Advertisement

Archives of Virology

, Volume 156, Issue 7, pp 1295–1297 | Cite as

Molecular characterization of two distinct strains of blueberry scorch virus (BlScV) in northern Italy

  • M. Moretti
  • M. Ciuffo
  • P. Gotta
  • D. Prodorutti
  • P. Bragagna
  • M. Turina
Annotated Sequence Record

Abstract

During blueberry scorch virus (BlScV) surveys of highbush blueberries in Italy between 2005 and 2010, we initially discovered infected orchards only in Piedmont. Since 2009, however, three infected orchards have also been found in Trentino, where a new host species, Vaccinium ashei, was found to be infected by BlScV. Molecular characterization of isolates during the study period suggests that two very distinct epidemics are now present in Italy: the Piedmont isolates belong to a new BlScV strain, whereas the Trentino isolates are almost identical to the Washington State strain.

Keywords

Supplementary Appendix Epidemiological Aspect Highbush Blueberry Maximum Composite Likelihood Method Italian Isolate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a grant from the Regione Piemonte (MIRVI 2008-2010) in collaboration with DIVAPRA, Entomology Department, University of Turin, and Consorzio Ricerca e Sperimentazione per L’Orticoltura Piemontese (CReSO). We wish to thank CReSO for providing technical and orchard assistance. Thanks are also due to Alessandro Frontuto (Ufficio Fitosanitario Provinciale di Trento) and Daniele Pettiti for their help with identification of the infected orchards.

Supplementary material

705_2011_1018_MOESM1_ESM.doc (28 kb)
Supplementary Table S1 (DOC 27 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang JH, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25:3389–3402PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bernardy MG, Dubeau CR, Braun A, Harlton CE, Bunckle A, Wegener LA, Lowery DT, French CJ (2005) Molecular characterization and phylogenetic analysis of two distinct strains of Blueberry scorch virus from western Canada. Can J Plant Pathol 27:581–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bristow PR, Martin RR (1987) A virus associated with a new blight disease of highbush blueberry. Phytopathology 77:1721–1722Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bristow PR, Martin RR, Windom GE (2000) Transmission, orchard spread, cultivar response, and impact on yield in highbush blueberry infected with Blueberry scorch virus. Phytopathology 90:474–479PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cavileer TD, Halpern BT, Lawrence DM, Podleckis EV, Martin RR, Hillman BI (1994) Nucleotide-sequence of the carlavirus associated with blueberry scorch and similar diseases. J Gen Virol 75:711–720PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ciuffo M, Pettiti D, Gallo S, Masenga V, Turina M (2005) First report of Blueberry scorch virus in Europe. Plant Pathol 54:565–565Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hudgins E (2000) Survey of blueberry scorch virus in highbush blueberries in British Columbia. Can Plant Dis Surv 81:144–147Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pansa MG, Tavella L (2008) Aphid population dynamics on highbush blueberry in relation to the spread of Blueberry scorch virus in Piedmont (NW Italy). Bull Insectol 61:205–206Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rastgou M, Habibi MK, Izadpanah K, Masenga V, Milne RG, Wolf YI, Koonin EV, Turina M (2009) Molecular characterization of the plant virus genus Ourmiavirus and evidence of inter-kingdom reassortment of viral genome segments as its possible route of origin. J Gen Virol 90:2525–2535PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Raworth DA, Schade D (2006) Life-history parameters and population dynamics of Ericaphis fimbriata (Hemiptera: Aphididae) on blueberry, Vaccinium corymbosum. Can Entomol 138:205–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Raworth DA, French CJ, Lowery DT, Bernardy MG, Bouthillier M, Mathur S, Chan CK, Foottit RG, Maw E, Wegener LA, Sweeney M (2008) Temporal trends in the transmission of Blueberry scorch virus in British Columbia, Canada. Can J Plant Pathol 30:345–350Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method—a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stretch AW (1983) A previously undescribed blight disease of highbush blueberry in New Jersey. Phytopathology 73:375Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tamura K, Nei M, Kumar S (2004) Prospects for inferring very large phylogenies by using the neighbor-joining method. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:11030–11035PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S (2007) MEGA4: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol 24:1596–1599PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG (1997) The CLUSTAL_X Windows Interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucl Acids Res 25:4876–4882PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wegener LA, Punja ZK, Martin RR (2004) First report of Blueberry scorch virus in cranberry in Canada and the United States. Plant Dis 88:427–427Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wegener LA, Martin RR, Bernardy MG, MacDonald L, Punja ZK (2006) Epidemiology and identification of strains of Blueberry scorch virus on highbush blueberry in British Columbia, Canada. Can J Plant Pathol 28:250–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wegener LA, Punja ZK, Martin RR (2007) First report of Blueberry scorch virus in black huckleberry in British Columbia. Plant Dis 91:328–328Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Moretti
    • 1
  • M. Ciuffo
    • 1
  • P. Gotta
    • 2
  • D. Prodorutti
    • 3
  • P. Bragagna
    • 3
  • M. Turina
    • 1
  1. 1.Sez. di Torino, CNRIstituto di Virologia VegetaleTurinItaly
  2. 2.Servizio Fitosanitario Regionale-Regione PiemonteTurinItaly
  3. 3.Fondazione Edmund MachIstituto Agrario di San Michele all’AdigeS. Michele all’AdigeItaly

Personalised recommendations