1 Introduction

The Earth has undergone periods of climatic change throughout its history. Before the dawn of the Industrial Revolution, climatic change was caused by natural effects, e.g., volcanic eruptions and fluctuations in solar radiation. However, global warming during the latter half of the twentieth century has accelerated and become more severe because of human activities (Zwiers et al. 2011), rapid economic expansion, and urbanization (Avila et al. 2012). In particular, because of the increase in concentrations of greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide (Karl et al. 2008; Jones et al. 2005), the global average temperature has risen by 0.74 °C over the last 100 years, with accelerated warming during the last three decades (Solomon et al. 2007). Another study has found that the global temperature has risen twice as fast during the first decade of the twenty-first century, compared with the final two decades of the twentieth century (Hansen et al. 2010). The increase in global mean temperature appears related to changes in the temperature extremes (Easterling et al. 1997) reported in many regions in the world. Because these extremes are located within the tails of the temperature distribution, small changes in the mean value produce large changes in the extreme temperatures (Karl et al. 2008; Trenberth 2012). A recent study concluded that the effect of hot temperature extremes has greater significance on extreme events than the global mean temperature (Seneviratne et al. 2014).

Studies have shown that, compared with the average climate, extreme events are more likely to drive changes in natural ecosystems (Parmesan et al. 2000). Such events have direct, immediate effects both on human socioeconomic structure and on natural systems. For example, extreme events such as droughts and heat waves can have serious implications for human health, harm cattle, and lead to devastated crop production and water scarcity. Such extreme events are likely to increase in frequency and severity (Coumou and Rahmstorf 2012) because of the warming of the Earth (Trenberth 2012). Fischer and Schär (2010) projected more intense heat waves across Europe by the end of the twenty-first century. Prolonged heat exposure could pose a major challenge to society coping with the effects of climate change, because heat waves can be a major public health hazard (Karl et al. 2008). Warming weather and urban effects are known to both worsen the problem of heat-related illness in USA (Luber and McGeehin 2008). Risk management steps to counteract the effects related to extreme climatic events, such as reduced crop production, water scarcity, and public health hazards are contingent on accurate predictions of the changing weather patterns.

The results from an analysis of global extremes (Frich et al. 2002) for the latter half of the twentieth century indicated that the world is becoming warmer; e.g., the number of cold temperature extremes decreased during that time. Analysis of global extreme temperatures in the twentieth century (specifically, 1951–2003) showed a significant increase in the annual frequency of warm nights and a reduction in the annual frequency of cold nights (Alexander et al. 2006; Morak et al. 2013). To provide a better picture of the global weather change, a number of studies have investigated extreme events in regions that have previously not been analyzed because of the lack of proper data (Peterson and Manton 2008), such as South and Central Asia, China, and South America (Frich et al. 2002; Zhai and Pan 2003; Vincent et al. 2005; Klein Tank et al. 2006).

Several studies have considered the Middle East, where reliable and high-quality weather data are available. Zhang et al. (2005) conducted the first analysis of the region for the period 1950–2003. They analyzed data from 52 stations and concluded that there were statistically significant warming trends in the Arabian Peninsula. Focusing on the Arabian Peninsula, trends of the mean, maximum, and minimum temperatures and the diurnal temperature range were found to indicate a general warming trend for most stations (AlSarmi and Washington 2011). Extreme climate indices were analyzed for some countries in the Arabian Peninsula by AlSarmi and Washington (2014). Recently, a comprehensive analysis of climate extremes, based on the 27 Expert Team on Climate Change Detection and Indices (ETCCDI) for the entire Arabian region, indicated a consistent warming trend with an increase in the occurrence of warm days and nights, fewer cold days and nights, shorter cold spells, and higher extreme temperature values (Donat et al. 2013). In a recent analysis, Lelieveld et al. (2012) concluded that the heating across the region of the eastern Mediterranean to the Arabian Peninsula is more prominent. Summer temperature in the region are expected to rise by up to 10 °C, coupled with prolonged heat waves in selected population centers (Lelieveld et al. 2014). The projected significant increase in the temperature is mostly attributed to increasing air pollution, the urban heat island effect, and rapid municipal expansion, which are expected to create localized hot spots within this region. Most of these studies have focused on individual countries within the Middle East; e.g., Saudi Arabia (Almazroui et al. 2014; Islam et al. 2014), Iran (Rahimzadeh et al. 2009; Marofi et al. 2011), and Kuwait (Nasrallah et al. 2004). Nevertheless, there remains a lack of reliable, high-quality data for the analysis of climatic change in many parts of the world (Coumou and Rahmstorf 2012).

The Persian Gulf is important because of its unique geographical and weather conditions. Most studies of the climatic conditions of this region have focused on the inland areas of bigger countries such as Saudi Arabia and Iran (Almazroui et al. 2012, 2014; Rahimzadeh et al. 2009), and there have been few studies on the climatic conditions of other countries such as Bahrain and Qatar (Brooks and Rogers 2000; Shi et al. 2004). Moreover, these studies have focused mainly on interannual variations of weather, with only very limited consideration of seasonal variations, e.g., Islam et al. (2014) for Saudi Arabia and Kostopoulou et al. (2014) for the entire eastern Mediterranean and Middle East region.

The objectives of this study were to fill the gap in the analysis of climatic change within this region and to provide further insight into local weather conditions, as part of a greater effort toward the analysis of the changing weather patterns in Qatar (Singha and Sadr 2012). Data from three weather stations were used to obtain greater spatial coverage for Qatar, gain a deeper understanding of the local climate, and supplement the long-term climate change analysis of extreme temperature events in the Middle East. This paper presents a detailed analysis of the trends of extreme temperature events in Qatar based on 12 selected ETCCDI using updated weather data. The obtained trends are discussed with respect to the trends in pollution generation due to the rapid urbanization/industrial growth of Qatar.

2 Data

Qatar is a peninsula located on the eastern coast of the Arabian Peninsula. It is bordered by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to the south and surrounded by the Persian Gulf in all other directions. The peninsula has an area of 11,571 km2, and it protrudes approximately 160 km into the Persian Gulf (hereafter, the Gulf). Figure 1 shows the location of Qatar in the Middle East. Qatar is a relatively flat peninsula with natural topography that varies from 5 to 103 m above sea level. It has a hot desert environment and small annual precipitation. Qatar is often hit by Shamals, which are predominantly northwesterly dust storms that occur during the summer.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Map of Qatar with the location of the Qatari stations highlighted: DIA Doha International Airport, AU Al Udeid and HIA Hamad International Airport. Additional stations (AUH Abu Dhabi, BAH Bahrain, DHA Dhahran, KWI Kuwait, and RAK Ras al Khaimah) in the region are also highlighted. Courtesy of Google Earth map service

To analyze changes in climate extremes, it is essential to have continuous time series data with at least daily resolution (Klein Tank et al. 2009), which allows the detection of the sub-monthly nature of many such extremes. Weather data, including temperature, humidity, wind speed, and wind direction, were obtained from three different measurement stations in Qatar. Metrological data were recorded at the following station locations: Doha International Airport (DIA) and Al Udeid (AU). DIA is located less than 3 km from the coast and AU is situated 29 km inland from Qatar’s east coast. A separate weather station was also established by the Micro-Scale Thermal Fluid Lab on a pier 500 m out to sea from the Hamad International Airport (HIA). These stations recorded a set of high-resolution data to characterize the weather conditions as part of a more comprehensive metrological effort (Singha and Sadr 2012). For comparison purposes, Table 1 lists the details of the three Qatari stations and four other stations in the Gulf region (their locations are shown in Fig. 1). Station data from DIA were selected for the subsequent analysis of the temperature extremes based on the long-term series, daily resolution, and data completeness. Additional datasets were obtained from the same agency for various locations across the region, i.e., Abu Dhabi, Bahrain, Dhahran, Kuwait and Ras Al-Khaimah, for comparison purposes. Data from the other two Qatari sites were used to check the spatial variability of the temperature in Qatar and to evaluate the data quality and homogeneity at DIA.

Table 1 Location of the weather stations and data details

3 Methodology

3.1 Data quality and homogeneity

All stations used in this work, shown in Table 1, are located in airport zones and are isolated from the direct effects of rapid urbanization and the construction boom. In particular, this is true for the two weather stations in Qatar, which has witnessed rapid economic growth in recent decades. For data quality control and homogeneity checks, the procedures described in the WMO guidance on developing long-term, high-quality climate data were followed (Brunet et al. 2008; Klein Tank et al. 2009).

Graphical and statistical techniques were used to inspect the data for various erroneous values. Rigorous quality control ensured that dubious data values or outliers did not affect the subsequent homogeneity results. Outliers are defined as values that fall outside four standard deviations (σ) of the daily mean (μ) value (i.e., μ ± 4σ). These values in the daily minimum and maximum temperature series were first identified and carefully checked individually before their removal from the dataset. Errors caused by incorrect keying of data values and nonexistent dates (e.g., 31 November) were withdrawn from the data series. Additionally, days that had only a single observation without any meta-data support were removed. Finally, interpolation was used to obtain the hourly data from 1983 to 1995, where the weather data were recorded once every 3 h. A verification mechanism was implemented to flag any significant deviations between consecutive data points, which were subsequently investigated by manual inspection. Figure 2 shows the interpolated dataset from the original hourly data for two randomly selected months, using linear interpolation for temperatures between the 3-hourly time intervals used in the original data from 1983 to 1995. The interpolated dataset almost reproduces the original hourly temperature data with only minor discrepancies. The small differences between the original dataset and interpolated dataset show that linear interpolation can be used to expand the 3-hourly data from 1983 to 1995 into hourly data.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Comparison of the original hourly temperature data with interpolated data using data at time points at 12 a.m., 3 a.m., 6 a.m., 9 a.m., 12 p.m., 3 p.m., 6 p.m., and 9 p.m.

After quality control, the next step was to check the temporal homogeneity of the long-term data. Inhomogeneity can be caused by a variety of factors, e.g., station relocation, changing surroundings, and instrument changes. The primary objective of data homogenization is to ensure that variations in the recorded values are only due to climatic processes. The RHtestV3 software package (available for the scientific community from http://etccdi.pacificclimate.org/software.shtml) was used to assess the data homogeneity (Wang and Feng 2010). The software can detect multiple shifts in data based on the penalized maximal t and F tests (Wang 2008; Wang et al. 2008) depending on the availability of a reference station. Monthly maximum and minimum temperature series were first tested for homogeneity using the penalized maximal t test (Wang et al. 2008; Wang 2008). It showed a zero trend in the data series for the entire recorded period. The daily data series were then tested with the RHtestV3 software and compared with the outcome of the monthly data series. This test is applied when a reference station is available, as in this case. A homogeneous reference station from Bahrain (Donat et al. 2013; AlSarmi and Washington 2011) was selected as the reference station to check the homogeneity of the data series from DIA.

A significant step change seen in the maximum temperature series was determined to be a result of climatic factors in January 1998, which coincided with the heating associated with the 1997/1998 El Niño year. Several stations within the region also reported this unexpected heating (AlSarmi and Washington 2011; Donat et al. 2013). There were also reports (e.g., Webster et al. 1999; Yu et al. 1999) of anomalous rises of the sea surface temperature in the Indian Ocean, which could have been related to the El Niño effect. The original data during this period that were used as the inhomogeneities in the maximum temperature series might be related to El Niño heating. No significant inhomogeneities were detected in the minimum temperature series.

The annual variation of relative humidity was compiled in a similar manner to show the long-term trend of annual variation. The heat index is a single parameter that combines temperature and relative humidity, which is calculated from hourly temperature and humidity data. The thermohygrometric index (HI), commonly and hereafter referred as the heat index, measures the perceived comfort level of human beings in terms of temperature and relative humidity (Unger 1999). The value of the heat index can be obtained from the relation according to the US National Weather Service, described by Eq. (1):

$$ HI=\mathrm{T}-\left(0.55-0.0055\kern0.36em RH\right)\kern0.36em \left(\mathrm{T}-14.5\right) $$
(1)

where T is the air temperature (°C) and R is relative humidity (%). The index is commonly used to characterize the existence of a heat wave, which is considered a prolonged period of unwarranted hot and humid conditions that persists for at least three consecutive days (Deo et al. 2007). The heat index time series was converted to an indicator for heat waves (i.e., the Heat Wave Index) using the approach devised by Meehl and Tebaldi (2004). A 3-day moving average of the heat index was computed and the maximum of the 3-day running mean taken to represent the worst annual heat wave event of the given year. The procedure was repeated for each year, which yielded a time series of the Heat Wave Index in Doha.

3.2 Analysis method

Overall, 27 climate indices were defined to describe the intensity, frequency, and duration of extreme events by the ETCCDI. These indices are statistically robust, and they can easily be used for comparisons of different regions. There were 16 temperature and 11 precipitation indices determined from the daily maximum and minimum temperature and daily precipitation series; their detailed definitions can be found in Zhang et al. (2011). The indices were categorized into five groups (Alexander et al. 2006): (1) absolute; (2) percentile-based; (3) threshold; (4) duration; and (5) miscellaneous. Table 2 summarizes the 12 indices chosen in this study that are relevant to the climate of the target region. The selected indices were calculated from both annual and seasonal data. Two seasons were assumed: dry season (May–October) and wet season (January–April, November, and December). These indices were calculated using the RClimDex software developed at the Climate Research Division, Environment Canada. The base period for the calculation of the percentile-based indices was chosen to be 1984–2011, because data were available beginning from 1983. For the base period, less than 1 % of the daily data points were missing. For the index calculations, annual indices were not determined for a given year if (a) more than 15 days were missing in that year or (b) if 3 or more days were missing in any given month during the year.

Table 2 Summary of temperature indices

The temperature data were analyzed using the nonparametric methods of the Mann–Kendall test to establish the trend in the time series and the Thiel–Sen estimator to determine the true slope (Sen 1968). One of the advantages of the Mann–Kendall test is that there is no presumption regarding the underlying probability distribution of the sample data being analyzed. The annual (and seasonal) indices were examined using the Mann–Kendall test to determine whether monotonic increasing or decreasing trends existed. The slopes were then estimated using the Thiel–Sen estimator, which is a simple nonparametric estimation of the true slope, if a slope is present in the dataset. The nonparametric approach has been widely applied in statistical meteorological studies (Zhang et al. 2005; Aguilar et al. 2009; Butt et al. 2009; AlSarmi and Washington 2014).

4 Weather pattern of Qatar

4.1 Spatial variation

The high-resolution dataset listed in Table 1 is a continuous complete 18-month dataset that was compared against the National Climatic Data Center datasets at DIA and AU. Figure 3 shows a scatter plot of the average daily temperatures for all three stations. The average daily temperatures at HIA and AU are 0.34 °C warmer and 0.85 °C cooler, respectively, than at DIA. The correlations were performed over the period from January 2011 to June 2012. In each case, the station with the long-term data, i.e., DIA, was chosen as the base station. The solid line indicates a perfect correlation, and the y-intercepts are 0.1 and −2.3 °C for DIA and AU, respectively. The slopes of the best-fitted lines in Fig. 3 are 0.999 and 1.068 for HIA and AU, respectively. AU exhibits lower daily temperatures compared with DIA for the region below 20 °C. This result can be attributed to the fact that AU is located 29 km inland from the sea and hence, it experiences a greater temperature drop after sunset compared with the coastal stations, where the sea regulates the temperature somewhat. Overall, there is no significant difference in the daily temperature data for the three weather stations, inland (AU), coastal (DIA), and offshore (HIA), which supports the analysis of data quality and homogeneity discussed in Section 3.1. Thus, based on the data available, it was assumed that the long-term temperature record available at DIA was a good representation of the temperature of the State of Qatar and this particular section of the Gulf. The subsequent analysis will include the 30-year daily temperature series from DIA.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Scatter plots of averaged daily temperatures between a DIA-HIA and b DIA-AU; solid red line represents the ideal correlation, a line with a 45° slope

4.2 Annual variation

The temperature dataset was first analyzed for annual variation to ensure there were no significant interannual changes. Figure 4a shows the 30-year average hourly variation of temperature for an entire year (365 days). The minimum temperature recorded was 5 °C and the maximum temperature was 50 °C (between 1983 and 2012, inclusive). It can be seen from the figure that, on average, the daily temperatures vary between 13 and 42 °C. The 30-year mean annual minimum and maximum temperatures are 24 and 32 °C, respectively. Figure 4b shows the standard deviation of the 30-year hourly average temperature observations illustrated in Fig. 4a. This figure shows that for the 30-year duration of the data examined here, the annual temperature variations are often highest during the afternoon hours. Moreover, temperature variations are lowest during the months of August through November at any given time.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Averaged 30-year hourly temperature variation: a top figure: average temperature distribution, and b bottom figure: standard deviation of the average plot

Figure 5a shows the 30-year mean hourly variation of relative humidity from 1983 to 2012 in Doha, Qatar. The average daily relative humidity fluctuates between 17 and 85 %, where the mean annual minimum and maximum relative humidity values are 37 and 70 %, respectively. Figure 5b shows the standard deviation of the 30-year hourly average humidity observations of Fig. 5a. The annual fluctuations in humidity are highest in the dry season months during the night hours. For most of the winter months (December–February), the fluctuations in relative humidity are relatively small. In general, summer months can be characterized by hot, dry weather, whereas winter months exhibit milder temperatures and higher humidity compared with summer. Figure 6a shows the 30-year average heat index variation. The heat index reaches dangerous levels, defined as a heat index value >41 °C, mostly between July and September when the humidity increases. The annual fluctuation of the heat index is shown in Fig. 6b; the variations are highest during the night from July to September and in January.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Averaged 30-year hourly relative humidity variation: a top figure: average relative humidity distribution, and b bottom figure: standard deviation of the average plot

Fig. 6
figure 6

Averaged 30-year hourly variation of the heat index (HI): a top figure: average HI distribution, and b bottom figure: standard deviation of the average plot

5 Trends in extreme temperature events

5.1 Long-term variation of percentile-based indices

Both Figs. 7 and 8 show a negative trend for the frequency of cool days (TX10p) and cool nights (TN10p) and a positive trend for warm days (TX90p) and warm nights (TN10p), respectively, in Qatar from 1983 to 2012. These are the percentile indices, which represent the positive and negative tails of the temperature distributions of the daytime and nighttime during this period. These figures show a positive trend for the number of warm days and nights and a negative trend for the number of cool days and nights. An increase in the frequency of these indices indicates a shift in the temperature distributions toward higher temperatures. Figures 7 and 8 show that the number of cool days and nights decreases along with a simultaneous increase in the number of warm days and nights. These figures show that the temperature distribution in Doha has undergone an asymmetric shift toward higher temperatures from 1983 to 2012. The rise of the minimum temperature occurred at a higher rate than the increase of the maximum temperature. Karl et al. (1993) observed similar trends in North America, the former Soviet Union, China, Japan, South Africa, and Sudan from 1951 to 1990, where the authors noticed substantial warming of the minimum temperature relative to the maximum. Our analysis also showed that there was a substantial decline in the number of cool nights before 2000, while the number of warm nights increased rapidly since 2000.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Annual frequency of cool days (top) and cool nights (bottom)

Fig. 8
figure 8

Annual frequency of warm days (top) and warm nights (bottom)

Table 3 shows the seasonal trend for the percentile indices during the dry season (May–October) and wet season (January–April, November, and December). The nighttime trend slopes (both annual and seasonal) are almost twice as large as the corresponding daytime trend slopes. Moreover, the dry season trend slopes are generally higher than the wet season indices. These results show that dry season heating is more prominent during the year in Doha. Compared with the data obtained by Almazroui et al. (2014) for Dhahran in Saudi Arabia, the trend for cool/warm nights is more pronounced than in Saudi Arabia. In contrast, the number of cool/warm days is at least 30 % lower than in the corresponding counterparts of Saudi Arabia. There is a smaller difference in the trends of warm days/nights in Qatar than in Saudi Arabia.

Warming is evident because the nighttime rate of change is almost double that of the day indices. Similar trends have been observed in many parts of the world (Donat and Alexander 2012), including the Arabian region (Donat et al. 2013). The warming trends in the percentile-based indices for Qatar are greater than the corresponding averages for the Arabian Peninsula, as mentioned before. In Fig. 7, the increases in the number of warm days/nights occurred gradually during the 1980s, except for a sharp rise in the 1990s for both indices. Region-wide averaged results reported by Zhang et al. (2005) and Donat et al. (2013) have shown similar trends to the single-station results illustrated in Figs. 7 and 8. Because the trends calculated by Zhang et al. (2005) are for 1970–2003 rather than 1983–2012 as in this study, the data show that accelerated warming across the Gulf area has occurred since 2000. Additionally, the spike in the percentage of warm days and nights observed in 1998 can be attributed to the exceptional heating caused by the 1998 El Niño year, as mentioned above.

5.2 Long-term variation of absolute indices

Figure 9 shows the rate of change in the number of summer days and tropical nights in Qatar from 1983 to 2012. This figure shows a significant increase in both these indices with the rise in the number the tropical nights being almost double that of summer days. The number of tropical nights has increased by approximately 30 days between 1983 and 2012. Similar results have been reported by Alexander et al. (2006) for several larger regions in the world. Figure 10 shows the interannual variation of the average minimum temperature together with its annual minimum (TNn) and maximum (TNx). The annual average daily minimum temperature, TNx, and TNn have all increased at approximately the same rate of about 1 °C/decade. During the 30-year period, the increase in TNn exhibits a slightly higher rate with greater fluctuations compared with TNx. Figure 11 shows the trends of the daily maximum temperature, which reflects a moderate increase of approximately 0.5 °C/decade. TXx occurs in the dry season, whereas TNn occurs in the wet season. This figure shows that the trends for the average daily maximum and TXx are smaller in magnitude when compared with TNn and TNx. No long-term variation is evident in the TXn series.

Fig. 9
figure 9

Interannual occurrence of summer days and tropical nights

Fig. 10
figure 10

Changes in the annual TNx, average minimum temperature, and TNn

Fig. 11
figure 11

Changes in annual maximum of the daily maximum TXx and average maximum and minimum values of daily maximum temperature TXn

Table 3 shows the slopes for both the annual and the seasonal temperature extremes. The dry season indices, which are statistically significant, have larger slope values than their winter counterparts. The values for the indices associated with the daily minimum temperature are greater than for their counterparts for the daily maximum temperature, regardless of the season. This indicates a more significant warming trend during dry season, particularly during the nighttime. Similar to the comparison of the percentile-based indices, the minimum temperatures in Doha increased at a faster rate than their corresponding values in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia (Almazroui et al. 2014). These results are consistent with the average trends in the Middle East (AlSarmi and Washington 2014; Almazroui et al. 2014). Both studies observed a significant increase in the maximum value of the daily maximum/minimum temperatures. This more rapid warming of the daily minimum temperature, in comparison with the daily maximum temperature, results in a negative trend for the monthly mean difference between TX and TN, daily temperature range (DTR), and extreme temperature range (ETR). Figure 12 shows that both the DTR and ETR parameters exhibit a decreasing trend, which has a slope that is approximately 0.5 °C/decade.

Table 3 Slope of best fitting curve for percentile indices; significant changes (at 95 % confidence level) are indicated in bold
Fig. 12
figure 12

Interannual variation of the diurnal temperature range (DTR) and the extreme temperature range (ETR)

5.3 Comparing the climatic trends in Qatar and the Gulf Region

Table 4 provides a comparison of the annual trends of the presented indices for Qatar compared with several other countries that border the Gulf, using weather data obtained from the US National Centers for Environmental Information. Abu Dhabi and Ras Al-Khaimah are located east of Qatar, and both cities exhibit similar warming trends to that reported for Doha. The trends are of comparable intensities, which indicate a general warming pattern for the southeastern coasts of the Gulf. Temperature indices were also calculated for Kuwait, which is located further toward the northwestern part of this region. Kuwait has experienced similar warming trends regarding the frequency of warm nights/days and cool nights/days; however, the intensities are less than at Doha. Detailed numerical results for the northern part of the Gulf are unavailable; however, Marofi et al. (2011) showed that Bushehr, Iran, which is located approximately 400 km northwest of Doha, has experienced significant warming in recent decades. Warming can be mainly observed by the higher frequency of warm nights and days, reduction in the number of cool nights and days, and a more significant rise in the minimum temperature indices. Another Iranian location, Kish Island, which is located approximately 300 km northeast of Doha, has also witnessed warming but less severe compared with Doha and Bushehr (Marofi et al. 2011). The minimum temperatures have increased, and the occurrence of summer days and tropical nights has increased. In summary, the trends shown in this study are consistent with the pattern between 1981 and 2010 in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, which also showed an increase in the number of cool/warm nights, although with a slower rate of increase than in Qatar (Almazroui et al. 2014). The seasonal temperature trends for Qatar are also similar to Saudi Arabia. There has been a sharp increase in the number of warm days and nights during the warm seasons in Saudi Arabia from 1981 to 2010 and a significant decrease in the number of cool nights during the cool season (Islam et al. 2014).

Table 4 Comparison of the annual trends between different cities discussed in the text; significant changes (at 95 % confidence level) are indicated in bold

5.4 Effects of humidity and long-term trend of heat index

The annual variations in the maximum, minimum, and mean relative humidity for Doha were also computed, and they are plotted in Fig. 13. The relative humidity depends on both the specific humidity and temperature. The results in Fig. 13 show that the humidity indices in Qatar have been decreasing at a rate of approximately 1.5 %/decade. The associated p values for the best-fitting slopes are all <0.005, which indicates that the slopes are statistically significant at the 95 % confidence level. The annual reduction in the relative humidity supports the earlier warming trends found in the extreme temperature indices. A decrease in relative humidity can be due to the following: a decrease in specific humidity (i.e., a decrease in the mass of water vapor in a unit mass of moist air), or an increase in saturated vapor pressure caused by an increase in temperature.

Fig. 13
figure 13

Interannual trends of maximum, minimum, and average humidity. The p values for the slope of the best fitting curve are 0.004, 0.005, and 0.002 for ϕ min , average ϕ, and ϕ max , respectively

The long-term trends of the annual maximum and minimum values of the heat index, shown in Table 5, reflect the intensified heating during the dry season. Figure 14 shows a statistically significant upward trend of 1.57 °C/decade of the Heat Wave Index. The 3-day running mean temperature is consistently >41 °C through most of the three decades, which could cause serious health risks such as heat stroke. Persistently high temperatures have been shown to increase the mortality rate in the temperate regions of Europe and North America (Kovats and Jendritzky 2006; Martens 1998). There are only limited studies on the impact of climate change on the parameters of importance for Qatari national interests, such as the vulnerability of natural resources such as water, and the health impact of its residents, and the margins of their adaptability are becoming increasingly limited. This is a gap yet to be fulfilled.

Table 5 Slope of the best fitting curve for the extremes of heat indices; significant changes (at 95 % confidence level) are indicated in bold
Fig. 14
figure 14

Interannual trend of the Heat Wave Index. Data obtained from the World Bank Open Data (data.worldbank.org)

Min. HI min minimum of minimum daily heat index, Max HI min maximum of minimum daily heat index,

Min. HI max minimum of maximum daily heat index, Max HI max maximum of maximum daily heat index

6 Discussion

The presented results indicate statistically significant trends in the temperature indices associated with the heating trend in Qatar. In particular, the results show a significant increase in the minimum temperature, which reflects a reduction in the DTR for Qatar. Several studies have investigated the rise in the minimum temperature in the Arabian Peninsula, which is attributed to the warming trend of changes in atmospheric circulations over the Mediterranean Sea, Indian Ocean, and Sudan (Almazroui et al. 2014; AlSarmi and Washington 2014). The Kendall tau correlation coefficient between the DTR and averaged humidity in Qatar is 0.28 with a p value of 0.035, which is statistically significant, indicating a strong relation between the relative humidity and DTR. This observation is consistent with the reported regional decrease in the dew point temperature over the southeastern and southern Arabian Peninsula (AlSarmi and Washington 2014).

In addition to the changes in the regional weather pattern, the rapid economic growth in Qatar might also intensify the warming trend. According to the World Bank World Development Indicator Data Bank, Qatar has observed a fivefold increase in population, from approximately 0.3 million in 1983 to over 2 million in 2013 (World Bank Group 2014a). The urban population increased from 90 to over 95 % of the total population during the same period. An overwhelming majority of the population (>85 % in the 2010 census) is concentrated around Doha (the national capital and largest city in the country) and its adjoining suburbs. The overall population density in Doha is approximately 3000 persons/km2, with the maximum value within the city of greater than 10,000 persons/km2. DIA is nowadays located in a highly urbanized area, and urbanization is one of the primary causes of an intensified heat island effect, and an increase in population has been shown to correlate with terrain warming in urban areas (Chung et al. 2004). Published literature has noted that urban warming is more pronounced during summer evenings (Karl et al. 1993) because urban structures release heat that has been absorbed during the day. Moreover, the widespread use of air conditioning, which dissipates warm air outdoors, could be another primary reason for pronounced warming during summer evenings. Similar climatic trends due to urbanization have been reported in Bahrain (Elagib and Abdu 2010). Cyprus (Price et al. 1999), and Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (Qureshi and Khan 1994). Urbanization might explain, at least partially, the rapid increase in the temperature indicators shown in Table 3 during the dry season in Doha.

Finally, the rapid economic expansion in Qatar during recent decades might also have further intensified the rapid warming trend in the country over the past few years. According to the World Bank, the total energy consumption in the country increased from 5000 kt of oil equivalent in 1983 to 33,000 kt of oil equivalent in 2011, an almost sevenfold increase (World Bank Group 2014b). This increase implies higher energy consumption per capita during the same period. Industrial expansion and development increase the production of greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, and water vapor. In addition to the rapid growth of the oil–gas processing industry in Qatar, the Qatar Statistic Authority has reported that the number of vehicles registered in Qatar has increased by almost 230 % over the period 2000–2010. Automobiles are a major contributor to urban pollution and significantly raise the level of greenhouse gases. The amount of greenhouse gas emissions increased sixfold for carbon dioxide, and those for nitrous oxide more than doubled between 1990 and 2011 (World Bank Group 2014c). Figure 15 shows the variation of total carbon dioxide emissions in Qatar between 1983 and 2010. The trend value is 16 Mt./decade for the period 1983–2000. The trend value has tripled since the turn of the century, which corresponds to the rapid economic and industrial expansion in the nation since 2000. The increment of carbon dioxide emissions in Qatar since 2000 coincides with the temperature rise over the same period. Comparing Fig. 10 with Fig. 11, the trend values for the daily minimum temperature are larger than the corresponding values for the daily maximum temperature. This observation could be an indication that emissions of greenhouse gases could lead to a more significant increase in the daily minimum temperature. However, further research on this topic is required for a thorough understanding of the asymmetric trends of the maximum and minimum temperatures in Qatar and its dependence on the local level of air pollution. The climatic change in Qatar has been similar to Bahrain, an island nation off the West Coast of Qatar, which has also undergone intense economic development in recent times (Elagib and Abdu 2010). It has been shown that rapid urbanization causes intensified heating of the country, especially in summer.

Fig. 15
figure 15

Relation between carbon dioxide emissions in megatons and temperature extremes

7 Conclusions

The extreme temperature events during a 30-year period (1983–2012) in Doha, Qatar, were examined in this study. The study provides the most up-to-date analysis of climate change in Doha and neighboring stations within this region. The authors expect that this analysis will fill the gap in the study of climate change over the eastern Arabia Peninsula, where only very limited observational studies are available in the literature. The results showed that a significant warming has occurred in Doha during the studied period, which has occurred at an increasing rate over the last decade. This result is consistent with published studies that have reported global and regional warming trends. For Doha, warming is reflected most in terms of the occurrence of warm days and nights, reduced numbers of cool days and nights, higher minimum temperatures in the wet season, and increased frequency of hot days and nights during the dry season. Spatially consistent warming trends were observed in the percentile-based indices for all the cities analyzed within the coastal region. Warming of the temperatures during the wet season and the number of hot days in the dry season were found to be spatially consistent to the east of Doha (Abu Dhabi and Ras Al-Khaimah), whereas to the north (primarily Bushehr), qualitatively similar warming trends were observed in terms of the wet season temperatures.

This detailed weather analysis for Qatar and the evidence for a warming region fill important gaps in the global picture of climate change studies. Further investigations are necessary to understand the effects of local pollution and urbanization on extreme temperatures in Qatar, which will be essential regarding the effective planning of socioeconomic infrastructure.