Advertisement

Theoretical and Applied Climatology

, Volume 118, Issue 3, pp 511–521 | Cite as

The biogeophysical effects of extreme afforestation in modeling future climate

  • Ye WangEmail author
  • Xiaodong Yan
  • Zhaomin Wang
Original Paper

Abstract

Afforestation has been deployed as a mitigation strategy for global warming due to its substantial carbon sequestration, which is partly counterbalanced with its biogeophysical effects through modifying the fluxes of energy, water, and momentum at the land surface. To assess the potential biophysical effects of afforestation, a set of extreme experiments in an Earth system model of intermediate complexity, the McGill Paleoclimate Model-2 (MPM-2), is designed. Model results show that latitudinal afforestation not only has a local warming effect but also induces global and remote warming over regions beyond the forcing originating areas. Precipitation increases in the northern hemisphere and decreases in southern hemisphere in response to afforestation. The local surface warming over the forcing originating areas in northern hemisphere is driven by decreases in surface albedo and increases in precipitation. The remote surface warming in southern hemisphere is induced by decreases in surface albedo and precipitation. The results suggest that the potential impact of afforestation on regional and global climate depended critically on the location of the forest expansion. That is, afforestation in 0°–15°N leaves a relatively minor impact on global and regional temperature; afforestation in 45°–60°N results in a significant global warming, while afforestation in 30°–45°N results in a prominent regional warming. In addition, the afforestation leads to a decrease in annual mean meridional oceanic heat transport with a maximum decrease in forest expansion of 30°–45°N. These results can help to compare afforestation effects and find areas where afforestation mitigates climate change most effectively combined with its carbon drawdown effects.

Keywords

Land Cover Change Surface Albedo Atmospheric General Circulation Model Cloud Feedback Latitude Band 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by NUAA (Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics) Youth Science and Technology Innovation Foundation (grant no. 3082013NS2013068).

References

  1. Anderson RG, Canadell JG, Randerson JT, Jackson RB, Hungate BA, Baldocchi DD, Ban-Weiss GA, Bonan GB, Caldeira K, Cao L, Diffenbaugh NS, Gurney KR, Kueppers LM, Law BE, Luyssaert S, O’Halloran TL (2011) Biophysical considerations in forestry for climate protection. Front Ecol Environ 9:174–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson-Teixeira KJ, Snyder PK, Twine TE, Cuadra SV, Costa MH, DeLucia EH (2012) Climate-regulation services of natural and agricultural ecoregions of the Americas. Nat Clim Chang 2:177–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bala G, Caldeira K, Wickett M, Phillips TJ, Lobell DB, Delire C, Mirin A (2007) Combined climate and carbon cycle effects of large-scale deforestation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104(16):6550–6555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bala G, Krishna S, Narayanappa D, Cao L, Caldeira K (2013) An estimate of equilibrium sensitivity of global terrestrial carbon cycle using NCAR CCSM4. Clim Dyn 40:1671–1686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Betts RA (2000) Offset of the potential carbon sink from boreal forestation by decreases in surface albedo. Nature 408:187–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Betts RA (2011) Climate science: afforestation cools more or less. Nat Geosci 4:504–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Betts RA, Falloon PD, Goldewijk KK, Ramankutty N (2007) Biogeophysical effects of land use on climate: model simulations of radiative forcing and large-scale temperature change. Agric For Meteorol 142:216–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bonan GB (2008) Forests and climate change: forcings, feedbacks, and the climate benefits of forests. Science 320:1444–1449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bonan G, Pollard A, Thompson S (1992) Effects of boreal forest vegetation on global climate. Nature 359:716–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bounoua L, DeFries R, Collatz GJ, Sellers P, Khan H (2002) Effects of land cover conversion on surface climate. Clim Chang 52:29–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brovkin V, Ganopolski A, Svirezhev Y (1997) A continuous climate-vegetation classification for use in climate-biosphere studies. Ecol Model 101:251–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brovkin V, Levis S, Loutre M, Crucifix M, Claussen M, Ganopolski A, Kubatzki C, Petoukhov V (2003) Stability analysis of the climate-vegetation system in the northern high latitudes. Clim Chang 57:119–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brovkin V, Claussen M, Driesschaert E, Fichefet T, Kicklighter D, Loutre MF, Matthews HD, Ramankutty N, Schaeffer M, Sokolov A (2006) Biogeophysical effects of historical land cover changes simulated by six Earth system models of Intermediate complexity. Clim Dyn 26:587–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brovkin V, Raddatz T, Reick CH, Claussen M, Gayler V (2009) Global biogeophysical interactions between forest and climate. Geophys Res Lett 36, L07405. doi: 10.1029/2009GL037543 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Canadell JG, Raupach MR (2008) Managing forests for climate change mitigation. Science 320:1456–1457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Canadell JG, Quéré CL, Raupach MR, Field CB, Buitenhuis ET, Ciais P, Conway TJ, Gillett NP, Houghton RA, Marland G (2007) Contributions to accelerating atmospheric CO2 growth from economic activity, carbon intensity, and efficiency of natural sinks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:18866–18870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chapin FS III, Randerson JT, McGuire AD, Foley JA, Field CB (2008) Changing feedbacks in the climate-biosphere system. Front Ecol Environ 6:313–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chen G, Notaro M, Liu Z, Liu Y (2012) Simulated local and remote biophysical effects of afforestation over Southeast United States in boreal summer. J Clim 25:4511–4522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Claussen M, Brovkin V, Ganopolski A (2001) Biogeophysical versus biogeochemical feedbacks of large-scale land cover change. Geophys Res Lett 28:1011–1014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Costa MH, Foley J (2000) Combined effects of deforestation and doubled atmosphere CO2 concentration on the climate of Amazonia. J Clim 13:18–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Crowley TJ (2000) Causes of climate change over the past 1000 years. Science 289(5477):270–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dallmeyer A, Claussen M (2011) The influence of land cover change in the Asian monsoon region on present-day and mid-Holocene climate. Biogeosciences 8:1499–1519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Davin EL, Noblet-Ducoudré ND (2010) Climatic impact of global-scale deforestation: radiative versus nonradiative processes. J Clim 23:97–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. De Fries RS, Bounoua L, Collatz GJ (2002) Human modification of the landscape and surface climate in the next fifty years. Glob Chang Biol 8:438–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Field CB, Lobell DB, Peters HA, Chiariello NR (2007) Feedbacks of terrestrial ecosystems to climate change. Annu Rev Environ Resour 32:1–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Forest CE, Stone PH, Sokolov AP (2002) Quantifying uncertainties in climate system properties with the use of recent climate observations. Science 295:113–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ganopolski A, Petoukhov V, Rahmstorf S, Brovkin V, Claussen M, Eliseev A, Kubatzki C (2001) CLIMBER-2: a climate system model of intermediate complexity. Part II: model sensitivity. Clim Dyn 17:735–751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gibbard S, Caldeira K, Bala G, Phillips TJ, Wickett M (2005) Climate effects of global land cover change. Geophys Res Lett 32, L23705. doi: 10.1029/2005GL024550 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Govindasamy B, Duffy PB, Caldeira K (2001) Land use changes and Northern Hemisphere cooling. Geophys Res Lett 28(2):291–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Henderson-Sellers A, Dickinson RE, Durbidge TB, Kennedy PJ, Mcguffie K, Pitman AJ (1993) Tropical deforestation: modeling local-scale to regional-scale climate change. J Geophys Res 98:7289–7315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Khatiwala S, Primeau F, Hall T (2009) Reconstruction of the history of anthropogenic CO2 concentrations in the ocean. Nature 462:346–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kleidon A, Fraedrich K, Heimann M (2000) A green planet versus a desert world: estimating the maximum effect of vegetation on the land surface climate. Clim Chang 44:471–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ma D, Notaro M, Liu Z, Chen G, Liu Y (2012) Simulated impacts of afforestation in East China monsoon region as modulated by ocean variability. Clim Dyn 41(9-10):2439–2450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nabuurs GJ, Masera O, Andrasko K, Benitez-Ponce P, Boer R, Dutschke M, Elsiddig E, Ford-Robertson J, Frumhoff P, Karjalainen T, Krankina O, Kurz WA, Matsumoto M, Oyhantcabal W, Ravindranath NH, Sanchez MJS, Zhang X (2007) In: Metz B, Davidson O, Bosch P, Dave R, Meyer L (eds) IPCC climate change 2007: mitigation of climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 541–584Google Scholar
  35. Pan Y, Birdsey RA, Fang J, Houghton R, Kauppi PE, Kurz WA, Phillips OL, Shvidenko A, Lewis SL, Canadell JG, Ciais P, Jackson RB, Pacala SW, McGuire AD, Piao S, Rautiainen A, Sitch S, Hayes D (2011) A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests. Science 333:988–993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pielke RA, Marland G, Betts RA, Chase TN, Eastman JL, Niles JO, Niyogi DDS, Running SW (2002) The influence of land-use change and landscape dynamics on the climate system: relevance to climate-change policy beyond the radiative effect of greenhouse gases. Phil Trans R Soc London A 360:1705–1719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pongratz J, Reick C, Raddatz T, Claussen M (2008) A reconstruction of global agricultural areas and land cover for the last millennium. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 22, GB3018. doi: 10.1029/2007GB003153 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rahmstorf S, Marotzke J, Willebrand J (1996) Stability of the thermohaline circulation. In: Krauss W (ed) The warm water sphere of the North Atlantic Ocean. Borntraeger, Stuttgart, pp 129–158Google Scholar
  39. Renssen H, Goosse H, Fichefet T (2003) On the non-linear response of the ocean thermohaline circulation to global deforestation. Geophys Res Lett 30(2):1061. doi: 10.1029/ 2002GL016155 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Swann ALS, Fung IY, Chiang JCH (2012) Mid-latitude afforestation shifts general circulation and tropical precipitation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109(3):712–716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wang Z, Mysak LA (2000) A simple coupled atmosphere–ocean-sea ice-land surface model for climate and paleoclimate studies. J Clim 13:1150–1172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wang Z, Mysak LA (2001) Ice sheet-thermohaline circulation interactions in a climate model of intermediate complexity. J Oceanogr 57:481–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wang Z, Mysak LA (2005) Simulation of the last glacial inception with the green McGill Paleoclimate Model. Geophys Res Lett 32, L12705. doi: 10.1029/2005GL023047 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wang Y, Mysak LA, Wang Z, Brovkin V (2005a) The greening of the McGill Paleoclimate Model. Part I: improved land surface scheme with vegetation dynamics. Clim Dyn 24:469–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wang Y, Mysak LA, Wang Z, Brovkin V (2005b) The greening of the McGill Paleoclimate Model. Part II: simulation of holocene millennial-scale natural climate changes. Clim Dyn 24:481–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wramneby A, Smith B, Samuelsson P (2010) Hot spots of vegetation-climate feedbacks under future greenhouse forcing in Europe. J Geophys Res (A) 115:1–12Google Scholar
  47. Zeng N, Neelin JD, Lau K-M, Tucker CJ (1999) Enhancement of interdecadal climate variability in the Sahel by vegetation interaction. Science 286:1537–1540CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Civil AviationNanjing University of Aeronautics and AstronauticsNanjingChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Regional Climate-Environment for East AsiaChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology (ESPRE), College of Global Change and Earth System ScienceBeijing Normal UniversityBeijingChina
  4. 4.British Antarctic SurveyCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations