Advertisement

Climatology of snowfall/total precipitation days over Turkey

  • Evren ÖzgürEmail author
  • Kasım Koçak
Original Paper

Abstract

Annual and regional trend of snowfall/total precipitation days (S/P) have been examined by using observation collected from 237 meteorological stations evenly distributed over Turkey. Precipitation data have been analyzed as snow and rain separately. The annual Mann-Kendall trend test has been applied to the ratios of snowfall days to total precipitation days. In the study, only winter season has been used in order to account for days with snowfall. The months for which the percentage of snowy days less than 1% of total snowy days have not been considered as “winter months.” During the study period, 23 different precipitation periods have been determined for the meteorological stations. The annual Mann-Kendall trend test revealed that 65 stations have decreasing trends. Following trend test applied on the basis of individual station, stations were separated into four groups in terms of their altitudes. Then, regional trend test was applied to the grouped stations. According to the results of the regional Mann-Kendall test, a decreasing trend has been observed for all regions. In order to explain the variations of the S/P days in time, we conducted the same procedure of trend analysis for temperature data. According to the trend results, statistically significant increases in winter temperatures were observed for all regions. This revealed the fact that the decrease in S/P days can be explained by the increasing trend in the temperature variations.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the Turkish State Meteorological Service for providing the wind observations that made this research possible.

References

  1. Barnett TP, Schlese LDU, Roeckner E, Latif M (1989) The effect of Euroasian snow cover on regional and global climate variations. J Atmos Sci 46:661–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berghuijs WR, Woods RA, Hrachowitz M (2014) A precipitation shift from snow towards rain leads to a decrease in streamflow. Nat Clim Chang 4(7):583–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Feng S, Hu Q (2007) Changes in winter snowfall/precipitation ratio in the contiguous United States. J Geophys Res 112:D15109.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008397 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Groisman PY, Karl TR, Knight RW, Stenchikov GL (1994) Changes in snow cover, temperature, and the radiative heat balance over the Northern Hemisphere. J Clim 7:1633–1656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Helsel DR, Frans LM (2006) Regional Kendall test for trend. Environ Sci Technol 40:4066–4073.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es051650b. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hirsch RM, Alexander RB, Smith RA (1991) Selection of methods for detection and estimation of trends in water quality data. Water Resour Res 27(5):803–813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Huntington TG, Hodgkins GA, Keim BD, Dudley RW (2004) Changes in the proportion of precipitation occurring as snow in New England (1949-2000). J Clim 17:2626–2636.  https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017<2626:CITPOP>2.0.CO;2
  8. Kendall MG (1975) Rank correlation methods. Griffin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Ke CQ, Yu T, Yu K, Tang GD, King L (2009) Snowfall trends and variability in Qinghai, China. Theor Appl Climatol 98:251–258.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-009-0105-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Knowles N, Dettinger MD, Cayan DR (2006) Trends in snowfall versus rainfall in the Western United States. J Clim 19:4545–4559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kocak K (2017) A component not considered in the calculation of water budget: sublimation losses. In 5th International Participation Soil and Water Resources Congress, Kirklareli, Turkey (in Turkish).Google Scholar
  12. Mann HB (1945) Non-parametric tests against trend. Econometrica 13:245–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Niedźwiedź T, Twardosz R, Walanus A (2009) Long-term variability of precipitation series in east central Europe in relation to circulation patterns. Theor Appl Climatol 98(3–4):337–350Google Scholar
  14. Nikolova N, Faško P, Lapin M, Švec M (2013) Changes in snowfall/precipitation-day ratio in Slovakia and their linkages with air temperature and precipitation. Contribution to Geophysics and Geodesy 43(2):141–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Özgür E (2013). Annual and regional trend analysis of ratio of snowfall days to total precipitation days, MSc. Thesis (in Turkish), Istanbul Technical University, Graduate School of Science, Engineering and Technology, Istanbul, Turkey.Google Scholar
  16. Raja NB, Aydin O, Türkoğlu N, Çiçek I (2017) Space-time kriging of precipitation variability in Turkey for the period 1976–2010. Theor Appl Climatol 129:293–3024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Steppuhn H (1981) Snow and agriculture. In: Gray DM, Male DH (eds) Handbook of snow: principles, processes, management and use. Pergamon, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  18. Serquet G, Marty C, Dulex JP, Rebetez M (2011) Seasonal trends and temperature dependence of the snowfall/precipitation-day ratio in Switzerland. Geophys Res Lett 38:L07703.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL046976 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averty KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (2007) Contribution of working group I to the Fourth Assessment Report the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, United KingdomGoogle Scholar
  20. Tatli H, Dalfes HN, Mentes ŞS (2004) A statistical downscaling method for monthly total precipitation over Turkey. Int J Climatol 24:161–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Twardosz R, Łupikasza E, Niedźwiedź T, Walanus A (2012) Long-term variability of occurrence of precipitation forms in winter in Kraków, Poland. Clim Chang 113:623–638.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0352-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wang J, Zhang M, Wang S, Ren Z, Che Y, Qiang F, Qu D (2016) Decrease in snowfall/rainfall ratio in the Tibetan Plateau from 1961 to 2013. J Geogr Sci 26(9):1277–1288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Yue S, Pilon P, Cavadias G (2002) Power of the Mann-Kendall and Spearman’s rho tests for detecting monotonic trends in hydrologic series. J Hydrol 259:254–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Yu S, Zou S, Whittemore D (1993) Non-parametric trend analysis of water quality data of rivers in Kansas. J Hydrol 150:61–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Department of MeteorologyIstanbul Technical UniversityMaslak, IstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Civil EngineeringIstanbul Medeniyet UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations