Advertisement

Modelling climate change effects on Zagros forests in Iran using individual and ensemble forecasting approaches

  • Roozbeh Valavi
  • Hossein Shafizadeh-Moghadam
  • AliAkbar Matkan
  • Alireza Shakiba
  • Babak Mirbagheri
  • Seyed Hossein Kia
Original Paper

Abstract

It is believed that climate change will cause the extinction of many species in the near future. In this study, we assessed the impact of climate change on the climatic suitability of the Persian oak in Zagros forests in southwest Iran, by simulating their conditions under four climate change scenarios in the 2030s, 2050s, 2070s, and 2080s. Additionally, we evaluated the predictive performance of different modelling algorithms by projecting the geographic distribution of Persian oak, using a block cross-validation technique. According to the results, the Persian oak shows a stronger response to temperature, particularly the maximum temperature of the warmest month, rather than precipitation variables. This indicates that temperature has a powerful control over the geographic distribution of the Persian oak. Based on a comparison of the Persian oak’s current climatic suitability and future projections, regardless of the chosen climatic scenarios, there will be an upward shift in its climatic suitability. However, an upward shift under the pessimistic scenarios was greater than the optimistic ones. The results also indicate that an ensemble of all models had a higher accuracy than single models. Despite the agreement between current climate condition predictions (mean correlation of 0.94), the projection of different algorithms for future periods is highly variable (mean correlation of 0.71). Thus, the ensemble approach was used to reduce the uncertainty of modelling, favouring the consensus of all models for future projection.

Supplementary material

704_2018_2625_MOESM1_ESM.docx (908 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 907 kb)

References

  1. Aarts G, Fieberg J, Matthiopoulos J (2012) Comparative interpretation of count, presence-absence and point methods for species distribution models: species distribution as spatial point process. Methods Ecol Evol 3:177–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amiri MJ, Eslamian SS (2010) Investigation of climate change in Iran. J Environ Sci Technol 3:208–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Araújo MB, New M (2007) Ensemble forecasting of species distributions. Trends Ecol Evol 22:42–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Araujo MB, Pearson RG, Thuiller W, Erhard M (2005) Validation of species–climate impact models under climate change. Glob Chang Biol 11:1504–1513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bessa-Gomes C, Petrucci-Fonseca F (2003) Using artificial neural networks to assess wolf distribution patterns in Portugal. In: Animal conservation forum. Cambridge University Press, pp 221–229Google Scholar
  6. Bradshaw WE (2006) Climate change: evolutionary response to rapid climate change. Science 312:1477–1478.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1127000 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Mach Learn 45:5–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen I-C, Hill JK, Ohlemuller R, Roy DB, Thomas CD (2011) Rapid range shifts of species associated with high levels of climate warming. Science 333:1024–1026.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1206432 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Choe H, Thorne JH, Seo C (2016) Mapping national plant biodiversity patterns in South Korea with the MARS species distribution model. PLoS One 11:e0149511.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149511 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cutler DR, Edwards TC, Beard KH et al (2007) Random forests for classification in ecology. Ecology 88:2783–2792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Development Core Team R (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  12. Diniz-Filho JAF, Mauricio Bini L, Fernando Rangel T et al (2009) Partitioning and mapping uncertainties in ensembles of forecasts of species turnover under climate change. Ecography 32:897–906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Elith J, Franklin J (2013) Species distribution modeling. In: Levin SA (ed) Encyclopedia of biodiversity, 2nd edn. Academic Press, Waltham, pp 692–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Elith J, Leathwick J (2007) Predicting species distributions from museum and herbarium records using multiresponse models fitted with multivariate adaptive regression splines. Divers Distrib 13:265–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Elith J, Leathwick J (2009) The contribution of species distribution modelling to conservation prioritization. In: Spatial conservation prioritization: quantitative methods. pp 70–93Google Scholar
  16. Elith J, Ferrier S, Huettmann F, Leathwick J (2005) The evaluation strip: a new and robust method for plotting predicted responses from species distribution models. Ecol Model 186(3):280–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Elith J, Graham CH, Anderson RP, Dudík M, Ferrier S, Guisan A, Hijmans RJ, Huettmann F, Leathwick JR, Lehmann A, Li J, Lohmann LG, Loiselle BA, Manion G, Moritz C, Nakamura M, Nakazawa Y, Overton J, McC, Peterson AT, Phillips SJ, Richardson KS, Scachetti-Pereira R, Schapire RE, Soberón J, Williams S, Wisz MS, Zimmermann NE (2006) Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data. Ecography 29(2):129–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Elith J, Leathwick JR, Hastie T (2008) A working guide to boosted regression trees. J Anim Ecol 77:802–813.  https://doi.org/10.2307/20143253 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Elith J, Phillips SJ, Hastie T, Dudík M, Chee YE, Yates CJ (2011) A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists. Divers Distrib 17:43–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Forester BR, DeChaine EG, Bunn AG (2013) Integrating ensemble species distribution modelling and statistical phylogeography to inform projections of climate change impacts on species distributions. Divers Distrib 19:1480–1495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Franklin J (2010) Mapping species distributions: spatial inference and prediction. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  22. Friedman JH (1991) Multivariate adaptive regression splines. Ann Stat 19:1–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Friedman JH (2002) Stochastic gradient boosting. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 38:367–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Graham CH, Loiselle BA, Velásquez-Tibatá J, Cuesta F (2011) Species distribution modeling and the challenge of predicting future distributions. Climate change and biodiversity in the Tropical Andes Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI) and Scientific Committee on Problems of the Environment (SCOPE), São José dos Campos and Paris 295–310Google Scholar
  25. Grenouillet G, Buisson L, Casajus N, Lek S (2011) Ensemble modelling of species distribution: the effects of geographical and environmental ranges. Ecography 34:9–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Guisan A, Edwards TC, Hastie T (2002) Generalized linear and generalized additive models in studies of species distributions: setting the scene. Ecol Model 157:89–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hickling R, Roy DB, Hill JK et al (2006) The distributions of a wide range of taxonomic groups are expanding polewards. Glob Chang Biol 12:450–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A (2005) Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol 25:1965–1978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hosseini A, Asghari S (2012) Investigating the relation between climatic variables and the dying occurance in Iranian oak. In: National Conference on Desertification and Sustainable Development of Iranian Desert Wetlands. pp 1–5Google Scholar
  30. Keith DA, Mahony M, Hines H et al (2014) Detecting extinction risk from climate change by IUCN Red List criteria. Conserv Biol 28:810–819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Leathwick JR, Elith J, Hastie T (2006) Comparative performance of generalized additive models and multivariate adaptive regression splines for statistical modelling of species distributions. Ecol Model 199:188–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lek S, Guégan JF (1999) Artificial neural networks as a tool in ecological modelling, an introduction. Ecol Model 120:65–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lindner M, Fitzgerald JB, Zimmermann NE, Reyer C, Delzon S, van der Maaten E, Schelhaas MJ, Lasch P, Eggers J, van der Maaten-Theunissen M, Suckow F, Psomas A, Poulter B, Hanewinkel M (2014) Climate change and European forests: what do we know, what are the uncertainties, and what are the implications for forest management? J Environ Manag 146:69–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Loghmanpour M, Vardanian Z, Kiadaliri H, Elahi M (2012) To review climate change effects on basic resources (a case study of these effects on Zagros forests). In: International Conference on Applied Life Sciences. InTechGoogle Scholar
  35. Marmion M, Parviainen M, Luoto M, Heikkinen RK, Thuiller W (2009) Evaluation of consensus methods in predictive species distribution modelling. Divers Distrib 15:59–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McCullagh P, Nelder JA (1989) Generalized linear models. Chapman & HallGoogle Scholar
  37. Miller JA, Holloway P (2015) Incorporating movement in species distribution models. Progress in Physical Geography; London 39:837–849.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133315580890 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Minaei M, Irannezhad M (2018) Spatio-temporal trend analysis of precipitation, temperature, and river discharge in the northeast of Iran in recent decades. Theor Appl Climatol 131(1–2):167–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Minaei, M., Shafizadeh-Moghadam, H., Tayyebi, A. (2018). Spatiotemporal nexus between the pattern of land degradation and land cover dynamics in Iran. Land Degradation Dev, (September 2017), 1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mirabolfathy M (2013) Outbreak of charcoal disease on Quercus spp. and Zelkova carpinifolia trees in forests of Zagros and Alborz mountains in Iran. Iranian Journal of Plant PathologyGoogle Scholar
  41. Moritz C, Agudo R (2013) The future of species under climate change: resilience or decline? Science 341:504–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Moritz C, Patton JL, Conroy CJ, Parra JL, White GC, Beissinger SR (2008) Impact of a century of climate change on small-mammal communities in Yosemite National Park, USA. Science 322:261–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Muscarella R, Galante PJ, Soley-Guardia M, Boria RA, Kass JM, Uriarte M, Anderson RP (2014) ENMeval: an R package for conducting spatially independent evaluations and estimating optimal model complexity for Maxent ecological niche models. Methods Ecol Evol 5:1198–1205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Naimi B, Hamm NA, Groen TA et al (2014) Where is positional uncertainty a problem for species distribution modelling? Ecography 37:191–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ogawa-Onishi Y, Berry PM, Tanaka N (2010) Assessing the potential impacts of climate change and their conservation implications in Japan: a case study of conifers. Biol Conserv 143:1728–1736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pacifici M, Foden WB, Visconti P, Watson JEM, Butchart SHM, Kovacs KM, Scheffers BR, Hole DG, Martin TG, Akçakaya HR, Corlett RT, Huntley B, Bickford D, Carr JA, Hoffmann AA, Midgley GF, Pearce-Kelly P, Pearson RG, Williams SE, Willis SG, Young B, Rondinini C (2015) Assessing species vulnerability to climate change. Nat Clim Chang 5:215–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Parmesan C (2006) Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 37:637–669.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110100 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pearson R (2006) Climate change and the migration capacity of species. Trends Ecol Evol 21:111–113.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2005.11.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pearson RG, Dawson TP, Berry PM, Harrison PA (2002) SPECIES: a spatial evaluation of climate impact on the envelope of species. Ecol Model 154:289–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Peters J, Baets BD, Verhoest NEC, Samson R, Degroeve S, Becker PD, Huybrechts W (2007) Random forests as a tool for ecohydrological distribution modelling. Ecol Model 207:304–318.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.05.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Phillips SJ, Dudík M, Schapire RE (2004) A maximum entropy approach to species distribution modeling. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-First International Conference on Machine Learning. ACM, p. 83Google Scholar
  52. Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE (2006) Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol Model 190:231–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pourhashemi M, Mohajer MRM, Zobeiri M, Amiri GZ, Panahi P (2004) Identification of forest vegetation units in support of government management objectives in Zagros forests, Iran. Scand J For Res 19:72–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Renner IW, Warton DI (2013) Equivalence of MAXENT and Poisson point process models for species distribution modeling in ecology. Biometrics 69:274–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Roberts DR, Bahn V, Ciuti S, Boyce MS, Elith J, Guillera-Arroita G, Hauenstein S, Lahoz-Monfort JJ, Schröder B, Thuiller W, Warton DI, Wintle BA, Hartig F, Dormann CF (2017) Cross-validation strategies for data with temporal, spatial, hierarchical, or phylogenetic structure. Ecography 40:913–929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sabeti H (1976) Forests, trees and shrubs of Iran. Ministry of Agriculture and Natural Resources, TehranGoogle Scholar
  57. Sagheb-Talebi K, Pourhashemi M, Sajedi T (2014) Forests of Iran: a treasure from the past, a hope for the future. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  58. Salehi A, Eriksson LO (2010) A management model for Persian oak—a model for management of mixed coppice stands of semiarid forests of Persian oak. Mathematical and Computational Forestry & Natural Resource Sciences 2:20Google Scholar
  59. Shafizadeh-Moghadam H, Asghari A, Tayyebi A, Taleai M (2017) Coupling machine learning, tree-based and statistical models with cellular automata to simulate urban growth. Comput Environ Urban Syst 64:297–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Shafizadeh-Moghadam H, Valavi R, Shahabi H, Chapi K, Shirzadi A (2018) Novel forecasting approaches using combination of machine learning and statistical models for flood susceptibility mapping. J Environ Manag 217:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Solaymani HR, Jabbari S (2015) Impacts and vulnerabilities of climate change and socio-economic challenges on oak forest deterioration—west of IranGoogle Scholar
  62. Sorte FAL, Frank RT III (2007) Poleward shifts in winter ranges of North American birds. Ecology 88:1803–1812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Thomas CD, Cameron A, Green RE, Bakkenes M, Beaumont LJ, Collingham YC, Erasmus BFN, de Siqueira MF, Grainger A, Hannah L, Hughes L, Huntley B, van Jaarsveld AS, Midgley GF, Miles L, Ortega-Huerta MA, Townsend Peterson A, Phillips OL, Williams SE (2004) Extinction risk from climate change. Nature 427:145–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Thuiller W (2004) Patterns and uncertainties of species’ range shifts under climate change. Glob Chang Biol 10:2020–2027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Thuiller W (2007) Biodiversity: climate change and the ecologist. Nature 448:550–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Thuiller W, Richardson DM, Pyšek P et al (2005) Niche-based modelling as a tool for predicting the risk of alien plant invasions at a global scale. Glob Chang Biol 11:2234–2250.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.001018.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Thuiller W, Albert C, Araújo MB, Berry PM, Cabeza M, Guisan A, Hickler T, Midgley GF, Paterson J, Schurr FM, Sykes MT, Zimmermann NE (2008) Predicting global change impacts on plant species’ distributions: future challenges. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 9:137–152.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppees.2007.09.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Thuiller W, Georges D, Engler R, Breiner F (2017) biomod2: ensemble platform for species distribution modeling. R Package Version 3:3–7 https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=biomod2 Google Scholar
  69. Wessely J, Hülber K, Gattringer A, Kuttner M, Moser D, Rabitsch W, Schindler S, Dullinger S, Essl F (2017) Habitat-based conservation strategies cannot compensate for climate-change-induced range loss. Nat Clim Chang 7:823–827.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3414 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Zohrevandi AA, Pourbabaei H, Akhavan R, Bonad AE (2016) Determination of appropriate grid dimension and sampling plot size for assessment of woody species diversity in Zagros forest, Iran. Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity 17:24–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Remote Sensing & GIS CentreShahid Beheshti UniversityTehranIran
  2. 2.Department of GIS and Remote SensingTarbiat Modares UniversityTehranIran
  3. 3.Department of Environmental ScienceTarbiat Modares UniversityTehranIran

Personalised recommendations