Molecular characterization and analysis of conserved potyviral motifs in bean common mosaic virus (BCMV) for RNAi-mediated protection
- 76 Downloads
Australian bean common mosaic virus (BCMV) isolates were sequenced, and the sequences were compared to global BCMV and bean common mosaic necrosis virus (BCMNV) sequences and analysed for conserved potyviral motifs to generate in planta RNA-interference (RNAi) resistance. Thirty-nine out of 40 previously reported potyvirus motifs were conserved among all 77 BCMV/BCMNV sequences. Two RNAi target regions were selected for dsRNA construct design, covering 920 bp of the nuclease inclusion b (NIb) protein and 461 bp of the coat protein (CP). In silico prediction of the effectiveness of these constructs for broad-spectrum defence against the 77 BCMV and BCMNV sequences was done via analysis of putative 21-nucleotide (nt) and 22-nt small-interfering RNAs (siRNAs) generated from the target regions. The effectiveness of both constructs for siRNA generation and BCMV RNAi-mediated resistance was validated in Nicotiana benthamiana transient assays.
The authors would like to thank Queensland Alliance of Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI), Australia and the University of Queensland, Australia, for their support.
This study was funded by the Accelerated Partnership Grant, Queensland Government (2014000652), awarded to N.M. with Nufarm Australia Limited as the industry partner. E.A.W. PhD programme with N.M. is supported by a scholarship from the University of Queensland.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available in the NCBI GenBank repository, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Only complete genomes of BCMV and BCMNV were used.
- 1.International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications (ISAAA) (2018) Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) GM EventsGoogle Scholar
- 2.Aleman-Verdaguer M-E, Goudou-Urbino C, Dubern J, Beachy RN, Fauquet C (1997) Analysis of the sequence diversity of the P1, HC, P3, NIb and CP genomic regions of several yam mosaic potyvirus isolates: implications for the intraspecies molecular diversity of potyviruses. J Gen Virol 78:1253–1264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Anuradha C, Balasubramanian V, Selvarajan R (2015) Sequence motif comparison and homology modeling of helper component proteinase (HC–Pro) of banana bract mosaic virus.Google Scholar
- 6.Bhadramurthy V, Bhat A (2009) Biological and molecular characterization of Bean common mosaic virus associated with vanilla in India. Indian J Virol 20:70–77Google Scholar
- 9.Bravo E, Calvert LA, Morales FJ (2008) The complete nucleotide sequence of the genomic RNA of bean common mosaic virus strain nl4. Rev Acad Colomb Cienc Exactas 32:37–46Google Scholar
- 15.El-Sawy MA, Mohamed HAE, Elsharkawy MM (2013) Serological and molecular characterisations of the Egyptian isolate of Bean common mosaic virus. Arch Phytopathol Plant Protect 47:1–13Google Scholar
- 21.Hamid A, Ahmad M, Padder B, Shah M, Saleem S, Sofi T, Mir A (2013) Pathogenic and coat protein characterization confirming the occurrence of Bean common mosaic virus on common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) in Kashmir, India. Phytoparasitica 42:1–6Google Scholar
- 27.Koch A, Biedenkopf D, Furch A, Weber L, Rossbach O, Abdellatef E, Linicus L, Johannsmeier J, Jelonek L, Goesmann A (2016) An RNAi-based control of Fusarium graminearum infections through spraying of long dsRNAs involves a plant passage and is controlled by the fungal silencing machinery. PLoS Pathog 12:e1005901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Li Y, Jia A, Qiao Y, Xiang J, Zhang Y, Wang W (2017) Virome analysis of lily plants reveals a new potyvirus. Arch Virol 163:1–4Google Scholar
- 34.Lin J-J (1995) Electrotransformation of Agrobacterium. 171–178Google Scholar
- 54.Sastry KS (2013) Mechanism of seed transmission. Seed-borne plant virus diseases. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 85–100Google Scholar
- 56.Shapter FM, Waters DL Genome walking T cereal genomics, pp 133–146Google Scholar