Advertisement

Theoretical and Applied Climatology

, Volume 133, Issue 3–4, pp 911–924 | Cite as

Comprehensive modeling of monthly mean soil temperature using multivariate adaptive regression splines and support vector machine

  • Saeid Mehdizadeh
  • Javad Behmanesh
  • Keivan Khalili
Original Paper

Abstract

Soil temperature (T s) and its thermal regime are the most important factors in plant growth, biological activities, and water movement in soil. Due to scarcity of the T s data, estimation of soil temperature is an important issue in different fields of sciences. The main objective of the present study is to investigate the accuracy of multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) and support vector machine (SVM) methods for estimating the T s. For this aim, the monthly mean data of the T s (at depths of 5, 10, 50, and 100 cm) and meteorological parameters of 30 synoptic stations in Iran were utilized. To develop the MARS and SVM models, various combinations of minimum, maximum, and mean air temperatures (T min, T max, T); actual and maximum possible sunshine duration; sunshine duration ratio (n, N, n/N); actual, net, and extraterrestrial solar radiation data (R s, R n, R a); precipitation (P); relative humidity (RH); wind speed at 2 m height (u 2); and water vapor pressure (Vp) were used as input variables. Three error statistics including root-mean-square-error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and determination coefficient (R 2) were used to check the performance of MARS and SVM models. The results indicated that the MARS was superior to the SVM at different depths. In the test and validation phases, the most accurate estimations for the MARS were obtained at the depth of 10 cm for T max, T min, T inputs (RMSE = 0.71 °C, MAE = 0.54 °C, and R 2 = 0.995) and for RH, V p, P, and u 2 inputs (RMSE = 0.80 °C, MAE = 0.61 °C, and R 2 = 0.996), respectively.

References

  1. Adamowski J, Chan HF, Prasher SO, Sharda VN (2012) Comparison of multivariate adaptive regression splines with coupled wavelet transform artificial neural networks for runoff forecasting in Himalayan micro-watersheds with limited data. J Hydroinf 14(3):731–744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmad MF, Rasul G (2008) Prediction of soil temperature by air temperature: a case study for Faisalabad. Pakistan J Meteorol 5(9):19–27Google Scholar
  3. Allen RG, Periera LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration: guideline for computing crop water requirement. FAO irrigation and drainage paper no. 56. FAO, Rome, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  4. Behmanesh J, Mehdizadeh S (2017) Estimation of soil temperature using gene expression programming and artificial neural networks in a semiarid region. Environ Earth Sci. doi: 10.1007/s12665-017-6395-1
  5. Brar GS, Steiner JL, Unger PW, Prihar SS (1992) Modeling sorghum seedling establishment from soil wetness and temperature of drying seed zones. Agron J 84(5):905–910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brooks PD, McKnight D, Elder K (2004) Carbon limitation of soil respiration under winter snowpacks: potential feedbacks between growing season and winter carbon fluxes. Glob Change Biol 11(2):231–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen JL, Li GS, Wu SJ (2013) Assessing the potential of support vector machine for estimating daily solar radiation using sunshine duration. Energy Convers Manag 75:311–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cheng MY, Cao MT (2014) Accurately predicting building energy performance using evolutionary multivariate adaptive regression splines. Appl Soft Comput 22:178–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Citakoglu H (2016) Comparison of artificial intelligence techniques for prediction of soil temperatures in Turkey. Theor Appl Climatol. doi: 10.1007/s00704-016-1914-7
  10. Friedman JH (1991) Multivariate adaptive regression splines. Ann Stat 19(1):1–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gill J, Singh S (2015) An efficient neural networks based genetic algorithm model for soil temperature prediction. Int J Emerg Technol Eng Res (IJETER) 3:1–5Google Scholar
  12. Jackson T, Mansfield K, Saafi M, Colman T, Romine P (2008) Measuring soil temperature and moisture using wireless MEMS sensors. Measurement 41(4):381–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jebamalar AS, Raja SAT, Bai SJS (2012) Prediction of annual and seasonal soil temperature variation using artificial neural network. Indian J Radio Space Phys 41(1):48–57Google Scholar
  14. Kim S, Singh VP (2014) Modeling daily soil temperature using data driven models and spatial distribution. Theor Appl Climatol 118(3):465–479Google Scholar
  15. Kisi O (2015) Pan evaporation modeling using least square support vector machine, multivariate adaptive regression splines and M5 model tree. J Hydrol 528:312–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kisi O (2016) Modeling reference evapotranspiration using three different heuristic regression approaches. Agric Water Manag 169:162–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kisi O, Cimen M (2012) Precipitation forecasting by using wavelet-support vector machine conjunction model. Eng Appl Artif Intell 25(4):783–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kisi O, Sanikhani H, Cobaner M (2016) Soil temperature modeling at different depths using neuro-fuzzy, neural network, and genetic programming techniques. Theor Appl Climatol. doi: 10.1007/s00704-016-1810-1
  19. Lal R, Shukla MK (2004) Principles of soil physics. Marcel Dekker, Inc, New York, p 682Google Scholar
  20. Lin JD (1980) On the force-restore method for prediction of ground surface temperature. J Geophys Res: Oceans 85(C6):3251–3254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lu WZ, Wang D (2008) Ground-level ozone prediction by support vector machine approach with a cost-sensitive classification scheme. Sci Total Environ 395(2–3):109–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. de Martonne E (1925) Traité de Géographie Physique, 3 tomes. ParisGoogle Scholar
  23. Mazou E, Alvertos N, Tsiros IX (2012) Soil temperature prediction using time-delay neural networks. In: Advances in meteorology, Climatology and Atmospheric Physics. Part of the Series Springer Atmospheric Sciences, pp. 611–615Google Scholar
  24. Mehdizadeh S, Behmanesh J, Khalili K (2017a) Using MARS, SVM, GEP and empirical equations for estimation of monthly mean reference evapotranspiration. Comput Electron Agric 139:103–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mehdizadeh S, Behmanesh J, Khalili K (2017b) Evaluating the performance of artificial intelligence methods for estimation of monthly mean soil temperature without using meteorological data. Environ Earth Sci. doi: 10.1007/s12665-017-6607-8
  26. Mohammadi K, Shamshirband S, Anisi MH, Alam KA, Petkovic D (2015) Support vector regression based prediction of global solar radiation on a horizontal surface. Energy Convers Manag 91:433–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nadiri AA, Gharekhani M, Khatibi R, Sadeghfam S, Asghari Moghaddam A (2017) Groundwater vulnerability indices conditioned by supervised intelligence committee machine (SICM). Sci Total Environ 574:691–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nahvi B, Habibi J, Mohammadi K, Shamshirband S, Al Razgan OS (2016) Using self-adaptive evolutionary algorithm to improve the performance of an extreme learning machine for estimating soil temperature. Comput Electron Agric 124:150–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ozturk M, Salman O, Koc M (2011) Artificial neural network model for estimating the soil temperature. Can J Soil Sci 91(4):551–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Peters-Lidard CD, Blackburn E, Liang X, Wood EF (1998) The effect of soil thermal conductivity parameterization on surface energy fluxes and temperatures. J Atmos Sci 55:1209–1224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Qian B, Gregorich EG, Gameda S, Hopkins DW, Wang XL (2011) Observed soil temperature trends associated with climate change in Canada. J Geophys Res Atmosphere 116(D2):1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schimel JP, Bilbrough C, Welker JM (2004) Increased snow depth affects microbial activity and nitrogen mineralization in two Arctic tundra communities. Soil Biol Biochem 36(2):217–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Seyfried MS, Flerchinger GN, Murdock MD, Hanson CL, Van Vactor S (2001) Long-term soil temperature database, Reynolds Creek experimental watershed, Idaho, United States. Water Resour Res 37(11):2843–2846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tabari H, Sabziparvar AA, Ahmadi M (2011) Comparison of artificial neural network and multivariate linear regression methods for estimation of daily soil temperature in an arid region. Meteorog Atmos Phys 110(3–4):135–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tabari H, Talaee PH, Willems P (2015) Short-term forecasting of soil temperature using artificial neural network. Meteorol Appl 22(3):576–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Vapnik V (1995) The nature of statistical learning theory, 2nd edn. Springer, New York, p 309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wang L, Kisi O, Zounemat-Kermani M, Li H (2017) Pan evaporation modeling using six different heuristic computing methods in different climates of China. J Hydrol 544:407–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Saeid Mehdizadeh
    • 1
  • Javad Behmanesh
    • 1
  • Keivan Khalili
    • 1
  1. 1.Water Engineering DepartmentUrmia UniversityUrmiaIran

Personalised recommendations