Theoretical and Applied Climatology

, Volume 139, Issue 1–2, pp 57–73 | Cite as

Spatiotemporal changes of 7-day low flow in Iran’s Namak Lake Basin: impacts of climatic and human factors

  • Zahra Sheikh
  • Mohammad Reza YazdaniEmail author
  • Alireza Moghaddam Nia
Original Paper


Low flow is very sensitive to climate change and human intervention, especially in arid regions. In this study, changes of the 7-day low flow along the most important rivers of Iran’s Namak Lake Basin were investigated using nonparametric (Mann-Kendall and modified-Mann-Kendall) tests. A significant diminishing trend was observed in 72.2% of stations during the period of 1970–2012. The northern part of the basin lacked a significant trend, while in other parts of the basin, the descending trend was distributed uniformly. On the other hand, the changes of the annual rainfall during this period showed no clear trend (a significant trend in 36% and non-significant trend in 64% of stations), and the identified pattern of its changes was complicated on the basin scale and during the year. On a monthly scale, a significant decreasing trend was observed in March as one of the most productive months of the year in 49% of the stations. In addition, rainfall reduction was significant (over 35%) over the past 15 years in more than 71% of the stations. Also, changes in the proportion of seasonal rainfall and rainfall regime were considerable. The share of winter and spring rainfall showed a diminishing trend in 90% and 82% of stations, respectively. Also, rainfall regime based on precipitation concentration index (PCI) revealed a tendency to disorder (in 53% of stations). The annual temperature and temperature of October and February indicated a strong ascending trend in 92%, 71%, and 64% of stations, respectively, which can be effective during snow melting in basins with snow-rainy regimes and increasing evapotranspiration. Groundwater level changes also showed that, in the studied plains, the average water table drawdown was between 0.31 and 1.33 m/year. Therefore, the observed trend of low flow rates in this basin reflects the impact of climate change, where both direct and indirect human interference has led to the exacerbation of this situation.



  1. Abdul Aziz OI, Burn DH (2006) Trends and variability in the hydrological regime of the Mackenzie River Basin. J Hydrol 319(1):282–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abghari H, Tabari H, Hosseinzadeh Talaee P (2013) River flow trends in the west of Iran during the past 40 years: impact of precipitation variability. Glob Planet Chang 101:52–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Abkhan Consulting Engineers (2013) Updated studies for balancing of water resources in the studied regions of Namak Lake BasinGoogle Scholar
  4. Assani AA, Chalifour A, Légaré G, Manouane C-S, Leroux D (2011) Temporal regionalization of 7-day low flows in the St. Lawrence Watershed in Quebec (Canada). Water Resour Manag 25(14):3559–3574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Azizabadi Farahani M, Khalili D (2013) Seasonality characteristics and spatio-temporal trends of 7-day low flows in a large, semi-arid watershed. Water Resour Manag 27(14):4897–4911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burn DH, Sharif M, Zhang K (2010) Detection of trends in hydrological extremes for Canadian watersheds. Hydrol Process 24(13):1781–1790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coch A, Mediero L (2016) Trends in low flows in Spain in the period 1949–2009. Hydrol Sci J 61(3):568–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dai A (2011) Drought under global warming: a review. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 2(1):45–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dai A (2013) Increasing drought under global warming in observations and models. Nat Clim Chang 3(1):52–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. de Wit MJM, van den Hurk B, Warmerdam PMM, Torfs PJJF, Roulin E, van Deursen WPA (2007) Impact of climate change on low-flows in the river Meuse. Clim Chang 82(3–4):351–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Degefu MA, Bewket W (2017) Variability, trends, and teleconnections of stream flows with large-scale climate signals in the Omo-Ghibe River Basin, Ethiopia. Environ Monit Assess 189(4):142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ehsanzadeh E, Adamowski K (2010) Trends in timing of low stream flows in Canada: impact of autocorrelation and long-term persistence. Hydrol Process 24(8):970–980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ehsanzadeh E, Ouarda TBMJ, Saley HM (2011) A simultaneous analysis of gradual and abrupt changes in Canadian low streamflows. Hydrol Process 25(5):727–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fiala T, Ouarda TBMJ, Hladný J (2010) Evolution of low flows in the Czech Republic. J Hydrol 393(3):206–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Foulon É, Rousseau AN, Gagnon P (2018) Development of a methodology to assess future trends in low flows at the watershed scale using solely climate data. J Hydrol 557:774–790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Giuntoli I, Renard B, Vidal J-P, Bard A (2013) Low flows in France and their relationship to large-scale climate indices. J Hydrol 482:105–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grandry M, Verstraete A, Gailliez S, Degré A (2012) Low flow regionalisation in the Walloon Region. EPAMAGoogle Scholar
  18. Grubbs FE (1969) Procedures for detecting outlying observations in samples. Technometrics 11(1):1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hamed KH, Ramachandra Rao A (1998) A modified Mann-Kendall trend test for autocorrelated data. J Hydrol 204(1–4):182–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Huang S, Krysanova V, Hattermann FF (2013) Projection of low flow conditions in Germany under climate change by combining three RCMs and a regional hydrological model. Acta Geophys 61(1):151–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kendall MG (1975) Rank correlation measures. Charles Griffin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. Khalili K, Tahoudi MN, Mirabbasi R, Ahmadi F (2016) Investigation of spatial and temporal variability of precipitation in Iran over the last half century. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 30(4):1205–1221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Khaliq MN, Ouarda TBMJ, Gachon P (2009) Identification of temporal trends in annual and seasonal low flows occurring in Canadian rivers: the effect of short- and long-term persistence. J Hydrol 369(1):183–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Konapala G, Valiya Veettil A, Mishra AK (2017) Teleconnection between low flows and large-scale climate indices in Texas River basins. Stoch Env Res Risk A:1–14Google Scholar
  25. Li F, Zhang G, Xu YJ (2014) Spatiotemporal variability of climate and streamflow in the Songhua River Basin, northeast China. J Hydrol 514:53–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lim HS, Boochabun K, Ziegler AD (2012) Modifiers and amplifiers of high and low flows on the Ping River in Northern Thailand (1921–2009): the roles of climatic events and anthropogenic activity. Water Resour Manag 26(14):4203–4224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ling H, Xu H, Fu J (2013) High- and low-flow variations in annual runoff and their response to climate change in the headstreams of the Tarim River, Xinjiang, China. Hydrol Process 27(7):975–988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mann HB (1945) Nonparametric tests against trend. Econometrica 13(3):245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mann HB, Whitney DR (1947) On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Ann Math Stat 1:50–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Masih I, Uhlenbrook S, Maskey S, Smakhtin V (2011) Streamflow trends and climate linkages in the Zagros Mountains, Iran. Clim Chang 104(2):317–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mittal N, Bhave AG, Mishra A, Singh R (2016) Impact of human intervention and climate change on natural flow regime. Water Resour Manag 30(2):685–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Oliver JE (1980) Monthly precipitation distribution: a comparative index. Prof Geogr 32(3):300–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Saadat S, Khalili D, Kamgar-Haghighi AA, Zand-Parsa S (2013) Investigation of spatio-temporal patterns of seasonal streamflow droughts in a semi-arid region. Nat Hazards 69(3):1697–1720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sawaske SR, Freyberg DL (2014) An analysis of trends in baseflow recession and low-flows in rain-dominated coastal streams of the pacific coast. J Hydrol 519:599–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Smakhtin V (2001) Low flow hydrology: a review. J Hydrol 240(3):147–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stahl K, Hisdal H, Hannaford J, Tallaksen LM, van Lanen HAJ, Sauquet E, Demuth S, Fendekova M, Jódar J (2010) Streamflow trends in Europe: evidence from a dataset of near-natural catchments. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 14(12):2367–2382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Steinschneider S, Brown C (2012) Forecast-informed low-flow frequency analysis in a Bayesian framework for the northeastern United States. Water Resour Res 48(10)Google Scholar
  38. Svensson C, Kundzewicz WZ, Maurer T (2005) Trend detection in river flow series: 2. Flood and low-flow index series / Détection de tendance dans des séries de débit fluvial: 2. Séries d’indices de crue et d’étiage. Hydrol Sci J 50(5)Google Scholar
  39. Tabari H, Hosseinzadeh Talaee P (2011) Analysis of trends in temperature data in arid and semi-arid regions of Iran. Glob Planet Chang 79(1–2):1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tabrizi AA, Khalili D, Kamgar-Haghighi AA, Zand-Parsa S (2010) Utilization of time-based meteorological droughts to investigate occurrence of streamflow droughts. Water Resour Manag 24(15):4287–4306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tongal H, Demirel MC, Booij MJ (2013) Seasonality of low flows and dominant processes in the Rhine River. Stoch Env Res Risk A 27(2):489–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wald A, Wolfowitz J (1943) An exact test for randomness in the non-parametric case based on serial correlation. Ann Math Stat 14(4):378–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. WMO (2008) Manual on low-flow estimation and prediction. Operational Hydrology ReportGoogle Scholar
  44. Yaghmaei H, Sadeghi SH, Moradi H, Gholamalifard M (2018) Effect of dam operation on monthly and annual trends of flow discharge in the Qom Rood Watershed, Iran. J Hydrol 557:254–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Yang T, Xu C-Y, Shao Q, Chen X, Lu G-H, Hao Z-C (2010) Temporal and spatial patterns of low-flow changes in the Yellow River in the last half century. Stoch Env Res Risk A 24(2):297–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Yekom Consulting Engineers (2012a) Studies on updating master plan of water in Namak Lake, Gavkhouni, Siahkooh, Rig-Zarin and Central Desert basins: report of meteorology and climatologyGoogle Scholar
  47. Yekom Consulting Engineers (2012b) Studies on updating master plan of water in Namak Lake, Gavkhouni, Siahkooh, Rig-Zarin and Central Desert basins: report of studies on surface water resources (quantitative and qualitative)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Combat Desertification, Faculty of Desert StudiesSemnan UniversitySemnanIran
  2. 2.Department of Rehabilitation of Arid and Mountainous Regions, Faculty of Natural ResourcesUniversity of TehranKarajIran

Personalised recommendations