Advertisement

Theoretical and Applied Climatology

, Volume 130, Issue 1–2, pp 173–189 | Cite as

Future projections of synoptic weather types over the Arabian Peninsula during the twenty-first century using an ensemble of CMIP5 models

  • Ahmed M. El KenawyEmail author
  • Matthew F. McCabe
Original Paper

Abstract

An assessment of future change in synoptic conditions over the Arabian Peninsula throughout the twenty-first century was performed using 20 climate models from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) database. We employed the mean sea level pressure (SLP) data from model output together with NCEP/NCAR reanalysis data and compared the relevant circulation types produced by the Lamb classification scheme for the base period 1975–2000. Overall, model results illustrated good agreement with the reanalysis, albeit with a tendency to underestimate cyclonic (C) and southeasterly (SE) patterns and to overestimate anticyclones and directional flows. We also investigated future projections for each circulation-type during the rainy season (December–May) using three Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs), comprising RCP2.6, RCP4.5, and RCP8.5. Overall, two scenarios (RCP4.5 and RCP 8.5) revealed a statistically significant increase in weather types favoring above normal rainfall in the region (e.g., C and E-types). In contrast, weather types associated with lower amounts of rainfall (e.g., anticyclones) are projected to decrease in winter but increase in spring. For all scenarios, there was consistent agreement on the sign of change (i.e., positive/negative) for the most frequent patterns (e.g., C, SE, E and A-types), whereas the sign was uncertain for less recurrent types (e.g., N, NW, SE, and W). The projected changes in weather type frequencies in the region can be viewed not only as indicators of change in rainfall response but may also be used to inform impact studies pertinent to water resource planning and management, extreme weather analysis, and agricultural production.

Keywords

Circulation Pattern Ensemble Member Base Period Arabian Peninsula Weather Type 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

Research reported in this publication was supported by the King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Saudi Arabia. We wish to thank the various international modeling groups for providing their data through the CMIP5 initiative. We also would like to thank the NOAA/OAR/ESRL PSD, Boulder, Colorado, USA, for providing the NCEP reanalysis data.

References

  1. Almazroui M (2013) Simulation of present and future climate of Saudi Arabia using a regional climate model (PRECIS). Int J Climatol 33(9):2247–2259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alpert P, Osetinsky I, Ziv B, Shafir H (2004) Semi-objective classification for daily synoptic systems: application to the eastern Mediterranean climate change. Int J Climatol 24(8):1001–1011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barfus K, Bernhofer C (2014) Assessment of GCM capabilities to simulate tropospheric stability on the Arabian Peninsula. Int J Climatol;doi: 10.1002/joc.4092
  4. Bauer P, Thorpe A, Brunet G (2015) The quiet revolution of numerical weather prediction. 525(7567):47–55. doi:  10.1038/nature14956
  5. Belleflamme A, Fettweis X, Lang C, Erpicum M (2013) Current and future atmospheric circulation at 500 hPa over Greenland simulated by the CMIP3 and CMIP5 global models. Clim Dyn 41(7–8):2061–2080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brohan P, Kennedy JJ, Harris I, Tett SFB, Jones PD (2006) Uncertainty estimates in regional and global observed temperature changes: a new data set from 1850. J Geoph Res Atmospheres 111(D12), doi: 10.1029/2005JD006548.
  7. Cahynová M, Huth R (2009) Changes of atmospheric circulation in central Europe and their influence on climatic trends in the Czech Republic. Theor Appl Climatol 96(1–2):57–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clancy R, Kaitala JE, Ambresky LF (1986) The Fleet Numerical Oceanography Center Global Spectral Ocean Wave Model. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 67:498–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Conway D, Jones PD (1998) The use of weather types and air flow indices for GCM downscaling. J Hydrol 212–213:348–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cortesi N, Trigo RM, Gonzalez-Hidalgo JC, Ramos AM (2013) Modelling monthly precipitation with circulation weather types for a dense network of stations over Iberia. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 17:665–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. de Vries AJ, Tyrlis E, Edry D, Krichak SO, Steil B, Lelieveld J (2013) Extreme precipitation events in the Middle East: dynamics of the Active Red Sea Trough. J Geophys Res Atmospheres 118(13):7087–7108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Demuzere M, Werner M, van Lipzig NPM, Roeckner E (2009) An analysis of present and future ECHAM5 pressure fields using a classification of circulation patterns. Int J Climatol 29(12):1796–1810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Deng L, McCabe MF, Stenchikov G, Evans JP, Kucera PA (2015) Simulation of flash-flood-producing storm events in Saudi Arabia using the weather research and forecasting model. J Hydrometeorology 16:615–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Donat MG et al (2014) Changes in extreme temperature and precipitation in the Arab region: long-term trends and variability related to ENSO and NAO. Int J Climatol 34(3):581–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. El Kenawy AM, McCabe MF, Stenchikov G, Raj J (2014) Multi-Decadal Classification of Synoptic Weather Types, Observed Trends and Links to Rainfall Characteristics over Saudi Arabia. Front Environ Sci 2;doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2014.00037
  16. Esteban P, Jones PJ, Martín-Vide J, Mases M (2005) Atmospheric circulation patterns related to heavy snowfall days in Andorra, Pyrenees. Int J Climatol 25(3):319–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Evans JP (2009) 21st century climate change in the Middle East. Clim Chang 92:417–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Flato G, Marotzke J, Abiodun B, Braconnot P, Chou SC, Collins W, Cox P, et al (2013) Evaluation of climate models. In: Climate change 2013: The Physical science basis. Working Group I contribution to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, Tech. rep., Groupe d’experts intergouvernemental sur l’evolution du climat/Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change-IPCC, C/O World Meteorological Organization, 7bis Avenue de la Paix, CP 2300 CH-1211 Geneva 2 (Switzerland)Google Scholar
  19. Goldreich Y (2003) The Climate of Israel. Observation, Research and Applications. KluerAcademic/Plenum Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Goodess CM (2000) The Construction of Daily Rainfall Scenarios for Mediterranean Sites Using a Circulation-Type Approach to Downscaling. Ph.D. thesis, University of East Anglia, NorwichGoogle Scholar
  21. Hanggi PJM, Kuttel M, Wanner H, Weingartner R (2011) Weather type-related trend analysis of precipitation in Switzerland. Hydrol Wasserbewirts 55:140–154Google Scholar
  22. Hess P, Brezowsky H (1977) “Katalog der Grosswetterlagen Europas 1881–1976,” in Berichte des Deutschen Wetterdienst, No. 113 (Offenbach am Main: Selbstverlag des Deutschen Wetterdienstes), pp 54Google Scholar
  23. Hope P, Drosdowsky W, Nicholls N (2006) Shifts in the synoptic systems influencing southwest Western Australia. Clim Dyn 26(7–8):751–764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Huang A, Zhou Y, Zhang Y, Huang D, Zhao Y, Wu W (2014) Changes of the annual precipitation over central Asia in the twenty-first century projected by multimodels of CMIP5. J Clim 27:6627–6646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Huth R, Beck C, Philipp A, Demuzere M, Ustrnul Z, Cahynová M, Kyselý J, Tveito OE (2008) Classifications of Atmospheric Circulation Patterns. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1146(1):105–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. IPCC (2007) Climate Change 2007. The Physical Science Basis. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (ed) Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, p 996Google Scholar
  27. IPCC (2013) Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner GK, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM (eds) Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, USAGoogle Scholar
  28. Jones PD, Hulme M, Briffa KR (1993) A comparison of Lamb circulation types with an objective classification scheme. Int J Climatol 13(6):655–663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kalnay EKM, Kistler R, Collins W, Deaven D, Gandin L, Iredell M, Saha S, White G, Woollen J, Zhu Y, Leetmaa A, Reynolds R, Chelliah M, Ebisuzaki W, Higgins W, Janowiak D, Mo KC, Ropelewski C, Wang J, Jenne R, Joseph D (1996) The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 77:437–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kwarteng AY, Dorvlo AS, Kumar GTV (2009) Analysis of a 27-year rainfall data (1977–2003) in the Sultanate of Oman. Int J Climatol 29(4):605–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Leng G, Tang Q, Rayburg S (2015) Climate change impacts on meteorological, agricultural and hydrological droughts in China. Glob Planet Chang 126:23–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Littmann T (2000) An empirical classification of weather types in the Mediterranean Basin and their interrelation with rainfall. Theor Appl Climatol 66(3–4):161–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lorenzo MN, Taboada JJ, Gimeno L (2008) Links between circulation weather types and teleconnection patterns and their influence on precipitation patterns in Galicia (NW Spain). Int J Climatol 28(11):1493–1505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lorenzo MN, Taboada JJ, Gimeno L (2011) Changes in Present and Future Circulation Types Frequency in Northwest Iberian Peninsula. PLoS One 6(1), e16201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Moss RH, Hibbard KA, Manning MR, Rose SK, van Vuuren DP, Carter TR, Emori S, Kainuma M, Kram T, Meehl GA, Mitchell JFB, Nakicenovic N, Riahi K, Smith SJ, Stouffer RJ, Thomson AM, Weyant JP, Wilbanks TJ (2010) The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment. Nature 463:747–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Papadopoulos A, Paschalidou AK, Kassomenos PA, McGregor G (2014) On the association between synoptic circulation and wildfires in the Eastern Mediterranean. Theor Appl Climatol 115(3–4):483–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Perez J, Menendez M, Mendez F, Losada I (2014) Evaluating the performance of CMIP3 and CMIP5 global climate models over the northeast Atlantic region. Clim Dyn 43(9–10):2663–2680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ramos AM, Sousa P, Trigo RM, Janeira M, Prior V (2011) Cloud to ground lightning activity over Portugal and its association with circulation weather types. Atmos Res 101(1–2):84–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ramos AM, Cortesi N, Trigo RM (2014) Circulation weather types and spatial variability of daily precipitation in the Iberian Peninsula. Front Earth Sci 2;doi: 10.3389/feart.2014.00025
  40. Roshan GRL, Khoshakh F, Azizi GH, Mohammadi H (2011) Simulation of temperature changes in Iran under the atmosphere carbon dioxide duplication condition. J Environ Health Sci Eng 8(2):139–152Google Scholar
  41. Saaroni H, Halfon N, Ziv B, Alpert P, Kutiel H (2010) Links between the rainfall regime in Israel and location and intensity of Cyprus lows. Int J Climatol 30(7):1014–1025Google Scholar
  42. Schoof JT, Pryor SC (2003) Evaluation of the NCEP–NCAR reanalysis in terms of synoptic-scale phenomena: a case study from the Midwestern USA. Int J Climatol 23(14):1725–1741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sillmann J, Kharin VV, Zhang X, Zwiers FW, Bronaugh D (2013) Climate extremes indices in the CMIP5 multimodel ensemble: Part 2. Future climate projections. J Geophys Res Atmospheres 118(6):2473–2493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Smith RA, Kummerow CD (2013) A Comparison of in Situ, Reanalysis, and Satellite Water Budgets over the Upper Colorado River Basin. J Hydrometeor 14:888–905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Taylor KE, Stouffer RJ, Meehl GA (2012) An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 93:485–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Trigo RM, DaCamara CC (2000) Circulation weather types and their influence on the precipitation regime in Portugal. Int J Climatol 20(13):1559–1581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Türkeş M, Erlat E (2005) Climatological responses of winter precipitation in Turkey to variability of the North Atlantic Oscillation during the period 1930–2001. Theor Appl Climatol 81(1–2):45–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vicente-Serrano SM, López-Moreno JI (2006) The influence of atmospheric circulation at different spatial scales on winter drought variability through a semi-arid climatic gradient in Northeast Spain. Int J Climatol 26(11):1427–1453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wilks DS (2011) Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences, 3rd edn. Academic Press, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  50. Xoplaki E, González-Rouco J, Gyalistras D, Luterbacher J, Rickli R, Wanner H (2003) Interannual summer air temperature variability over Greece and its connection to the large-scale atmospheric circulation and Mediterranean SSTs 1950–1999. Clim Dyn 20(5):537–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Biological and Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Water Desalinaton and Reuse CenterKing Abdullah University of Science and TechnologyThuwalSaudi Arabia
  2. 2.Department of GeographyMansoura UniversityMansouraEgypt

Personalised recommendations