Advertisement

Theoretical and Applied Climatology

, Volume 135, Issue 3–4, pp 873–876 | Cite as

The potential of a modified physiologically equivalent temperature (mPET) based on local thermal comfort perception in hot and humid regions

  • Tzu-Ping LinEmail author
  • Shing-Ru Yang
  • Yung-Chang Chen
  • Andreas Matzarakis
Original Paper

Abstract

Physiologically equivalent temperature (PET) is a thermal index that is widely used in the field of human biometeorology and urban bioclimate. However, it has several limitations, including its poor ability to predict thermo-physiological parameters and its weak response to both clothing insulation and humid conditions. A modified PET (mPET) was therefore developed to address these shortcomings. To determine whether the application of mPET in hot-humid regions is more appropriate than the PET, an analysis of a thermal comfort survey database, containing 2071 questionnaires collected from participants in hot-humid Taiwan, was conducted. The results indicate that the thermal comfort range is similar (26–30 °C) when the mPET and PET are applied as thermal indices to the database. The sensitivity test for vapor pressure and clothing insulation also show that the mPET responds well to the behavior and perceptions of local people in a subtropical climate.

Keywords

Physiologically equivalent temperature mPET Thermal comfort Hot-humid regions 

References

  1. Chen Y-C, Matzarakis A (2017) Modified physiologically equivalent temperature—basics and applications for western European climate. Theor Appl Climatol.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-017-2158-x Google Scholar
  2. Chen YC (2016) Modification and adjustment of physiologically equivalent temperature for universal applications. PhD Thesis, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg im BreisgauGoogle Scholar
  3. Cohen P, Potchter O, Matzarakis A (2013) Human thermal perception of Coastal Mediterranean outdoor urban environments. Appl Geogr 37:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. de Dear RJ, Fountain ME (1994) Field experiments on occupant comfort and office thermal environments in a hot-humid climate. ASHRAE Trans 100:457–474Google Scholar
  5. Fanger PO (1972) Thermal comfort. McGraw Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Höppe P (1999) The physiological equivalent temperature—a universal index for the biometeorological assessment of the thermal environment. Int J Biometeorol 43:71–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kántor N, Unger J (2011) The most problematic variable in the course of human-biometeorological comfort assessment—the mean radiant temperature. centeurjgeo 3:90–100Google Scholar
  8. Lin T-P, Yang S-R, Matzarakis A (2015) Customized rating assessment of climate suitability (CRACS): climate satisfaction evaluation based on subjective perception. Int J Biometeorol 59:1825–1837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lin TP (2009) Thermal perception, adaptation and attendance in a public square in hot and humid regions. Build Environ 44:2017–2026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lin TP, Matzarakis A (2008) Tourism climate and thermal comfort in Sun Moon Lake, Taiwan. Int J Biometeorol 52:281–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mahmoud AHA (2011) Analysis of the microclimatic and human comfort conditions in an urban park in hot and arid regions. Build Environ 46:2641–2656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Oliveira S, Andrade H (2007) An initial assessment of the bioclimatic comfort in an outdoor public space in Lisbon. Int J Biometeorol 52:69–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Salata F, Golasi I, de Lieto Vollaro R, de Lieto Vollaro A (2016) Outdoor thermal comfort in the Mediterranean area. A transversal study in Rome, Italy. Build Environ 96:46–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. VDI (1998) Methods for the human biometeorological evaluation of climate and air quality for the urban and regional planning. Part I: Climate. VDI guideline 3787. Part 2. Beuth, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  15. Yahia MW, Johansson E (2013) Evaluating the behaviour of different thermal indices by investigating various outdoor urban environments in the hot dry city of Damascus, Syria. Int J Biometeorol 57:615–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Zeng Y, Dong L (2015) Thermal human biometeorological conditions and subjective thermal sensation in pedestrian streets in Chengdu, China. Int J Biometeorol 59:99–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ArchitectureNational Cheng Kung UniversityTainanTaiwan
  2. 2.Research Center for Environmental Changes, Academia SINICA, 11F of HSSBTaipeiTaiwan
  3. 3.Chair of Environmental Meteorology, Faculty of Environment and Natural ResourcesAlbert-Ludwigs-University FreiburgFreiburgGermany
  4. 4.Research Center Human BiometeorologyGerman Meteorological ServiceFreiburgGermany

Personalised recommendations