertisement

Archives of Virology

, Volume 164, Issue 2, pp 523–534 | Cite as

Structural analysis and proteomics studies on the Myoviridae vibriophage M4

  • Sayani Das
  • Moumita Dutta
  • Anindito Sen
  • Amar N. GhoshEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Bacteriophages play a crucial role in tracking the spread of bacterial epidemics. The frequent emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacterial strains throughout the world has motivated studies on bacteriophages that can potentially be used in phage therapy as an alternative to conventional antibiotic treatment. A recent outbreak of cholera in Haiti took many lives due to a rapid development of resistance to the available antibiotics. The properties of vibriophages, bacteriophages that infect Vibrio cholerae, are therefore of practical interest. A detailed understanding of the structure and assembly of a vibriophage is potentially useful in developing phage therapy against cholera as well as for fabricating artificial nanocontainers. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to determine the three-dimensional organization of vibriophage M4 at sub-nanometer resolution by electron microscopy and single-particle analysis techniques to facilitate its use as a therapeutic agent. We found that M4 has a large capsid with T = 13 icosahedral symmetry and a long contractile tail. This double-stranded DNA phage also contains a head-to-tail connector protein complex that joins the capsid to the tail and a prominent baseplate at the end of the tail. This study also provides information regarding the proteome of this phage, which is proteins similar to that of other Myoviridae phages, and most of the encoded proteins are structural proteins that form the exquisite architecture of this bacteriophage.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to Dr. Shanta Dutta, the director of this institute, for her interest and encouragement in this study. This study was supported in part by financial assistance from CSIR, Government of India [Grant no. 21(0948)/13/EMR-II]. We are also thankful to Prof. Peter Rosenthal, Francis Crick Institute, London, UK, for allowing us to collect negative stain data. We also express our sincere thanks to Professor Steven J. Ludtke, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA, and to Dr. Bernard Heymann, NIH, USA, for their expert comments regarding reconstructions. We are also thankful to UCSF for allowing us to use Chimera software. Access of NCBI-Blast search tool is also thankfully acknowledged. We are also very much thankful to Dr. Kalyan Mitra, CSIR-CDRI, Lucknow, for his immense support for this study. We are thankful to Dr. Ranjan Kumar Nandy, Dr. Sambit Roy, and Dr. Anuradha Sinha of this institute for helping us in performing the gel studies of proteins. We are also thankful to Mr. Sandip Chakraborty, technical officer, CSIR-IICB, Kolkata, for helping us with the MALDI-TOF study of proteins. S.D. performed research, analyzed data, processed data, and wrote the paper. M.D. performed research and analyzed data. A.S. analyzed and processed data. A.N.G. designed and performed research, analyzed and interpreted data, and corrected the paper. All authors have read and approved the paper.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical issues

No human subjects or animals were used in this study.

References

  1. 1.
    D’Herelle F (2007) On an invisible microbe antagonistic toward dysenteric bacilli: brief note by Mr. F. D’Herelle, presented by Mr. Roux. 1917. Res Microbiol 158:553–554.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resmic.2007.07.005 Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ackermann HW, Furniss AL, Kasatiya SS, Lee JV, Mbiquino A, Newman FS, Takeya K, Viev JF (1983) Morphology of Vibrio cholerae typing phages. Ann Virol (Inst Pasteur) 134E:387–404Google Scholar
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
    Siddique AK, Baqui AH, Eusof A, Haider K, Hossain MA, Bashir I, Zaman K (1991) Survival of classic cholera in Bangladesh. Lancet 337:1125–1127Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sepúlveda J, Valdespino JL, Garcia L (2006) Cholera in Mexico: the paradoxical benefits of the last pandemic. Int J infect Dis 10(1):4–13Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pearson GD, Mekalanos JJ (1982) Molecular cloning of Vibrio cholerae enterotoxin genes in Escherichia coli K-12. Proc Natl Acad Sci 79(9):2976–2980Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yen M, Cairns LS, Camilli A (2017) A cocktail of three virulent bacteriophages prevents Vibrio cholerae infection in animal models. Nat Commun 8:14187.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14187 Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fokine A, Chipman PR, Leiman PG, Mesyanzhinov VV, Rao VB, Rossmann MG (2004) Molecular architecture of the prolate head of bacteriophage T4. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:6003–6008Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sen A, Ghosh AN (2017) Visualizing a Vibrio cholerae O1 El Tor typing bacteriophage belonging to the Myoviridae group and the packaging of its genomic ends inside the phage capsid. J Biomol Struct Dyn 17:1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2017.1368416 Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chattopadhyay DJ, Sarkar BL, Ansari MQ, Chakrabarti BK, Roy MK, Ghosh AN, Pal SC (1993) New phage typing scheme for Vibrio cholerae O1 biotype El Tor strains. J Clin Microbiol 31:1579–1585Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sayani D, Ghosh AN (2018) Preliminary characterization of El Tor Vibriophage M4. Intervirology.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000485835 Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Adams MH (1959) Bacteriophages. Wiley (Interscience), New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Laemmli UK (1970) Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227:680–685.  https://doi.org/10.1038/227680a0 Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Khatua B, Van VJ, Choudhury BP, Chaudhry R, Mandal C (2014) Sialylation of outer membrane porin protein D: a mechanistic basis of antibiotic uptake in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mol Cell Proteom 13(6):1412–1428.  https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M113.030999 Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ludtke SJ (2016) Single-particle refinement and variability analysis in EMAN2.1. Methods Enzymol 579:159–189.  https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.mie.2016.05.001 Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Heymann JB, Belnap DM (2007) Bsoft: image processing and molecular modeling for electron microscopy. J Struct Biol 157(1):3–18Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC, Couch GS, Greenblatt DM, Meng EC, Ferrin TE (2004) UCSF chimera—a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J Comput Chem 25(13):1605–1612Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Baker TS, Johnson JE (1996) Low resolution meets high: towards a resolution continuum from cells to atoms. Curr Opin Struct Biol 6:585–594Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Parent KN, Gilcrease EB, Casjens SR, Baker TS (2012) Structural evolution of the P22-like phages: comparison of Sf6 and P22 procapsid and virion architectures. Virology 427(2):177–188.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virol.2012.01.040 Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nováček J, Šiborová M, Benešík M, Pantůček R, Doškař J, Plevka P (2016) Structure and genome release of Twort-like Myoviridae phage with a double-layered baseplate. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113(33):9351–9356.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1605883113 Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bebeacua C, Lai L, Vegge C, Brøndsted L, van Heel Veesler D, Cambillau C (2013) Visualizing a complete siphoviridae member by single-particle electron microscopy: the structure of lactococcal phage TP901-1. J Virol 87:1061–1068.  https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.02836-12 Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bebeacua C, Tremblay D, Farenc C, Chapot-Chartier MP, Sadovskaya I, van Heel M, Cambillau C (2013) Structure, adsorption to host, and infection mechanism of virulent lactococcal phage p2. J Virol 8:12302–12312Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Müller DJ, Engel A, Carrascosa JL, Vélez M (1997) The bacteriophage phi29 head-tail connector imaged at high resolution with the atomic force microscope in buffer solution. EMBO J 16(10):2547–2553.  https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.02033-13 Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hendrix RW (1978) Symmetry mismatch and DNA packaging in large bacteriophages. Proc NatI Acad Sci 75(10):4779–4783Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Simpson AA, Tao Y, Leiman PG, Badasso MO, He Y, Jardine PJ, Olson NH, Morais MC, Grimes S, Anderson DL, Baker TS, Rossmann MG (2000) Structure of the bacteriophage phi29 DNA packaging motor. Nature 408(6813):745–750Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tavares P, Lurz R, Sitiege A, Ruckert B, Trautner TA (1996) Sequential headful packaging and fate of the cleaved DNA ends in bacteriophage SPP1. J Mol Biol 264(5):954–957Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sassi M, Bebeacua C, Drancourt M, Cambillau C (2013) The first structure of a mycobacteriophage, the Mycobacterium abscessus subsp. bolletii phage Araucaria. J Virol 87(14):8099–8109.  https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.01209-13 Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nováček J, Šiborová M, Benešík M, Pantůček R, Doškař J, Plevka P (2016) Structure and genome release of Twort-like Myoviridae phage with a double-layered baseplate. Proc Natl Acad Sci 113(33):9351–9356.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1605883113 Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Aksyuk AA, Kurochkina LP, Fokine A, Forouhar F, Mesyanzhinov VV, Tong L, Rossmann MG (2011) Structural conservation of the myoviridae phage tail sheath protein fold. Structure 19(12):1885–1894.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2011.09.012 Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Aksyuk AA, Leiman PG, Shneider MM, Mesyanzhinov VV, Rossmann MG (2009) The structure of gene product 6 of bacteriophage T4, the hinge-pin of the baseplate. Structure 17(6):800–808.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2009.04.005 Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kostyuchenko VA, Leiman PG, Chipman PR, Kanamaru S, van Raaij MJ, Arisaka F, Rossmann MG (2003) Three-dimensional structure of bacteriophage T4 baseplate. Nat Struct Biol 10:688–693.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nsb970s Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Seed KD, Bodi KL, Kropinski AM, Ackermann HW, Calderwood SB, Qadri F, Camilli A (2011) Evidence of a dominant lineage of Vibrio cholerae-specific lytic bacteriophages shed by cholera patients over a 10-year period in Dhaka, Bangladesh. MBio 2(1):e00334-10.  https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.00334-10 Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Shigenobu M, Shuji T, Tetsuro K, Tomio K (1992) A broad-host-range Vibriophage, KVP40, isolated from sea water. Microbiol Immunol 36(1):93–97.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1348-0421.1992.tb01645 Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Canova MJ, Molle V (2014) Bacterial serine/threonine protein kinases in host–pathogen interactions. J Biol Chem 4:289(14):9473–9479.  https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.R113.529917 Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hatfull GF (2012) Complete genome sequences of 138 mycobacteriophages. J Virol 86(4):2382–2384.  https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.06870-11 Google Scholar
  36. 36.
  37. 37.
    Sergio GB, José MO, Carmela G, Antonio L, Richard K, Gavin C, Mark JR (2010) Structure of the bacteriophage T4 long tail fiber receptor-binding tip. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107:20287–20292.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1011218107 Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Leimen PG, Shneider MM, Mesyanzhinov VV, Rossmann MG (2006) Evolution of bacteriophage tails: structure of T4 gene product 10. J Mol Biol 358(3):912–921Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Artimo P, Arnold K, Baratin D et al (2012) ExPAsY: SIB bioinformatics resource portal. Neuclic Acid Res 40(W1):W597–W603Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sayani Das
    • 1
  • Moumita Dutta
    • 1
  • Anindito Sen
    • 1
    • 2
  • Amar N. Ghosh
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Division of Electron MicroscopyICMR-National Institute of Cholera and Enteric DiseasesKolkataIndia
  2. 2.Microscopy and Imaging CenterTexas A &M UniversityCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations