Theoretical and Applied Climatology

, Volume 126, Issue 1–2, pp 51–60 | Cite as

Investigation of the impact of anthropogenic heat flux within an urban land surface model and PILPS-urban

Original Paper

Abstract

Results from the first international urban model comparison experiment (PILPS-Urban) suggested that models which neglected the anthropogenic heat flux within the surface energy balance performed at least as well as models that include the source term, but this could not be explained. The analyses undertaken show that the results from PILPS-Urban were masked by the signal from including vegetation, which was identified in PILPS-Urban as being important. Including the anthropogenic heat flux does give improved performance, but the benefit is small for the site studied given the relatively small magnitude of this flux relative to other terms in the surface energy balance. However, there is no further benefit from including temporal variations in the flux at this site. The importance is expected to increase at sites with a larger anthropogenic heat flux and greater temporal variations.

Keywords

Anthropogenic heat JULES Surface energy balance Urban environment 

References

  1. Best MJ (2005) Representing urban areas within operational numerical weather prediction models. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 114:91–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Best MJ, CSB G, Villani MG (2006) Evaluation of the urban tile in MOSES using surface energy balance observations. Bound- Layer Meteorol 118:503–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Best MJ, Pryor M, Clark DB, Rooney GG, Essery RHL, Ménard CB, Edwards JM, Hendry MA, Porson A, Gedney N, Mercado LM, Sitch S, Blyth E, Boucher O, Cox PM, Grimmond CSB, Harding RJ (2011) The Joint UK Land Environment Simulator (JULES), model description—part 1: energy and water fluxes. Geosci Model Dev 4:677–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Best MJ, Grimmond CSB (2013) Analysis of the seasonal cycle within the first international urban land surface model comparison. Bound-Layer Meteorol 146:421–446. doi:10.1007/s10546-012-9769-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Best MJ, Grimmond CSB (2014) Importance of initial state and atmospheric conditions for urban land surface models performance. Urban Climate. doi:10.1016/j.uclim.2013.10.006 Google Scholar
  6. Christen A, Vogt R (2004) Energy and radiation balance of a Central European City. Int J Climatol 24:1395–1421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coutts AM, Beringer J, Tapper NJ (2007) Impact of increasing urban density on local climate: spatial and temporal variations in the surface energy balance in Melbourne, Australia. J Appl Meteorol 47:477–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cullen MJP (1993) The unified forecast/climate model. Meteorol Mag 122:81–94Google Scholar
  9. Grimmond CSB (1992) The subruban energy balance: Methodological considerations and results for a mid-latitude west coast city under winter and spring conditions. Int J Climatol 12:481–497Google Scholar
  10. Grimmond CSB, Blackett M, Best MJ, Barlow J, Baik J-J, Belcher SE, Bohnenstengel SI, Calmet I, Chen F, Dandou A, Fortuniak K, Gouvea ML, Hamdi R, Hendry M, Kawai T, Kawamoto Y, Kondo H, Krayenhoff ES, Lee S-H, Loridan T, Martilli A, Masson V, Miao S, Oleson K, Pigeon G, Porson A, Ryu Y-H, Salamanca F, Shashua-Bar L, Steeneveld G-J, Trombou M, Voogt J, Young D, Zhang N (2010) The international urban energy balance models comparison project: first results from phase 1. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 49:1268–1292. doi:10.1175/2010JAMC2354.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Grimmond CSB, Blackett M, Best MJ, Baik J-J, Belcher SE, Beringer J, Bohnenstengel SI, Calmet I, Chen F, Coutts A, Dandou A, Fortuniak K, Gouvea ML, Hamdi R, Hendry M, Kanda M, Kawai T, Kawamoto Y, Kondo H, Krayenhoff ES, Lee S-H, Loridan T, Martilli A, Masson V, Miao S, Oleson K, Ooka R, Pigeon G, Porson A, Ryu Y-H, Salamanca F, Steeneveld G-J, Trombou M, Voogt J, Young D, Zhang N (2011) Initial results from phase 2 of the international urban energy balance model comparison. Int J Climatol 30:244–272. doi:10.1002/joc.2227 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hallenbeck M, Rice M, Smith B, Cornell-Martinez C, Wilkinson J (1997) Vehicle volume distribution by classification. Washington State Transportation Center, University of Washington, 54 pp. [Available from Washington State Transportation Center, University of Washington, 1107 NE 45th St. Suite 535, Seattle WA 98105]Google Scholar
  13. Hamdi R, Degrauwe D, Duerinckx A, Cedilnik J, Costa V, Dalkilic T, Essaouini K, Jerczynki M, Kocaman F, Kullmann L, Mahfouf J-F, Meier F, Sassi M, Schneider S, Váňa F, Termonia P (2014) Evaluating the performance of SURFEXv5 as a new land surface scheme for the ALADINcy36 and ALARO-0 models. Geosci Model Dev 7:23–39. doi:10.5194/gmd-7-23-2014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hamilton IG, Davies M, Steadman P, Stone A, Ridley I, Evans S (2009) The significance of the anthropogenic heat emissions of London’s buildings: a comparison against captured shortwave solar radiation. Build Environ. 44:807–817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Iamarino M, Beevers S, Grimmond CSB (2012) High-resolution (space, time) anthropogenic heat emissions: London 1970–2025. Int J Climatol 32:1754–1767. doi:10.1002/joc.2390 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ichinose T, Shimodozono K, Hanaki K (1999) Impact of anthropogenic heat on urban climate in Tokyo. Atmos Environ 33:3897–3909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kotthaus S, Grimmond CSB (2014) Energy exchange in a dense urban environment—part I: temporal variability of long-term observations in central London. Urban Climate. doi:10.1016/j.uclim.2013.10.002
  18. Lemonsu A, Belair S, Mailhot J (2009) The new Canadian urban modelling system: evaluation for two cases from the joint urban 2003 Oklahoma city experiment. Bound- Layer Meteorol 113:47–70. doi:10.1007/s10546-009-9414-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Manabe S (1969) Climate and the ocean circulation: 1, the atmospheric circulation and the hydrology of the earths’ surface. Mon Wea Rev 97:739–805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Martilli A, Clappier A, Rotach MW (2002) An urban surface exchange parameterisation for mesoscale models. Bound-Layer Meteorol 104:261–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Masson V (2000) A physically-based scheme for the urban energy budget in atmospheric models. Bound-Layer Meteorol 41:1011–1026Google Scholar
  22. McCarthy MP, Best MJ, Betts RA (2010) Climate change in cities due to global warming and urban effects. Geophys Res Letters 37: L09705. doi:10.1029/2010GL042845
  23. Offerle B, Grimmond CSB, Fortuniak K (2005) Heat storage and anthropogenic heat flux in relation to the energy balance of a central european city centre. Int J Climatol 25:1405–1419. doi:10.1002/joc.1198 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Oleson KW, Bonan GB, Feddema J, Vertenstein M, Grimmond CSB (2008) An urban parameterization for a global climate model: 1. Formulation and Evaluation for two Cities J Appl Meteorol Climatol 47:1038–1060Google Scholar
  25. Pigeon G, Legain D, Durand P, Masson V (2007) Anthropogenic heat release in an old European agglomeration (Toulouse, France). Int J Climatol 27:1969–1981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Quah AKL, Roth M (2011) Diurnal and weekly variation of anthropogenic heat emissions in a tropical city, Singapore. Atmos Environ 46:92–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ross SL, Oke TR (1988) Tests of three urban energy balance models. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 44:73–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sailor DJ (2011) A review of methods for estimating anthropogenic heat and moisture emissions in the urban environment. Int J Climatol 31:189–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sailor DJ, Lu L (2004) A top-down methodology for developing diurnal and seasonal anthropogenic heating profiles for urban areas. Atmos Environ 38:2737–2748CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Crown Copyright 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ExeterUK
  2. 2.Department of GeographyKing’s College LondonLondonUK
  3. 3.Department of MeteorologyUniversity of ReadingReadingUK

Personalised recommendations