Theoretical and Applied Climatology

, Volume 133, Issue 1–2, pp 437–446 | Cite as

Retrieval of effective cloud field parameters from radiometric data

  • Marius PaulescuEmail author
  • Viorel Badescu
  • Marek Brabec
Original Paper


Clouds play a key role in establishing the Earth’s climate. Real cloud fields are very different and very complex in both morphological and microphysical senses. Consequently, the numerical description of the cloud field is a critical task for accurate climate modeling. This study explores the feasibility of retrieving the effective cloud field parameters (namely the cloud aspect ratio and cloud factor) from systematic radiometric measurements at high frequency (measurement is taken every 15 s). Two different procedures are proposed, evaluated, and discussed with respect to both physical and numerical restrictions. None of the procedures is classified as best; therefore, the specific advantages and weaknesses are discussed. It is shown that the relationship between the cloud shade and point cloudiness computed using the estimated cloud field parameters recovers the typical relationship derived from measurements.



This work was partially supported the by a grant of the Romanian National Authority for Scientific Research and Innovation, CNCS/CCCDI – UEFISCDI, project number PN-III-P2-2,1-PED-2016-0592, by the CVUT (Czech Technical University in Prague, Czech Republic) institutional resources for research and by the long-term strategic development financing of the Institute of Computer Science (Czech Republic RVO 67985807)


  1. ARM (2017) Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Climate Research Facility. . Accessed April 2017
  2. Badescu V (1991) Studies concerning the empirical relationship of cloud shade to point cloudiness (Romania). Theor Appl Climatol 44:187–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Badescu V (1992) Over and under estimation of cloud amount: theory and Romanian observations. Int J Solar Energy 11:201–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Badescu V (2002) A new kind of cloudy sky model to compute instantaneous values of diffuse and global solar irradiance. Theor Appl Climatol 72:127–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Badescu V (2015) Solar radiation estimation from cloudiness data. Satellite vs. ground-based observations. Int J Green Energy 12:852–864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Badescu V, Dumitrescu A (2016) Simple solar radiation modelling for different cloud types and climatologies. Theor Appl Climatol 124:141–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Badescu V, Paulescu M (2011) Statistical properties of the sunshine number illustrated with measurements from Timisoara (Romania). Atmos Res 101:194–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Badescu V, Paulescu M, Brabec M (2016) Reconstruction of effective cloud field geometry from series of sunshine number. Atmos Res 176–177:254–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brabec M, Badescu V, Paulescu M, Dumitrescu A (2016a) A new perspective on the relationship between cloud shade and point cloudiness. Atmos Res 172:136–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brabec M, Badescu V, Dumitrescu A, Paulescu M (2016b) A new point of view on the relationship between global solar irradiation and sunshine quantifiers. Sol Energy 126:252–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. CMSAF (2017) The Satellite Application Facility on Climate Monitoring. CM SAF: Documentation. Accessed April 2017
  12. Han D, Ellingson RG (2000) An experimental technique for testing the validity of cumulus cloud parameterization for longwave radiation calculations. J Appl Meteorol 39:1147–1159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harrison AW, Coombes CA (1986) Empirical relationship of cloud shade to point cloudiness (Canada). Sol Energy 37:417–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Harrison RG, Chalmers N, Hogan RJ (2008) Retrospective cloud determinations from surface solar radiation measurements. Atmos Res 90:54–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hunerbein A, Fischer J, Lorenz P (2014) A comparison of solar radiative flux above clouds from MODIS with BALTIMOS regional climate model simulations. Theor Appl Climatol 118:707–713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kassianov E, Long CN, Ovtchinnikov M (2005) Cloud sky cover versus cloud fraction: whole-sky simulations and observations. J Appl Meteorol 44:86–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kasten F, Czeplak G (1980) Solar and terrestrial radiation dependent on the amount and type of clouds. Sol Energy 24:177–189Google Scholar
  18. Kauth RJ, Penquite JL (1967) The probability of clear lines of sight through a cloudy atmosphere. J Appl Meteorol 6:1005–1017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kazantzidis A, Tzoumanikas P, Bais AF, Fotopoulos S, Economou G (2012) Cloud detection and classification with the use of whole-sky ground-based images. Atmos Res 113:80–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Komar L, Kocifaj M (2016) Statistical cloud coverage as determined from sunshine duration: a model applicable in daylighting and solar energy forecasting. J Atmos Terr Phys 150:1–8Google Scholar
  21. Kottek M, Grieser J, Beck C, Rudolf B, Rubel F (2006) Worldmap of the Köppen–Geiger climate classification updated. Meteorol Z 15:259–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ma Y (2004) Longwave radiative transfer through 3D cloud fields: Testing the probability of clear line of sight models with the ARM cloud observations. Thesis. Department of Meteorology, University of Maryland, College ParkGoogle Scholar
  23. Maranas CD, Floudas CA (1995) Finding all solutions of nonlinearly constrained systems of equations. J Glob Optim 7:143–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Paulescu M, Badescu V (2011) New approach to measure the stability of the solar radiative regime. Theor Appl Climatol 103:459–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Paulescu M, Schlett Z (2004) Performance assessment of global solar irradiation models under Romanian climate. Renew Energ 29:767–777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Randall D, Khairoutdinov M, Arakawa A, Grabowski W (2003) Breaking the cloud parameterization deadlock. B AM Meteorol Soc 84:1547–1564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rosen MA, Hooper FC (1988) The development of a model for the geometric description of clouds and cloudy skies. Sol Energy 41:361–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Solar Platform (2017) Solar Platform of the West University of Timisoara, Romania. . Accessed February 2017
  29. Tomson T, Hansen M (2011) Dynamic properties of clouds Cumulus humilis and Cumulus fractus extracted by solar radiation measurements. Theor Appl Climatol 106:171–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. WMO (2008) Guide to Meteorological Instruments and Methods of Observation, WMO No. 8/2008. . Accessed February 2017.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marius Paulescu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Viorel Badescu
    • 2
    • 3
  • Marek Brabec
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.Physics DepartmentWest University of TimisoaraTimisoaraRomania
  2. 2.Candida Oancea InstitutePolytechnic University of BucharestBucharestRomania
  3. 3.Romanian AcademyBucharestRomania
  4. 4.Department of Nonlinear Modeling, Institute of Computer ScienceAcademy of Sciences of the Czech RepublicPrague 8Czech Republic
  5. 5.Czech Institute of Informatics, Robotics, and CyberneticsCzech Technical University in PraguePrague 6Czech Republic

Personalised recommendations