Advertisement

Archives of Virology

, 154:1719 | Cite as

Complete nucleotide sequence of four RNA segments of fig mosaic virus

  • Toufic Elbeaino
  • Michele Digiaro
  • Giovanni P. Martelli
Original Article

Abstract

The complete sequence of four viral RNA segments of fig mosaic virus (FMV) was determined. Each of the four RNAs comprises a single open reading frame (ORF) 7,093, 2,252, 1,490 and 1,472 nucleotides in size, respectively. These ORFs encode the following proteins in the order: RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (p1 264 kDa), a putative glycoprotein (p2 73 kDa), a putative nucleocapsid protein (p3 35 kDa) and a protein with unknown function (p4 40.5 kDa). All RNA segments possess untranslated regions containing at the 5′ and 3′ termini a 13-nt complementary sequence. A conserved motif denoted premotif A was found to be present in addition to the five RdRp motifs A–F in RNA-1. In phylogenetic trees constructed with the amino acid sequences of RNA-1 and RNA-2, FMV clustered consistently with European mountain ash ringspot-associated virus (EMARaV) in a clade close to those comprising members of the genera Hantavirus, Orthobunyavirus and Tospovirus. The amino acid sequence of the putative FMV nucleocapsid protein encoded by RNA-3 shared identity with comparable sequences of EMARaV and the unclassified viruses pigeonpea sterility mosaic virus (PPSMV) and maize red stripe virus (MRSV). The nucleocapsid sequences rooted the four viruses in a clade close to the genus Tospovirus. Based on molecular, morphological and epidemiological features, FMV appears to be very closely related to PPSMV and MRSV. All these viruses are phylogenetically related to EMARaV and therefore seem to be eligible for classification in the proposed genus Emaravirus, which, in turn, may find a taxonomic allocation in the family Bunyaviridae.

Keywords

Transmembrane Helix Single Open Reading Frame Viral Nature Guanidine Isothiocyanate Glycoprotein Precursor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Ahn KK, Kim KS, Gergerich RC, Jensen S, Anderson EJ (1996) Comparative ltrastructure of double membrane-bound particles and inclusions associated with eriophyid mite-borne plant disease of unknown etiology: a potentially new group of plant viruses. J Submicrosc Cytol Pathol 28:345–355Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Altschul SF, Stephen F, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403–410PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Appiano A, Conti M, Zini N (1995) Cytopathological study of the double-membrane bodies occurring in fig plants affected by fig mosaic disease. Acta Hortic 386:585–592Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Benthack W, Mielke N, Buttner C, Muhlbach HP (2005) Double-stranded RNA pattern and partial sequence data indicate plant virus infection associated with ringspot disease of European mountain ash (Sorbus aucuparia L.). Arch Virol 150:37–52CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bradfute OR, Whitmoyer RE, Nault RL (1970) Ultrastructure of plant leaf tissue infected with mite-borne viral-like particles. Proc Electron Microsc Soc Am 258:178–179Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bruenn JA (2003) A structural and primary sequence comparison of the viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerases. Nucleic Acids Res 31(7):1821–1829CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Castellano MA, Gattoni G, Minafra A, Conti M, Martelli GP (2007) Fig mosaic in Mexico and South Africa. J Plant Pathol 89:441–443Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chomczynski P (1992) One-hour downward alkaline capillary transfer for blotting of DNA and RNA. Anal Biochem 201:134–139CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Condit IJ, Horne WT (1933) A mosaic of the fig in California. Phytopathology 23:887–896Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Coutts RHA, Livieratos IC (2003) A rapid method for sequencing the 5′- and 3′-termini of double-stranded RNA viral templates using RLM-RACE. J Phytopathol 151:525–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dodds JA (1993) DsRNA in diagnosis. In: Matthews REF (ed) Diagnosis of plant virus diseases. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 273–294Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ebrahim-Nesbat F, Izadpanah K (1992) Virus-like particles associated with ringfleck mosaic of mountain ash and a mosaic disease of raspberry in the Bavarian forest. Eur J Forest Pathol 22:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Elbeaino T, Digiaro M, Alabdullah A, De Stradis A, Minafra A, Mielke N, Castellano MA, Martelli GP (2009) A multipartite single-stranded negative-sense RNA virus is the putative agent of fig mosaic disease. J Gen Virol 90(5):1281–1288CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Emanuelsson O, Nielsen H, Brunak S, Von Heijne G (2000) Predicting subcellular localization of proteins based on their N-terminal amino acid sequence. J Mol Biol 300:1005–1016CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Emanuelsson O, Brunak S, Von Heijne G, Nielsen H (2007) Locating proteins in the cell using TargetP, SignalP, and related tools. Nat Protoc 2:953–971CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Flock RA, Wallace JM (1955) Transmission of fig mosaic by the eriophyid mite Aceria ficus. Phytopathology 45:52–54Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Foissac X, Svanella-Dumas L, Gentit P, Dulucq MJ, Candresse T (2001) Polyvalent detection of fruit tree Tricho, Capillo and Foveavirus by nested RT-PCR using degenerated and inosine containing primers (DOP RT-PCR). Acta Hortic 550:37–43Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kulkarni NK, Lava Kumar P (2002) Transmission of Pigeon pea sterility mosaic virus by the eriophyid mite, Aceria cajani (Acari: Arthropoda). Plant Dis 86:1297–1302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lava Kumar PL, Duncan GC, Roberts IM, Jones AT, Reddy DVR (2002) Cytopathology of Pigeonpea sterility mosaic virus in pigeonpea and Nicotiana benthamiana: similarities with those of eriophyid mite-borne agents of undefined aetiology. Ann Appl Biol 140:87–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lava Kumar PL, Jones AT, Reddy DVR (2003) A novel mite-transmitted virus with a divided RNA genome closely associated with pigeonpea sterility mosaic disease. Phytopathology 93:71–81CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Marck C (1988) DNA Strider: a “C” programme for the fast analysis of DNA and protein sequences on the Apple Macintosh family computers. Nucleic Acids Res 16:1829–1836CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Martelli GP (2009). Fig mosaic disease and associated viruses. In: Hadidi A, Barba M, Candresse T, Jelkmann W (eds) Virus and virus-like diseases of pome and stone fruits. APS Press, St. Paul (in press)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Martelli GP, Castellano MA, Lafortezza R (1993) An ultrastructural study of fig mosaic. Phytopathol Mediterr 32:33–43Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Matsuda S, Vert JP, Saigo H, Ueda N, Toh H, Akutsu T (2005) A novel representation of protein sequences for prediction of subcellular location using support vector machines. Protein Sci 14:2804–2813CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mielke N, Muehlbach HP (2007) A novel, multipartite, negative-strand RNA virus is associated with the ringspot disease of European mountain ash (Sorbus aucuparia L.). J Gen Virol 88:1337–1346CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Müller R, Poch O, Delarue M, Bishop DHL, Bouloy M (1994) Rift valley fever virus L segment: correction of the sequence and possible functional role of newly identified regions conserved in RNA-dependent polymerases. J Gen Virol 75:1345–1352CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pearson WR, Lipman DJ (1988) Improved tools for biological sequence comparison. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:2444–2448CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Perlman D, Halvorson HO (1983) A putative signal peptidase recognition site and sequence in eukaryotic and prokaryotic signal peptides. J Mol Biol 167:391–409CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Perrière G, Gouy M (1996) WWW-query: an on-line retrieval system for biological sequence banks. Biochimie 78:364–369CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Proeseler G (1972) Beziehungen zwischen Virus, Vektor und Wirstpflanze am Beispiel des Feigenmosaik-Virus und Aceria ficus Cotte (Eriophyoidea). Acta Phytopathologica Academiae Scientiarium Hungaricae 7:106–179Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Saldarelli P, Minafra A, Martelli GP, Walter B (1994) Detection of grapevine leafroll-associated closterovirus III by molecular hybridization. Plant Pathol 43:91–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Skare JM, Wijkamp I, Rezende JAM, Kitajima EW, Park JW, Desvoyes B, Rush CM, Michels G, Scholthof KBG, Scholthof HB (2006) A new eriophyid mite-borne membrane-enveloped virus-like complex isolated from plants. Virology 347:343–353CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Von Heijne G (1986) A new method for predicting signal sequence cleavage sites. Nucleic Acids Res 14:4683–4690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Von Heijne G (1983) Patterns of amino acids near signal sequence cleavage sites. Eur J Biochem 133:17–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Walia JJ, Salem NM, Falk BW (2009) Partial sequence and survey analysis identify a multipartite, negative-sense RNA virus associated with fig mosaic. Plant Dis 93:4–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Toufic Elbeaino
    • 1
  • Michele Digiaro
    • 1
  • Giovanni P. Martelli
    • 2
  1. 1.Istituto Agronomico MediterraneoValenzano (BA)Italy
  2. 2.Dipartimento di Protezione delle Piante e Microbiologia ApplicataUniversità degli Studi and Istituto di Virologia Vegetale del CNR, sezione di BariBariItaly

Personalised recommendations