Archives of Virology

, Volume 153, Issue 3, pp 601–604 | Cite as

Panicum streak virus diversity is similar to that observed for maize streak virus

  • A. VarsaniEmail author
  • S. Oluwafemi
  • Oliver P. Windram
  • D. N. Shepherd
  • A. L. Monjane
  • B. E. Owor
  • E. P. Rybicki
  • P. Lefeuvre
  • D. P. Martin
Annotated Sequence Record

Panicum streak virus (PanSV; genus Mastrevirus, family Geminiviridae) is, together with maize streak virus (MSV), sugarcane streak virus (SSV), sugarcane streak Reunion virus (SSRV) and sugarcane streak Egypt virus (SSEV), one of the currently described “African streak virus” (AfSV) species [6]. As with all the other AfSV species other than MSV, very little is known about PanSV genomic sequence diversity across Africa. Only two PanSV full genome sequences have ever been reported: one from Kenya [2], and the other from South Africa [17]. Both these genomes were isolated from Panicum maximum plants, but share only approximately 90% sequence identity. The reason this is noteworthy is that throughout mainland Africa all MSV genomes ever sampled from maize have been found to share >97% sequence identity. Although other MSV strains sharing between 78 and 90% identity with the maize-adapted strain (MSV-A) have been described, these have all been isolated from different host species, indicating that host adaptation is probably the main force driving MSV diversification. MSV and PanSV share common vector species (leafhoppers in the genus Cicadulina) and probably also share some host species. Although the host range of PanSV is currently unknown, the MSV host range is extensive and includes P. maximum [3]. One might therefore expect that similar evolutionary forces acting on both species might result in their sharing similar patterns of both geographical and host-associated diversity. Here we describe the full genome sequences of five new PanSV isolates (including two new strains) sampled from southern and western Africa, and report that PanSV and MSV do indeed have similar patterns of diversity. We find, however, that unlike with MSV, geographical separation rather than host adaptation is possibly the dominant force driving PanSV diversification.


NIfo Full Genome Sequence Streak Virus Inverted Repeat Sequence Host Adaptation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This research was partially funded by the National Research Foundation (South Africa). AV is supported by the Carnegie Corporation of New York. DNS is supported by PANNAR (Pty) Ltd; DPM is supported by the Harry Oppenheimer Trust and the Sydney Brenner Fellowship. PL is supported by the French Ministère de la Recherche et de l’Enseignement supérieur; BO is supported by the Rockefeller foundation through the USHEPiA programme; ALM is supported by the Canon Collins Trust for Southern Africa and a University of Cape Town International Scholarship.

Supplementary material

705_2007_20_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (276 kb)
PDF 276 KB


  1. 1.
    Boni M, Posada D, Feldman MW (2007) An exact nonparametric method for inferring mosaic structure in sequence triplets. Genetics 176:1035–1047PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Briddon RW, Lunness P, Chamberlin LC, Pinner MS, Brundish H, Markham PG (1992) The nucleotide sequence of an infectious insect-transmissible clone of the geminivirus Panicum streak virus. J Gen Virol 73:1041–1047PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Damsteegt VD (1983) Maize streak virus host range and vulnerability of maize germ plasm. Plant Disease 67:734–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gibbs MJ, Armstrong JS, Gibbs AJ (2000) Sister-scanning: a Monte Carlo procedure for assessing signals in recombinant sequences. Bioinformatics 16:573–582PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Guindon S, Gascuel O (2003) A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst Biol 52:696–704PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hughes FL, Rybicki EP, von Wechmar MB (1992) Genome typing of southern African subgroup-1 geminiviruses. J Gen Virol 73:1031–1040PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Martin D, Rybicki E (2000) RDP: detection of recombination amongst aligned sequences. Bioinformatics 16:562–563PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Martin DP, Posada D, Crandall KA, Williamson C (2005) A modified bootscan algorithm for automated identification of recombinant sequences and recombination breakpoints. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 21:98–102PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Martin DP, Williamson C, Posada D (2005) RDP2: recombination detection and analysis from sequence alignments. Bioinformatics 21:260–262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Martin DP, Willment JA, Billharz R, Velders R, Odhiambo B, Njuguna J, James D, Rybicki EP (2001) Sequence diversity and virulence in Zea mays of maize streak virus isolates. Virology 288:247–255PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Maynard Smith J (1992) Analyzing the mosaic structure of genes. J Mol Evol 34:126–129Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Owor BE, Martin DP, Shepherd DN, Edema R, Monjane AL, Rybicki EP, Thomson JA, Varsani A (2007) Genetic analysis of maize streak virus isolates from Uganda reveals widespread distribution of a recombinant variant. J Gen Virol 88:3154–3165PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Owor BE, Shepherd DN, Taylor NJ, Edema R, Monjane AL, Thomson JA, Martin DP, Varsani A (2007) Successful application of FTA Classic Card technology and use of bacteriophage phi29 DNA polymerase for large-scale field sampling and cloning of complete maize streak virus genomes. J Virol Methods 140:100–105PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Padidam M, Sawyer S, Fauquet CM (1999) Possible emergence of new geminiviruses by frequent recombination. Virology 265:218–225PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Posada D (2006) ModelTest Server: a web-based tool for the statistical selection of models of nucleotide substitution online. Nucleic Acids Res 34:700–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Posada D, Crandall KA (2002) The effect of recombination on the accuracy of phylogeny estimation. J Mol Evol 54:396–402PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schnippenkoetter WH, Martin DP, Hughes FL, Fyvie M, Willment JA, James D, von Wechmar MB, Rybicki EP (2001) The relative infectivities and genomic characterisation of three distinct mastreviruses from South Africa. Arch Virol 146:1075–1088PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S (2007) MEGA4: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0., pp 1596–1599Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ (1994) CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 22:4673–4680PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Varsani
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • S. Oluwafemi
    • 3
  • Oliver P. Windram
    • 4
  • D. N. Shepherd
    • 2
  • A. L. Monjane
    • 2
  • B. E. Owor
    • 2
  • E. P. Rybicki
    • 2
    • 5
  • P. Lefeuvre
    • 6
  • D. P. Martin
    • 5
  1. 1.Electron Microscope UnitUniversity of Cape TownCape TownSouth Africa
  2. 2.Department of Molecular and Cell BiologyUniversity of Cape TownCape TownSouth Africa
  3. 3.Department of Crop Production, Soil and Environmental ManagementBowen UniversityIwoNigeria
  4. 4.Warwick Systems Biology CentreUniversity of WarwickWellesbourneUK
  5. 5.Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular MedicineUniversity of Cape TownCape TownSouth Africa
  6. 6.CIRAD, UMR 53 PVBMT CIRAD-Université de la Reunion, Pôle de Protection des PlantesSaint Pierre, La RéunionFrance

Personalised recommendations