Advertisement

Theoretical and Applied Climatology

, Volume 120, Issue 1–2, pp 377–390 | Cite as

An evaluation of single-site statistical downscaling techniques in terms of indices of climate extremes for the Midwest of Iran

  • M. FarajzadehEmail author
  • R. Oji
  • A. J. Cannon
  • Y. Ghavidel
  • A. Massah Bavani
Original Paper

Abstract

Seven single-site statistical downscaling methods for daily temperature and precipitation, including four deterministic algorithms [analog model (ANM), quantile mapping with delta method extrapolation (QMD), cumulative distribution function transform (CDFt), and model-based recursive partitioning (MOB)] and three stochastic algorithms [generalized linear model (GLM), Conditional Density Estimation Network Creation and Evaluation (CaDENCE), and Statistical Downscaling Model–Decision Centric (SDSM–DC] are evaluated at nine stations located in the mountainous region of Iran’s Midwest. The methods are of widely varying complexity, with input requirements that range from single-point predictors of temperature and precipitation to multivariate synoptic-scale fields. The period 1981–2000 is used for model calibration and 2001–2010 for validation, with performance assessed in terms of 27 Climate Extremes Indices (CLIMDEX). The sensitivity of the methods to large-scale anomalies and their ability to replicate the observed data distribution in the validation period are separately tested for each index by Pearson correlation and Kolmogorov–Smirnov (KS) tests, respectively. Combined tests are used to assess overall model performances. MOB performed best, passing 14.5 % (49.6 %) of the combined (single) tests, respectively, followed by SDSM, CaDENCE, and GLM [14.5 % (46.5 %), 13.2 % (47.1 %), and 12.8 % (43.2 %), respectively], and then by QMD, CDFt, and ANM [7 % (45.7 %), 4.9 % (45.3 %), and 1.6 % (37.9 %), respectively]. Correlation tests were passed less frequently than KS tests. All methods downscaled temperature indices better than precipitation indices. Some indices, notably R20, R25, SDII, CWD, and TNx, were not successfully simulated by any of the methods. Model performance varied widely across the study region.

Keywords

Statistical Downscaling Quantile Mapping Weather Typing Statistical Downscaling Model Statistical Downscaling Method 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research project would not have been possible without the facilities and research environment of the Pacific Climate Impact Consortium (PCIC). Therefore, we are grateful to Prof. Francis Zwiers, PCIC director, who provided us with the opportunity to use these facilities.

References

  1. Barry RG, Perry AH (1973) Synoptic climatology: methods and applications. Methuen, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Benestad RE (2010) Downscaling precipitation extremes. Theor Appl Climatol 100:1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benestad RE, Hanssen-Bauer I, Chen D (2008) Empirical–statistical downscaling. World Scientific Publishers, ISBN 978-981-281-912-3Google Scholar
  4. Bronaugh D, for the Pacific Climate Impacts Consortium (2011) climdex.pcic: PCIC implementation of CLIMDEX routines. R package version 0.4-1. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=climdex.pcic
  5. Bürger G, Murdock TQ, Werner AT, Sobie SR, Cannon AJ (2012) Downscaling extremes—an intercomparison of multiple statistical methods for present climate. J Clim 25:4366–4388. doi: 10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00408.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bürger G, Sobie S, Cannon A, Werner A, Murdock T (2013) Downscaling extremes—an intercomparison of multiple methods for future climate. J Clim. doi: 10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00249.1 Google Scholar
  7. Cannon AJ (2012a) Neural networks for probabilistic environmental prediction: Conditional Density Estimation Network Creation & Evaluation (CaDENCE) in R. Compt Rendus Geosci 41:126–135. doi: 10.1016/j.cageo.2011.08.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cannon AJ (2012b) Regression-guided clustering: a semisupervised method for circulation-to-environment synoptic classification. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 51:185–190. doi: 10.1175/JAMC-D-11-0155.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cannon AJ, Whitfield PH, Lord ER (2002) Synoptic map-pattern classification using recursive partitioning and principal component analysis. Mon Weather Rev 130(5):1187–1206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dee DP et al (2011) The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system. Q J R Meteorol Soc 137:553–597. doi: 10.1002/qj.828 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dibike YB, Coulibaly P (2006) Temporal neural networks for downscaling climate variability and extremes. Neural Netw 19:135–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Frich P, Alexander LV, Della-Marta P, Gleason B, Haylock M, Klein Tank AMG, Peterson T (2002) Observed coherent changes in climatic extremes during the second half of the twentieth century. Clim Res 19:193–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Frost AJ, Charles SP, Timbal B et al (2011) A comparison of multi-site daily rainfall downscaling techniques under Australian conditions. J Hydrol 408:1–18. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.06.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Furrer EM, Katz RW (2007) Generalized linear modeling approach to stochastic weather generators. Clim Res 34:129–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Guijarro JA (2012) climatol: some tools for climatology: series homogenization, plus windrose and Walter&Lieth diagrams. R package version 2.1. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=climatol
  16. Hamlet AF, Salathe E P, Carrasco P (2010) Statistical downscaling techniques for global climate model simulations of temperature and precipitation with application to water resources planning studies. http://www.hydro.washington.edu/2860/report
  17. Harpham C, Wilby RL (2005) Multi-site downscaling of heavy daily precipitation occurrence and amounts. J Hydrol 312:235–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Imbert A, Benestad RE (2005) An improvement of analog model strategy for more reliable local climate change scenarios. Theor Appl Climatol 82:245–255. doi: 10.1007/s00704-005-0133-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Imbert A, Benestad RE (2012) anm: analog model for downscaling. R package version 1.1-1. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=anm
  20. IPCC (2012) Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. A special report of working groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 582Google Scholar
  21. Kallache M, Vrac M, Naveau P, Michelangeli P‐A (2011) Nonstationary probabilistic downscaling of extreme precipitation. J Geophys Res 116, D05113. doi: 10.1029/2010JD014892 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kalnay E et al (1996) The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 77(3):437–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kharin VV, Zwiers FW (2000) Changes in the extremes in an ensemble of transient climate simulations with a coupled atmosphere–ocean GCM. J Clim 13:3760–3788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kharin VV, Zhang X, Hegerl GC (2007) Changes in temperature and precipitation extremes in the IPCC ensemble of global coupled model simulations. J Clim 20:1419–1444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Khoshakhlagh F, Oji R, Jafarbeglou M (2008) A synoptic study on seasonal patterns of wet and dry spells in Midwest of Iran. Desert 13:89–103Google Scholar
  26. Kim K-Y, Yi G-S, CSBio Lab., Information and Communications University (2008) Sequential KNN imputation method. R package version 1.0.1. http://www.inside-r.org/packages/seqknn
  27. Klein Tank AMG, Zwiers FW, Zhang X (2009) Guidelines on analysis of extremes in a changing climate in support of informed decisions for adaptation. WMO-TD No. 1500, 56 ppGoogle Scholar
  28. Mekis E, Vincent LA (2011) An overview of the second generation adjusted daily precipitation dataset for trend analysis in Canada. Atmosphere-Ocean 49:163–177. doi: 10.1080/07055900.2011.583910 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Menne MJ, Durre I, Vose RS, Gleason B, Houston TG (2012) An overview of the Global Historical Climatology Network-Daily Database. J Atmos Ocean Technol 29:897–910. doi: 10.1175/JTECH-D-11-00103.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Michelangeli P-A, Vrac M, Loukos H (2009) Probabilistic downscaling approaches: application to wind cumulative distribution functions. Geophys Res Lett 36, L11708. doi: 10.1029/2009GL038401 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Min S-K, Zhang X, Zwiers FW, Hegerl GC (2011) Human contribution to more-intense precipitation extremes. Nature 470:378–381. doi: 10.1038/nature09763 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Oji R (2006) A synoptic study on atmospheric patterns, tracks and frequencies of cyclones in wet spells of Iran’s Midwest. M.S. thesis in climatology. Tehran University, Tehran, in PersianGoogle Scholar
  33. Olsson J, Uvo C, Jinno K (2001) Statistical atmospheric downscaling of short-term extreme rainfall by neural networks. Phys Chem Earth 26B:695–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Peterson TC, Manton MJ (2008) Monitoring changes in climate extremes: a tale of international collaboration. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 89:1266–1271. doi: 10.1175/2008BAMS2501.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schubert S, Henderson-Sellers A (1997) A statistical model to downscale local daily temperature extremes from synoptic scale atmospheric circulation patterns in the Australian region. Clim Dyn 13:223–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sillmann J, Kharin VV, Zwiers FW, Zhang X, Bronaugh D (2013) Climate extremes indices in the CMIP5 multimodel ensemble: part 2. Future climate projections. J Geophys Res Atmos. doi: 10.1002/jgrd.50188 Google Scholar
  37. Tebaldi C, Hayhoe K, Arblaster JM, Meehl GA (2006) Going to the extremes. Clim Chang 79:185–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Vincent LA, Zhang X, Bonsal BR, Hogg WD (2002) Homogenization of daily temperatures over Canada. J Clim 15:1322–1334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vrac M, Michelangeli P-A (2012) CDFt: statistical downscaling through CDF-transform. R package version 1.0.1. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=CDFt
  40. Vrac M, Naveau P (2007) Stochastic downscaling of precipitation: from dry events to heavy rainfalls. Water Resour Res 43, W07402. doi: 10.1029/2006WR005308 Google Scholar
  41. Wang XL (2008a) Accounting for autocorrelation in detecting mean-shifts in climate data series using the penalized maximal t or F test. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 47:2423–2444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wang XL (2008b) Penalized maximal F-test for detecting undocumented mean-shifts without trend-change. J Atmos Ocean Technol 25:368–384. doi: 10.1175/2007/JTECHA982.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wang XL, Feng Y (2010) RHtestsV3 user manual. Climate Research Division, Science and Technology Branch, Environment Canada, Toronto, ON, Canada. http://cccma.seos.uvic.ca/ETCCDMI/RHtest/RHtestsV3_UserManual.doc
  44. Wang XL, Wen QH, Wu Y (2007) Penalized maximal t test for detecting undocumented mean change in climate data series. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 46:916–931. doi: 10.1175/JAM2504.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wang XL, Chen H, Wu Y, Feng Y, Pu Q (2010) New techniques for the detection and adjustment of shifts in daily precipitation data series. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 49:2416–2436. doi: 10.1175/2010JAMC2376.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wilby RL, Dawson CW (2012) The Statistical DownScaling Model: insights from one decade of application. Int J Climatol. doi: 10.1002/joc.3544 Google Scholar
  47. Wilby RL, Dawson CW (2007) SDSM4.2 – A decision support tool for the assessment of regional climate impacts. User Manual 1–94Google Scholar
  48. Wilby RL, Dawson CW (2013) Statistical downscaling model–decision centric (SDSM-DC) version 5.1 supplementary note. Loughborough University, LoughboroughGoogle Scholar
  49. Wilby RL, Fowler HJ (2010) Regional climate downscaling. In: Fung CF, Lopez A, New M (eds) Modelling the impact of climate change on water resources. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  50. Wilby RL, Dawson CW, Barrow EM (2002) A decision support tool for the assessment of regional climate. Impacts Environ Model Softw. doi: 10.1016/S1364-8152(01)00060-3 Google Scholar
  51. Wilks DS (2006) Statistical methods in the atmospheric sciences, 2nd edn. Elsevier, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  52. Wood A, Maurer E, Kumar A, Lettenmaier DP (2002) Long-range experimental hydrologic forecasting for the eastern United States. J Geophys Res 107:4429. doi: 10.1029/2001JD000659 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Yang T, Li H, Wang W, Xu C-Y, Yu Z (2012) Statistical downscaling of extreme daily precipitation, evaporation, and temperature and construction of future scenarios. Hydrol Proced 26:3510–3523. doi: 10.1002/hyp.8427 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Yarnal B (1993) Synoptic climatology in environmental analysis: a primer. Bellhaven, LondonGoogle Scholar
  55. Zeileis A, Hothorn T, Hornik K (2008) Model-based recursive partitioning. J Comput Graph Stat 17:492–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zhang X et al (2011) Indices for monitoring changes in extremes based on daily temperature and precipitation data. WIREs Clim Chang 2:851–870. doi: 10.1002/wcc.147 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Farajzadeh
    • 1
    Email author
  • R. Oji
    • 1
  • A. J. Cannon
    • 2
  • Y. Ghavidel
    • 1
  • A. Massah Bavani
    • 3
  1. 1.Tarbiat Modares UniversityTehranIran
  2. 2.Pacific Climate Impacts ConsortiumUniversity of VictoriaVictoriaCanada
  3. 3.Department of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, College of AbouraihanUniversity of TehranPakdashtIran

Personalised recommendations