Quantification of climatic feedbacks on the Caspian Sea level variability and impacts from the Caspian Sea on the large-scale atmospheric circulation
With a fall of the Caspian Sea level (CSL), its size gets smaller and therefore the total evaporation over the sea is reduced. With a reduced evaporation from the sea, the fall of the CSL is weakened. This creates a negative feedback as less evaporation leads to less water losses of the Caspian Sea (CS). On the other hand, less evaporation reduces the water in the atmosphere, which may lead to less precipitation in the catchment area of the CS. The two opposite feedbacks are estimated by using an atmospheric climate model coupled with an ocean model only for the CS with different CS sizes while keeping all other forcings like oceanic sea surface temperatures (SSTs) and leaf area index the same from a global climate simulation. The investigation is concentrated on the medieval period because at that time the CSL changed dramatically from about − 30 to − 19 m below the mean ocean sea level, partly man-made. Models used for simulating the last millennium are not able to change the size of the CS dynamically so far. When results from such simulations are used to investigate the CSL variability and its causes, the present study should help to parameterize its feedbacks.
A first assumption that the total evaporation from the CS will vary with the size of the CS (number of grid points representing the sea) is generally confirmed with the model simulations. The decrease of grid points from 15 to 14, 10, 8 or 7 leads to a decrease of evaporation to 96, 77, 70 and 54%. The lower decrease than initially expected from the number of grid points (93, 67, 53 and 47%) is probably due to the fact that there would also be some evaporation at grid points that run dry with a lower CSL but a cooling of the CS SST with increasing CS size in summer may be more important. The reduction of evaporation over the CS means more water for the budget of the whole catchment of the CS (an increase of the CSL) but from the gain through reduced evaporation over the CS, only 70% is found to remain in the water budget of the whole catchment area due to feedbacks with the precipitation. This suggests a high proportion of recycling of water within the CS catchment area.
When using a model which does not have a correct CS size, the effect of a reduced CS area on the water budget for the whole CS catchment can be estimated by taking the evaporation over the sea multiplied by the proportional changed area. However, only 50% of that change is ending up in the water balance of the total catchment of the CS. A formula is provided. This method has been applied to estimate the CSL during the Last Glacial Maximum to be at − 30 to − 33 m.
The experiments show as well that the CS has an impact on the large-scale atmospheric circulation with a widened Aleutian 500 hPa height field trough with increasing CS sizes. It is possible to validate this aspect with observational data.
We are grateful to the National Center for High-performance Computing/Taiwan for computer time and facilities. We thank Reviewer no. 4 for his constructive suggestions, which led to improvements of the manuscript.
This study was supported with funds from the project MOST/TW 103-2621-M-005-003, 104-2621-M-005-006, 105-2621-M-005-001, 106-2111-M-005-001 and 106-2111-M-002-001.
- Arpe, K., & Leroy, S. A. (2007). The Caspian Sea Level forced by the atmospheric circulation, as observed and modelled. Quat Int 173:144–152Google Scholar
- Arpe K, Bengtsson L, Golitsyn GS, Mokhov II, Semenov VA, Sporyshev PV (2000) Connection between Caspian Sea level variability and ENSO. Geophys Res Lett 27(17):2693–2696Google Scholar
- Arpe K, Leroy SAG, Mikolajewicz U (2014) A comparison of climate simulations for the last glacial maximum with three different versions of the ECHAM model and implications for summer-green tree refugia. Clim Past 7:1–242011, Theor Appl Climatol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-013-0937-6 Google Scholar
- Dee DP, Uppala SM, Simmons AJ, Berrisford P, Poli P, Kobayashi S, Andrae U, Balmaseda MA, Balsamo G, Bauer P, Bechtold P, Beljaars ACM, van de Berg L, Bidlot J, Bormann N, Delsol C, Dragani R, Fuentes M, Geer AJ, Haimberger L, Healy SB, Hersbach H, Hólm EV, Isaksen L, Kållberg P, Köhler M, Matricardi M, McNally AP, Monge-Sanz BM, Morcrette J-J, Park B-K, Peubey C, de Rosnay P, Tavolato C, Thépaut J-N, Vitart F (2011) The ERA -interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system. Q J R Meteorol Soc 137, 656:553–597, Part A. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj828 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- ECMWF (2015) http://apps.ecmwf.int/datasets. Last access May 2015
- Jungclaus JH, Lorenz SJ, Timmreck C, Reick CH, Brovkin V, Six K, Segschneider J, Giorgetta MA, Crowley TJ, Pongratz J, Krivova NA, Vieira LE, Solanki SK, Klocke D, Botzet M, Esch M, Gayler V, Haak H, Raddatz TJ, Roeckner E, Schnur R, Widmann H, Claussen M, Stevens B, Marotzke J (2010) Climate and carbon-cycle variability over the last millennium. Clim Past 6:723–737. https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-6-723-2010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Leroy SAG, Lahijani HAK, Djamali M, Naqinezhad A, Moghadam MV, Arpe K, Shah-Hosseini M, Hosseindoust M, Miller CS, Tavakoli V, Habibi P, Naderi Beni M (2011) Late Little Ice Age palaeoenvironmental records from the Anzali and Amirkola lagoons (South Caspian Sea): vegetation and sea level changes. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 302:415–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Marković SB, Ruman A, Gavrilov MB, Stevens T, Zorn M, Komac B, Perko D (2014) Modelling of the Aral and Caspian seas drying out influence to climate and environmental changes. Acta Geogr Slov 54(1):143–161Google Scholar
- Molavi-Arabshahi M, Arpe K, Leroy SAG (2015) Precipitation and temperature of the Southwest Caspian Sea region during the last 55 years: their trends and teleconnections with large-scale atmospheric phenomena. Int J Climatol. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc4483
- Naderi Beni A, Lahijani H, Mousavi Harami R, Arpe K, Leroy SAG, Marriner N, Berberian M, Andrieu-Ponel V, Djamali M, Mahboubi A, Reimer PJ (2013) Caspian Sea-level changes during the last millennium: historical and geological evidence from the south Caspian Sea. Clim Past 9:1645–1665. www.clim-past.net/9/1645/2013. https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-9-1645-2013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Toropov PA, Morozova PA (2010) Evaluation of Caspian Sea level at late Pleistocene period (on the base of numerical simulation adjusted for Scandinavian glacier melting) 134–138 Proceedings of the international conference THE CASPIAN REGION: ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES OF THE CLIMATE CHANGE. Moscow State University, faculty of geography, Russian Foundation for basic research, 14–16 Oct., 2010. https://istina.msu.ru/collections/1550121/http:/www.ngdc.noaa.gov/mgg/global/global.html/ https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JC010691https
- Tseng YH, Dietrich DE, Ferziger JH (2005) Regional circulation of the Monterey Bay region: hydrostatic versus nonhydrostatic modeling. J Geophys Res Oceans 110(C9). https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JC002153
- Tseng YH, Shen ML, Jan S, Dietrich DE, Chiang CP (2012) Validation of the Kuroshio current system in the dual-domain Pacific Ocean model framework. Prog Oceanogr 105:102–124Google Scholar
- Tsuang B-J, Tu C-Y, Arpe K (2001) Lake parameterization for climate models. Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie, HamburgGoogle Scholar
- Tu CY, Tsuang BJ (2005) Cool-skin simulation by a one-column ocean model. Geophys Res Lett 32(22)Google Scholar
- UNEP-Dewa (2003) Freshwater in Europe. Last accessed 25 March 2017Google Scholar
- Van der Vorst HA (1992) Bi-CGSTAB: a fast and smoothly converging variant of Bi-CG for the solution of nonsymmetric linear systems. SIAM J Sci Stat Comput 13(2):631–644. https://doi.org/10.1137/0913035 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biconjugate_gradient_stabilized_method CrossRefGoogle Scholar