Advertisement

Theoretical and Applied Climatology

, Volume 138, Issue 3–4, pp 1511–1523 | Cite as

Toward coupling hydrological and meteorological drought characteristics in Lake Urmia Basin, Iran

  • Mohammad Nazeri TahroudiEmail author
  • Mohsen Pourreza-Bilondi
  • Yousef Ramezani
Original Paper
  • 61 Downloads

Abstract

Investigation of precipitation characteristics on daily, monthly, and annual time scales can contribute to gaining important information related to temporal and spatial distribution of precipitation or even flow rate challenges (e.g., hydrological droughts). The low levels of long-term precipitation and high variability in different time scales are considered the main inherent characteristics of climate in Iran. Due to the direct effects of precipitation on water resources, especially on the river flow rate, it is necessary to assess the efficient indices to visualize the variations in the components of water resources. One of the main indices is the precipitation concentration index (PCI) which is known as a strong indicator of the precipitation distribution generally used on annual and seasonal scales. In this study, drought analysis in the Lake Urmia Basin (LUB) located in northwest of Iran was performed with the daily river flow rate and monthly precipitation values within the period of 1984–2013. The results of changes in precipitation indicated that the irregularity of precipitation distribution had grown in spring months. Also, due to the diminishing precipitation trend on the annual time scale, PCI index also increased. It is concluded that LUB detected a significant descending trend on the annual, spring, and winter time scales in the last 30 years. The PCI values were proved high irregularity in summer with PCI amount of 20.1 and most regularity in winter with PCI amount of 10.4. This paper also aims to assess the effects of PCI on the river flow rate along with the flow shortness volume values using hydrometric and rain gauge stations within LUB. The results obtained from the changes in river flow rate and flow shortness volume revealed that the river flow rate has mostly a falling trend. Finally, it was observed that the time when the river flow rate data changed happened after beginning of changes in the precipitation data. A decrease in inflow from 900 million cubic meters up to 14 billion cubic meters with high flow shortness volume may happen in worst conditions. These results highlighted the importance of applying water resources management in LUB.

Keywords

Flow shortness volume Lake Urmia Meteorological drought Precipitation concentration index Time of change point 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank West Azerbaijan Regional Water Authority for providing river flow and precipitation data.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Adegun O, Balogun I, Adeaga O (2012) Precipitation concentration changes in Owerri and Enugu Special Publication of the Nigerian Association of Hydrological Sciences. pp 383–391Google Scholar
  2. Asong ZE, Khaliq MN, Wheater HS (2015) Regionalization of precipitation characteristics in the Canadian Prairie Provinces using large-scale atmospheric covariates and geophysical attributes. Stoch Env Res Risk A 29(3):875–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Besharat S, Khalili K, Tahrudi MN (2014) Evaluation of SAM and Moments methods for estimation of log Pearson type III parameters (Case Study: daily flow of rivers in Lake Urmia basin). J Appl Environ Biol Sci 4(S1):24–32Google Scholar
  4. Delju A, Ceylan A, Piguet E, Rebetez M (2013) Observed climate variability and change in Urmia Lake Basin, Iran. Theor Appl Climatol 111:285–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dinpashoh Y, Mirabbasi R, Jhajharia D, Abianeh HZ, Mostafaeipour A (2013) Effect of short-term and long-term persistence on identification of temporal trends. J Hydrol Eng 19(3):617–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fathian F, Morid S, Kahya E (2015) Identification of trends in hydrological and climatic variables in Urmia Lake basin, Iran. Theor Appl Climatol 119(3-4):443–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gan TY, Ito M, Hülsmann S, Qin X, Lu XX, Liong SY, Koivusalo H (2016) Possible climate change/variability and human impacts, vulnerability of drought-prone regions, water resources and capacity building for. Afr Hydrol Sci J 61(7):1209–1226Google Scholar
  8. Hamed KH, Rao AR (1998) A modified Mann-Kendall trend test for autocorrelated data. J Hydrol 204(1-4):182–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Harding R, Reynard N, Kay A (2014) Current understanding of climate change impacts on extreme events hydrometeorological hazards: interfacing science and policy 27–47Google Scholar
  10. Kendall MG (1948) Rank correlation methods Oxford England: Griffin 202 pagesGoogle Scholar
  11. Khajeh S, Paimozd S, Moghaddasi M (2017) Assessing the impact of climate changes on hydrological drought based on reservoir performance indices (Case Study: ZayandehRud River Basin, Iran). Water Resour Manag 31(9):2595–2610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Khalili K, Nazeri Tahrudi M, Khanmohammadi N (2014) Trend analysis of precipitation in recent two decade over. Iran J Appl Environ Biol Sci 4:5–10Google Scholar
  13. Khalili K, Tahoudi MN, Mirabbasi R, Ahmadi F (2016) Investigation of spatial and temporal variability of precipitation in Iran over the last half century. Stoch Env Res Risk A 30:1205–1221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kumar S, Merwade V, Kam J, Thurner K (2009) Streamflow trends in Indiana: effects of long term persistence, precipitation and subsurface drains. J Hydrol 374(1-2):171–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lin Q, Wu Z, Singh VP, Sadeghi SHR, He H, Lu G (2017) Correlation between hydrological drought, climatic factors, reservoir operation, and vegetation cover in the Xijiang Basin, South China. J Hydrol 549:512–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Luis MD, Gonzalez-Hidalgo JC, Brunetti M, Longares LA (2011) Precipitation concentration changes in Spain 1946–2005. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 11(5):1259–1265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mann HB (1945) Nonparametric tests against trend Econometrica. J Econ Soc 13:245–259Google Scholar
  18. Martin-Vide J (2004) Spatial distribution of a daily precipitation concentration index in peninsular Spain. Int J Climatol 24(8):959–971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Modarres R, Sarhadi A (2009) Frequency distribution of extreme hydrologic drought of southeastern semiarid region. Iran J Hydrol Eng 15(4):255–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nützmann G, Mey S (2007) Model-based estimation of runoff changes in a small lowland watershed of north-eastern Germany. J Hydrol 334(3-4):467–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Oliver JE (1980) Monthly precipitation distribution: a comparative index. Prof Geogr 32(3):300–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pandey RP, Mishra SK, Singh R, Ramasastri KS (2008) Streamflow drought severity analysis of Betwa river system (INDIA). Water Resour Manag 22(8):1127–1141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pettitt AN (1979) A non-parametric approach to the change-point problem. Appl Stat 28:126–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Raziei T, Daryabari J, Bordi I, Pereira LS (2014) Spatial patterns and temporal trends of precipitation in Iran. Theor Appl Climatol 115:531–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sen PK (1968) Estimates of the regression coefficient based on Kendall’s tau. J Am Stat Assoc 63(324):1379–1389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shiau JT, Shen HW (2001) Recurrence analysis of hydrologic droughts of differing severity. J Water Resour Plan Manag 127(1):30–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tabari H, Nikbakht J, Talaee PH (2013) Hydrological drought assessment in Northwestern Iran based on streamflow drought index (SDI). Water Resour Manag 27(1):137–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Thiel H (1950) A rank-invariant method of linear and polynomial regression analysis, Part 3 In Proceedings of Koninalijke Nederlandse Akademie van Weinenschatpen A. 53:1397–1412Google Scholar
  29. Valli M, Shanti Sree K, Murali Krishna IV (2013) Analysis of precipitation concentration index and rainfall prediction in various agro-climatic zones of Andhra Pradesh. India Int Res J Environ Sci 2(5):53–61Google Scholar
  30. Van Loon AF (2015) Hydrological drought explained. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Water 2(4):359–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zamani R, Mirabbasi R, Nazeri M, Meshram SG, Ahmadi F (2018) Spatio-temporal analysis of daily, seasonal and annual precipitation concentration in Jharkhand State, India. Stoch Env Res Risk A 32(4):1085–1097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zhang Q, Xu CY, Gemmer M, Chen YD, Liu C (2009) Changing properties of precipitation concentration in the Pearl River basin, China. Stoch Env Res Risk A 23(3):377–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Water Engineering, Faculty of AgricultureUniversity of BirjandBirjandIran

Personalised recommendations