Advertisement

Theoretical and Applied Climatology

, Volume 135, Issue 3–4, pp 1091–1103 | Cite as

The lagged connection of the positive NAO with the MJO phase 3 in a simplified atmospheric model

  • Xiaolu Shao
  • Jie SongEmail author
  • Shuanglin Li
Original Paper
  • 119 Downloads

Abstract

Based on a simplified nonlinear model and reanalysis data, the lagged connection of the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) with the Madden–Julian Oscillation (MJO) in boreal winters is investigated. The positive NAO is observed to occur more frequently about 8–20 days after the onset of the MJO phase 3. A series of heating forcing experiments and initial-value experiments are conducted by utilizing the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (GFDL) dynamical core atmospheric model. The extratropical responses to the tropical heating associated with the MJO phase 3 are characterized by a wave train over the Pacific–North American region with an anticyclone anomaly over the northeastern Pacific and then followed by a positive-NAO-like pattern over the North Atlantic sector. These circulation anomalies generally match the observed lagged-connection well. At the earlier stage, the Rossby wave train excited by the MJO convection propagates into the North Atlantic, leading to a planetary wave anomaly with a low-over-high dipole prior to the positive NAO. At the later stage, the anomalous synoptic eddy vorticity forcing (EVF) streamfunction tendency has a negative-over-positive dipole, which plays a key role in the development of the positive NAO. Further analysis of the initial-value experiments indicates that, for the subsequent formation of the positive NAO, the anomalous circulation over the Indian Ocean aroused by the MJO phase 3 is more crucial than that over the northeastern Pacific.

Notes

Funding information

This study was jointly supported by the National Key Basic Research Program of China (2015CB453202), the Strategic Project of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant XDA11010401), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41528502, 41421004, 41490642, and 41790473).

References

  1. Bader J, Latif M (2005) North Atlantic Oscillation response to anomalous Indian Ocean SST in a coupled GCM. J Clim 18:5382–5389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnes EA, Hartmann DL (2010) Dynamical feedbacks and the persistence of the NAO. J Atmos Sci 67:851–865.  https://doi.org/10.1175/2009jas3193.1
  3. Benedict JJ, Lee S, Feldstein SB (2004) Synoptic view of the North Atlantic oscillation. J Atmos Sci 61:121–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Branstator G (2002) Circumglobal teleconnections, the jet stream waveguide, and the North Atlantic Oscillation. J Clim 15:1893–1910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Branstator G (2014) Long-lived response of the midlatitude circulation and storm tracks to pulses of tropical heating. J Clim 27:8809–8826.  https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-14-00312.1
  6. Cassou C (2008) Intraseasonal interaction between the Madden-Julian Oscillation and the North Atlantic Oscillation. Nature 455:523–527.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07286
  7. Chang EKM (2006) An idealized nonlinear model of the Northern Hemisphere winter storm tracks. J Atmos Sci 63:1818–1839.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3726.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chang EKM, Guo Y (2007) Dynamics of the stationary anomalies associated with the interannual variability of the midwinter Pacific storm track—the roles of tropical heating and remote eddy forcing. J Atmos Sci 64:2442–2461.  https://doi.org/10.1175/jas3986.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chang EK, Zurita-Gotor P (2007) Simulating the seasonal cycle of the northern hemisphere storm tracks using idealized nonlinear storm-track models. J Atmos Sci 64:2309–2331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Drouard M, Rivière G, Arbogast P (2013) The North Atlantic Oscillation response to large-scale atmospheric anomalies in the northeastern Pacific. J Atmos Sci 70:2854–2874.  https://doi.org/10.1175/jas-d-12-0351.1
  11. Drouard M, Rivière G, Arbogast P (2015) The link between the North Pacific climate variability and the North Atlantic Oscillation via downstream propagation of synoptic waves. J Clim 28:3957–3976.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00552.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Feldstein SB (2003) The dynamics of NAO teleconnection pattern growth and decay. Q J R Meteorol Soc 129:901–924.  https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.02.76
  13. Franzke C, Lee S, Feldstein SB (2004) Is the North Atlantic Oscillation a breaking wave? J Atmos Sci 61:145–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hagos S, Zhang C, Tao WK, Lang S, Takayabu YN, Shige S, Katsumata M, Olson B, L’Ecuyer T (2010) Estimates of tropical diabatic heating profiles: commonalities and uncertainties. J Clim 23:542–558.  https://doi.org/10.1175/2009jcli3025.1
  15. Held IM, Suarez MJ (1994) A proposal for the intercomparison of the dynamical cores of atmospheric general circulation models. Bull Amer Meteor Soc 75:1825–1830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hurrell JW, Kushnir Y, Ottersen G, Visbeck M (2003) An overview of the North Atlantic oscillation. Geophys Monogr 134:1–35Google Scholar
  17. Jiang Z, Feldstein SB, Lee S (2017) The relationship between the Madden-Julian Oscillation and the North Atlantic Oscillation. Q J R Meteorol Soc 143:240–250.  https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2917
  18. Jin F, Pan L, Watanabe M (2006) Dynamics of synoptic eddy and low-frequency flow interaction. Part I: a linear closure. J Atmos Sci 63:1677–1694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kalnay E, Kanamitsu M, Kistler R, Collins W, Deaven D, Gandin L, Iredell M, Saha S, White G, Woollen J, Zhu Y, Leetmaa A, Reynolds R, Chelliah M, Ebisuzaki W, Higgins W, Janowiak J, Mo KC, Ropelewski C, Wang J, Jenne R, Joseph D (1996) The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bull Amer Meteor Soc 77:437–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Li S, Perlwitz J, Hoerling MP, Chen X (2010) Opposite annular responses of the Northern and Southern Hemispheres to Indian Ocean warming. J Clim 23:3720–3738.  https://doi.org/10.1175/2010jcli3410.1
  21. Lin H, Brunet G, Derome J (2009) An observed connection between the North Atlantic Oscillation and the Madden–Julian Oscillation. J Clim 22:364–380.  https://doi.org/10.1175/2008jcli2515.1
  22. Lin H, Brunet G, Yu B (2015) Interannual variability of the madden-Julian oscillation and its impact on the North Atlantic oscillation in the boreal winter. Geophys Res Lett 42:5571–5576.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2015gl064547
  23. Ling J, Zhang C (2011) Structural evolution in heating profiles of the MJO in global reanalyses and TRMM retrievals. J Clim 24:825–842.  https://doi.org/10.1175/2010jcli3826.1
  24. Luo D, Lupo AR, Wan H (2007) Dynamics of eddy-driven low-frequency dipole modes. Part I: a simple model of North Atlantic Oscillations. J Atmos Sci 64:3–28.  https://doi.org/10.1175/jas3818.1
  25. Luo D, Gong T, Diao Y (2008) Dynamics of eddy-driven low-frequency dipole modes. Part IV: planetary and synoptic wave-breaking processes during the NAO life cycle. J Atmos Sci 65:737–765.  https://doi.org/10.1175/2007jas2440.1
  26. Luo D, Zhong L, Franzke CLE (2015) Inverse energy cascades in an eddy-induced NAO-type flow: scale interaction mechanism. J Atmos Sci 72:3417–3448.  https://doi.org/10.1175/jas-d-15-0062.1
  27. Madden RA, Julian PR (1994) Observations of the 40–50-day tropical oscillation—a review. Mon Weather Rev 122:814–837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Matthews AJ, Hoskins BJ, Masutani M (2004) The global response to tropical heating in the Madden–Julian oscillation during the northern winter. Q J R Meteorol Soc 130:1991–2011.  https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.02.123
  29. Nigam S, Chung C, Deweaver E (2000) ENSO diabatic heating in ECMWF and NCEP–NCAR reanalyses, and NCAR CCM3 simulation. J Clim 13:3152–3171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Peng S, Whitaker JS (1999) Mechanisms determining the atmospheric response to midlatitude SST anomalies. J Clim 12:1393–1408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rivière G, Orlanski I (2007) Characteristics of the Atlantic storm-track eddy activity and its relation with the North Atlantic Oscillation. J Atmos Sci 64:241–266.  https://doi.org/10.1175/jas3850.1
  32. Seo K-H, Son S-W (2012) The global atmospheric circulation response to tropical diabatic heating associated with the Madden–Julian Oscillation during northern winter. J Atmos Sci 69:79–96.  https://doi.org/10.1175/2011jas3686.1
  33. Seo K-H, Lee H-J, Frierson DMW (2016) Unraveling the teleconnection mechanisms that induce wintertime temperature anomalies over the northern hemisphere continents in response to the MJO. J Atmos Sci 73:3557–3571.  https://doi.org/10.1175/jas-d-16-0036.1
  34. Seo K-H, Lee H-J (2017) Mechanisms for a PNA-like teleconnection pattern in response to the MJO. J Atmos Sci 74:1767–1781.  https://doi.org/10.1175/jas-d-16-0343.1
  35. Song J (2016) Understanding anomalous eddy vorticity forcing in North Atlantic Oscillation events. J Atmos Sci 73:2985–3007.  https://doi.org/10.1175/jas-d-15-0253.1
  36. Straus DM, Swenson E, Lappen C-L (2015) The MJO cycle forcing of the North Atlantic circulation: intervention experiments with the community earth system model. J Atmos Sci 72:660–681.  https://doi.org/10.1175/jas-d-14-0145.1
  37. Wheeler MC, Hendon HH (2004) An all-season real-time multivariate MJO index: development of an index for monitoring and prediction. Mon Weather Rev 132:1917–1932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Xie P, Arkin PA (1997) Global precipitation: a 17-year monthly analysis based on gauge observations, satellite estimates, and numerical model outputs. Bull Amer Meteor Soc 78:2539–2558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yadav P, Straus DM (2017) Circulation response to fast and slow MJO episodes. Mon Weather Rev 145:1577–1596.  https://doi.org/10.1175/mwr-d-16-0352.1
  40. Zhang C (2005) Madden-Julian Oscillation. Rev Geophys 43:RG2003  https://doi.org/10.1029/2004rg000158 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nansen-Zhu International Research Centre and Climate Change Research Center, Institute of Atmospheric PhysicsChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  2. 2.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.LASG, Institute of Atmospheric PhysicsChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  4. 4.Department of Atmospheric ScienceChina University of GeosciencesWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations