Advertisement

Archives of Virology

, Volume 164, Issue 2, pp 381–390 | Cite as

Molecular characterization and phylogenetic analysis of very virulent infectious bursal disease virus circulating in Morocco during 2016-2017

  • Charifa Drissi Touzani
  • Siham Fellahi
  • Fatima Gaboun
  • Ouafaa Fassi Fihri
  • Selene Baschieri
  • Rachid Mentag
  • Mohammed El HouadfiEmail author
Original Article
  • 73 Downloads

Abstract

Very virulent infectious bursal disease virus (vvIBDV), the cause of significant economic losses in many poultry-producing areas, has been present in Morocco since 1991. In spite of the introduction of vaccination, disease outbreaks are frequently observed. To ascertain if vaccines failure may be due to the emergence of new strains, the aim of this study was to perform for the first time the molecular characterization of vvIBDV strains circulating in Morocco by focusing on the hypervariable region (HVR) of the VP2 protein, which is frequently used for molecular epidemiology and phylogenetic studies. Field samples of haemorrhagic bursae of Fabricius were collected for molecular characterization in different parts of the country during 2016-2017 from 48 chicken flocks showing symptoms of disease. In a phylogenetic tree, nucleotide sequences containing the VP2 HVR of 13 samples that were positive for vvIBDV formed a common branch with those of vvIBDV references strains published in GenBank, but they clearly grouped into a distinct subcluster. An alignment of the deduced amino acid sequences, in addition to confirming the presence of the “signature” typical of the vvIBDV HVR, also revealed the presence of substitutions in hydrophilic loops that are known to be involved in the elicitation of neutralizing antibodies. One of these substitutions is unique to the Moroccan isolates. These results represent the first molecular characterization of vvIBDV isolates in Morocco and may indicate that one of the causes of vaccine ineffectiveness is antigenic drift.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by AVIAMED project through the ARIMNet2 2015 Call by the following funding agencies: Ministry of Higher Education, Scientific Research and Professional Training of Morocco (MESRSFC) and Italian Ministry of Agricultural, Food and Forestry Policies (MIPAAF). ARIMNet2 (ERA-NET) has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under grant agreement no. 618127.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Cosgrove AS (1962) An apparently new disease of chickens: avian nephrosis. Avian Dis 6:385.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1587909 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Müller H, Islam MR, Raue R (2003) Research on infectious bursal disease—the past, the present and the future. Vet Microbiol 97:153–165.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2003.08.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berg TPVD, Gonze M, Meulemans G (1991) Acute infectious bursal disease in poultry: isolation and characterisation of a highly virulent strain. Avian Pathol 20:133–143.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03079459108418748 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lasher HN, Shane SM (1994) Infectious bursal disease. Worlds Poult Sci J 50:133–166.  https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS19940013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Berg TPVD (2000) Acute infectious bursal disease in poultry: a review. Avian Pathol 29:175–194.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03079450050045431 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sharma J (2000) Infectious bursal disease virus of chickens: pathogenesis and immunosuppression. Dev Comp Immunol 24:223–235.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0145-305X(99)00074-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rautenschlein S, Yeh H-Y, Njenga MK, Sharma JM (2002) Role of intrabursal T cells in infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) infection: T cells promote viral clearance but delay follicular recovery. Arch Virol 147:285–304.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s705-002-8320-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ozel M, Gelderblom H (1985) Capsid symmetry of viruses of the proposed Birnavirus group. Arch Virol 84:149–161.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01378968 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hoque MM, Omar AR, Chong LK et al (2001) Pathogenicity of SspI-positive infectious bursal disease virus and molecular characterization of the VP2 hypervariable region. Avian Pathol J WVPA 30:369–380.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03079450120066377 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    van den Berg TP, Morales D, Eterradossi N et al (2004) Assessment of genetic, antigenic and pathotypic criteria for the characterization of IBDV strains. Avian Pathol 33:470–476.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03079450400003650 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Heine HG, Haritou M, Failla P et al (1991) Sequence analysis and expression of the host-protective immunogen VP2 of a variant strain of infectious bursal disease virus which can circumvent vaccination with standard type I strains. J Gen Virol 72(Pt 8):1835–1843.  https://doi.org/10.1099/0022-1317-72-8-1835 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Letzel T, Coulibaly F, Rey FA et al (2007) Molecular and structural bases for the antigenicity of VP2 of infectious bursal disease virus. J Virol 81:12827–12835.  https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.01501-07 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bayliss CD, Spies U, Shaw K et al (1990) A comparison of the sequences of segment A of four infectious bursal disease virus strains and identification of a variable region in VP2. J Gen Virol 71:1303–1312.  https://doi.org/10.1099/0022-1317-71-6-1303 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jackwood DJ, Sommer-Wagner S (2007) Genetic characteristics of infectious bursal disease viruses from four continents. Virology 365:369–375.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virol.2007.03.046 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Michel LO, Jackwood DJ (2017) Classification of infectious bursal disease virus into genogroups. Arch Virol 162:3661–3670.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-017-3500-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mardassi H, Khabouchi N, Ghram A et al (2004) A very virulent genotype of infectious bursal disease virus predominantly associated with recurrent infectious bursal disease outbreaks in tunisian vaccinated flocks. Avian Dis 48:829–840.  https://doi.org/10.1637/7210-052004R CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mawgod SA, Arafa AS, Hussein HA (2014) Molecular genotyping of the infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) isolated from Broiler Flocks in Egypt. Int J Vet Sci Med 2:46–52.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijvsm.2014.02.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mohamed MA, Elzanaty KES, Bakhit BM, Safwat MM (2014) Genetic characterization of infectious bursal disease viruses associated with gumboro outbreaks in commercial broilers from Asyut Province, Egypt. ISRN Vet Sci 2014:1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/916412 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nwagbo IO, Shittu I, Nwosuh CI et al (2016) Molecular characterization of field infectious bursal disease virus isolates from Nigeria. Vet World 9:1420–1428.  https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2016.1420-1428 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tomás G, Hernández M, Marandino A et al (2012) Development and validation of a TaqMan-MGB real-time RT-PCR assay for simultaneous detection and characterization of infectious bursal disease virus. J Virol Methods 185:101–107.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2012.06.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Senne D (2008) Virus propagation in emgryonating eggs in Dufour-Zavala. In: Swayne DE, Glisson JR, Pearson JE, Reed WM, Jackwood MW, Woolcock PR (eds) A laboratory manual for the isolation, identification and characterization of Avian Pathogens, 5th edn. American Association of Avian Pathologists, pp 204–208Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hall TA (1999) BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NTGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tan DY, Hair-Bejo M, Omar AR, Aini I (2004) Pathogenicity and molecular analysis of an infectious bursal disease virus isolated from Malaysian village chickens. Avian Dis 48:410–416.  https://doi.org/10.1637/7089 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mundt E (1999) Tissue culture infectivity of different strains of infectious bursal disease virus is determined by distinct amino acids in VP2. J Gen Virol 80:2067–2076.  https://doi.org/10.1099/0022-1317-80-8-2067 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Brandt M, Yao K, Liu M et al (2001) Molecular determinants of virulence, cell tropism, and pathogenic phenotype of infectious bursal disease virus. J Virol 75:11974–11982.  https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.75.24.11974-11982.2001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Silva MS, Bertran K, Moresco K et al (2016) Infection with some infectious bursal disease virus pathotypes produces virus in chicken muscle tissue and the role of humoral immunity as a mitigation strategy. Avian Dis 60:758–764.  https://doi.org/10.1637/11394-021716-Reg CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Silva MS, Rissi DR, Swayne DE (2016) Very virulent infectious bursal disease virus produces more-severe disease and lesions in specific-pathogen-free (SPF) leghorns than in SPF broiler chickens. Avian Dis 60:63–66.  https://doi.org/10.1637/11230-070615-ResNote.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Jackwood DJ, Sommer SE (1999) Restriction fragment length polymorphisms in the VP2 gene of infectious bursal disease viruses from outside the United States. Avian Dis 43:310.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1592622 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lupini C, Giovanardi D, Pesente P et al (2016) A molecular epidemiology study based on VP2 gene sequences reveals that a new genotype of infectious bursal disease virus is dominantly prevalent in Italy. Avian Pathol 45:458–464.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03079457.2016.1165792 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Eterradossi N, Arnauld C, Toquin D, Rivallan G (1998) Critical amino acid changes in VP2 variable domain are associated with typical and atypical antigenicity in very virulent infectious bursal disease viruses. Arch Virol 143:1627–1636.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s007050050404 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Jackwood DJ, Sreedevi B, LeFever LJ, Sommer-Wagner SE (2008) Studies on naturally occurring infectious bursal disease viruses suggest that a single amino acid substitution at position 253 in VP2 increases pathogenicity. Virology 377:110–116.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virol.2008.04.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Xia RX, Wang HY, Huang GM, Zhang MF (2008) Sequence and phylogenetic analysis of a Chinese very virulent infectious bursal disease virus. Arch Virol 153:1725–1729.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-008-0140-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Shabbir MZ, Ali M, Abbas M et al (2016) Molecular characterization of infectious bursal disease viruses from Pakistan. Arch Virol 161:2001–2006.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-016-2869-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Coulibaly F, Chevalier C, Delmas B, Rey FA (2010) Crystal structure of an aquabirnavirus particle: insights into antigenic diversity and virulence determinism. J Virol 84:1792–1799.  https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.01536-09 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charifa Drissi Touzani
    • 1
    • 2
  • Siham Fellahi
    • 1
  • Fatima Gaboun
    • 2
  • Ouafaa Fassi Fihri
    • 1
  • Selene Baschieri
    • 3
  • Rachid Mentag
    • 2
  • Mohammed El Houadfi
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Unité de Pathologie Aviaire, Département de Pathologie et Santé Publique VétérinaireIAV Hassan IIRabatMorocco
  2. 2.Unité de Biotechnologie, CRRA-RabatInstitut National de la Recherche Agronomique INRARabatMorocco
  3. 3.Laboratory of BiotechnologyAgenzia Nazionale per le Nuove tecnologie, l’Energia e lo Sviluppo economico sostenibile (ENEA), C.R. CasacciaRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations